SECOND MARNE BATTLE

Held at the Ypres and Arras barriers in the north it was inevitable

that Ludendorff's next move would be in the south. The railways freed

by the expansion of the Picardy salient in March, the unhampered

concentrations made possible at Péronne, St. Quentin, La Fère, and

Hirson, and the admirable surface of the Laon Plateau for purposes of

manoeuvring large bodies of troops--all pointed to the line northwest

of Rheims as the probable point of attack. Then, when it came on May

27, consternation reigned among military critics as they observed the

apparent ease with which the Germans carried, first, the mighty Chemin

des Dames, protected on the east by Craonne and its three plateaux and

on the west by the Ailette and the Oise, and then the south bank of the

Aisne, with its formidable prepared fortifications at Soissons. The

German feints in the Lys salient and before Amiens in the preceding

week were said to have distracted Foch, who had thus been outgeneraled.

And when the Marne was reached between Dormans and Château-Thierry, it

was remembered how the Third German Army under General von Hausen had

swept across the river at that identical spot on Aug. 25, 1914.

In the first three days of the drive the Germans with the greatest

auxiliary force of tanks, machine guns, and poison gas projectors they

had ever mobilized employed twenty-five divisions, or 325,000 men. When

they doubled their base line and had reached the Marne and were trying

to deploy they were using forty divisions containing over 400,000 of

their best troops. When the offensive quieted down in the first days

of June it was estimated that they had lost fully 30 per cent. of the

total in casualties. On the other hand, they claimed to have captured

over 45,000 prisoners and taken 400 guns. They had come thirty miles

and had occupied 650 square miles of territory. But they were held.

What is the explanation of this seeming paradox? Foch could by calling

on a certain number of reserves easily have held the Chemin des Dames

until--he had been flanked and enfiladed out, between Neufchatel and

Rheims on the east and from the Oise where it enters the Aisne on

the west. He might have held out longer on the southern bank of the

Aisne, but the result would have been the same--losses equaling if not

surpassing those of the enemy and the surrender of thousands of guns

and large quantities of war material. Finally, he would have gained

nothing and might even have been unable to hold the Marne.

It is obvious that he did none of these things. But what did he do? He

left his front protected by only sufficient men and guns to produce

the greatest possible losses among the enemy as he slowly advanced

south and concentrated heavily on the enemy's flanks. It was he and not

Ludendorff who decreed that the Germans should reach the Marne between

Dormans and Château-Thierry, and nowhere else. But it was Pétain who

executed the plans of Foch.

New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918 · 第 28 / 346 题