Three of the most widely known and respected of the older ministers also

spoke in opposition to the proposition to form an association of liberal

Christians. These men were typical pastors and preachers, whose parishes

were limited only by the town in which they lived, and who preached the

gospel without sectarian prejudice or doctrinal qualifications. Dr. John

Pierce, of Brookline, thought the measure of the committee "very

dangerous," and likely to do much harm in many of the parishes by arousing

the sectarian spirit. He spoke three times in the course of the meeting,

opposing with his accustomed vehemence all attempt at organization. Dr.

Abiel Abbot, of Beverly, thought that presenting a distinct object for

opposition would arrest the progress of Unitarianism, for in his

neighborhood liberal Christianity owed everything to slow and silent

progress. Dr. John Allyn, of Duxbury, one of the most original and learned

ministers of his time in New England, was opposed to the use of any

sectarian name, especially that of Unitarian or Liberal. He was willing to

join in a general convention, and he desired to have a meeting of delegates

from all sects. He expressed the opinion of several leading men who were

present at this meeting, who favored an unsectarian organization, that

should include all men of liberal opinions, of whatever name or

denominational connection.

Those who were in favor of a Unitarian Association did not remain silent,

and they spoke with clearness and vigor in approval of the proposition of

the committee. Alden Bradford, who became the Secretary of State in

Massachusetts, and wrote several valuable biographical and historical

works, thought that Unitarians were too timid and did not wisely defend

their position. He was followed by Andrews Norton in a vigorous declaration

of the importance of the association, in the course of which he pointed out

how inadequately Unitarians had protected and fostered the institutions

under their care, and declared that closer union was necessary. Jared

Sparks also earnestly favored the project, and said that what was proposed

was not a plan of proselyting. It was his opinion that Unitarians ought to

come forward in support of their views of truth, and that an association

was necessary in order to promote sympathy among them throughout the

country. Colonel Joseph May, who had been for thirty years a warden of

King's Chapel, and a man held in high esteem in Boston, referred to the

work already accomplished by the zeal and effort of the few Unitarians who

had worked together to promote liberal interests. The most incisive word

spoken, however, came from John Pierpont, who was just coming into his fame

as an orator and a leader in reforms. "We have," he declared, "and we must

have, the name Unitarian. It is not for us to shrink from it. Organization

is necessary in order to maintain it, and organization there must be. The

general interests of Unitarians will be promoted by using the name, and

organizing in harmony with it."

In the long discussion at this meeting it appears that, of the ministers,

Channing, Norton, Bancroft, Ware, Pierpont, Sparks, Edes, Nichols, Parker,

Thayer, Willard, and Harding were in favor of organization; Pierce, Allyn,

Abbot, Freeman, and Bigelow, against it. Of the laymen, Charles Jackson and

George Bond were vigorously in opposition; and Judge Story, Judge White,

Judge Howe, of Northampton, Alden Bradford, Leverett Salstonstall, Stephen

Higginson, and Joseph May spoke in favor. The result of the meeting was the

appointment of a committee, consisting of Sullivan, Bradford, Ware,

Channing, Palfrey, Walker, Pierpont, and Higginson, which was empowered to

call together a larger meeting at some time during the session of the

General Court. But this committee seems never to have acted. At the end of

his report of this preliminary meeting James Walker wrote: "The meeting

proposed was never called. As there appeared to be so much difference of

opinion as to the expediency and nature of the measure proposed, it was

thought best to let it subside in silence."

The zeal of those favorable to organization, however, did not abate; and

the discussion went on throughout the winter. On May 25, 1825, at the

meeting of the Berry Street Conference of Ministers, Henry Ware, the

younger, who had been chairman of the first committee, renewed the effort,

and presented the following statement as a declaration of the purposes of

the proposed organization:--

It is proposed to form a new association, to be called The American

Unitarian Society. The chief and ultimate object will be the promotion

of pure and undefiled religion by disseminating the knowledge of it

where adequate means of religious instruction are not enjoyed. A

secondary good which will follow from it is the union of all Unitarian

Christians in this country, so that they would become mutually

acquainted, and the concentration of their efforts would increase their

efficiency. The society will embrace all Unitarian Christians in the

United States. Its operations would extend themselves through the whole

country. These operations would chiefly consist in the publication and

distribution of tracts, and the support of missionaries.

It was announced that in the afternoon a meeting would be held for the

further consideration of the subject. This meeting was held at four

o'clock, and Dr. Henry Ware acted as moderator. The opponents of

organization probably absented themselves, for action was promptly taken,

and it was "_Voted_, that it is expedient to form a new society to be

called the American Unitarian Association." All who were present expressed

themselves as in favor of this action. Rev. James Walker, Mr. Lewis Tappan,

and Rev. Ezra S. Gannett were appointed a committee to draft a form of

organization. On the next morning, Thursday, May 26, 1825, this committee

reported to a meeting, of which Dr. Nathaniel Thayer, of Lancaster, was

moderator; and, with one or two amendments, the constitution prepared by

the committee was adopted. This constitution, with slight modifications, is

still in force. The object of the Association was declared to be "to

diffuse the knowledge and promote the interests of pure Christianity." A

committee to nominate officers selected Dr. Channing for president; Joseph

Story, of Salem, Joseph Lyman, of Northampton, Stephen Longfellow, of

Portland, Charles H. Atherton, of Amherst, N.H., Henry Wheaton, of New

York, James Taylor, of Philadelphia, Henry Payson, of Baltimore, William

Cranch, of Alexandria, Martin L. Hurlbut, of Charleston, as

vice-presidents; Ezra S. Gannett, of Boston, for secretary; Lewis Tappan,

of Boston, for treasurer; and Andrews Norton, Jared Sparks, and James

Walker, for executive committee.

When Mr. Gannett wrote to his colleague, Dr. Channing, to notify him of his

election as president, there came a letter declining the proffered office.

"I was a little disappointed," Channing wrote, "at learning that the

Unitarian Association is to commence operations immediately. I conversed

with Mr. Norton on the subject before leaving Boston, and found him so

indisposed to engage in it that I imagined that it would be let alone for

the present. The office which in your kindness you have assigned to me I

must beg to decline. As you have made a beginning, I truly rejoice in your

success." Norton and Sparks also declined to serve as directors, ill-health

and previous engagements being assigned by them for their inability to act

with the other officers elected. The executive committee proceeded to fill

these vacancies by the election of Dr. Aaron Bancroft, of Worcester, as

president, and of the younger Henry Ware and Samuel Barrett to the

executive committee; and the board of directors thus constituted

administered the Association during its first year.

In the selection of Dr. Bancroft as the head of the new association a wise

choice was made, for he had the executive and organizing ability that was

eminently desirable at this juncture. He was an able preacher, and one of

the strongest thinkers in the Unitarian body. His biography of Washington

had made him widely known; and his volume of controversial sermons,

published in 1822, had received the enthusiastic praise of John Adams and

Thomas Jefferson. When he was settled, he was almost an outcast in

Worcester County because of his liberalism; but such were the strength of

his character and the power of his thought that gradually he secured a wide

hearing, and became the most popular preacher in Central Massachusetts.

After fifty years of his ministry he could count twenty-one vigorous

Unitarian societies about him, all of which had profited by his

influence.[8] Although he was seventy years of age at the time he

accepted the presidency of the Unitarian Association, he was in the full

enjoyment of his powers; and he filled the office for ten years, giving it

and the cause which the Association represented the impetus and weight of

his sound judgment and deserved reputation.

The executive work of the Association fell to the charge of the secretary,

Ezra S. Gannett, who had been one of the most enthusiastic advocates of the

new organization. Gannett was but twenty-four years old, and had been but

one year in the active ministry, as the colleague of Dr. Channing. He had

youth, zeal, and executive force. Writing of him after his death, Dr.

Bellows said: "He had rare administrative qualities and a statesmanlike

mind. He would have been a leader anywhere. He had the ambition, the

faculties, and the impulsive temperament of an actor in affairs. He had the

fervor, the concentration of will, the passionate enthusiasm of conviction,

the love of martyrdom, which make men great in action."[9] Throughout his

life Gannett labored assiduously for the Association, serving it in every

capacity refusing no drudgery, travelling over the country in its

interests, and giving himself, heart and soul, to the cause it represented.

The Unitarian cause never had a more devoted friend or one who made greater

sacrifices in its behalf. To him more than to any other man it owes its

organized life and its missionary serviceableness.

Lewis Tappan, the treasurer, was a successful young business man. His term

of service was brief; for two years after the organization of the

Association he removed to New York, where he had an honorable career as one

of the founders of the Journal of Commerce, and as the head of the first

mercantile agency established in the country. He was later one of the

anti-slavery leaders in New York, and an active and earnest member of

Plymouth Church in Brooklyn.[10]

The executive committee was composed of the three devoted young ministers

who had been foremost in organizing the Association. Barrett was thirty,

Ware and Walker were thirty-one years of age; and all three had been in

Harvard College and the Divinity School together. Samuel Barrett had just

been chosen minister of the newly formed Twelfth Congregational Church of

Boston, which he served throughout his life. He was identified with all

good causes in Eastern Massachusetts, a founder of the Benevolent

Fraternity, and an overseer of Harvard College. Henry Ware, the younger,

was, at the time of his election, the minister of the Second Church in

Boston. Five years later he became professor in the Harvard Divinity

School, and his memory is still cherished as the teacher and exemplar of a

generation of Unitarian ministers. James Walker was, in 1825, the minister

of the Harvard Church in Charlestown, and already gave evidence of the

sanity and catholicity of mind, the practical organizing power, the wide

philosophic culture, and the dignity of character which afterward

distinguished him as professor in Harvard College, and as its president.

Thus the organization started on its way, as the result of the determined

purpose of a small company of the younger ministers and laymen. It took a

name that separated it from all other religious organizations in this

country, so far as its members then knew. The Unitarian name had been first

definitely used in this country in 1815, to describe the liberal or

Catholic Christians. They at first scornfully rejected it, but many of them

had finally come to rejoice in its declaration of the simple unity of God.

As a matter of history, it may be said that the word "Unitarian" was used

in this doctrinal sense only; and it had none of the implications since

given it by philosophy and science. Those who used it meant thereby to say

that they accepted the doctrine of the absolute unity of God, and that the

position of Christ was a subordinate though a very exalted one. No one can

read their statements with historic apprehension, and arrive at any other

conclusion. Yet these persons had no wish to cut themselves off from

historic Christianity; rather was it their intent to restore it to its

primitive purity.

[Sidenote: Work of the First Year.]

If others were disinclined to action, the executive committee of the

Unitarian Association was determined that something should be done. At

their first, meeting, held in the secretary's study four days after their

election, there were present Norton, Walker, Tappan, and Gannett. They

commissioned Rev. Warren Burton to act as their agent in visiting

neighboring towns to solicit funds, and a week later they voted to employ

him as a general agent. The committee held six meetings during June; and at

one of these an address was adopted, defining the purposes and methods of

the Association. "They wish it to be understood," was their statement,

"that its efforts will be directed to the promotion of true religion

throughout our country; intending by this, not exclusively those views

which distinguish the friends of this Association from other disciples of

Christ; but those views in connection with the great doctrines and

principles in which all Christians coincide, and which constitute the

substance of our religion. We wish to diffuse the knowledge and influence

of the gospel of our Lord and Saviour. Great good is anticipated from the

co-operation of persons entertaining similar views, who are now strangers

to each other's religious sentiments. Interest will be awakened, confidence

inspired, efficiency produced by the concentration of labors. The spirit of

inquiry will be fostered, and individuals at a distance will know where to

apply for information and encouragement. Respectability and strength will

be given to the class among us whom our fellow Christians have excluded

from the control of their religious charities, and whom, by their exclusive

treatment, they have compelled in some measure to act as a party." The

objects of the Association were stated to be the collection of information

about Unitarianism in various parts of the country; the securing of union,

sympathy, and co-operation among liberal Christians; the publishing and

distribution of books inculcating correct views of religion; the employment

of missionaries, and the adoption of other measures that might promote the

general purposes held in view.

At the end of the year the Association held its first anniversary meeting

in Pantheon Hall, on the evening of June 30, 1826, when addresses were made

by Hon. Joseph Story, Hon. Leverett Salstonstall, Rev. Ichabod Nichols, and

Rev. Henry Coleman. The executive committee presented its report, which

gave a detailed account of the operations during the year. They gave

special attention to their discovery of "a body of Christians in the

Western states who have for years been Unitarians, have encountered

persecution on account of their faith, and have lived in ignorance of

others east of the mountains who maintained many similar views of Christian

doctrine." With this group of churches, which would consent to no other

name than that of Christian, a correspondence had been opened; and, to

secure a larger acquaintance with them, Rev. Moses G. Thomas[11] had

visited several of the Western states. His tour carried him through

Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, and as far as St. Louis.

His account of his journey was published in connection with the second

report of the Association, and is full of interest. He did not preach, but

he carefully investigated the religious prospects of the states he

journeyed through; and he sought the acquaintance of the Christian churches

and ministers. He gave an enthusiastic account of his travels, and reported

that the west was a promising field for the planting of Unitarian churches.

He recommended Northumberland, Harrisburg, Pittsburg, Steubenville,

Marietta, Paris, Lexington, Louisville, St. Louis, St. Charles,

Indianapolis, and Cincinnati as promising places for the labors of

Unitarian missionaries,--places "which will properly appreciate their

talents and render them doubly useful in their day and generation."

During the first year of its existence the Unitarian Association endeavored

to unite with itself, or to secure the co-operation of, the Society for the

Promotion of Christian Knowledge, Piety, and Charity, the Evangelical

Missionary Society, and the Publishing Fund Society; but these

organizations were unwilling to come into close affiliation with it. The

Evangelical Missionary Society has continued its separate existence to the

present time, but the others were absorbed by the Unitarian Association

after many years. This is one indication of how difficult it was to secure

an active co-operation among Unitarians, and to bring them all into one

vigorous working body. In concluding their first report, the officers of

the Association alluded to the difficulties with which they had met the

reluctance of the liberal churches to come into close affiliation with each

other. "They have strenuously opposed the opinion," they said of the

leaders of the Association, "that the object of the founders was to build

up a party, to organize an opposition, to perpetuate pride and bigotry. Had

they believed that such was its purpose or such would be its effect, they

would have withdrawn themselves from any connection with so hateful a

thing. They thought otherwise, and experience has proved they did not judge

wrongly."

[Sidenote: Work of the First Quarter of a Century.]

Having thus organized itself and begun its work, the Association went

quietly on its way. At no time during the first quarter of a century of its

existence did it secure annual contributions from one-half the churches

calling themselves Unitarian, and it did well when even one-third of them

contributed to its treasury during any one year. The churches of Boston,

for the most part, held aloof from it, and gave it only a feeble support,

if any at all. They had so long accepted the spirit of congregational

exclusiveness, had so great a dread of interference on the part of

ecclesiastical organizations, and so keenly suspected every attempt at

co-operation on the part of the churches as likely to lead to restrictions

upon congregational independence, that it was nearly impossible to secure

their aid for any kind of common work. Very slowly the contributions

increased to the sum of $5,000 a year, and only once in the first quarter

of a century did the total receipts of a year reach $15,000. With so small

a treasury no great work could be undertaken; but the money given was

husbanded to the utmost, and the salaries paid to clerks and the general

secretary were kept to the lowest possible limit.

Dr. Bancroft was succeeded in the presidency of the Association, in 1836,

by Dr. Channing, who nominally held the position for one year; but at the

next annual meeting he declined to have his name presented as a

candidate.[12] The office was then filled by Dr. Ichabod Nichols, of

Portland, who served from 1837 to 1844. He was the minister of the First

Church in Portland from 1809 to 1855, and then retired to Cambridge, where

he wrote his Natural Theology and his Hours with the Evangelists. Joseph

Story, the great jurist, who had been vice-president of the Association

from 1826 to 1836, was elected president in 1844, and served for one year.

He was followed by Dr. Orville Dewey, who was president from 1845 to 1847.

He had been settled in New Bedford, and over the Church of the Messiah in

New York; and subsequently he had short pastorates in Albany, in

Washington, and over the New South Church in Boston. His lectures and his

sermons have made him widely known. In intellectual and emotional power he

was one of the greatest preachers the country has produced. Dr. Gannett

served as the president from 1847 to 1851, being succeeded by Dr. Samuel K.

Lothop, who continued to hold the office until 1856. Dr. Lothrop was first

settled in Dover, N.H., but became the minister of the Brattle Street

Church, Boston, in 1834, retaining that position until 1876.

The office of secretary was held by Rev. Ezra S, Gannett until 1831. He was

succeeded in that year by Rev. Alexander Young, who held the position for

two years. Dr. Young was the minister of the New South Church from 1825

until his death, in 1854. His Chronicles of the Pilgrim Fathers, and other

works, have given him a reputation as a historian. In 1829 the office of

foreign secretary was created; and it was held by the younger Henry Ware

from 1830 to 1834, when it ceased to exist. Rev. Samuel Barnett was

secretary in 1833 and 1834, and recording secretary until 1837. In 1834 the

office of general secretary was established, in order to secure the

services of an active missionary. Rev. Jason Whitman, who held this

position for one year, had been the minister in Saco; and he was afterward

settled in Portland and Lexington. Rev. Charles Briggs became the general

secretary in 1835, and continued in office until the end of 1847. He had

been settled in Lexington, but did not hold a pastorate subsequent to his

connection with the Association. In the mean time Rev. Samuel K. Lothrop

was the assistant or recording secretary from 1837 to 1847. In 1847 Rev.

William G. Eliot was elected the general secretary; but he did not serve,

owing to the claims of his parish in St. Louis. Rev. Frederick West

Holland, who had been settled in Rochester, was made the general secretary

in January, 1848; and he held the position until the annual meeting of

1860. Subsequently he was settled in East Cambridge, Neponset, North

Cambridge, Rochester, and Newburg.

It was Charles Briggs who first gave definite purpose to the missionary

work of the Association. The annual report of 1850 said of him that he "had

led the institution forward to high ground as a missionary body, by

unfailing patience prevailed over every discouragement, by inexhaustible

hope surmounted serious obstacles, by the most persuasive gentleness

conciliated opposition, and done perhaps as much as could be asked of sound

judgment, knowledge of mankind, and devotion to the cause, with the

drawback of a slender and failing frame." In 1845 Rev. George G. Channing

entered upon a service as the travelling agent of the Association, which he

continued for two years. His duties required him to take an active interest

in missionary enterprises, revive drooping churches, secure information as

to the founding of new churches, and to add to the income of the

Association. He was a brother of Dr. Channing, held one or two pastorates,

and was the founder and editor of The Christian World, which he published

in Boston as a weekly Unitarian paper from January, 1843, to the end of

1848.

At a meeting of the Unitarian Association held on June 3, 1847, the final

steps were taken that secured its incorporation under the laws of

Massachusetts. In the revised constitution the fifteen vice-presidents were

reduced to two, and the president and vice-presidents were made members of

the executive committee, and so brought into intimate connection with the

work of the Association. The directors and other officers were made an

executive committee, by which all affairs of moment must be considered; and

it was required to hold stated monthly meetings. These changes were

conducive to an enlarged interest in the work of the Association, and also

to the more thorough consideration of its activities on the part of a

considerable body of judicious and experienced officers. They were made in

recognition of the increasing missionary labors of the Association, and

enabled it thenceforth to hold and to manage legally the moneys that came

under its control.

[Sidenote: Publication of Tracts and Books.]

Unitarianism in America: A History of its Origin and Development · 第 10 / 34 段