Man must have the _courage_ of his natural instincts restored to him.--

_The poor opinion_ he has of himself must be destroyed (_not_ in the

sense of the individual, but in the sense of the _natural_ man ...)--

The _contradictions_ in things must be eradicated, after it has been

well understood that we were responsible for them--

_Social idiosyncrasies_ must be stamped out of existence (guilt,

punishment, justice, honesty, freedom, love, etc. etc.)--

An advance towards "_naturalness_": in all political questions, even

in the relations between parties, even in merchants', workmen's, or

contractors' parties, only _questions_ of _power_ come into play:--

"what one _can_ do" is the first question, what one ought to do is only

a secondary consideration.

125.

Socialism--or the _tyranny_ of the meanest and the most

brainless,--that is to say, the superficial, the envious, and the

mummers, brought to its zenith,--is, as a matter, of fact, the logical

conclusion of "modern ideas" and their latent anarchy: but in the

genial atmosphere of democratic well-being the capacity for forming

resolutions or even for coming _to an end_ at all, is paralysed. Men

follow--but no longer their reason. That is why socialism is on the

whole a hopelessly bitter affair: and there is nothing more amusing

than to observe the discord between the poisonous and desperate faces

of present-day socialists--and what wretched and nonsensical feelings

does not their style reveal to us!--and the childish lamblike happiness

of their hopes and desires. Nevertheless, in many places in Europe,

there may be violent hand-to-hand struggles and irruptions on their

account: the coming century is likely to be convulsed in more than

one spot, and the Paris Commune, which finds defenders and advocates

even in Germany, will seem to have been but a slight indigestion

compared with what is to come. Be this as it may, there will always

be too many people of property for socialism ever to signify anything

more than an attack of illness: and these people of property are like

one man with one faith, "one must possess something in order _to

be_ some one." This, however, is the oldest and most wholesome of

all instincts; I should add: "one must desire more than one has in

order to _become_ more." For this is the teaching which life itself

preaches to all living things: the morality of Development. To have

and to wish to have more, in a word, _Growth_--that is life itself.

In the teaching of socialism "a will to the denial of life" is but

poorly concealed: botched men and races they must be who have devised

a teaching of this sort. In fact, I even wish a few experiments might

be made to show that in a socialistic society, life denies itself,

and itself cuts away its own roots. The earth is big enough and man

is still unexhausted enough for a practical lesson of this sort and

_demonstratio ad absurdum_--even if it were accomplished only by a vast

expenditure of lives--to seem worth while to me. Still, Socialism,

like a restless mole beneath the foundations of a society wallowing in

stupidity, will be able to achieve something useful and salutary: it

delays "Peace on Earth" and the whole process of character-softening of

the democratic herding animal; it forces the European to have an extra

supply of intellect,--that is to say, craft and caution, and prevents

his entirely abandoning the manly and warlike qualities,--it also saves

Europe awhile from the _marasmus femininus_ which is threatening it.

126.

The most favourable obstacles and remedies of modernity:

(1) Compulsory _military service_ with real wars in which all joking is

laid aside.

(2) _National_ thick-headedness (which simplifies and concentrates).

(3) Improved _nutrition_ (meat).

(4) Increasing _cleanliness_ and wholesomeness in the home.

(5) The predominance of _physiology_ over theology, morality,

economics, and politics.

(6) Military discipline in the exaction and the practice of one's

"duty" (it is no longer customary to praise).

127.

I am delighted at the military development of Europe, also at the inner

anarchical conditions: the period of quietude and "Chinadom" which

Galiani prophesied for this century is now over. Personal and _manly_

capacity, bodily capacity recovers its value, valuations are becoming

more physical, nutrition consists ever more and more of flesh. Fine

men have once more become possible. Bloodless sneaks (with mandarins

at their head, as Comte imagined them) are now a matter of the past.

The savage in every one of us is _acknowledged,_ even the wild animal.

_Precisely on that account,_ philosophers will have a better chance.

--Kant is a scarecrow!

128.

I have not yet _seen_ any reasons to feel discouraged. He who acquires

and preserves a _strong will,_ together with a broad mind, has a more

favourable chance now than ever he had. For the _plasticity_ of man has

become exceedingly great in democratic Europe: men who learn easily,

who readily adapt themselves, are the rule: the gregarious animal of

a high order of intelligence is prepared. He who would command finds

those who _must_ obey: I have Napoleon and Bismarck in mind, for

instance. The struggle against strong and unintelligent wills, which

forms the surest obstacle in one's way, is really insignificant Who

would not be able to knock down these "objective" gentlemen with weak

wills, such as Ranke and Renan!

129.

_Spiritual enlightenment_ is an unfailing means of making men

uncertain, weak of will, and needful of succour and support; in

short, of developing the herding instincts in them. That is why all

great artist-rulers, hitherto (Confucius in China, the Roman Empire,

Napoleon, Popedom--at a time when they had the courage of their

worldliness and frankly pursued power) in whom the ruling instincts,

that had prevailed until their time, culminated, also made use of the

spiritual enlightenment--or at least allowed it to be supreme (after

the style of the Popes of the Renaissance). The self-deception of

the masses on this point, in every democracy for instance, is of the

greatest possible value: all that makes men smaller and more amenable

is pursued under the title "progress."

130.

The highest equity and mildness as a condition of _weakness_ (the New

Testament and the early Christian community--manifesting itself in the

form of utter foolishness in the Englishmen, Darwin and Wallace). Your

equity, ye higher men, drives you to universal suffrage, etc.; your

"humanity" urges you to be milder towards crime and stupidity. In the

_end_ you will thus help stupidity and harmlessness to conquer.

_Outwardly_: Ages of terrible wars, insurrections, explosions.

_Inwardly_: ever more and more weakness among men; _events_ take the

_form of excitants._ The Parisian as the type of the European extreme.

_Consequences_: (1) Savages (at first, of course, in conformity with

the culture that has reigned hitherto); (2) _Sovereign individuals_

(where _powerful_ barbarous _masses_ and emancipation from all that

has been, are crossed). The age of greatest stupidity, brutality, and

wretchedness in the masses, and _in the highest individuals._

131.

An incalculable number of higher individuals now perish: but he who

_escapes their fate_ is as strong as the devil. In this respect we are

reminded of the conditions which prevailed in the Renaissance.

132.

How are _Good Europeans_ such as ourselves distinguished from the

patriots? In the first place, we are atheists and immoralists, but we

take care to support the religions and the morality which we associate

with the gregarious instinct: for by means of them, an order of men is,

so to speak, being prepared, which must at some time or other fall into

our hands, which must actually _crave_ for our hands.

Beyond Good and Evil,--certainly; but we insist upon the unconditional

and strict preservation of herd-morality.

We reserve ourselves the right to several kinds of philosophy which it

is necessary to learn: under certain circumstances, the pessimistic

kind as a hammer; a European Buddhism might perhaps be indispensable.

We should probably support the development and the maturation of

democratic tendencies; for it conduces to weakness of will: in

"Socialism" we recognise a thorn which prevents smug ease.

Attitude towards the people.. Our prejudices; we pay attention to the

results of cross-breeding.

Detached, well-to-do, strong: irony concerning the "press" and its

culture. Our care: that scientific men should not become journalists.

We mistrust any form of culture that tolerates news-paper reading or

writing.

We make our accidental positions (as Goethe and Stendhal did), our

experiences, a foreground, and we lay stress upon them, so that we

may deceive concerning our backgrounds. We ourselves _wait_ and

avoid putting our heart into them. They serve us as refuges, such as

a wanderer might require and use--but we avoid feeling at home in

them. We are ahead of our fellows in that we have had a _disciplina

voluntatis._ All strength is directed to the _development of the will,_

an art which allows us to wear masks, an art of understanding _beyond_

the passions (also "super-European" thought at times).

This is our preparation before becoming the law-givers of the future

and the lords of the earth; if not we, at least our children. Caution

where marriage is concerned.

133.

_The twentieth century._--The Abbé Galiani says somewhere: "_La

prévoyance est la cause des guerres actuelles de l'Europe. Si l'on

voulait se donner la peine de ne rien prévoir, tout le monde serait

tranquille, et je ne crois pas qu'on serait plus malheureux parce qu'on

ne ferait pas la guerre._" As I in no way share the unwarlike views of

my deceased friend Galiani, I have no fear whatever of saying something

beforehand with the view of conjuring in some way the cause of wars.

A condition of excessive _consciousness,_ after the worst of

earthquakes: with new questions.

134.

It is the time of the _great noon, of the most appalling

enlightenment_: my particular kind of _Pessimism_: the great

starting-point.

(1) Fundamental contradiction between civilisation and the elevation of

man.

(2) Moral valuations regarded as a history of lies and the art of

calumny in the service of the Will to Power (of the will of the _herd,_

which rises against stronger men).

(3) The conditions which determine every elevation in culture (the

facilitation of a _selection_ being made at the cost of a crowd) are

the _conditions_ of all growth.

(4). _The multiformity_ of the world as a question of _strength,_

which sees all things in the _perspective of their growth._ The moral

Christian values to be regarded as the insurrection and mendacity of

slaves (in comparison with the aristocratic values of the _ancient

world). _

The Will to Power: An Attempted Transvaluation of All Values. Book I and II · 第 49 / 89 题