1. Modern Buddhism differs from the Theoretical Buddhism of Gotama.

There is a marked difference between the theoretical Buddhism of early

days, reflected in the standard literature of Southern Buddhism, and

the Buddhism of the present day in Southern Asia. The Buddhism which

Western enthusiasts are eager to introduce into their own countries is

something which they have learnt, not from the peoples of Buddhist

lands, but from the ancient literature of Buddhism. Captivated at

first, it may be, by the beauty of some isolated saying, or, possibly,

deeply touched during some moonlight scene at the great golden pagodas

of Burma or on the hillsides of Ceylon, they become eager and not

infrequently learned students of the Buddhism of Gotama. They have to

declare with sadness that the great bulk of the people who profess

Buddhism have wandered very far from its true principles and practice,

and that human nature, for the most part, needs something less

austere.

This old Buddhism of the Books may be regarded and used as a kind of

Old Testament for Buddhists; already they have passed away from its

traditions.

2. The Central Emphasis of Buddhism varies in the Three Southern

Countries.

Not only does Buddhism, as the missionary comes in contact with it,

differ very markedly from theoretical Buddhism, but the central

emphasis varies in different parts of Southern Asia. The student must

know his country and his people in order to know their Buddhism, as

well as _vice versâ_. Nothing can be further from the sunny

temperament of the Burmese than the central "truth" of Buddhism that

"all is sorrowful"; and it is a strange perversion of the truth which

claims, as some of these Western writers have claimed, that the

Burmese are optimistic because they are free from _tanhā_. The fact

that they believe in a good Buddha as a living god, however, has much

to do with it: and temperament has even more.

In Ceylon, while Buddhist ideals are better suited to the more

melancholic temperament of the people, yet they are acutely conscious

of their powerlessness to gain the victory over sin and sorrow

unaided. As in Japan and China, so in a lesser degree in Burma and

Ceylon, Buddhism has been constrained to die to itself (to substitute

the idea of a saviour for the idea of earning one's own salvation) in

a way that is full of encouragement and suggestion to the Christian.

For, if the mythical Kwanyin and the far-off Metteya can so captivate

hungry human hearts, how shall not the historic and living Christ be

enthroned in their stead?

Buddhism in the Modern World · 第 52 / 66 题