THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN LICENSING AND CENSORSHIP

It must not be concluded that the uncompromising abolition of all

censorship involves the abandonment of all control and regulation of

theatres. Factories are regulated in the public interest; but there

is no censorship of factories. For example, many persons are sincerely

convinced that cotton clothing is unhealthy; that alcoholic drinks are

demoralizing; and that playing-cards are the devil's picture-books.

But though the factories in which cotton, whiskey, and cards are

manufactured are stringently regulated under the factory code and the

Public Health and Building Acts, the inspectors appointed to carry out

these Acts never go to a manufacturer and inform him that unless

he manufactures woollens instead of cottons, ginger-beer instead of

whiskey, Bibles instead of playing-cards, he will be forbidden to place

his products on the market. In the case of premises licensed for the

sale of spirits the authorities go a step further. A public-house

differs from a factory in the essential particular that whereas disorder

in a factory is promptly and voluntarily suppressed, because every

moment of its duration involves a measurable pecuniary loss to the

proprietor, disorder in a public-house may be a source of profit to the

proprietor by its attraction for disorderly customers. Consequently a

publican is compelled to obtain a licence to pursue his trade; and this

licence lasts only a year, and need not be renewed if his house has been

conducted in a disorderly manner in the meantime.

The Shewing-up of Blanco Posnet · 第 40 / 68 题