THE CRUSADERS LOOK FOR ANOTHER CHIEF

When the Count was buried, Matthew of Montmorency, Simon of Montfort,

Geoffry of Joinville who was seneschal, and Geoffry the Marshal, went

to Odo, Duke of Burgundy, and said to him, “Sire, your cousin is dead.

You see what evil has befallen the land overseass We pray you by God

that you take the cross, and succour the land overseas in his stead.

And we will cause you to have all his treasure, and will swear on holy

relics, and make the others swear also, to serve you in all good faith,

even as we should have served him.”

Such was his pleasure that he refused. And be it known to you that he

might have done much better. The envoys charged Geoffry of Joinville to

make the self-same offer to the Count of Bar-le-Duc, Thibaut, who was

cousin to the dead count, and he refused also.

Very great was the discomfort of the pilgrims, and of all who were

about to go on God’s service, at the death of Count Thibaut of

Champagne; and they held a parliament, at the beginning, of the month,

at Soissons, to determine what they should do. There were present Count

Baldwin of Flanders and Hainault, the Count Louis of Blois and

Chartres, the Count Geoffry of Perche, the Count Hugh of Saint-Paul,

and many other men of worth.

Geoffry the Marshal spake to them and told them of the offer made to

the Duke of Burgundy, and to the Count of Bar-le-Duc, and how they had

refused it. “My lords,” said he, “listen, I will advise you of somewhat

if you will consent thereto. The Marquis of Montferrat* is very worthy

and valiant, and one of the most highly prized of living men. If you

asked him to come here, and take the sign of the cross and put himself

in place of the Count of Champagne, and you gave him the lordship of

the host, full soon would he accept thereof.”

[Note: Boniface, Marquis of Montferrat, was one of the most

accomplished men of the time, and an approved soldier. His little court

at Montferrat was the resort of artist and troubadour. His family was a

family of Crusaders. The father, William of Montferrat, had gone

overseass and fought valiantly against the infidel. Boniface’s eldest

brother, William of the Long Sword, married a daughter of the titular

King of Jerusalem, and their son became titular king in turn. Another

brother, Conrad, starting for the Holy Land, stopped at Constantinople,

and did there such good service that the Greek emperor gave his sister

to him in marriage; but afterwards fearing the perfidy of his

brother-in-law, Conrad fled to Syria, and there battled against

Saladin. Yet another brother, Renier, also served in the Greek Empire,

married an Emperor’s daughter, and received for guerdon of his deeds

the kingdom of Salonika. Boniface himself had fought valiantly against

Saladin, been made prisoner, and afterwards liberated on exchange. It

was no mean and nameless knight that Villehardouin was proposing as

chief to the assembled Crusaders, but a princely noble, the patron of

poets, versed in state affairs, and possessing personal experience of

Eastern warfare. I extract these details from M. Bouchet’s _Notice_].

Many were the words spoken for and against; but in the end all agreed,

both small and great. So were letters written, and envoys chosen, and

the marquis was sent for. And he came, on the day appointed, through

Champagne and the Isle-de-France, where he received much honour, and

specially from the King of France, who was his cousin.

BONIFACE, MARQUIS OF MONTFERRAT, BECOMES CHIEF OF THE CRUSADE—NEW

CRUSADERS—DEATH OF GEOFFRY COUNT OF PERCHE

So he came to a parliament assembled at Soissons; and the main part of

the counts and barons and of the other Crusaders were there assembled.

When they heard that the marquis was coming, they went out to meet him,

and did him much honour. In the morning the parliament was held in an

orchard belonging to the abbey of our Lady of Soissons. There they

besought the marquis to do as they had desired of him, and prayed him,

for the love of God, to take the cross, and accept the leadership of

the host, and stand in the place of Thibaut Count of Champagne, and

accept of his money and of his men. And they fell at his feet, with

many tears; and he, on his part, fell at their feet, and said he would

do it right willingly.

Thus did the marquis consent to their prayers, and receive the lordship

of the host. Whereupon the Bishop of Soissons, and Master Fulk, the

holy man, and two white monks whom the marquis had brought with him

from Ws own land, led him into the Church of Notre Dame, and attached

the cross to his shoulder. Thus ended this parliament, and the next day

he took leave to return to his own land and settle his own

affairs-telling them all to settle their own affairs likewise, for that

he would meet them at Venice.

Thence did the marquis go to attend the Chapter at Citeaux, which is

held on Holy Cross Day in September (14th September 1241). There he

found a great number of abbots, barons and other people of Burgundy;

and Master Fulk went thither to preach the Crusade. And at that place

took the cross Odo the Champenois of Champlitte, and William his

brother, Richard of Dampierre, Odo his brother, Guy of Pesmes, Edmund

his brother, Guy of Conflans, and many other good men of Burgundy,

whose names are not recorded. Afterwards took the cross the Bishop of

Autun, Guignes Count of Forez, Hugh of Bergi (father and son), Hugh of

Colemi. Further on in Provence took the cross Peter Bromont, and many

others whose names are unknown to us.

Thus did the pilgrims make ready in all lands. Alas! a great mischance

befell them in the following Lent (March 1202) before they had started,

for the Count Geoffry of Perche fell sick, and made his will in such

fashion that he directed that Stephen, his brother, should have his

goods, and lead his men in the host. Of this exchange the pilgrims

would willingly have been quit, had God so ordered. Thus did the count

make an end and die; and much evil ensued, for he was a baron high and

honoured, and a good knight. Greatly was he mourned throughout all his

lands.

FIRST STARTING OF THE PILGRIMS FOR VENICE, AND OF SOME WHO WENT NOT

THITHER

After Easter and towards Whitsuntide (June 1202) began the pilgrims to

leave their own country. And you must know that at their departure many

were the tears shed for pity and sorrow, by their own people and by

their friends. So they journeyed through Burgundy, and by the mountains

of Mont-joux (? Jura) by Mont Cenis, and through Lombardy, and began to

assemble at Venice, where they were lodged on an island which is called

St. Nicholas in the port.

At that time started from Flanders a fleet that carried a great number

of good men-at-arms. Of this fleet were captains John of Nêle,

Castellan of Bruges, Thierri, who was the son of Count Philip of

Flanders, and Nicholas of Mailly. And these promised Count Baldwin, and

swore on holy relics, that they would go through the straits of

Morocco, and join themselves to him, and to the host of Venice, at

whatsoever place they might hear that the count was faring. And for

this reason the Count of Flanders and Henry his brother had confided to

them certain ships loaded with cloth and food and other wares.

Very fair was this fleet, and rich, and great was the reliance that the

Count of Flanders and the pilgrims placed upon it, because very many of

their good sergeants were journeying therein. But ill did these keep

the faith they had sworn to the count, they and others like them,

because they and such others of the same sort became fearful of the

great perils that the host of Venice had undertaken.

Thus did the Bishop of Autun fail us, and Guignes the Count of Forez,

and Peter Bromont, and many people besides, who were greatly blamed

therein; and of little worth were the exploits they performed there

where they did go. And of the French failed us Bernard of Moreuil, Hugh

of Chaumont, Henry of Araines, John of Villers, Walter of Saint-Denis,

Hugh his brother, and many others, who avoided the passage to Venice

because of the danger, and went instead to Marseilles-whereof they

received shame, and much were they blamed-and great were the mishaps

that afterwards befell them.

Memoirs or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade and the Conquest of Constantinople · 第 9 / 79 题