The story of Wedgwood’s life I will not even give briefly, though the

beauty and lesson of it make one long to tell it till every American

china-manufacturer learns to read between the lines the story of

personal supervision, patient trial, unwearied labor, honest ambition,

and liberal broadness that made his life a success and his productions a

delight. Miss Meteyard and Mr. Jewitt have given it in careful detail,

and every word is of keenest interest and importance to the china

collector. From these books, and from the beautiful volumes of

engravings and photographs of Wedgwood ware preserved in English

collections, the American china hunter can learn, if not from the

specimens themselves.

A few of the Wedgwood cameo medallions are found in America. Wedgwood

sent as a gift to Thomas Jefferson three exquisite medallions; two were

oval and one oblong in shape. They were in blue and white jasper, with

mythological designs. The largest was twelve inches long and six inches

wide, and bore the lovely design of Cupid and Psyche with troops of

attending loves. Jefferson had them set in the front of a mantel in a

room at Monticello, and one of them dropped out and was destroyed before

the family sold the house. The others were picked or cut out and stolen.

Mrs. Ellen Harrison, the oldest living descendant of Jefferson, tells me

that during a visit to Monticello, some years before the present owner

took possession, she found on the floor a tiny bit of blue jasper

showing the foot and leg of one of the loves. Thus did this English

cherub cast from his feet the dust of an inartistic and relic-hunting

nation of vandals. Oh, the pity that things so beautiful could be so

wantonly destroyed! Would that everything that Wedgwood made had been

endowed with qualities of immortality and indestructibility to live

forever as lessons and examples for future generations of potters.

Occasionally a jasper medallion is found here with Wedgwood’s famous

anti-slavery design, a kneeling slave with fetters falling from his

hands, and the motto, “Am I not a Man and a Brother?” Dr. Darwin says

that “Wedgwood distributed many hundreds of these to excite the humane

to attend to and assist in the abolition of the detestable traffic in

human creatures.”

“Whether, O friend of art, the gem you mould

Rich with new taste, with ancient virtue bold,

Or the poor tortur’d slave on bended knee,

From Britain’s sons imploring to be free.”

Many found their way to America and a few are still preserved.

Occasionally also a rich dessert-service of old Wedgwood ware is seen.

Two superb ones were brought across the water by a sea-captain at the

beginning of this century and landed at Hudson, N. Y. A fair young bride

saw and coveted one of these china treasures, but stern and frugal

parents were horrified at the thought of spending seventy dollars for

such an unnecessary luxury. The bridegroom, Silas E. Burraws, at a later

date the starter of the monument to the mother of Washington, more

extravagant and more indulgent, bought it as a wedding gift. It is

“queen’s ware” of the rich blue, red, and gold design which is known

among American dealers as “Queen Charlotte’s pattern.” The fruit dishes

and comports are of the unique and perfect shapes often found in

Wedgwood ware. I have seen a single plate of this pattern in a shop

labelled with the price “thirty dollars.” The price given for a similar

one in the South Kensington Museum was four pounds. I know also of one

or two dinner services of yellow Wedgwood ware, with the vine and grape

border in white, early works of Wedgwood, clear and firm in outline and

beautiful in quality.

The frail fluted bowl, the graceful pitcher with twisted handle, and the

fragile creamer of queen’s ware shown on page 1 are all Wedgwood of

lovely shape and so thin and delicate a paste, that it is wonderful that

they have been safely preserved for a hundred years outside a

collector’s cabinet, and stranger still, have been used upon the

tea-table of a country home.

[Illustration: Castleford Teapot.]

A pottery was founded at Castleford in 1770, and black basalt ware, much

like Wedgwood’s, was made, and white stone-ware which must have been

imported to this country in vast quantity, for specimens are not rare. A

teapot commonly seen is here shown. It is found both in black basalt, a

curious brown ware, and salt-glazed cream ware. Special raised work

designs of the figure of Liberty and the American eagle were used, and

the sugar-bowls, creamers, and teapots bearing such designs were

doubtless made entirely for this market. The white surface of Castleford

ware was frequently divided into compartments by raised lines which were

colored blue or green. Teapots were made with lids hinged on metal pins,

or with sliding lids, and were exceedingly pretty and convenient. They

are often called Wedgwood, as are also pieces of Castleford black ware.

VI.

ENGLISH PORCELAINS IN AMERICA

As soon as porcelain was manufactured to any extent in England it was

exported to America. The _Boston Evening Post_ of November, 1754,

advertised “a variety of Bow China Cups and Saucers and Bowls,” and

other sales of Bow china were made, and special pieces also brought

across the ocean to wealthy Americans. Specimens of Plymouth and Bow

china may still be occasionally found in America, but any such that have

been preserved and gathered into private collections can be positively

identified only by comparison with authenticated and marked pieces in

public collections. It would be impossible to give any definite Bow

marks. The stamp or design of the anchor and dagger is popularly

considered proof that the piece thus marked is Bow. The triangle,

formerly regarded as a positive Bow mark, now appears to have a rather

shaky reputation, and is as frequently assigned to Chelsea. The

character and shape of the ware, and the style of the decoration are

better grounds to base identification upon than any marks. Excavations

made upon the site of the old Bow china-works revealed much débris of

broken pieces of china, and these specimens afford the most positive

means of identifying the paste and ornamentation. An account of these

discoveries was given in the _Art Journal_ of 1869. All the fragments

found were of porcelain, milky-white in color, and relatively heavy for

the thickness; some were ornamented in relief, with the May flower or

hawthorn; with a little sprig of two roses and a leaf on a stalk; with

the basket pattern; or with vertical bands overlaid with scrolls. Some

were painted in blue under the glaze with Chinese landscapes, flowers,

and figures. All were hand-painted, none were printed. These hints may

serve as guides in the detection and identification of Bow china.

I have seen in America cups and saucers painted with the partridge

pattern, which I believe are Bow, though the same pattern is found on

Worcester and Plymouth china. The well-known and exceedingly valuable

goat milk-jugs that, after forming for years the immovable standard from

which streamed defiantly the flag of Bow, are now calmly turned over to

Chelsea. These creamjugs are ornamented with two white goats in relief

at the base, and a bee is modelled on the front under the nose. The

handle is rustic with raised flowers. These jugs often have the triangle

mark. Some are painted with flowers, others are plain white porcelain.

Mr. Jewitt says they were sometimes made without the raised bee, but I

have never seen such an one. Two of these Bow jugs were in the

Strawberry Hill collection.

A very excitable young woman came rushing home one cold winter day, in

New York, with a demand for the “china books.” She had seen in an

antique shop, such a funny and pretty little pitcher, with a raised bee

on it, and she was sure that there was a picture of it somewhere in the

books—and she found it in Mr. Prime’s book on pottery and porcelain—a

Bow goat cream-jug. Well, it snowed, and was cold, and was late in the

afternoon, and the confident young collector deferred a purchasing visit

till the following morning. Alas! such a sickening disappointment—some

miserable despoiler had chanced to “drop in” on his way up-town and had

carried off the treasure. Worse still, the small boy who had sold it did

not know the purchaser’s name.

[Illustration: Plymouth Salt-cellar. Bow “Goat Cream-Jug.”]

Deeply did she mourn her ignorance, her indecision, her indolence, her

carelessness. The opportunity of a lifetime had thus been lost, to have

a goat cream-jug such as was sold at the Cother sale in London, in 1876,

for twenty-five pounds, to have such a jug offered for the paltry sum of

one dollar, and to refuse it—not to know enough to grasp such a

treasure. The bitterness of regret and of self-reproach nerved her to

action, and with the friendly and actively interested aid of the

antique-shop-boy, the jug-buyer was waylaid within a month’s time and

cajoled into reselling his purchase, which he did willingly enough. He

had bought it to keep his shaving brush in, because his father used to

keep his shaving brush in a similar one in England. With flecks of dried

shaving soap clinging to the goat’s horns, and mottling the bee’s wings,

she triumphantly brought her treasure home. It varies slightly in height

and by the turn of a leaf and twig from my Bow goat cream-jug, which

came from the Cavendish-Bentinck sale in London. The porcelain of the

New York captive of the chase is not so pure and clear and it may be of

Chelsea manufacture.

Another dainty piece of Bow found by a friend is a creamer or sauce-boat

of the overlapping leaf pattern. The handle is formed by a leaf stem;

raised flowers are at the base of the handle, and on the leaves flowers

are delicately painted. This is like Number “H. 12” in the Museum of

Practical Geology.

The beautiful tall coffee-pot here shown is Plymouth with embossed

surface and Chinese style of decoration in blue. Its cover was

destroyed, alas! by some careless Newburyport housewife. The salt-cellar

of pure unpainted porcelain on page 121 is undoubtedly Plymouth also,

being clearly marked. The design of vine leaves and grapes is very

delicate and perfect. The piece came from an old home in Baltimore.

Though Bristol china was manufactured only from the year 1768 to 1781,

and though pieces are rare and high-priced in England, it is possible to

obtain specimens in America. Perhaps some invoices of the ware of the

short-lived factory were sent to the new land by Richard Champion, the

founder of the Bristol Works, for he was an enthusiastic lover and

admirer of America. In the Trumbull-Prime Collection are a large number

of pieces classed as Bristol because they have the Bristol cross, but

not assigned definitely to that factory.

[Illustration: Plymouth Coffee-pot.]

The few Bristol pieces I have seen in American homes are portions of

tea-services, teapots being more plentiful than other forms. Some have

an imperfect or blistered glaze, but occasionally fine specimens are

found. It is impossible to state the value of Bristol china. In the

Governor Lyon sale there were two lovely Bristol cups and saucers

decorated with a heavy gold rim and oriental landscape in dark blue,

that sold for four dollars each. A plate with the same decoration

brought only a dollar and a half.

The most beautiful and interesting piece of Bristol porcelain in

existence is in America. It is owned by Mrs. James M. Davis, of Camden,

South Carolina. She is a great-granddaughter of Richard Champion and

inherited it from him. This lovely piece is a funerary design—a mourning

female figure leaning against a pedestal bearing a funeral urn. In one

hand she holds a wreath. The beauty of the figure, the grace of the

attitude, and the elegance of the drapery combine to make this statue

exceedingly exquisite. It was made by the English potter as a memorial

for his daughter, Eliza Champion, who died in early youth—a memorial

such as was tenderly though crudely suggested by the carefully made

burial urn of the Indian mother. The inscription is so simple and so

touching, and is couched in such quaint old-time diction that I copy it

in full.

ELIZA CHAMPION

Ob. XIII Octob. MDCCLXIX

AEtat XIV

Nat. XXI Mart. MDCCLXVI

On the cornice of the pedestal are the words:

“OSTENDENT TERRIS HANC TANTVM FATA NEC VLTRA ESSE SINENT.”

[Illustration: Bristol Memorial Figure.]

On the dado this inscription:

“We loved you, my dear Eliza, whilst you were with us. We lament you now

you are departed. The Almighty God is just and merciful, and we must

submit to His will with the Resignation and Reverence becoming human

frailty. He has removed you, Eliza, from the trouble which has been our

Lot, and does not suffer you to behold the Scenes of horror and distress

in which these devoted Kingdoms must be involved. It is difficult to

part with our beloved Child, though but for a season. Yet our Interest

shall not be put into competition with her felicity, and we will even

bear her Loss with Chearfulness. Happy in each other, we were happy in

you, Eliza, and will with contented minds cherish your memory till the

period arrives, when we shall all again meet and Pain and Sorrow shall

be thought of no more. R.C.—I.C.”

On the plinth lines altered from Book I., Ode XXIV., of Horace are

printed thus:

(QVIS DESIDERIO SIT PVDOR AVT MODVS

TAM CHARI CAPITIS?—

—CVI PVDOR, ET JVSTITIAE SOROR

INCORRVPTA FIDES, NVDAQVE VERITAS

QVANDO VLLAM INVENIENT PAREM?

DVRVM! SED LAEVIUS FIT PATIENTIA,

QVICQVID CORRIGERE EST NEFAS.)

On the base:

“THIS TRIBUTE TO THE MEMORY OF AN AMIABLE GIRL WAS INSCRIBED ON HER

COFFIN THE 16TH OF OCTOBER, 1779, BY A FATHER WHO LOVED HER.”

Who could read, even after a century’s time, this beautiful and tender

tribute to the gentle young girl, who died so many years ago, without

feeling deep sympathy with the bereaved father, “who loved her?” The

unsuccessful worker and the patriot speak plainly also in the lines:

“He has removed you from the trouble which has been our Lot and does not

suffer you to behold the scenes of horror and distress in which these

devoted Kingdoms must be involved.”

Mrs. Davis also possessed some of the beautiful Bristol figures of

Spring, Summer, and Winter, and she patriotically sent them for

exhibition at the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, in 1876. Like

many another rare and beautiful article sent confidingly there at that

time, they were never returned to their owner. This loss must have been

hard to endure with patience, not only from the historical and

hereditary value and interest of the pieces, but also because the

previous year duplicate pieces of Bristol were sold in London for £54

each.

One of the most beautiful of Richard Champion’s productions in England

or America is the medallion plaque of Franklin, described in Chapter

XIV.

Mr. Owen’s description of Bristol china is very clear and concise. “The

pieces are graceful in form and well moulded, the flowers brilliant in

colour and skilfully painted; and the gilding, bright though

unburnished, is of that particularly rich and solid character that

always distinguished the manufacture. Though it often bears Dresden

marks, and is moulded in Dresden shapes, the quality of the paste is so

different that it is easily distinguished from the Dresden. The glaze is

rich and creamy white, while the Dresden has a cold, glassy surface.”

[Illustration: Crown Derby Covered Dish.]

Crown Derby is seldom picked up by the china hunter—never I believe in

country homes in New England. Near New York a few rare pieces have been

found. Miss Henrietta D. Lyon, of Staten Island, has part of an

exceedingly rich and elegant Crown Derby dinner service painted in

delicate colors and gold, one covered dish of which is here shown. The

gilding and painting upon these pieces is in the highest style of

artistic beauty and dexterity. They bear the mark used at the Derby

factory from 1784 to 1796.

The most common piece offered to the china hunter in New England is what

is known as the willow-pattern ware. It was made first by Thomas Turner,

at Caughley, in 1780. He manufactured both pottery and porcelain. I

often have wished that he had never invented that willow-pattern. I have

had it thrust in my face for purchase until I could scarcely bear to

look at it. I have had visions of dainty Bow, Bristol, and Plymouth

china brought before me through vivid but uncertain description, only to

come face to face with more printed willow-pattern. I should imagine

that a large proportion of all that ever was made was sent to America.

And it has been made in vast quantities, too, for it has been certainly

the most popular pattern ever printed anywhere on stone-ware or

porcelain. Mr. Jewitt says: “Early examples bearing the Caughley

mark—the cups without handles and ribbed and finished precisely like the

Oriental, are rare.” Of course they are, in England, but not in America;

as the prices prove at the Governor Lyon sale. Old willow-pattern plates

sold there for one dollar each.

Pieces of willow-pattern ware are often of astounding age and fabulous

value. Forty dollars is the favorite price that knowing country owners

assert they can get in the city for their willow-pattern platters. I

have a favorite formula which I always use in answer to these aspiring

traders—my “willow-pattern answer.” I reply, gravely, “Yes, that pattern

is priceless.” It does not mean anything and it pleases them, and if you

told them that the platter was worth about two or three dollars they

would look upon you as a swindler. Modern willow-pattern ware is also

offered at fancy valuations. I have never been able to decide whether an

old farmer who brought two willow-ware plates about a year old to sell

to me, assuring me (though they bore the visible mark and stamp of

modern production) that “this old crockery had been in his fam’ly more’n

a hundred year”—I have never decided whether that ingenuous bucolic were

a deep-dyed swindler or the innocent tool of some crafty sharper. I

answered him soberly with my patent “willow-pattern answer”—“That

pattern is priceless,” and he went away hugging his antiques with

delight. I have seen within a year at a well-known dealer’s in New York,

a modern willow-pattern platter upon which was pasted this printed

inscription: “This platter belonged to Miles Standish, and was often

used by him, and is therefore very rare and of great historical value.”

This was an auction label cut from the catalogue of a sale, and the

dealer let it remain as a joke for the knowing ones, and possibly as a

bait for the unsophisticated.

“The Broseley Blue Dragon” and the “Broseley Blue Canton” pieces and

their imitations are frequently found. These patterns were also made at

the Caughley or Salopian Works. The “cabbage leaf jugs” came from that

manufactory.

I have never been able to understand why the willow-pattern should have

been so much more popular than the Blue Dragon. The latter is certainly

very handsome and consistent, or rather congruous throughout, while the

willow-pattern is neither “fish nor fowl nor good red herring”—it is not

English, and it is certainly not wholly Oriental. The color is good, as

was all blue at that time.

At a later date than the reign of Lowestoft on “company” dinner tables

in New England, the fine “best tea china” of well-to-do people was

English porcelain of copper-lustre and pink and green decoration. Many

of these pretty lustre sets are still preserved and can be bought of

country owners. A terrible blow has been dealt, however, to the desire

to purchase such wares by the fact that modern reproductions showing

equal beauty of color and similar designs have appeared in large numbers

within the past two years. Pitchers of pottery, “prankt in faded antique

dress” of light brown or pinkish purple lustres are now manufactured.

They bear no marks and cannot be distinguished from the old ones—and are

just as good, perhaps, for every one but a china hunter. The solid

lustre teapots, sugar-boxes, and pitchers—copper-colored, brownish

lustre or silver on a pottery ground, have not, so far as I know, been

reproduced. On many pieces the lustre is diversified by a pretty design

in white, sometimes in relief or by painted flowers. The finest old

pitcher of this ware that I have ever seen bore a graceful embossed

design which was decorated upon the highest reliefs in pink, green, and

gold lustre. This was positively affirmed to be part of the Mayflower

cargo. Most of these lustre pieces are unmarked, hence it is impossible

to assign them to any factory. A few of them, the clearest and purest in

paste, and most delicate in decoration are New Hall, for I have plates

so marked. The stamp is a cursive New Hall not enclosed in a ring. This

stamp is not given in English books of stamps and marks. Mr. Jewitt says

such pieces are rare in England. They certainly have not been rare in

New England. Some of the lustre pieces may be assigned to Newcastle. The

Woods also manufactured them, while at Shelton were made pieces with

lustre borders and black printed designs signed “Bentley, Weare and

Bourne, Engravers and Printers, Shelton, Staffordshire.”

I have never seen a dinner set of lustre ware—only tea-sets, comprising

usually a teapot, sugar-box, creamer, bowl, a dozen tea-plates (often of

different design and paste), two cake-plates, a dozen cups and saucers,

and sometimes a dozen little cup-plates. Salt-cellars, pepper-boxes, and

mustard-pots of similar lustre are seen, and sometimes wine-glasses, or

rather wine-cups—but never any of the pieces of dinner services.

Pitchers appear in various sizes. The china is usually clear and fine in

quality, but the design is often confused. A few punch-bowls of

copper-lustre on coarse pottery have also been found in New England, but

are curious rather than beautiful.

I have never been able to add to my collection, through china hunting,

but one piece of Worcester porcelain, the one shown on page 29, nor have

I ever seen in a country home a piece of Chelsea, Coalport, Pinxton, or

Nantgawr porcelain, and but one set of Spode, which was seized from an

English vessel by a Yankee privateersman in the war of 1812, and brought

triumphantly into Salem Harbor. Nor, may I add, have I ever seen a piece

of pottery or porcelain of Continental manufacture, save Delft. For any

porcelain save that made in China and England, American collectors must

turn to china dealers.

VII.

LIVERPOOL AND OTHER PRINTED WARE

At the end of the past and beginning of the present century, great

numbers of cream-colored pottery pitchers and mugs were printed in

England with various designs and were sent to the United States for

sale. These pieces were advertised in early Federal days, and are known

as “yellow ware” and Liverpool ware, and are found in seaport towns on

the Atlantic coast, especially in New England. Many bore mottoes,

inscriptions, likenesses, and views relating to America and the

celebrated Americans of the time, and thus form interesting mementos of

the wars of the Revolution and of 1812. I have never seen a Liverpool

pitcher in an inland country home, nor have I ever had one offered to me

for sale in an inland town, either in a private home or an antique shop.

The reasons for this are very simple: many of them were brought to

America by Yankee sailors and sailing-masters who lived, as a rule, in

seaport towns, and importations of these pitchers were not transported

inland in ante-railroad days with the facility and safety that we find

possible nowadays; and, best reason of all, nine-tenths of them with

their ornamentation of ships and brigs and ropes and anchors were made

to tickle the fancy of a seafaring man, and did not appeal to the

sentiment of a land-lubber of a farmer.

It is always a great delight to the inland-dwelling and novelty-seeking

china hunter when she enters a low, single-storied seaside home, and

spies on the mantelpiece a creamy Naval or Sailor pitcher flanked by a

carved Indian idol and an elaborate model of the “Nimble Nine-pence,”

the “Belisarius,” or the “Three Wives” (named by one stanch old widower

after he was married to wife number four). Her joy is, as a rule,

quickly turned to lamentation, for the housewife who values her

Liverpool pitcher enough to place it on her parlor mantel, will never be

“willing to part with it.” And here let me render my thanks to the

American merchant service. Blessings on those dead and gone old

seafaring Yankees who risked their lives on the stormy seas and brought

home “behind their wooden walls” the variety and wealth of china and

crockery that have descended to us, a pathetic reminder of the weary

watch on deck and the homesick hours in cabin or forecastle.

China collecting in America · 第 7 / 24 段