A NEGLECTED DISINFECTANT.

When the household of our grandmothers was threatened with infection,

the common practice was to sprinkle brimstone on a hot shovel or on hot

coals on a shovel, and carry the burning result through the house. But

now this simple method of disinfecting has gone out of fashion without

any good and sufficient reason. The principal reason is neither good

nor sufficient, viz., that nobody can patent it and sell it in shilling

and half-crown bottles.

On September 18th last, M. d’Abbadie read a paper at the Academy of

Sciences on “Marsh Fevers,” and stated that in the dangerous regions

of African river mouths immunity from such-fevers is often secured by

sulphur fumigations on the naked body. Also that the Sicilian workers

in low ground sulphur mines suffer much less than the rest of the

surrounding population from intermittent fevers. M. Fouqué has shown

that Zephyria (on the volcanic island of Milo or Melos, the most

westerly of the Cyclades), which had a population of 40,000 when it

was the centre of sulphur-mining operations, became nearly depopulated

by marsh fever when the sulphur-mining was moved farther east, and

the emanations prevented by a mountain from reaching the town. Other

similar cases were stated.

It is well understood by chemists that bleaching agents are usually

good disinfectants; that which can so disturb an organic compound as

to destroy its color, is capable of either arresting or completing

the decompositions that produce vile odors and nourish the organic

germs or ferments which usual accompany, or, as some affirm, cause

them. Sulphurous acid is, next to hypochlorous acid, one of the most

effective bleaching agents within easy reach.

I should add that sulphurous acid is the gas that is _directly_ formed

by burning sulphur. By taking up another dose of oxygen it becomes

sulphuric acid, which, combined with water, is oil of vitriol. The

bleaching and disinfecting action of the sulphurous acid is connected

with its activity in appropriating the oxygen which is loosely held

or being given off by organic matter. Chlorine and hypochlorous

acid (which is still more effective than chlorine itself) act in the

opposite way, so do the permanganates, such as Condy’s fluid, etc. They

supply oxygen in the presence of water. It is curious that opposite

actions should produce like results. A disquisition on this and its

suggestions would carry me beyond the limits of a note.

Science in Short Chapters · 第 109 / 116 题