THE ORIGIN OF LUNAR VOLCANOES.

Many theoretical efforts, some of considerable violence, have been

made to reconcile the supposed physical contradiction presented by

the great magnitude and area of former volcanic activity of the Moon,

and the present absence of water on its surface. So long as we accept

the generally received belief that water is a necessary agent in the

evolution of volcanic forces, the difficulties presented by the lunar

surface are rather increased than diminished by further examination and

speculation.

We know that the lava, scoriæ, dust and other products of volcanic

action on this earth are mainly composed of mixed silicates—those of

alumina and lime preponderating. When we consider that the solid crust

of the Earth is chiefly composed of silicic acid, and of basic oxides

and carbonates which combine with silicic acid when heated, a natural

necessity for such a composition of volcanic products becomes evident.

If the Moon is composed of similar materials to those of the Earth, the

fusion of its crust must produce similar compounds, as they are formed

independently of any atmospheric or aqueous agency.

This being the case, the phenomena presented by the cooling of

fused masses of mixed silicates in the absence of water become very

interesting. Opportunities of studying such phenomena are offered at

our great iron-works, where fused masses of iron cinder, composed

mainly of mixed silicates, are continually to be seen in the process of

cooling under a variety of circumstances.

I have watched the cooling of such masses very frequently, and have

seen abundant displays of miniature volcanic phenomena, especially

marked where the cooling has occurred under conditions most nearly

resembling those of a gradually cooling planet or satellite; that

is, when the fused cinder has been enclosed by a solid resisting and

contracting crust.

The most remarkable that I have seen are those presented by the cooling

of the “tap cinder” from puddling furnaces. This, as it flows from the

furnace, is received in stout iron boxes (“cinder-bogies”) of circular

or rectangular horizontal section. The following phenomena are usually

observable on the cooling of the fused cinder in a circular bogie.

First a thin solid crust forms on the red-hot surface. This speedily

cools sufficiently to blacken. If pierced by a slight thrust from

an iron rod, the red-hot matter within is seen to be in a state of

seething activity, and a considerable quantity exudes from the opening.

If a bogie filled with fused cinder is left undisturbed, a veritable

spontaneous volcanic eruption takes place through some portion,

generally near the centre, of the solid crust. In some cases, this

eruption is sufficiently violent to eject small spurts of molten cinder

to a height equal to four or five diameters of the whole mass.

The crust once broken, a regular crater is rapidly formed, and

miniature streams of lava continue to pour from it; sometimes slowly

and regularly, occasionally with jerks and spurts due to the bursting

of bubbles of gas. The accumulation of these lava-streams forms a

regular cone, the height of which goes on increasing. I have seen a

bogie about 10 or 12 inches in diameter, and 9 or 10 inches deep,

thus surmounted by a cone above 5 inches high, with a base equal to

the whole diameter of the bogie. These cones and craters could be but

little improved by a modeler desiring to represent a typical volcano in

miniature.

Similar craters and cones are formed on the surface of cinder which is

not confined by the sides of the bogie. I have seen them well displayed

on the “running-out beds” of refinery furnaces. These, when filled,

form a small lake of molten iron covered with a layer of cinder. This

cinder first skins over, as in the bogies, then small crevasses form in

this crust, and through these the fused cinder oozes from below. The

outflow from this chasm soon becomes localized, so as to form a single

crater, or a small chain of craters; these gradually develop into cones

by the accumulation of outflowing lava, so that when the whole mass has

solidified, it is covered more or less thickly with a number of such

hillocks. These, however, are much smaller than in the former case,

reaching to only one or two inches in height, with a proportionate

base. It is evident that the dimensions of these miniature volcanoes

are determined mainly by the depth of the molten matter from which

they are formed. In the case of the bogies, they are exaggerated by

the overpowering resistance of the solid iron bottom and sides, which

force all the exudation in the one direction of least resistance, viz.,

towards the centre of the thin upper crust, and thus a single crater

and a single cone of the large relative dimensions above described are

commonly formed.

The magnitude and perfection of these miniature volcanoes vary

considerably with the quality of the pig-iron and the treatment it

has received, and the difference appears to depend upon the evolution

of gases, such as carbonic oxide, volatile chlorides, fluorides, etc.

I mention the fluorides particularly, having been recently engaged

in making some experiments on Mr. Henderson’s process for refining

pig-iron, by exposing it when fused to the action of a mixture of

fluoride of calcium and oxides of iron, alumina, manganese, etc. The

cinder separated from this iron displayed the phenomena above described

very remarkably, and jets of yellowish flame were thrown up from the

craters while the lava was flowing. The flame was succeeded by dense

white vapors as the temperature of the cinder lowered, and a deposit of

snow-like, flocculent crystals was left upon and around the mouth or

crater of each cone. The miniature representation of cosmical eruptions

was thus rendered still more striking, even to the white deposit of the

haloid salts which Palmieri has described as remaining after the recent

eruption of Vesuvius.

The gases thus evolved have not yet been analytically examined, and

the details of the powerful reactions displayed in this process still

demand further study; but there can be no doubt that the combination

of silicic acid with the base of the fluor spar is the fundamental

reaction to which the evolution of the volatile fluorides, etc., is

mainly due.

A corresponding evolution of gases takes place in cosmical volcanic

action, whenever silicic acid is fused in contact with limestone or

other carbonate, and a still closer analogy is presented by the fusion

of silicates in contact with chlorides and oxides, in the absence of

water. If the composition of the Moon is similar to that of the Earth,

chlorides of sodium, etc., must form an important part of its solid

crust; they should correspond in quantity to the great deposit of

such salts that would be left behind if the ocean of the Earth were

evaporated to dryness. The only assumptions demanded in applying these

facts to the explanation of the surface configuration of the Moon are,

1st, that our satellite resembles its primary in chemical composition;

2d, that it has cooled down from a state of fusion; and 3d, that the

magnitude of the eruptions, due to such fusion and cooling, must bear

some relation to the quantity of matter in action.

The first and second are so commonly made and understood, that I need

not here repeat the well-known arguments upon which they are supported,

but may remark that the facts above described afford new and weighty

evidence in their favor.

If the correspondence between the form of a freely suspended and

rotating drop of liquid and that of a planet or satellite is accepted

as evidence of the exertion of the same forces of cohesion, etc.,

on both, the correspondence between the configuration of the lunar

surface, and that of small quantities of fused and freely cooled

earth-crust matter, should at least afford material support to the

otherwise indicated inference, that the materials of the Moon’s crust

are similar to those of the Earth’s, and that they have been cooled

from a state of fusion.

I think I may safely generalize to the extent of saying, that no

considerable mass of fused earthy silicates can cool down under

circumstances of free radiation without first forming a heated solid

crust, which, by further radiation, cooling, and contraction, will

assume a surface configuration resembling more or less closely that of

the Moon. Evidence of this is afforded by a survey of the spoil-banks

of blast furnaces, where thousands of blocks of cinder are heaped

together, all of which will be found to have their upper surfaces (that

were freely exposed when cooling) corrugated with radiating miniature

lava streams, that have flowed from one or more craters or openings

that have been formed in the manner above described.

The third assumption will, I think, be at once admitted, inasmuch as it

is but the expression of a physical necessity.

According to this, the Earth, if it has cooled as the Moon is supposed

to have done, should have displayed corresponding irregularities,

and generally, the magnitude of mountains of solidified planets and

satellites should be on a scale proportionate to their whole mass.

In comparing the mountains of the Moon and _Mercury_ with those of

the Earth, a large error is commonly made by taking the customary

measurements of terrestrial mountain-heights from the sea-level. As

those portions of the Earth which rise above the waters are but its

upper mountain slopes, and the ocean bottom forms its lower plains

and valleys, we must add the greatest ocean depths to our customary

measurements, in order to state the full height of what remains of the

original mountains of the Earth. As all the stratified rocks have been

formed by the wearing down of the original upper slopes and summits, we

cannot expect to be able to recognize the original skeleton form of our

water-washed globe.

If my calculation of the atmosphere of _Mercury_ is correct, viz.,

that its pressure is equal to about one seventh of the Earth’s, or

4¼ inches of mercury, there can be no liquid water on that planet,

excepting perhaps over a small amount of circumpolar area, and during

the extremes of its aphelion winter. Thus the irregularities of the

terminator, indicating mountain elevations calculated to reach to

1/253 of the diameter of the planet, are quite in accordance with the

above-stated theoretical consideration.

There is one peculiar feature presented by the cones of the cooling

cinder which is especially interesting. The flow of fused cinder

from the little crater is at first copious and continuous; then it

diminishes and becomes alternating, by a rising and falling of the

fused mass within the cone. Ultimately the flow ceases, and then the

inner liquid sinks, more or less, below the level of the orifice. In

some cases, where much gas is evolved, this sinking is so considerable

as to leave the cone as a mere hollow shell; the inner liquid having

settled down and solidified with a flat or slightly rounded surface, at

about the level of the base of the cone, or even lower. These hollow

cones were remarkably displayed in some of the cinder of the Henderson

iron, and their formation was obviously promoted by the abundant

evolution of gas.

If such hollow cones were formed by the cooling of a mass like that

of the Moon, they would ultimately and gradually subside by their own

weight. But how would they yield? Obviously by a gradual hinge-like

bending at the base towards the axis of the cone. This would occur

with or without fracture, according to the degree of viscosity of the

crust, and the amount of inclination. But the sides of the hollow-cone

shell, in falling towards the axis, would be crushing into smaller

circumferences. What would result from this? I think it must be the

formation of fissures, extending, for the most part, radially from the

crater towards the base, and a crumpling up of the shell of the cone by

foldings in the same direction. Am I venturing too far in suggesting

that in this manner may have been formed the mysterious rays and rills

that extend so abundantly from several of the lunar craters?

The upturned edges or walls of the broken crust, and the chasms

necessarily gaping between them, appear to satisfy the peculiar

phenomena of reflection which these rays present. These edges of the

fractured crust would lean towards each other, and form angular chasms;

while the foldings of the crust itself would form long concave troughs,

extending radially from the crater.

These, when illuminated by rays falling upon them in the direction of

the line of vision, must reflect more light towards the spectator than

does the general convex lunar surface, and thus they become especially

visible at the full Moon.

Such foldings and fractures would occur after the subsidence and

solidification of the lava-forming liquid—that is, when the formation

of new craters had ceased in any given region; hence they would extend

across the minor lateral craters formed by outbursts from the sides of

the main cone, in the manner actually observed.

The fact that the bottoms of the great walled craters of the Moon are

generally lower than the surrounding plains must not be forgotten in

connection with this explanation.

I will not venture further with the speculations suggested by the

above-described resemblances, as my knowledge of the details of the

telescopic appearances of the Moon is but second-hand. I have little

doubt, however, that observers who have the privilege of direct

familiarity with such details, will find that the phenomena presented

by the cooling of iron cinder, or other fused silicates, are worthy of

further and more careful study.

Science in Short Chapters · 第 60 / 116 题