CHARACTER OF THE MATERIAL USED IN THIS PAMPHLET.

[Sidenote: German sources.]

In this pamphlet throughout, as in the preceding pages, the evidence

is drawn mainly from German and American sources. The German sources

include official proclamations and other official utterances, letters

and diaries of German soldiers, and quotations from German newspapers.

The diaries which are so frequently quoted form a unique source. The

_Rules for Field Service_ of the German Army advises each soldier to

keep such a diary while on active service. Very many German soldiers

who have been taken prisoner had kept such diaries, and these have been

confiscated by the captors. Many have been published, frequently with

facsimile reproductions to guarantee their authenticity. The best known

collection was made by Bédier, whom Prof. Hollmann, of the University

of Berlin, properly described as "the distinguished Prof. Joseph Bédier

of the Collège de France." Of Bédier's publication Prof. Nyrop, of the

University of Copenhagen, says:

"He has translated the diaries and commented upon them just as one

does with all old historical documents, and, in order that everyone

may be in a position to check up his work, he has also accompanied

the account with facsimile copies of the documents he used. Here,

accordingly, at the outset every proof of the evidence which he has

employed is provided. No falsification is possible. The accounts

are those of eyewitnesses, and these eyewitnesses are Germans. They

tell what they themselves or their comrades have done, and Bédier

accompanies their remarks with running comments which show that not

only have common law and the Hague Conventions been violated, but sins

have also been committed against the most elementary laws of humanity.

Both the material and the presentation are unassailable. The details

which are provided by the German soldiers in regard to their own

violent acts are horror-striking."

Prof. Hollmann attempted to prove that Bédier had made mistakes in

translating and interpreting, but he did not deny the genuineness of

the diaries. "These notebooks," he says, "may well be authentic and I

accept this without further comment for all those which are provided

with the name of their authors and whose authenticity can in any case

be established after the war."

[Sidenote: American sources.]

The American evidence is drawn mainly from material in the archives

of the State Department. In addition, statements from our ambassadors

and ministers and other well-known officials and authors are given.

Messrs. Hoover, Kellogg, and Walcott have written statements especially

for this pamphlet. All of this material is essentially the testimony

of neutrals, for it is based wholly on observations made before the

United States entered the war. Occasionally official documents and well

authenticated facts from foreign sources are used.

[Sidenote: Frightfulness as a system.]

The purpose of this pamphlet is to show that the system of

frightfulness, which is itself the greatest atrocity, is the definite

policy of the German Government, against which more humane German

soldiers themselves revolted at times. For this reason it has not

seemed necessary to set forth the individual acts of cruelty; such

acts are cited only when necessary to illustrate the system. Anyone

who wishes to read chapters of horrors can find them in the _Report of

the Committee on Alleged German Outrages_, presided over by the former

British Ambassador to this country and therefore generally known as

"the Bryce report;" in the official reports by the Belgian _Commission

d'Enquête_; in the official French reports compiled under the auspices

of the French minister for foreign affairs; in many other publications,

and especially in the conclusive admissions of the official _German

White Book_ cited above. The last, published by the German Government,

is the most damning testimony concerning the system of frightfulness.

German War Practices, Part 1: Treatment of Civilians · 第 9 / 63 题