A picturesque feature of the old town was the canal that ran from the

city wall to the bay, becoming first an artery of trade, and then a

centre of fashionable life, as Broad Street, which took its place, has

since been a centre of commercial activity. It was directly opposite

Broad Street, in Wall, that the foundations of the new City Hall were

laid in 1699, the sale of the Stadt Huys helping to defray the cost of

the more pretentious structure. The arms of the English Governor, Lord

Bellomont, were blazoned on its walls; but two years later the marshal

was called upon to remove and destroy them. When New York became the

seat of the national government, the ninety-year-old City Hall, partly

reconstructed and lavishly decorated, became the meeting-place of

Congress. The most memorable day in its history was the 30th of April,

1789, when, attended by Chancellor Livingston and the committees of

Senators and Representatives, standing upon its balcony in the presence

of a great concourse, not merely of New Yorkers, but of Americans from

all the colonies, gathered together from far and near, George Washington

took the oath of office as first President of the United States. Where

the Capitol then stood now stands the Sub-Treasury, with Ward’s bronze

Washington looking gravely down from its steps upon the feverish turmoil

of Wall Street.

The oldest existing municipal building in New York is the Hall of

Records, in City Hall Park, whose contents are erelong to be housed in a

spacious, fire-proof edifice. It dates from the middle of the eighteenth

century. Its site formed a part of the Common, and it stood appropriately

convenient to the gallows, for it was originally a jail—the first

building on the island ever designed exclusively for the detention of

law-breakers. In popular parlance, as in practical use, it soon became

the Debtors’ Prison. When the British occupied the town during the

Revolution, it was turned to account as their principal military prison,

being known as The Provost, in reference to the title of the brutal

Cunningham, who was charged with the custody of American prisoners of

war—amongst others, “that d—d rebel, Ethan Allen.” The building was a

debtors’ jail again from 1787 to 1830; on the completion of alterations

projected at the latter date, it became, in 1835, the Register’s office,

and as such will probably see the close of the nineteenth century.

[Illustration: ST. PAUL’S CHURCH.]

[Illustration: CITY HALL.]

Vastly more attractive to the eye than this treasury of real-estate

records, and not wholly lacking in historic interest, is the adjacent

City Hall. This really handsome building, in the style of the Italian

Renaissance, was begun in 1803, and completed nine years later. The

likelihood of the city’s extending beyond it seemed too slight to

warrant lavishing upon its back the white marble which adds so much

to the dignity and grace of its façade; the rear wall was accordingly

constructed of a cheaper stone. In the “Governor’s room” on the

second floor, used for official receptions, are the desk on which

Washington wrote his first message to Congress, the chair in which he

was inaugurated as President, and the chairs used by the first federal

Congress.

In the same neighborhood, just beyond the lower extremity of the

old Common, now City Hall Park, stands St. Paul’s Chapel, Trinity

parish—an edifice much older than the parish church, which for the past

half-century, like its successive parent buildings, has stood farther

down Broadway, opposing its bulk to the westward progress of Wall Street.

Fenced off by iron palings, and bordered on each side by a strip of

graveyard, the chapel turns a picturesque and perhaps scornful back upon

the “topless towers” of Broadway—little dreamt of when its foundations

were laid in 1766, or three-and-twenty years later, when President

Washington attended service there on the day of his first inauguration.

These heaven-aspiring structures were only beginning to turn the street

into a canyon when the first President’s successor in office sat in the

same pew on the same day a century later (April 30, 1889).

Private houses of historic interest abounded not many years ago, notable

among them the country-seat called Richmond Hill, near the long since

absorbed village of Greenwich—a stately dwelling, identified with many

familiar names. John Adams lived there during a part of his first term

as Vice-President, and Aaron Burr started thence on that fateful July

morning in 1804 that saw the death of Hamilton at his hand, and the end

of his own political career. Of equal note was the house on Murray Hill,

where Mrs. Murray detained the British commander at lunch while the

American troops, under Putnam, made their escape from the island in 1776.

[Illustration: GRANT’S TOMB, RIVERSIDE DRIVE.]

The so-called Jumel Mansion, built for Washington’s whilom flame,

Miss Mary Philippse, by her successful suitor, Col. Roger Morris, and

afterwards occupied by Washington as his headquarters, became in turn the

property of the nation (Morris having been a royalist), of John Jacob

Astor, and of Stephen Jumel, whose erratic widow married Aaron Burr, but

soon tired of him, turned him out of doors and dropped his name. From

its coign of vantage on Harlem Heights at 169th Street, this dignified

colonial dwelling still looks down upon the Harlem River and across to

Long Island Sound. And at the foot of East 61st Street is yet to be

seen—vine-covered, and embowered in trees and shrubs—the substantial

stone residence of Col. William Smith, who married the daughter of

President Adams, and ruined himself by speculating in east-side real

estate. But the scarcity of such relics, and their glaring incongruity

with their surroundings, emphasize the divergence between the old New

York and that which is termed the Greater.

In the hall of Cooper Institute, Abraham Lincoln made that great speech

which first fully revealed him to the people of the Eastern States;

and hither he was brought, to lie in state in the City Hall, when a

martyr’s death had disclosed his greatness still more clearly to all his

countrymen.

Here have lived, for longer or shorter periods, sundry Presidents of

the United States, from Washington to Cleveland; the city has been the

permanent or occasional home of statesmen such as Jay and Livingston,

Alexander Hamilton and Gouverneur Morris; of political agitators such

as Aaron Burr and “Commonsense” Paine, and political leaders like

DeWitt Clinton and Samuel J. Tilden; of authors such as Washington

Irving, whose burlesque local history marked him out as the father of

American light literature, Fenimore Cooper, the most popular of American

romance-writers, and Edgar Allan Poe and Walt Whitman, most individual

of American poets. Here, for longer or shorter periods, have lived

and labored Curtis, and Bayard Taylor, and Stoddard, and Stedman, and

Aldrich, and Howells, and that greatest of poets among journalists

and journalists among poets, William Cullen Bryant, editor of _The

Evening Post_ and one of the founders of the Century Club; and Horace

Greeley, founder of _The Tribune_, and most famous of American editors

since Benjamin Franklin. As a resident of Brooklyn, and editor of a

metropolitan religious weekly, the best-known preacher of the century,

Henry Ward Beecher, was virtually a citizen of New York. In the annals of

invention, the names of four New Yorkers stand out conspicuously—Fulton

and Ericsson and Edison and Morse. And of all the free-booters that ever

terrorized the sea, none has left a more awful and enduring fame than a

once respectable resident of Liberty Street, renowned in song and story

for two centuries as Captain Kidd.

The hospitality of New York and her people is proverbial. Every

distinguished visitor to America for more than a century past has been

entertained here, officially or informally. Among the city’s guests

have been William IV. of England, while yet a sailor prince; Lafayette,

Louis Kossuth, the Prince of Wales, the Grand Duke Alexis, the Emperor

of Brazil, the Princess Eulalia, the Duke of Veragua, Li Hung Chang and

the Marquis Ito. Almost all the greatest preachers, orators, players,

singers, and instrumental performers of the nineteenth century have added

to their fame or wealth by facing New York audiences; and among the great

writers who have visited us have been Dickens, Thackeray, and Kipling.

While New York is easily first among the cities of the New World in

commercial importance, it is not on material bases only that her

supremacy rests. No community throughout the world responds more

generously to every appeal for sympathy or help, whether the call be

local, national or foreign. Her interest is keen in educational work of

every kind. Columbia University—one of the oldest of local institutions,

and more than local in its aims and fame and influence—has of late,

through the liberality of her sons and other citizens, been housed in a

manner commensurate with her requirements and aspirations; and so also

has the less venerable but justly honored New York University. And the

past few years have seen Barnard College for women and the Teachers

College (both allied with Columbia) emerge from the chrysalis state into

forms of beauty and power. The public-school system, moreover,—thanks

to a recent brief respite from Tammany control,—is in better condition

to-day than at any previous period of Tammany administration.

Of American literary activity, despite Boston’s ancient and deserved

prestige, it cannot be denied that New York is to-day the centre, as

it is the centre of the publishing trade, in books and periodicals.

Boston, with her splendid Public Library, has set an example which

the metropolis has been slow to follow; but the consolidation of the

Astor, Lenox and Tilden collections, and their prospective housing in a

magnificent and admirably situated building, has gone far to remove the

reproach incurred during long years of public indifference to popular

needs. The venerable Society Library, the modern and many-branched Free

Circulating Library and kindred institutions have helped to create and

in part to meet the demand which the Public Library in its new home may

reasonably be expected to satisfy. Equally important in their way are

those half-social, half-educational essays toward the solution of some

of the problems of the slums—the University Settlement of men and the

College Settlement of women. As a further indication that New York is not

wholly given over to the worship of Mammon, it may be mentioned that the

Greek Club, with its fortnightly meetings for the reading and discussion

of the classics, has been for more than three decades the only circle of

its kind in existence.

[Illustration: WASHINGTON ARCH.]

In art, the invaluable treasures of the Metropolitan Museum foster

the love of what is enduringly beautiful in sculpture, painting,

architecture, etc.; while the schools of this museum and of the National

Academy of Design and the Society of American Artists, to say nothing of

the more utilitarian classes of Cooper Institute and the School of Artist

Artisans, afford instruction in art of such a sort as to render foreign

study no longer indispensable, albeit no less attractive than of old.

Of music, vocal and instrumental, such feasts are spread before the local

amateur as can be matched for quality and abundance in no other city at

home or abroad, and while this is not true of the drama also, as the

Comédie Française has never come hither in a body, it is yet a fact that

nearly all that is best is seen, sooner or later, on the New York stage.

By what rapid strides the city is moving forward in some directions,

while halting lamentably in others, needs not to be pointed out. There

is expert testimony to the effect that in public morality it has at

least held its own during the past half-century; we trust it may some

day work out its salvation in things political, and cease to be the mild

milch cow of thirsty demagogues. It can never vie in picturesqueness and

historic interest with its European peers in population and importance,

nor atone by its singularly fortunate situation for its poverty in

little parks and its richness in rough-paved, right-angled and treeless

streets and avenues; yet it may some day rival even Paris in the absolute

beauty of its public and private buildings and historic monuments. A

brave beginning has been made, in the Washington Arch, the Madison

Square Garden, the Columbia and the New York University buildings, the

Washington, Hale and Farragut statues and certain churches, club-houses

and private dwellings. And in the Cathedral of St. John, the Public

Library, the Academy of Design and the Botanical and Zoölogical gardens,

a further stride will be made erelong in the only directions in which

æsthetic leadership seems possible.

[Illustration]

BROOKLYN

THE TOWN ON FREEDOM’S BATTLE-FIELD

BY HARRINGTON PUTNAM

The earliest Dutch settlements within the present borough limits are not

so old as the first hamlets on Manhattan. More than a score of years

after the houses and forts of New Amsterdam looked out across the East

River, the forest-crested heights of the west end of Long Island remained

in undisturbed Indian occupation.

The Dutch settlers were deterred, rather than attracted, by this

magnificent stretch of green woodlands extending along the high shore.

The Holland people were not accustomed to timber clearing and therefore

sought access to the island by the smoother meadow-lands of Gowanus,

and afterwards to the north where the sloping grasslands about the

Waalboght invited the settler to essay gardening without too much

preparation with the axe. The early Long Island farmers advanced on the

territory of Brooklyn by flank attacks, seeking to turn the wings of the

extended forest, rather than boldly to engage in the struggle with the

densely wooded heights in front. These pioneers were thrifty, energetic

Hollanders and Huguenots whose farms soon required regular communication

with Manhattan. In 1642 a public ferry was established between the

present foot of Fulton Street and a landing in Peck’s Slip. The houses

clustered about this Long Island landing constituted a little settlement

called The Ferry.

[Illustration: VIEW IN BROOKLYN IN THE OLDEN TIMES.]

As the Indians were dispossessed from their maize-fields, the colonists

found sites for a small village a mile or so inland. The modern visitor

who comes up Fulton Street should stop about the corner of Hoyt and

Smith Streets to locate this settlement and picture a primitive hamlet

of small one-story frame cottages, sometimes surrounded by palisades

for protection against attacks. The open lands were of small extent,

with forest to the east and west, and streams running south into a wide

morass, where is now Gowanus Canal. Undoubtedly the undrained land of

this settlement, receiving copious moisture from the surrounding forests,

contained many a marsh and fen like the homelands of Holland. So the

settlers called it the brookland, or Breuckelen, after an ancient village

of that name on the river Vecht in the Province of Utrecht. The records

of old Breuckelen are traced by local antiquarians of Utrecht to the time

of Tacitus. In its variant forms, Bracola, Broccke, Brocckede, Broicklede

and Brocklandia, it describes a moist meadow-land. Or, as a Dutch writer

declares, the town on the Vecht was called Breuckelen from the marshes

(_a paludibus_). Its beautiful gardens and quaint castles, as the

emigrants had beheld them when starting out from home, perhaps remained

in the imagination of the Long Island settlers as an ideal of what their

western home should some day become.

Just as Utrecht and Amersfoort are near-by towns to Breuckelen in

the Lowlands, so New Utrecht towards the south—near the present Fort

Hamilton—and Amersfoort (Flatlands) attested the determination of these

Netherlanders to preserve the associations of their origin between the

Rhine and the Zuyder Zee.

[Illustration: DENYSE’S FERRY.

THE FIRST PLACE AT WHICH THE BRITISH AND HESSIANS LANDED ON LONG ISLAND,

AUGUST 22, 1776. NOW FORT HAMILTON.]

The life of these hard-working settlers was not all hardship. Their

low houses with projecting roofs were strong and comfortable; the wide

spacious fireplaces gave warmth to a generous hospitality that laid on

the board wild turkeys and Gowanus oysters and other good eatables,

followed after the repast by the long clay pipes, which, when over, left

the weary toiler to be ushered to his night’s rest in a partitioned-off

bunk or _betste_. But these material comforts were not all the results

realized by the efforts of the first pioneers. These Dutch settlers were

zealous for religion, liberty, and good schools; and from the first were

not deficient in a commendable zeal for the public welfare.

Under the form of Colonial government the burghers were invited to

submit all difficulties to the Governor and council, who were fond of

the exercise of a strong, minute, and careful paternalism. The country

folk were not expected to intrude on the authorities their own ideas of

liberty, but merely to obey loyally what good, old, obstinate, arbitrary

Governor Stuyvesant should command. Yet even when he had spoken with the

official concurrence of his council, the eager spirits in Breuckelen

would often cavil, and boldly presume to come over to Manhattan to stir

up criticism and public remonstrance. So they were honored with a special

order. The folk of Breuckelen, Amersfoort and Midwout (Flatbush) in 1653

were directed to forbid their residents from attending political meetings

in New Amsterdam.

At this time the civic virtues were enforced in Breuckelen, and the good

of the village put before the preference of a private citizen to retire

from public office. The Governor would not allow any one to decline to

serve in an official capacity. The schepen-elect of Breuckelen proposed

not to continue in office for another term. He even said he would sooner

go back to Holland than remain burdened by the duties of schepen. The

Governor quickly took him at his word. The Sheriff was formally required

to notify him of this order of the Governor which stated with remarkable

clearness the obligation of good townsmen to the public and the penalty

for its neglect:

“If you will not accept to serve as schepen for the welfare of

the Village of Breuckelen, with others, your fellow residents,

then you must prepare yourself to sail in the ship _King

Solomon_ for Holland, agreeably to your utterance.”

No further refusals to hold office appear to have embarrassed the council.

The colonists of Breuckelen were specially solicitous for a meeting-house

and domine. They insisted that they should have good measure in

discourses and that if the services should be abbreviated by the

preacher, then on their side no tithes should be forthcoming. The

first meeting-house was begun in 1654 at Midwout (Flatbush). Soon they

worshipped in the partly roofed building. After much difficulty and

repeated applications to the Council it had been arranged that the Rev.

Mr. Polhemus should have his morning discourse at Flatbush, with his

evening service alternately at Midwout and in Breuckelen.

Governor Stuyvesant may have fancied that he had composed the difficulty.

Next winter, however, the Governor was presented with a further

remonstrance against the cutting-short of these alternating evening

devotions. They thus complained of this brief and scanty service:

“Every fortnight on Sundays he comes here, only in the

afternoon for a quarter of an hour, when he only gives us a

prayer in lieu of sermon, by which we can receive very little

instruction; while often, while one supposes the prayer or

sermon (whichever name might be preferred for it) is beginning,

then it is actually at an end, by which he contributes very

little to the edification of his congregation.”

To modern ears, this seems a strange grievance for legislation.

Governor Stuyvesant, however, admonished the Breuckelen folk to pay their

full tithes. Doubtless he privately reminded Mr. Polhemus of his duties

and obligations to give his people full service.

In three years they obtained a domine of their own. The Rev. Henricus

Selyns, a learned and devout young clergyman of a prominent Amsterdam

family came to Breuckelen in 1660. At first his parishioners worshipped

in a barn, but a meeting-house was soon erected. His spiritual labors

and influence were successful, and the four years of Mr. Selyns’s

ministrations were affectionately remembered. Compelled to return to

Holland by the last illness of his father, he came to America and settled

in New York eighteen years later. His warm admiration for Cotton Mather

is attested by a graceful Latin poem appended to the later editions of

the _Magnalia_.

Breuckelen was equally fortunate in a schoolmaster—Carel de Beauvois—a

cultured French Protestant from Leyden, who was appointed in Breuckelen

in 1661. Besides his duties, in the church, of precentor and Scripture

reader, it was stipulated that:

“He shall properly, diligently, and industriously attend to the

school, instill in the minds of the young the fear of the Lord,

and set them a good example; to open the school with prayer

and close with a Psalm, also to exercise the scholars in the

questions in the _groat regulen_ of the Rev. pious and learned

father Do. Johannes Megapolensis, Minister of the gospel in N.

Amsterdam.”

Here was a hamlet of but thirty-one families who were not satisfied until

they could listen to the ablest preaching of the day, and were also

favored with superior educational facilities.

Meanwhile the Dutch order was changing. The neighboring village of

Gravesend was being settled by the English. From Connecticut came

Quakers, who sowed the seeds of non-conformity and inculcated a new and

strange doctrine, that taxes should not be levied to maintain the clergy,

a principle especially attractive to those whose tithes were paid with a

grudging hand.

[Illustration: BUSHWICK TOWN-HOUSE AND CHURCH, 1800.]

At the end of the Dutch régime there were four or five little scattered

hamlets within the present borough. The Wallabout had the larger French

and Huguenot population. Eastward the English settlers were coming into

farming competition with their Dutch neighbors.

There was no great alarm or disappointment manifested on Long Island when

on a morning in August, 1664, a British fleet was found to have assembled

in the Narrows. Colonial militia under the British flag from New England

came through the Sound and encamped on the Breuckelen shore. On September

8, 1664, New Amsterdam yielded, and Governor Nicolls raised the flag

of Great Britain on the fort. Then New Amsterdam became New York; Long

Island and Staten Island, and probably part of Westchester County, were

made an English “shire,” and Breuckelen, after some changes of spelling,

was known as “Brooklyn in the West Riding of Yorkshire.”

This settlement of Dutch and Huguenots, maintained under the Colonial

government of New Amsterdam, in the score of years before the British

conquest had acquired a distinctive character. Contrary to a prevalent

opinion, these first Dutch settlements, in a sound and vigorous sense,

were essentially democratic. In the absence of class privileges—the

spirit to refer all questions to the supreme consideration of the general

welfare; to subordinate individual claims to the rights and advantage of

the public—Breuckelen and Vliessingen (Flushing) compared favorably in

civic life with contemporary villages in New England. As Holland had been

dyked against the sea by close, unremitting, and intimate co-operation—a

spirit further developed in the protracted struggle for independence—so

the smaller Dutch colonies in New York, while they kept their

agricultural character, retained a collective rather than an individual

ideal, which tended to exclude none from equal social opportunities. They

never had to struggle with the incubus of a modified feudalism, which,

though inevitably breaking up, was leaving its impress of regard for rank

and class privilege in the American colonies of British origin.

Colonial life under British rule was marked by more rigid laws as the

communities grew. The careful protection of common-lands was strictly

attended to, especially the town forests of Brooklyn against the

encroachment of those who would surreptitiously cut away the timber.

Trustees of the common woodlands were appointed; but in the year 1702

these lands were equitably divided and all allotted to each householder

in Brooklyn to insure their better protection.

Historic towns of the middle states · 第 8 / 17 段