SECT. III.

XV. Of this variety of defects and virtues in the same blood, we have

a striking example in the Antonian family, who were people of note

and fame in ancient Rome. Marcus Antonius, called the orator, may be

said to be the man who raised this house; for the Antonian family,

which was so well known in the first ages of Rome, became divided

into two branches; the one that was called Patrician became extinct;

and from the other, which was called Plebeian, although it is not

known by what accident they fell from their ancient splendour, sprung

Marcus Antonius. This man, who was of humble extraction, by his rare

and excellent qualities, raised himself to the first charges in the

republic, and exercised them gloriously; but his two sons Marcus

Antonius, called Creticus, and Caius Antonius, degenerated entirely

from the excellencies of their great father, and were men without

virtue, without conduct, and without valour. To Marcus Antonius

Creticus, succeeded Marcus Antonius the triumvir, in whom the vices of

his father were augmented, although he inherited part of the virtues

of his grandfather, for he was a good soldier, and no bad politician,

but a glutton, a drunkard, and lascivious, and this last failing,

caused him to sacrifice his life and his fortune to the beauty of the

dishonest Cleopatra. From so bad a father, descended an admirable

daughter, the wise, beautiful, modest, prudent, and spirited Antonia.

This eminent woman, who was beyond doubt the ornament of Rome in

her day, had two sons and a daughter, which differed as greatly in

their dispositions and manners, as if their blood and education had

been diametrically opposite. Germanicus the eldest, turned out an

able, discreet, mild, generous, and modest prince. Claudius, who was

afterwards emperor, was so stupid, and differed so greatly from his

brother and mother, that she was used to say her son Claudius was a

monster, for that nature had begun to make him a man, but had never

finished the work. Livilla, the sister of these two, was another

species of monster, for she was convicted of adultery, and murdering

her own husband. But the dissimilitude which we have hitherto remarked

among the individuals of this family, may be called trivial, compared

to that which appeared between Germanicus and his son Caligula; the

first, was an harmonious compound of virtues and graces, the last the

tail or fag-end of abominations; in fine, he was so bad, that people

were used to say, nature had made him as he was to shew to what a

degree mankind could be formed perverse. I have exposed to view, the

signal inequality, which in native disposition and manners, there was

between the individuals of the Antonian family, in order to illustrate,

the little dependance that is to be placed on how the children will

turn out, by conjectures, founded on the influence or example of the

parents. If we were to make the same analysis of other families, we

should find the same inequality with but little or no difference.

Essays, or discourses, vol. 1 (of 4) · 第 88 / 107 题