I spoke to the man. I touched him on the arm; he started; I pointed to

the fairy lights; “Do you remember,” I asked him, “when those things

came in?” “It was about ten years ago,” he said, without hesitation.

Then the present moment reasserted itself. He became again one of the

submerged. “Lend me half a crown,” he said. “On Monday morning I will

meet you here, and I’ll return it.” On the following Monday morning I

repaired to the china and glass shop. My friend, however, had forgotten

his appointment. Faith in my own expectations would have been shaken had

he kept it. I have only to add that he took the half crown as one

gentleman accepts, say, a cigar, from another. “Thanks, thanks,” he

said, airily, and he moved away with the bearing of one who is on his

way to his club. It was pleasant to observe the momentary return to the

old manner, though the contrast between the rags and the manner

presented an incongruity that could not pass unobserved, and I regret to

this day that I did not invite him to a chop-house and to a statement

from his own point of view as to the turning of fortune’s wheel.

I have said that the submerged do not, as a rule, give much trouble to

the police. They may have had their lapses from virtue, their

indiscretions, but they are not habitual criminals. The way of the

latter, so long as he keeps out of prison, is much more comfortable; for

transgressors the prison in which they pass most of their time is hard,

but the intervals of freedom are often times of plenty and revelry. The

submerged have no such intervals. The common rogue is generally a brazen

braggart, while the submerged is timid and ashamed. Of course, too, it

is by no means a common thing that he has been a gentleman; in East

London there are over ten thousand of the homeless and the wanderers,

loafers, and the casuals, with some criminals. I have before me twelve

cases investigated by an officer of the Salvation Army. The men belonged

to the following trades: confectioner, feather-bed dresser, tailor,

riverside laborer, sawyer, distiller, accountant in a bank, builder’s

laborer, plumber’s laborer, carman, match-seller, slater. Out of the

twelve, one, you see, had been a gentleman. The cause of destitution was

variously stated: age—it is very difficult in some trades to resist the

pressure of the young; cataract in one eye; inability to find work,

though young and strong; cut out by machinery; last place lost, by his

own fault—an admission reluctantly made and not explained; arm withered;

brought up to no trade, and so on.

As for their attempts to get work, the odd job appears to be the most

common, if the most hopeless. It will be seen from the cases given above

that the men can no longer get work at their own trades; now, they know

no other; what, then, are they to try? One cannot expect much resource

in an elderly man who has been making confectionery all his life, when

he has lost his place and his work; nor in a feather-bed dresser, when

feather-beds are no longer made. The former can do nothing in the world

except make sugar plums according to certain rules of the mystery; the

latter can do nothing but “dress” feather-beds. The ignorance and

helplessness of our craftsmen outside their own branch of work are

astonishing. So that the run after the odd job is explained. There is

nothing else for them to try. A great many working hands are dock

laborers, and fight every day for the chance of being taken on; but a

man advanced in years, with the sight of one eye gone or with a withered

arm—what chance has he of getting employment?

Sometimes they try to sell things—boot-laces and useful odds and ends.

But capital is wanted, a few shillings that can be locked up, and the

returns are deplorable. Sometimes they try matches; the man with the

“box o’ lights” is busy on Sundays and holidays outside the railway

station or at the stopping places of omnibus or tram; I believe that

threepence or so represents the average daily profit to be made in this

branch of commerce. A few try to sell newspapers, but they are cut out

by the boys who run and bawl and force their “specials” on the public.

Newspaper selling in the streets is only good when one has a popular

“pitch.” For instance, at Piccadilly Circus, where the stream of life

runs full and strong, a news-vender must do very well, but such

“pitches” are rare. Sometimes they offer the latest novelty out for one

penny. The trade in “novelties” depends on the attractiveness of the

wares; they must be really novel to catch the eye, and they must seem

desirable. The principal markets for the penny novelties are the kerb of

Broad Street and that on the north side of Cheapside. There is generally

a new “novelty” every week, and the ingenuity, the resource, the

invention of the unknown genius who provides it are beyond all praise.

When he hits the popular taste you may see the dealers selling their

pennyworths as fast as they can lay them out on their trays. Sometimes

there is a “frost”; the novelty does not “catch on.” Then the poor

dealer loses his little capital, and what happens to the inventor no one

knows.

It is recorded of a certain collector, who spent his whole life in

making a collection of the penny novelties, that at his death his

museum, his life’s work, was sold for the enormous sum of £12. I suppose

he might have found comfort in the reflection that there are a great

many men whose whole life’s work would not fetch as many pence. But his

soul must have felt a certain amount of dejection after so busy a

pursuit—and one covering so many years—to find it valued at no more than

£12. How many poets, novelists, preachers, journalists, could get as

much as £12 for their contributions to literature? After all, he was

above the average, this collector.

One would think that journalism would offer chances to the submerged.

Here, at least, is a door always wide open. I know of one case in which

a man just let out of prison met with a singular piece of good luck; he

was a man whose character was hopelessly gone, and could never be

retrieved, who had committed frauds and cheats innumerable upon all his

old companions, whose friends had long since plainly told him that

nothing, nothing more would be done for him, and that no mercy would be

shown him in case of further frauds. The day came when he was released

from prison; he stood outside and looked up and down and across the

road; he saw a stony-hearted world; amid this multitude of people there

was not one single person to whom he could turn for help; it was a cold,

gray morning; he had concocted several little schemes of villainy in his

cell; now, in the open air, he realized that they were hopeless; prison

had somewhat reduced his strength of mind; he felt that just then he

could not sit down and work out any one of his schemes; he saw no

prospect before him but that of a casual loafer in the streets,

submerged for life.

He turned to the east; he wandered away, he knew not where; he had a

small sum of money in his pocket, enough for a short time. After that,

the slouch along the streets.

Suddenly he came upon a street scene, a short, quick, dramatic scene

enacted in a few minutes. It fired his imagination; he saw a chance; he

bought paper and pen at a stationer’s shop; he went into a coffee-house,

called for a cup of coffee and the ink, and wrote a descriptive paper on

that scene; when it was done he took it to the office of a great daily

paper, and asked to see one of the subeditors. His paper was read and

accepted; he was told that he might bring more; he did bring more; he

became one of the staff; he was presently sent abroad on the business of

that paper. I do not know whether he thought fit to tell the editor

anything about his own record. Well, the man ought to have become one of

the submerged; but, you see, he was a scholar and a man of imagination;

he had been engaged, it is true, in frauds, and was morally hopeless and

corrupt through and through, but he had not lost his power of will; he

had had no experience of the disappointments and the step-by-step

descent which rob the submerged of his energy and his resource. The

example only proves that journalism opens its doors in vain for the

ordinary submerged who has lost his grasp of realities.

For those who are strong enough to walk about the streets at an even

pace for a great many hours a day the sandwich offers a tolerably safe

means of living. Remember, however, that your truly submerged very

often, by reason of age and infirmities,—some physical weakness

generally appears after a time to aggravate the misery,—cannot undergo

the fatigue of carrying the boards all day. If, however, the strength is

there the work can generally be found at a shilling or one shilling and

twopence a day. It is work which entirely suits any man who has left off

trying. At the same time, it is a help to the young man who for the

moment may be down on his luck. For the former it means simply the

fatigue of walking about for so many hours on end. It is interesting to

walk slowly along the pavement while the single file of sandwich men

pass along, one after the other. They never talk, there is no exchange

of jokes, they never chaff the workmen or the girls or the lads or the

drivers who threaten to run over them; on the other hand, no one chaffs

them; they are by common consent held sacred, as men in the world but

not of the world. Some of them carry a pipe between their lips, but

merely as a habit; it is an empty pipe; there is no speculation in their

faces; they manifest no interest in anything; there may be a police row

and a fight, there may be a horse down, the sandwich man pays no

attention; he looks neither to the right nor to the left; the show that

he advertises is not for himself; the wares exposed in the shop-windows

are not for him to buy; the moving panorama, the procession of active

and eager life along which he marches is nothing to him; he takes no

longer any interest in anything; he is like the hermit, the anchorite,

the recluse—he is dead to the world; he is without friends, without

money, without work, without hope; his mind has nothing to occupy it; he

thinks of vacant space; he walks in his sleep; he is comatose; if he

lifts his eyes and looks upon the world it must be in wonder that his

own figure is not in its proper place, its old place—it ought to be

there. Why is it not? How did he get into the gutter, one of a line in

single file, with a board in front of him and a board behind him?

Newsboys shout their latest; the shops light up till every street is a

fairyland of brightness; the carriages go up and down. To all the sights

around him, to the meaning of the show and to the dance of life, which

is so often the dance of death, the sandwich man remains indifferent. He

has nothing left of all the joys and toys and dreams and vanities of the

world; the past is a blurred memory on which he will not dwell if he can

help it; there is no future for him, only the day’s tramp; the shilling

at the end of it; fivepence will give him warmth, light, a bed, and a

modicum of food; eightpence, or, if he is lucky, tenpence, must find him

food, drink, and tobacco for the following day, with some means of

keeping the mud and water out of his boots.

[Illustration: Sandwich-men.]

A small contingent of the submerged is formed by the men who, not being

habitual and hardened criminals, have been in prison and have not only

found employment difficult and even impossible in consequence of a

misfortune which many worse than themselves escape, but have returned to

the world broken down by the terrible discipline of an English prison.

The prison receives a man; it turns out a machine, an obedient machine,

as obedient as the dog which follows at heel: it obeys cowering; the

machine has no self-respect left, and no power of initiative; the prison

bird can only henceforth live in a cage where he is not called upon to

earn his livelihood or to carry on a trade. I know little about prisons

in other countries, but I doubt whether any system has ever been

invented more effective in destroying the manhood of the poor wretches

who are subjected to its laws than the prison system of Great Britain.

There is no sadder sight imaginable than the reception of a released

prisoner by the Salvation Army Refuge for these unfortunate men. Every

day their officer attends at the prison doors at the hour of discharge,

and invites the men, as they come out, to the refuge. They come in dazed

and pale; the light, the air, the freedom, the absence of the man of

authority with the keys—all together make them giddy; they are received

with a welcome and a handshake which make them suspicious; they are

invited to sit down and take food; they obey with a shrinking readiness

which brings a flush of shame to the spectator’s face. See; after a

little they push the plate away; it is solid food—they cannot take it;

they have been so long accustomed to gruel that a plate of meat is too

much for them; they can neither eat nor talk; they cannot respond even

to kindliness; they cannot understand it; the man—the lost manhood—has

to be built up again. The Salvation Army’s Helping Hand rescues some; it

fails with some; even where it fails, some good effect must be left in

their minds by the show of friendliness and kindness.

The best place to find the submerged is at one of the shelters of the

Salvation Army. Here they give for fourpence a large pot of coffee, tea,

or cocoa, with a hunch of bread; it is probably the best meal that the

men have had that day; the fourpence also entitles them to a warm and

well-lighted room with benches and tables, the means of getting a good

wash and a bed. For a smaller sum the accommodation is not so good.

Every evening the shelters are quite full; every evening there is held

that kind of service, with addresses, prayers, and the singing of hymns,

which is called a Salvation Meeting. Well, the men feel, at last, that

they are with friends; the lasses with the banjos and the tambourines,

the men in the jerseys who speak to them—these are not making any money

out of them, they are working for them, they are taking an immense

amount of pains entirely on their behalf; I cannot but believe—indeed, I

know—that among this poor wreckage of society their efforts meet with

the kind of response that is most desired.

Or, if you can get so far out, there is Medland Hall by the riverside at

Ratcliffe. It was formerly a Dissenting chapel; it is now a free

lodging-house. No one pays anything; there are bunks ranged in lines

over the floor—they are rather like coffins, it is true; these bunks are

provided with mattresses, and for sheet and blanket with American cloth,

which can be easily kept clean. I believe that bread is also provided.

An effort is made to find out a way of helping the men to work; the

likely young fellows are sent to the recruiting sergeants; some

connection has been formed with the railway companies for men young and

strong.

The casual ward is a place to which no one will go if he can possibly

avoid it. This refuge will only receive the actual destitute, those who

have no money at all; their rations of food are light, to say the least.

The allowance for young and old, strong and weak, is the same—for

breakfast, half a pound of gruel and eight ounces of bread; the same for

supper; for dinner, eight ounces of bread and an ounce and a half of

cheese; for drink, cold water. The casual is put into a cell by himself

and there locked up; in the morning, when he ought to be out and looking

for work, he is detained to do stone-breaking or oakum-picking—half a

ton of stone-breaking or four pounds of oakum, a task so heavy that it

takes him the best part of the day, and he is lucky if he is not

detained as a punishment for another night and day, with a corresponding

increase in the task imposed upon him.

One would like to take some of the permanent officials of the Local

Government Board and set them to the same work _on the same food_. What

is the man’s crime? Poverty. There may be other crimes which have

reduced him to this condition of destitution, but no questions are

asked. It is poverty, poverty, nothing but poverty, for which this

treatment is the punishment. I once visited a casual ward; it was, I

believe, Saturday afternoon. I was shown one cell occupied by a

woe-begone young country lad; he was sitting alone; I think he had done

his task; he was to be a prisoner till Monday morning—such was the

infamy of his poverty. Lucky for him if he was not kept over Monday, to

pick more oakum and to reduce his strength and impair his constitution

by more starvation on gruel and bread weighed out by ounces. With

refuges for the destitute where they are starved and made to work hard

on insufficient food, with prisons for the criminal where manhood is

crushed and strength is destroyed by feeding men on gruel, we support

bravely the character of a country obedient to the laws of God and

marching in the footsteps of Christ.

Such are the submerged—an army of brokendown gentlemen, ruined

professional men, penniless clerks, bankrupt traders, working-men who

are out of work through age or infirmity, victims of drink, ex-prisoners

and convicts, but not habitual criminals. It is a helpless and a

hopeless army; I have said already that this is the note of the

submerged. We shall see presently what is done for this great body of

misery. One thing must be remembered. There are lower levels than those

reached by this army; physicians, clergymen, missionaries, journalists,

whisper things far worse than can be alleged against the submerged. And

we have not included among them the tramp, that class whose blood is

charged with restlessness hereditary, who cannot remain long in any

place, who cannot enter upon steady work, who are driven by their

restlessness, as by a whip of scorpions, along the roads. Not the tramp,

nor the sturdy rogue, nor the professional criminal, nor the vile

wretches who live by the vilest trades, may be numbered among the

submerged. They fall noiselessly from their place of honor, they live

noiselessly in their place of dishonor; they might perhaps be brought

back to work, but the cases of recovery must be very few in proportion,

because the causes which dragged them down are those which prevent them

from being dragged up. If any physician can give back to the submerged

patience, resolution, will, courage, hope, he may reclaim them. If that

cannot be done they must remain as they are.

My illustration of the submerged seems to have little to do with East

London. As a fact, there is no respect paid to places. When a man has

belonged to the West End his wandering feet, over which, as over his

other actions, the patient has no control, carry him about the scenes of

his former prosperity without his taking any steps to prevent it. Old

acquaintances recognize him, and pass him by with a cold eye which

denies the recognition and conceals the pity. He himself sees nobody and

remembers nobody. In the same way a man who belongs by birth and habits

to East London will remain there after he has come to grief. Or, if the

former gentleman, for some reason, gets into East London and finds out

its ways, with the cheap lodgings, the shelters, the “ha’penny” cups of

cocoa, and the many helping hands from which he may get some kind of

relief he will stay in East London. We need not hesitate about awarding

the palm of nourishing or starving more or fewer of the submerged to

East or West London. It is enough to know that they exist in both

quarters, and that, according to statistics, there are over ten thousand

of them in East London alone. If any help can be found for this mass of

wreckage let us find that help and give it with full hands and in

measure overflowing, for indeed of all those who are poor and distressed

and unhappy the company of the submerged are the most wretched. Even if,

as is almost always the case, they have brought their punishment upon

themselves by the folly of the prodigal, the weakness of those who take

the Easy Way, and the wickedness of those who indulge the natural

inclination to vice, let us not inquire too closely into the record; let

us still stretch out our hand of help; if we can restore some of

them—even a few, even one here and there—to the life of honesty among

folk of good repute, we must still leave them the shameful memory of the

past. That punishment we cannot avert; we cannot remove it from them.

The world will forgive them, but how shall we find that Lethe whose

waters will enable them to forgive themselves? “Arise”—it is easy for

the world to say—“thy sins shall no longer be imputed to thee for a

reproach and a hissing.” Alas! When the better self returns, how shall

that poor wretch cease to reproach himself?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

X

THE MEMORIES OF THE PAST

------------------------------------------------------------------------

X

THE MEMORIES OF THE PAST

I HAVE so often insisted that East London must be regarded as a city of

many crafts—the working-man’s city—that it may seem contradictory to

call attention to another aspect. That part of East London with which we

have been most concerned is the densely populated part lying north of

the river and including all that part west of the river Lea as far north

as Dalston, Clapton, and Hackney, and east of that river, including Bow,

Stratford, Walthamstow, Wanstead, Forest Gate, Bromley West, and East

Ham and Barking. It includes, in a word, very nearly all the ancient

villages and hamlets whose names may be found upon the map. But there is

a fringe, and there are extensions. When one emerges at last from

streets which seem to have no end, when the nightmare of a world which

is all streets, with never a field or an orchard or a hillside left,

begins to break, when it is cleared away, as an ugly dream by the

daylight, by the reappearance of trees and large gardens and wide roads,

then we discover the fringe. Part of Stoke Newington, part of Stamford

Hill, a small part of Tottenham, part of Snaresbrook, belong to the

fringe. Here we get roads lined with trees, villas with trees in front

gardens, modern churches built all after the same half-dozen patterns,

in true proportions, correct and without inspiration; here we get

windows filled with flowers, and here presently we get houses well apart

and a wealth of creepers and of flowering shrubs; which means that the

breath of the crowded City is left behind.

But there are further extensions; the suburbs of East London are not

confined within the limits of the map of London; they stretch out far

afield, they include Chigwell and Chingford and Theydon Bois, and all

the villages round Epping Forest. Dotted about everywhere in this

extension are stately houses with large gardens and grounds, the

residences of the manufacturers and the employers, not those of the

small trades of East London, where the master is often but one degree

better off than the employee, but those of the factories and the works;

theirs is the capital invested; theirs is the enterprise; theirs the wit

and courage which have made them succeed; theirs is the wealth. This

extension is a delightful place in early summer; it is full of trees;

there are old churches, and there is “the” forest—the people of East

London always speak of “the” forest, for to them there is no other. It

is, also, a part of London very little visited; it is, to begin with,

somewhat inaccessible; one who would visit it from the West End has to

get first into the City. In the next chapter we will discourse on what

may be seen by the curious who would explore the forest and its

surroundings. Let us return to my group of villages.

To the American, and to most of my own people, the names of Stoke

Newington, Hackney, Stepney, Mile End, and the rest are names and

nothing else; they awaken no more memories than a list of Australian or

American townships. Let me try to endow these names with associations; I

would make them, if possible, venerable by means of their association

with those who have gone before. The suburban life of London belongs

essentially to the eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries. In the

former only the wealthy had their country, as well as their town,

houses; in the latter there have been no town houses left in the City at

all, and the whole of the people who every day carry on their business

in the City have now their suburban residences.

East London · 第 13 / 20 段