Belgian Boy Tells Story of Aerschot

[From THE NEW YORK TIMES, Nov. 18, 1914.]

_The following letter from an American civil engineer, lately

in business in Belgium, whose reliability is vouched for by

the person named in his letter as having been associated with

him in business in Pittsburgh, has been received by_ THE

TIMES:

B----, ----shire, England,

Oct. 3, 1914.

_To the Editor of The New York Times:_

I have just read an article in your issue of Sept. 16 on the German

killings at Aerschot, Belgium. You suggest an investigation into this

crime. I happen to have a first-hand contribution, which I herewith

inclose.

The writer is an American citizen, civil engineer, late partner of ----

---- of Pittsburgh, Penn., to whom you can refer. When war was declared I

had an engineering office in Belgium. As the use of telegraph and

telephone was suddenly stopped there remained nothing but to close the

office. I therefore paid off my employes, among whom was a young office

boy, a Belgian, about 16 years old, frail stature, small build, almost

childlike appearance, but well educated and intelligent.

The inclosed narrative is a strict translation of a letter received from

the boy. This is, therefore, first-hand information, and my knowledge of

the character of the boy, as well as the ring in what he has to tell,

justifies me in vouching for the correctness of his narrative.

In reading these pages, you will note a weak point in our administration

of charity, which has been repeatedly brought to my attention. England

has every intention to act generously and warm-heartedly with the

Belgian people, who you may say have been sacrificed for the Allies.

They tender homes for refugees and transportation from Belgian shores to

England. They give out money liberally, but when this boy, utterly

without means, friends or papers arrived in Antwerp, there is no help

for him. If he had been smaller, somebody would have treated him as a

child and brought him along. If his father had not been dragged off into

slavery in Germany he might with an old aunt have represented a family.

Had he been able to preserve his legitimatization papers the Belgian

authorities would have given him some support. Had he been older, he

would have been enlisted in the defense of his country.

Here, therefore, is an individual, not small enough, not large enough,

not having relations enough and not having any documents. He was worthy

of help, but did not fit in anywhere. I am now doing my best to get

money over to him through the Belgian National Bank, also to get him

some sort of a paper, through the Belgian Legation in London, which will

enable him at least to cross the frontier to Holland, whence he might be

able to pay for his way to England.

I hope you will publish the boy's letter, _but it is necessary that you

suppress both his and the writer's name_. Should either be given and the

boy remain in Belgium, _it may cost him his life_. The mention of my own

may later on cause me difficulties with our German friends of liberty.

Yours truly,

---- ----.

[Inclosure.]

Translation of letter received from one of my employes, a young Belgian

boy of about 16 years of age. Received in England Sept. 28, 1914.

ANTWERP, Sept. 23, 1914.

Dear Sir: As you correctly said in my testimonial when you were closing

the office, the war has isolated Belgium. Really I can well say that I

have been painfully struck by this scourge, and I permit myself, dear

Sir, to give you a little description of my Calvary.

Your offices were closed in the beginning of August. As I did not know

what to do and as the fatherland had not enough men to defend its

territory I tried to get myself accepted as a volunteer.

On Aug. 10 I went to Aerschot, my native town, to get my certificate of

good conduct. Then I went to Louvain to have same signed by the

commander of the place. This gentleman sent me to St. Nicholas and

thence to Hemixem, where I was rejected as too young. I then decided to

return to Brussels, passing through Aerschot. Here my aunt asked me to

stay with her, saying that she was afraid of the Germans.

I remained at Aerschot. This was Aug. 15. Suddenly, on the 19th, at 9

o'clock in the morning, after a terrible bombardment, the Germans made

their entry into Aerschot. In the first street which they passed through

they broke into the houses. They brought out six men whom I knew very

well and immediately shot them. Learning of this, I fled to Louvain,

where I arrived on Aug. 19 at 1 o'clock.

At 1:30 P.M. the Germans entered Louvain. They did not do anything to

the people in the beginning. On the following Saturday, Aug. 22, I

started to return to Aerschot, as I had no money. (All my money was

still in Brussels.) The whole distance from Louvain to Aerschot I saw

nothing but German armies, always Germans. They did not say a word to me

until I suddenly found myself alone with three of the "Todeshusaren,"

(Death's Head Hussars,) the vanguard of their regiment. They arrested me

at the point of the revolver, demanded where I was going, and why I had

run away from Aerschot. They said that the whole of Aerschot was now on

fire, because the son of the Burgomaster had killed a General. Finally

they searched me from head to foot, and I heard them discuss the

question of my fate.

Finally the non-commissioned officer told me that I could continue on my

way; that they would certainly take care of me in Aerschot, as I had

been firing at Germans, and they would shoot me when I arrived. I would

have liked better to return to Louvain, but with an imperious gesture he

pointed out my road to Aerschot, and I continued. On arriving within a

few hundred meters of the town I was arrested once more.

I forgot to tell you that of all the houses which I passed between

Louvain and Aerschot, there were only a few left intact. Upon these the

Germans had written in chalk in the German language: "Please spare. Good

people. Do not burn." Lying along the road I saw many dead horses

putrefying. There were also to be seen pigs, goats, and cows which had

nothing to eat, and which were howling like wild beasts. Not a soul was

to be seen in the houses or in the streets. Everything was empty.

I was then arrested when a short distance from Aerschot. There were with

me two or three families from Sichem, a village between Diest and

Aerschot. We remained in the fields alongside the road, while the

Prussian regiments with their artillery continued to pass by. When the

artillery had passed we were marched at the point of the bayonet to the

church in Aerschot. On arrival at the church the families of Sichem

(there were at least twenty small children) were permitted to continue

on their way, and the non-commissioned officer, delighted that I could

speak German, permitted me to go to my aunt's house.

The aspect of the town was terrible. Not more than half the houses were

standing. In the first three streets which the Germans traversed there

was not a single house left. There was not a house in the town but had

been pillaged. All doors had been burst open. There was nothing, nothing

left. The stench in the streets was insupportable.

I then went home, or, rather, I should say, I went to the house where my

father had always been boarding. You know, perhaps, that my mother died

twelve years ago. I did not find my father, but according to what the

people told me he had been arrested, and, with five other Aerschot men,

taken to Germany--I do not know for what purpose.

I got into this house without any difficulty, because the door was

smashed in. I stayed there from Saturday, Aug. 22, up to Wednesday, the

26th, a little more comfortable. There was nothing to eat left in the

house. I lived on what a few women who remained in Aerschot could give

me. I was forced to go with the soldiers into the cellars of M.X.,

director of a large factory, to hunt for wine. As recompense I got a

loaf. It was not much, but at this moment it meant very much for me.

On Wednesday, Aug. 26, we were all once more locked up in the church. It

was then half-past four in the afternoon. We could not get out, even for

our necessities. On Thursday, about 9 o'clock, each of us was given a

piece of bread and a glass of water. This was to last the whole day. At

10 o'clock a Lieutenant came in, accompanied by fifteen soldiers. He

placed all the men who were left in a square, selected seventy of us and

ordered us out to bury the corpses of Germans and Belgians around the

town, which had been lying there since the battle of the 19th. That was

a week that these bodies had remained there, and it is no use to ask if

there was a stench. Afterward we had to clean the streets, and then it

was evening.

They just got ready to shoot us. There were then ten of us. The guns had

already been leveled at us, when suddenly a German soldier ran out

shouting that we had not fired on them. A few minutes before we had

heard rifle firing and the Germans said it was the Aerschot people who

were shooting, though all these had been locked up in the church and we

were the only inhabitants then in the streets, cleaning them, under

surveillance of Germans. It was this German who saved our lives.

Picture to yourself what we have suffered! It is impossible to describe.

On Aug. 28 we were brought to Louvain, always guarded by German

soldiers. There were with us about twenty old men, over eighty years of

age. These were placed in two carts, tied to one another in pairs. I and

about twenty of my unfortunate compatriots had then to pull the carts

all the way to Louvain. It was hard, but that could be supported all the

same.

On arriving at Louvain I saw with my own eyes a German who shot at us.

The Germans who were at the station shouted "The civilians have been

shooting," and commenced a fusillade against us. Many of us fell dead,

others wounded, but I had the chance to run away.

I now took the road to Tirlemont, marching all the time among German

camps. Once I was arrested. Again they wanted to shoot me, insisting

that I was a student of the University of Louvain. The Germans pretend

it was the student who had caused the population in Louvain to shoot at

them. However, my youth saved me, and I was set at liberty.

I arrived in this way, making small marches, sleeping under the stars,

at a small village, St. Pierre Rhode, six miles from Aerschot. This

village had not been occupied by the Germans. A benevolent farmer took

me in, and I lived there peacefully until Wednesday, Sept. 9. On that

day the Germans arrived. They took us all with them and we had to march

in front of them to prevent the Belgians from shooting. After one hour

they gave us our liberty.

The Belgians had now retaken Aerschot. I returned there as quickly as I

could. Only a few houses were still burning. It was Sept. 10. I left

again in the afternoon at 4 o'clock, taking a train, together with the

railway officials, and arrived at 6 P.M. in Antwerp, where I now stay

without any resources.

All my money, the 20 francs which you presented me and my salary for

five weeks, as well as my little savings, are lying in Brussels, and I

cannot get at them. I cannot work, because there is no work to be got. I

cannot cross over to England, as, to do this, it is necessary that there

should be a whole family. In these horrible circumstances, I

respectfully take the liberty of addressing you, and I hope you will aid

me as best you can. I swear to you that I shall pay you back all that

you give me. I have here in Antwerp no place, no family. The town will

not give me any aid, because I have no papers to prove my identity. I

threw all my papers away for fear of the Germans. I count then on you

with a firm hope to pay you back later.

Please accept, dear Sir, my respectful greetings.

---- ----.

* * * * *

_Special to The New York Times._

PITTSBURGH, Penn., Oct. 17.--The Pittsburgh civil engineer mentioned as

the former partner of the writer of the letter to THE TIMES citing acts

of the Germans in Belgium, is well known here. He was informed by THE

TIMES correspondent tonight that he had been named by the writer of the

letter as likely to testify to his trustworthiness and was asked if he

cared to say anything regarding this. He replied:

"While I have no idea what my former partner has written to THE TIMES, I

would credit his statements, whatever they might be."

The New York Times Current History: the European War, February, 1915 · 第 61 / 119 题