Richard Harding Davis's Comment

_To the Editor of The New York Times_:

I have just seen a letter in THE TIMES from a correspondent in the

German trenches outside of Rheims. He reports a statement made to him by

Lieut. Wengler of the Heavy Artillery, who claims he is the officer who

shelled the cathedral, at which he fired two shots, and "only two."

Wengler says, "The French observer on the cathedral was first noticed on

Sept. 13 ... the fellow continued 'on the job' quite shamelessly until

the 18th, when I aimed two shots at the cathedral and only two. No more

were needed to dislodge him. One from a 15-centimeter howitzer struck

the top of the 'observation tower,' the other, from a 21-centimeter

mortar, hit the roof and set it on fire. I wanted to dislodge the

observer with the least possible damage to the fine old cathedral ...

the French also had a battery placed about 100 yards from the

cathedral."

Editorially THE TIMES says such a statement may prove of "value as

evidence." May I also, as evidence, tell what I saw? I arrived at the

cathedral at 3 o'clock in the afternoon of the day Lieut. Wengler says

he fired two shells, one of which hit the observation tower and one of

which set fire to the roof. Up to the hour of 3, howitzer shells had

passed through the southern wall of the cathedral, killing two of the

German wounded inside, had wrecked the Grand Hotel opposite the

cathedral, knocked down four houses immediately facing it, and in a

dozen places torn up immense holes in the cathedral square. Twenty-four

hours after Lieut. Wengler claims he ceased firing shells set fire to

the roof and utterly wrecked the chapel of the cathedral and the

Archbishop's palace, which is joined to the cathedral by a yard no wider

than Fifth Avenue, and in the direction of the German guns the two

shells fired by Lieut. Wengler had already wrecked all that part of the

city surrounding the cathedral for a quarter of a mile.

To get an idea of the destruction, suppose St. Patrick's Cathedral, on

Fifth Avenue, to be the Rheims Cathedral, the Union Club, and the

Vanderbilt houses, the chapel and Archbishop's palace, and all the

buildings running north from St. Patrick's Cathedral to Central Park and

east and west to Madison Avenue and Sixth Avenue, that part of Rheims

that was utterly wrecked. That gives you some idea of the effectiveness

of Lieut. Wengler's fire.

"Father," he says, "I cannot tell a lie. I did it with only two shells!"

The statement of Lieut. Wengler that the French placed a battery a

hundred yards from the cathedral also is interesting. The cathedral

stands in a maze of twisting narrow lanes. From no spot within a quarter

of a mile of it could you drive a golf ball without smashing a window a

hundred feet distant. To place a battery of artillery a hundred yards

from the Rheims Cathedral with the intent of firing upon the German

position would be like placing a battery in Wall Street with the idea of

shelling Germans in the Bronx. Before your shells reached the Bronx you

first would have to destroy all of Northern New York.

Wengler says the only shells aimed at the cathedral were fired by him on

the 18th, and that after that date neither he nor any other officer

fired a shot. On the 22d I was in the cathedral. It was then being

shelled. I was with the Abbé Chinot, Gerald Morgan of this city, Capt.

Granville Fortescue of Washington, and on the steps of the cathedral was

Robert Bacon, our ex-Ambassador to France.

The "evidence" of Lieut. Wengler is a question of veracity. It lies

between him and these gentlemen. I am content to let it go at that.

The New York Times Current History: the European War, February, 1915 · 第 45 / 119 题