VII. REPORT OF MR H. C. RIZER

Smithsonian Institution,

Bureau of Ethnology,

Washington, _November 24, 1891_.

Honorable J. W. Powell,

_Director of the Bureau of Ethnology_.

Sir: Complying with your order directing me to proceed to Florence,

Arizona, to witness the closing up of the work under contract for

the preservation of Casa Grande ruin near that place, and to report

to you the amount and character of the work accomplished, certifying

the amount due the contractors under each item, I have the honor to

submit the following report:

I visited the ruin first on October 20, and found the work well

advanced. Steady progress was made from said date until October 31,

the limitation expressed in the contract for prosecuting it.

In order to ascertain the exact location of Casa Grande ruin and to

aid me in the determination of the amount of work performed by the

contractors, I employed Mr Albert T. Colton, a civil engineer and

the official surveyor of Pinal county, Arizona, within the limits of

which the ruin stands. From actual measurements made by Mr Colton,

based upon official notes in his custody, he informed me the ruin

was located in the northeast corner of the northwest quarter of the

southwest quarter of section 16 of township 5 south, range 8 east. A

congressional township plat on which Mr Colton has marked the exact

location of the ruin is filed herewith, marked Exhibit A, and made a

part of this report [plate CXXV].

On October 29 Mr Colton at my instance took measurements of the

brickwork in underpinning and filling in cavities in the walls and

of the excavation done by the contractors. His estimate, based upon

these measurements, was submitted to me in writing. It is filed

herewith, marked Exhibit B, and is made a part of this report.

I find from these measurements that the contractors excavated and

removed to a point 100 yards from the ruin 570 cubic yards of

débris, 271 cubic yards of which were removed from the interior and

299 cubic yards from the exterior walls of the building, within an

area of 10 feet of said walls.

I also find the amount of underpinning done by the contractors to be

919 cubic feet, and the amount of filling in openings to be 1,161

cubic feet. The underpinning is done with hard-burned brick laid in

good cement mortar extending to a depth of 12 inches below the

original ground level. The face of the brickwork is set back from 1

to 2 inches from the face of the wall and plastered with a coat of

good cement mortar, making it flush with the outer wall.

In filling in cavities more than 500 lineal feet of 2 by 4 inch

squared lumber was used to replace broken-out lintels and laid side

by side across nearly the whole thickness of the walls, with not

more than 1 inch space between the boards. They occupy the same

horizontal planes as the original lintels, and the walls are trimmed

to afford solid resting places for them. The openings above the

lintels have been filled in the same manner as the underpinning,

with hard-burned brick set back 1 inch from the wall surfaces and

plastered with a coating of cement mortar, bringing it out flush

with the original wall.

I further find that the contractors have placed one wooden brace and

two iron braces as designated in the specifications. The wooden

brace is constructed of two pieces of good, clear, squared lumber 6

by 8 inches in cross section, well bolted together, secured by

plates of boiler iron three-eighths of an inch thick and 14 by 18

inches square. The specifications provide for this brace to run from

the south side of the south wall through the center room with a

plate on each side of the south wall and one on each side of the

wall on the north side of the center room. The contractors have

deviated from these requirements in having extended the said brace

through the entire length of the building and placed the plates that

were specified for the north wall of the center room on the

respective sides of the extreme north wall of the building. While

this deviation adds nothing to the security of the south wall, it is

doubtless as effective as it would have been had it been placed as

contemplated in the plan. It may in some degree strengthen the north

wall, and I recommend that it be accepted as in compliance with the

terms of the contract. The two iron rods called for in the

specifications are of wrought iron 1½ inches in diameter, secured by

boiler-iron plates three-eighths of an inch thick and 12 inches in

diameter, securely fastened as required in the specifications. There

was a necessary deviation from the plan as to the place the rod

nearest the east side of the building should be placed. Early in the

prosecution of the work a portion of the debris in contact with the

eastern wall was removed. During the night following this a section

of the south end of the east wall fell, carrying with it that

portion of the wall between the south and east rooms to which the

plan required said rod to be attached. In consequence the

contractors placed the rod so as to connect it with the portion of

the wall still intact. As a brace to the south wall it is placed

advantageously. In excavation, underpinning, and filling in the

contractors have exceeded the limitations prescribed in the

contract, and have therefore performed an amount of work for the

remuneration of which there is no provision. The following table

shows the amount of work authorized in each of the four items with

reference to which the contract was drawn and the amount actually

performed by contractors:

Item |1. Excavating and clearing out débris.

| |2. Underpinning walls.

| | |3. Filling in cavities.

| | | |4. Braces.

----------------------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+

Maximum authorized | 350 cubic | 750 cubic | 825 | 1 wood |

| yards | feet | cubic feet | and 1 iron|

| | | | |

Performed by | 570 cubic | 919 cubic | 1,161 | 1 wood and|

contractors | yards | feet | cubic feet | 2 iron |

| | | | |

Excess | 220 cubic | 169 cubic | 336 | |

| yards | feet | cubic feet | |

| | | | |

Contract Price | 60 cents | $1 per | $1 per | $200 |

| per cubic | cubic foot| cubic foot | |

| yard | | | |

| | | | |

Maximum allowances | $210 | $750 | 825 | 200 |

under contract | | | | |

| | | | |

Amount contractors | 342 | 919 | 1,161 | 200 |

claim to have | | | | |

earned | | | | |

| | | | |

Excess of contractors'| 132 | 169 | 336 | |

claim over amount | | | | |

authorized | | | | |

----------------------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+

From this it will be observed that, taking the rate of compensation

provided for in the contract as a basis, the contractors have

performed work in excess of that authorized to the amount of $638

[$637]. They are fully advised that there is no provision for the

payment of this excess. The requirements of the contract are, in my

opinion, fully met in the quality of material used and the work

performed.

The preservation of the ruin is incomplete. There are six places

where lintels have disappeared and not been replaced and a

corresponding number of cavities that should be filled. Deep seams

have been cut in the walls by the action of the elements, and unless

far greater provision is made for its protection the work already

done will be of small avail.

At many places where the débris came in contact with the wall

disintegration seems to have resulted. At a slight touch it

frequently crumbles. Owing to this fact two sections of the wall

fell during the progress of the work when the debris was

removed--one from the east wall, described above, and one from the

south wall near the west extremity. These breaches maybe observed as

shown in two of the six accompanying photographs [plates CXX, CXXI].

These photographs were taken ten days before the work was completed.

There being no professional photographer in that vicinity I was

compelled to take advantage of the kind offer of Mr H. H. Burrell,

an amateur photographer, who happened to be there at that time. Thus

the views I secured failed to show all the brickwork done. The

coating of mortar was not applied until after the date on which the

views were taken, in consequence of which the bare bricks are shown

in the views.

During the progress of work in removing the debris a number of

articles of interest to the ethnologist were found at various depths

and localities. They have been packed by the contractors and will be

sent to the National Museum.

The floors in the center, north, and east rooms were found to be

about 8 feet above the ground surface. The material was similar to

that of which the walls are composed. The west and south rooms

appeared to have had floors at one time on the same level, but the

surfaces had disintegrated, and there was a mass of loose earth,

which was removed to a depth of 6.9 feet below the floors of the

other three rooms, where another floor was found slightly less firm

than those.

Reverend Isaac T. Whittemore, who has been designated by the

honorable the Secretary of the Interior as the custodian of the

ruin, rendered me valuable assistance in the performance of my

mission. He has manifested a zealous concern for the preservation of

the ruin and has given time and labor to that end. There is no

provision for his just compensation. I therefore recommend that if

any funds be found available after the payment of the amount due the

contractors the same be ordered paid to Mr Whittemore for his

services.

Very respectfully,

H. C. Rizer, _Chief Clerk_.

The Repair of Casa Grande Ruin, Arizona, in 1891 Fifteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1893-94, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1897, pages 315-348 · 第 34 / 42 题