Small consolation this, even for the pain your loneliness inflicts on

yourself, still less for the breach of duties it involves.

There must, besides, be much danger in a habit of mind that leads you to

attribute to your own superiority those very unpleasantnesses which

would have no existence if that superiority were more complete. For, in

truth, if your spiritual nature asserted its due authority over the

animal, you would habitually exercise the power which is freely offered

you, of supreme control over the hidden movements of your heart as well

as over the outward expression of the lips.

I would strongly urge you to consider every evidence of your

isolation--of your want of sympathy with others--as marks of moral

inferiority; then, from your conscientiousness of mind, you would seek

anxiously to discover the causes of such isolation, and you would

endeavour to remove them.

Nothing is more difficult than the perpetual self-control necessary for

this purpose. Constant watchfulness is required to subdue every feeling

of superiority in the contemplation of your own character, and constant

watchfulness to look upon the words and actions of others through, as it

were, a rose-coloured medium. The mind of man has been aptly compared to

cut glass, which reflects the very same light in various colours as well

as different shapes, according to the forms of the glass. Display then

the mental superiority of which you are justly conscious, by moulding

your mind into such forms as will represent the words and actions of

others in the most favourable point of view. The same illustration will

serve to suggest the best manner of making allowances for those whose

minds are unmanageable, because uneducated and undisciplined. They

cannot _see_ things in the same point of view that you do; how

unreasonable then is it of you to expect that they should form the same

estimate of them.

Let us now enter into the more minute details of this subject, and

consider the many opportunities for self-control which may arise in the

course of even this one day. I will begin with moral evil.

You may hear falsehoods asserted, you may hear your friend traduced, you

may hear unfair and exaggerated statements of the conduct of others,

given to the very people with whom they are most anxious to stand well.

These are trials to which you may be often exposed, even in domestic

life; and their judicious management, the comparative advantages to

one's friends or one's self of silence or defence, will require your

calmest judgment and your soundest discretion; qualities which of course

cannot be brought into action without complete self-control. I can

hardly expect, or, indeed, wish that you should hear the falsehoods of

which I have spoken without some risings of indignation; these, however,

must be subdued for your friend's sake as well as your own. You would

think it right to conquer feelings of anger and revenge if you were

yourself unjustly accused, and though the other excitement may bear the

appearance of more generosity, you must on reflection admit that it is

equally your duty to subdue such feelings when they are aroused by the

injuries inflicted on a friend. The happy safeguard, the _instinctive_

test, by which the well-regulated and comparatively innocent mind may

safely try the right or the wrong of every indignant feeling is this: so

far as the feeling is painful, so far is it tainted with sin. To "be

angry and sin not,"[58] there must be no pain in the anger: pain and sin

cannot be separated: there may indeed be sorrow, but this is to be

carefully distinguished from pain. The above is a test which, after

close examination and experience, you will find to be a safe and true

one. Whenever they are thus safe and true, our instinctive feelings

ought to be gratefully made use of; thus even our animal nature may be

made to come to the assistance of our spiritual nature, against which it

is too often arrayed in successful opposition.

I have spoken of the exceeding difficulty of exercising self-control

under such trying circumstances as those above described, and this

difficulty will, I candidly confess, be likely to increase in proportion

to your own honesty and generosity. Be comforted, however, by this

consideration, that, conflict being the only means of forming the

character into excellence, and your natural amiability averting from you

many of the usual opportunities for exercising self-control, you would

be in want of the former essential ingredient in spiritual discipline

did not your very virtues procure it for you.

While, however, I allow you full credit for these virtues, I must insist

on a careful distinction between a mere virtue and a Christian grace.

Every virtue becomes a vice the moment it overpasses its prescribed

boundaries, the moment it is given free power to follow the bent of

animal nature, instead of being, even though a virtue, kept under the

strict control of religious principle.

I must now suggest to you some means by which I have known self-control

to be successfully exhibited and perpetuated, with especial reference to

that annoyance which we have last considered. Instead, then, of dwelling

on the deviations from truth of which I have spoken, even when they are

to the injury of a friend, try to banish the subject from your mind and

memory; or, if you are able to think of it in the very way you please,

try to consider how much the original formation of the speaker's mind,

careless habits, and want of any disciplining education, may each and

all contribute to lessen the guilt of the person who has annoyed you. No

one knows better than yourself that tho original nature of the mind, as

well as its implanted habits, modifies every fact presented to its

notice. Still further, the point of view from which the fact or the

character has been seen may have been entirely different from yours.

These other persons may absolutely have _seen_ the thing spoken of in a

position so completely unlike your mental vision of it, that they are as

incapable of understanding your view as you may be of understanding

theirs. If sincere in your wish for improvement, you had better prove

the truth of the above assertion by the following process. Take into

your consideration any given action, not of a decidedly honourable

nature--one which, perhaps, to most people would appear of an

indifferent nature,--but to your lofty and refined notions deserving of

some degree of reprehension. You have a sufficiently metaphysical head

to be able to abstract yourself entirely from your own view of the case,

and then you can contemplate it with a total freedom from prejudice.

Such a contemplation can only be attempted when no feeling is

concerned,--feeling giving life to every peculiarity of moral sentiment,

as the heat draws out those characters which would otherwise have passed

unknown and unnoticed. I would then have you examine carefully into all

the considerations which might qualify and alter, even your own view of

the case. Dwell long and carefully upon this part of the process. It is

astonishing (incredible indeed until it is tried) how much our opinions

of the very same action may alter if we determinately confine ourselves

to the favourable aspect in which it may be viewed, keeping the contrary

side entirely out of sight.

As soon as this has been carried to the utmost, you must further (that

my experiment may be fairly tried) endeavour to throw yourself, in

imagination, not only into the position, but also into the natural and

acquired mental and moral perceptions of the person whose action you are

taking into your consideration. For this purpose you must often

imagine--natural dimness of perception, absence of acute sensibility,

indifference to wounding the feelings of others from mere carelessness

and want of reflective powers, little natural conscientiousness, an

entire absence of the taste or the power of metaphysical examination

into the effect produced by our actions. All these natural deficiencies,

you must further consider, may in this case be increased by a totally

neglected education,--first, by the want of parental discipline, and

afterwards of that more important self-education which few people have

sufficient strength of character to subject themselves to. Lastly, I

would have you consider especially the moral atmosphere in which they

have habitually breathed: according to the nature of this the mental

health varies as certainly as the physical strength varies in a bracing

or relaxing air. A strong bodily constitution may resist longer, and

finally be less affected by a deleterious atmosphere than a weak or

diseased frame; and so it is with the mental constitution. Minds

insensibly imbibe the tone of the atmosphere in which they most

frequently dwell; and though natural loftiness of character and natural

conscientiousness may for a very long period resist such influences, it

cannot be expected that inferior natures will be able to do so.

You are then to consider whether the habits of mind and conversation

among those who are the constant associates of the persons you blame

have been such as to cherish or to deaden keen and refined perceptions

of moral excellence and nobility of mind; still further, whether their

own literary tastes have created around them an even more penetrating

atmosphere; whether from the elevated inspirations of appreciated

poetry, from the truthful page of history, or from the stirring

excitements of romantic fiction, their heart and their imagination have

received those lofty lessons for which you judge them responsible,

without knowing whether they have ever received them.

There is still another consideration. While the actions of those who are

not habitually under the control of high principle depend chiefly on the

physical constitution, as they are too often a mere yielding to the

immediate impulse of the senses, their judgment of men and things, on

the contrary, when uninfluenced by _personal_ feeling, depend probably

more on that keen perception of the beautiful which is the natural

instinct of a superior organization. Morality and religion will indeed

supply the place of these lofty _natural_ instincts, by giving habits of

mind which may in time become so burnt in, as it were, that they assume

the form of natural instincts, while they are at once much safer guides

and much stronger checks.

It is surprising that a mere sense of the beautiful will often confer

the clearest perceptions of the real nature of moral excellence. You may

hear the devoted worldling, or the selfish sensualist, giving the

highest and most inspiring lessons of self-renunciation, self-sacrifice,

and devotedness to God. Their lessons, truthful and impressive, because

dictated by a keen and exquisite perception of the beautiful, which ever

harmonizes with the precepts and doctrines of Christianity, have

kindled in many a heart that living flame, which in their own has been

smothered by the fatal homage of the lips and of the feelings only,

while the actions of the life were disobedient. Often has such a writer

or speaker stood in stern and truthfully severe judgment on the weak

"brother in Christ" when he has acted or spoken with an inconsistency

which the mere instinct of the beautiful would in his censor have

prevented. Such censors, however, ought to remember that these weak

brethren, though their instincts be less lofty, their sensibility less

acute, live closer to their principles than they themselves do to their

feelings; for the moment the natural impulse, in cases where that is the

only guide, is enlisted on the side of passion, the perception of the

beautiful is entirely sacrificed to the gratification of the senses.

When the animal nature comes into collision with the spiritual, the

highest dictates of the latter will be unheeded, unless the supremacy of

the spiritual nature be habitually maintained in practice as well as in

theory. In short, that keen perception of the true and the beautiful,

which is an essential ingredient in the formation of a noble character,

becomes, in the case of the self-indulgent worldling, only an increase

of his responsibility, and a deepening dye to his guilt. At present,

however, I suppose you to be sitting in judgment on those who are

entirely destitute of the aids and the responsibilities of a keen sense

of the beautiful: by nature or by education they know or have learned

nothing of it. How different, then, from your own must be their estimate

of virtue and duty! Add this, therefore, to all the other allowances

you have to make for them, and I will answer for it that any action

viewed through this qualifying medium will entirely change its aspect,

and your blame will most frequently turn to pity, though of course you

can feel neither sympathy nor respect.

On the other hand, the practice of dwelling only on the aggravating

circumstances of a case, will magnify into crime a trifling and

otherwise easily forgotten error. This is a fact in the mind's history

of which few people seem to be aware, and only few may be capable of

understanding. Its truth, however, may be easily proved by watching the

effect of words in irritating one person against another, and

increasing, by repeated insinuations, the apparent malignity of some

really trifling action. No one, probably, has led so blessed a life as

not to have been sometimes pained by observing one person trying to

exasperate another, who is, perhaps, rather peacefully inclined, by

pointing out all the aggravating circumstances of some probably

imaginary offence, until the listener is wrought up to a state of angry

excitement, and induced to look on that as an exaggerated offence which

would probably otherwise have passed without notice. What is in this

case the effect of another's sin is a state often produced in their own

mind by those who would be incapable of the more tangible, and therefore

more evidently sinful act of exciting the anger of one friend or

relative against another.

The sin of which I speak is peculiarly likely to be that of a

thoughtful, reflective, and fastidious person like yourself. It is

therefore to you of the utmost importance to acquire, and to acquire at

once, complete control over your thoughts,--first, carefully

ascertaining which those are that you ought to avoid, and then guarding

as carefully against such as if they were the open semblance of positive

sin. This is really the only means by which a truthful and candid nature

like your own can ever maintain the deportment of Christian love and

charity towards those among whom your lot is cast. You must resolutely

shut your eyes against all that is unlovely in their character. If you

suffer your thoughts to dwell for a moment on such subjects, you will

find additional difficulty afterwards in forcing them away from that

which is their natural tendency, besides having probably created a

feeling against which it will be vain to struggle. It is one of the

strongest reasons for the necessity of watchful self-control, that no

mind, however powerful, can exercise a direct authority over the

feelings of the heart; they are susceptible of indirect influence alone.

This much increases the necessity of our watchfulness as to the indirect

tendencies of thoughts and words, and our accountability with respect to

them. Our anxiety and vigilance ought to be altogether greater than if

we could exercise over our feelings that direct and instantaneous

control which a strong mind can always assert in the case of words and

actions.

Unless the indirect influence of which I have spoken were practicable,

the warnings and commands of Scripture would be a mockery of our

weakness,--a cruel satire on the helplessness of a victim whose efforts

to fulfil duty must, however strenuous, prove unavailing. The child is

commanded to honour his parent, the wife to reverence her husband; and

you are to observe attentively that there is no exception made for the

cases of those whose parents or husbands are undeserving of love and

reverence. There must, then, be a power granted, to such as ask and

_strive_ to acquire it, of closing the mental eyes resolutely against

those features in the character of the persons to whom we are bound by

the ties of duty, which would unfit us, if much dwelt upon, for

obedience in such important particulars as the love and reverence we are

commanded to feel towards them.

Even where there is such high principle and such uncommon strength of

character as to induce perseverance in the mere external forms of

obedience, how vain are all such while the heart has turned aside from

the appointed path of duty, and broken those commands of God which, we

should always remember, have reference to feeling as well as to

action:--"Honour thy father and thy mother;"[59] "Let the wife see that

she reverence her husband."[60]

In the habitual exercise of that self-control which I now urge upon you,

you will experience an ample fulfilment of that promise,--"The work of

righteousness shall be peace."[61] Instead of becoming daily further and

further severed from those who are indeed your inferiors, but towards

whom God has imposed duties upon you, you will daily find that, in

proportion to the difficulty of the task, will be the sweetness and the

peace rewarding its fulfilment. No affection resulting from the most

perfect sympathy of mind and heart will ever confer so deep a pleasure,

or so holy a peace, as the blind, unquestioning, "unsifting"[62]

tenderness which a strong principle of duty has cherished into

existence.

Glorious in every way will be the final result to those who are capable

(alas! few are so) of such a course of conduct. Far different in its

effects from the blind tenderness of infatuated passion is the noble

blindness of Christian self-control. While the one warms into existence,

or at least into open manifestation, all the selfishness and wilfulness

of the fondled plaything, the other creates a thousand virtues that were

not known before. Flowers spring up from the hardest rocks, the coldest,

sternest natures are gradually softened into gentleness, the faults of

temper or of character that never meet with worrying opposition, or

exercise unforgiving influence, gradually die away, and fade from the

memory of both. The very atmosphere alone of such rare and lovely

self-control seems to have a moral influence resembling the effects of

climate upon the rude and rugged marble,--every roughness is by degrees

smoothed away, and even the colouring becomes subdued into calm harmony

with all the features of its allotted position.

To the rarity of the virtue upon which I have so long dwelt, we may

trace the cause of almost all the domestic unhappiness we witness

whenever the veil is withdrawn from the secrets of _home_. Alas! how

often is this blessed word only the symbol of freely-indulged

ill-tempers, unresisted selfishness, or, perhaps the most dangerous of

all, exacting and unforgiving requirements. While the one party select

their home as the only scene where they may safely and freely vent their

caprices and ill-humours, the other require a stricter compliance with

their wishes, a more exact conformity with their pursuits and opinions,

than they meet with even from the temporary companions of their lighter

hours. They forget that these companions have only to exert themselves

for a short time for their gratification, and that they can then retire

to their own home, probably to be as disagreeable there as the relations

of whom the others complain. For then the mask is off, and they are at

liberty,--yes, at liberty,--freed from the inspection and the judgments

of the world, and only exposed to those of God!

My friend, I am sure you have often shared in the pain and grief I feel,

that in so few cases should home be the blessed, peaceful spot that

poetry pictures to us. There is no real poetry that is not truth in its

purest form--truth as it appears to eyes from which the mists of sense

are cleared away. Surely our earthly homes ought to realize the

representations of poetry; they would then become each day a nearer,

though ever a faint type of, that eternal home for which our earthly

one ought daily to prepare us.

Poetry and religion always teach the same duties, instil the same

feelings. Never believe that any thing can be truly noble or great, that

any thing can be really poetical, which is not also religious. The poet

is now partly a priest, as he was in the old heathen world; and though,

alas! he may, like Balaam, utter inspirations which his heart follows

not, which his life denies, yet, like Balaam also, his words are full of

lessons for us, though they may only make his own guilt the deeper.

I have been led to these concluding considerations respecting poetry by

my anxiety that you should turn your refined tastes and your acute

perceptions of the beautiful to a universally moral purpose. There is no

teaching more impressive than that which comes to us through our

passions. In the moment of excited feeling stronger impressions may be

made than by any of the warnings of duty and principle. If these latter,

however, be not motives co-existent, and also in strength and exercise,

the impressions of feeling are temporary, and even dangerous. It is only

to the faithful followers of duty that the excitements of romance and

poetry are useful and improving. To such they have often given strength

and energy to tread more cheerfully and hopefully over many a rugged

path, to live more closely to their beau-idéal, a vivid vision of which

has, by poetry, been awakened and refreshed in their hearts.

To others, on the contrary, the danger exceeds the profit. By the

excitement of admiration they may be deceived into the belief that

there must be in their own bosoms an answering spirit to the greatness,

the self-sacrifice, the pure and lofty affections they see represented

in the mirror of poetry. They are deceived, because they forget that we

have each within us two natures struggling for the mastery. As long as

we practically allow the habitual supremacy of the lower over the

higher, there can be no real excellence in the character, however a mere

sense of the beautiful may temporarily exalt the feelings, and thus

increase our responsibility, and consequent condemnation.

I am sure you have experimentally understood the subject on which I have

been writing. I am sure you have often risen from the teaching of the

poet with enthusiasm in your heart, ready to trample upon all those

temptations and difficulties which had, perhaps an hour before, made the

path of self-denial and self-control apparently impracticable.

Receive such intervals of excitement as heaven-sent aids, to help you

more easily over, it may be, a wearying and dreary path. They are most

probably sent in answer to prayer--in answer to the prayers of your own

heart, or to those of some pious friend.

Our Father in heaven works constantly by earthly means, and moulds the

weakest, the often apparently useless instrument to the furtherance of

his purposes of mercy, one of which you know is your own sanctification.

It is not his holy word only that gives you appointed messages and helps

exactly suited to your need. The flower growing by the way-side, the

picture or the poem, the works of God's own hand, or the works of the

genius which he has breathed into his creature Man, may all alike bear

you messages of love, of warning, of assistance.

Listen attentively, and you will hear--clearer still and clearer--every

day and hour. It is not by chance you take up that book, or gaze upon

that picture; you have found, because you are on the watch for it, in

the first, a suggestion that exactly suits your present need, in the

latter an excitement and an inspiration which makes some difficult

action you may be immediately called on to perform comparatively easy

and comparatively welcome.

The Young Lady's Mentor A Guide to the Formation of Character. In a Series of Letters to Her Unknown Friends · 第 6 / 18 段