If Mrs. White had now and then betrayed the impatience, the annoyance,

the despair she had every reason to experience over my stupidity and

awkwardness, if at the “psychological moment” she had occasionally

spoken sharply, blown me up as did the teachers later at the public

school, the effect I am convinced would have been definite and salutary.

But hers was the haggard benevolence of the child-gardener in its most

indestructible form. All day long sweetness and light glared from her

eyes like pharos rays that faileth not because they’ve been wound up.

There was in the loving expression around her mouth something

appallingly inanimate, objective, detachable; one felt that it hadn’t

grown there, it had been put. It bore about the same relation to reality

as does the art of the confectioner. It lay against her teeth like the

thin white icing on a cake, and the hand that itched to box an ear

faltered in its flight pausing to caress a curl. It terrified me to

realize that the perishable, narrow strips of glazed, colored paper we

tried to weave into mats, and the dried peas with which I finally

builded better than I knew were, even as the hairs of our heads, all

numbered. This was for the purpose of teaching us neatness and

thrift--the husbanding of our resources. To crumple the former or

scatter the latter was, we knew, a crime, but Mrs. White’s method of

calling our attention to it was merely an insult to the intelligence.

The punishment was a deliberate misfit, an elaborately artificial

evasion of the point at issue. When, for instance, a dried pea would

slip through my clumsy fingers and rattle over the uncarpetted floor

with what sounded to me like the detonations of artillery, Mrs. White

never told me to wake up and be more careful of what I was doing.

Instead she would coo like a philandering pigeon and murmur:

“Why, laddie--what would the hungry little birds say if they were to see

_all_ that nice food wasted!” When panic-stricken at the number of my

crumpled failures I feloniously thrust them into my pocket, she would

fish them out with sweet amaze, exclaiming:

“Why, dearie--how did _these_ get here? Does any little girl or boy know

how _all_ these poor little strips of paper got into the very bottom of

Charlie’s dark pocket?” When, as once in so often happened, I would “all

alone beweep my outcast state, And trouble deaf heaven with my bootless

cries, And look upon myself and curse my fate,” she never told me to

stop at once and behave myself; she would open her eyes to their

incredulous roundest, slightly drop her lower jaw, wonderingly scan

every face and then purr:

“Why, manny--what’s become of _all_ the smiles?”

There was invariably a reply to these inquiries and it was almost as

invariably furnished by one Adelaide Winkle, a dreadful child, but one

more sinned against, I now appreciate, than sinning. Forced to the limit

in the hothouse of the home, and deeply imbedded in the fertilizing

approval of Mrs. White, she was in all our gay little parterre the most

brilliant and the most noxious bloom. At the age of seven she already

had the executive air of a woman who has long presided over meetings.

She also played the piano, danced fancy dances, sang, recited, wore

three rings, a necklace and a red plush dress. I hated her, even more if

possible than I hated Mrs. White, for she not only kept an eye on my

shortcomings, she formulated them into ready words and by request smugly

proclaimed them. But it was the manner in which Mrs. White exploited her

before strangers that most enraged me. When visitors appeared, as they

often did, for a kindergarten under cultivation was a decided novelty,

Adelaide was called upon to execute her entire program from A to Izzard.

She sang, she elocuted “Bobolink, spink, spank, bobolink,” she played

her show piece (“Fairy Chimes”) on the-piano, she withdrew to an

adjoining room and tripped coquettishly in again, strewing, like the

springtime, an armful of tissue-paper roses, and last of all she gave

with experiments a short discourse on geography that brought tears to

the eyes of the most criminal. The experiments were evolved in sight of

the audience with the aid of a large wooden trayful of sand and a tin

dipperful of water. Under Adelaide’s precocious fingers these helpless

elements gave a presumably correct rendering of the Book of Genesis in

action, becoming at her will a continent, a river, a lake, an island, a

peninsula, a mountain. One downward thrust of an unerring thumb upon a

soggy peak and lo! the mountain was a volcano which, Adelaide always

ended the lecture by informing us, “Spouts when in a state of

ac-tiv-it-y, fire, smoke, glow-ing stones and mol-tennn law-vaw.”

Powerless to protest, and crushed beneath the weight of my own

incompetence, I have sat through the performance of this revolting rite

as often as three times in a single morning.

Revenge came slowly. It took nineteen years to arrive, but it arrived.

Unduly familiar in childhood with continents and dizzy heights,

Adelaide, as she matured, reached out, expanded, longed to become a

world-power. At the age of twenty-six, therefore, she eloped with a

French “count,” who not only failed to observe the convention of proving

to be a waiter or a hairdresser, he absolutely failed to be anything at

all and Adelaide ever since has had to support him.

At eleven o’clock we took a dejected orphan-asylum walk about the

suburban streets in two long lines led by the older pupils of the more

advanced school downstairs and followed by Mrs. White who, by constantly

running back and forth in order to satisfy herself that no one was

neglecting to “observe nature,” must have covered miles to our blocks.

How we all loathed nature! I loved animals and plants, clouds and rain,

snow and sunshine then as I do now, but “Nature” was something quite

different. I don’t believe we ever knew what it was and probably

connected the term in our minds not with the works of God themselves but

with the inescapable obligation of perpetually fussing about them. I

without doubt would have ended by becoming very fond of the White

Maria’s shaggy old ponies, but the labored pretense that we were all

dying to bring them a handful of oats for their Thanksgiving dinner and

a dozen other pretenses concerning them ended by preventing it. Birds

were really wonderful, heavenly creatures to watch and examine, but

weeks of prattle about the Christmas present (seeds, bread-crumbs and

more oats) of birds we had never seen, merely resulted in a band of

ornithological cynics. This fictitious passion for just

birds--disembodied, abstract birds, that Mrs. White entirely imagined

for us and widely advertised--was taken seriously by our families for

years. My grandmother fondly believed in it to the last and almost

embittered my young life by bequeathing in her will three beautiful

family portraits to my brothers, and to me the “nature lover,” the

unwilling product of Mrs. White’s, a set of Audubon!

On our return from the walk Mrs. White inspected our lunch-baskets,

confiscating what she considered injurious to our digestions and teeth

and allowing us to fortify ourselves against further blesséd play and

blesséd work with the remains. I have often wondered what actually

became of the cake and candy she daily took from us “for our own good,”

and I shouldn’t be surprised if she scattered it along the sidewalk or

threw it into passing carriages. It would have been a natural reaction

from her incessant official pother about “neatness and thrift,” but at

the time we all of course firmly believed that she put the loot away in

a pantry and that the whole White family lived on it for weeks.

Almost everything we learned at Mrs. White’s was sure to be incorrect to

the point of imbecility. For I don’t know how long after leaving there I

took it for granted that a thoughtful Creator had supplied dear Bossy

with a “dewlap” in order that she could wipe dry each mouthful of wet

grass before eating it.

“When Bossy goes out to the fields in the morning for her breakfast,

this long, soft fold you see here under her neck” (pointing to the

picture) “swings from side to side brushing away the damp and chilly

dew,” Mrs. White had told us, and I need scarcely dwell on the

disappointment and sense of injury I experienced when I subsequently

sought Bossy in her graminaceous lair and watched her dewlap quite

otherwise engaged. But even so, Mrs. White is no more, and anyhow I was

always a facile relenter. At times I have been even grateful for Mrs.

White’s. There was for instance the mystery of Mary Blake and the

mystery of the White Maria. I have often been grateful for them.

Mary Blake was an overgrown girl in the school downstairs. She was a

most pervasive lass--“a perfect romp.” We all knew her well. She

belonged to a family prominent in our growing town, and although my

family and hers were not intimate they no doubt would have thought they

were had they unexpectedly met for instance on the spiral stairway of 7

Rue Scribe. There were two sons and four daughters in Mary’s family and

none of them was named Jane. This is important. Years elapsed. I had

spent considerable time abroad, I had been occupied in growing up, in

going to school, in preparing for college. There were still four Blake

girls, but my interest in them was vague, collective. Then one day I

heard of the marriage of Jane Blake, which surprised me somewhat as

there had never been a Jane Blake. This led a short time later to my

expressing to Mrs. Blake a belated interest in Mary, at which Mrs. Blake

looked mystified for a moment and then said, “I think you must mean

Susan.” I didn’t mean Susan but I refrained from saying so, and since

then I have been haunted by the mystery of Mary Blake. Apparently there

is no Mary Blake and never was one, although in answer to my feverish

questionings several persons who were at Mrs. White’s with her have

assured me that they remember her perfectly. Every now and then I meet

Jane Blake and talk to her, wondering the while if she can be Mary. That

she is dark and Mary was blonde is perhaps negligible. Once I sat next

to Jane at dinner and when, after a pause in our conversation, I said,

“Come, now--aren’t you really your sister who died?” She answered coldly

that none of her sisters had ever died and immediately afterward refused

to let the servant help her to any more champagne.

The mystery of the White Maria I have never tried to solve. It is enough

to know that it was and to wonder if I shall ever again see anything so

lovely. The White Maria, as has been mentioned, was a large, square box

of black oilcloth. It’s inner surface, however, was white, soiled to a

neutral gray. On our outward journeys when I noticed this at all it was

only to feel the tragedy of life with a greater intensity. But on the

return.... To state in words what we saw when returning gives but little

idea of it. We were always tired, silent and a trifle sleepy when we

started for home, and we at once leaned back and quietly watched for It.

It often appeared but sometimes it refused to show itself for days, and

I then used to wonder if I had ever really seen it. The perpetual

fascination it had for us was a most complicated one, consisting as it

did of the mystery, the beauty, the unreality and the reality of the

thing itself, together with the fact that Mrs. White was somehow being

thwarted. The black canopy of the White Maria, in a word, sought to

imprison us, to impose an impenetrable barrier between us and the

outside world, but as we jogged along, the houses, the trees, the

horses, the wagons and the people we passed were reproduced in miniature

on one of the inside walls. The details were always clear enough to let

us know where we were; frequently they were perfect. The little

panorama, furthermore, was without color, which gave it an additional,

ghostly charm. I have never been hypnotized, but I think in staring at

this dreamlike, dissolving procession I used to be very near the

hypnotic state. At times when the White Maria drew up at our front door

I was asleep and it would take me half an hour or more to get back again

into my body--I can remember the sensation even if I can’t describe it.

The moving-picture shows of to-day seem to me like a crude and vulgar

attempt to recall and commercialize the age when we were mystics and had

visions.

THE END

Prejudices · 第 9 / 9 段