During a long and disgraceful reign of twenty-eight years, Honorius,
emperor of the West, was separated from the friendship of his
brother, and afterwards of his nephew, who reigned over the East; and
Constantinople beheld, with apparent indifference and secret joy, the
calamities of Rome. The strange adventures of Placidia gradually renewed
and cemented the alliance of the two empires. The daughter of the great
Theodosius had been the captive and the queen of the Goths; she lost
an affectionate husband, she was dragged in chains by his insulting
assassin, she tasted the pleasure of revenge, and was exchanged in the
treaty of peace, for six hundred thousand measures of wheat.
After her return from Spain to Italy, Placidia experienced a new
persecution in the bosom of her family. She was averse to a marriage
which had been stipulated without her consent; and the brave Constantius,
as a noble reward for the tyrants whom he had vanquished, received from
the hand of Honorius himself the struggling and reluctant hand of the
widow of Atawulf. But her resistance ended with the ceremony of the
nuptials; nor did Placidia refuse to become the mother of Honoria and
Valentinian III or to assume and exercise an absolute dominion over
the mind of her grateful husband. The generous soldier, whose time had
hitherto been divided between social pleasure and military service, was
taught new lessons of avarice and ambition. He extorted the title of
Augustus; and the servant of Honorius was associated to the empire of
the West. The death of Constantius, in the seventh month of his reign,
instead of diminishing, seemed to increase the power of Placidia. On a
sudden, by some base intrigues the city of Ravenna was agitated with
bloody and dangerous tumults, which could only be appeased by the forced
or voluntary retreat of Placidia and her children.
The royal exiles landed at Constantinople, soon after the marriage of
Theodosius, during the festival of the Persian victories. They were
treated with kindness and magnificence; but as the statues of the emperor
Constantius had been rejected by the Eastern court, the title of Augusta
could not decently be allowed to his widow. Within a few months after the
arrival of Placidia, a swift messenger announced the death of Honorius,
the consequence of a dropsy; but the important secret was not divulged
till the necessary orders had been despatched for the march of a large
body of troops to the seacoast of Dalmatia. The shops and the gates of
Constantinople remained shut during seven days; and the loss of a foreign
prince, who could neither be esteemed nor regretted, was celebrated with
loud and affected demonstrations of the public grief.
[Sidenote: [423-424 A.D.]]
While the ministers of Constantinople deliberated, the vacant throne
of Honorius was usurped by the ambition of a stranger. The name of the
rebel was Joannes. He filled the confidential office of _primicerius_,
or principal secretary; and history has attributed to his character
more virtues than can easily be reconciled with the violation of the
most sacred duty. Elated by the submission of Italy, and the hope of an
alliance with the Huns, Joannes presumed to insult, by an embassy, the
majesty of the Eastern emperor; but when he understood that his agents
had been banished, imprisoned, and at length chased away with deserved
ignominy, Joannes prepared to assert by arms the injustice of his claims.
In such a cause, the grandson of the great Theodosius should have marched
in person; but the young emperor was easily diverted by his physicians
from so rash and hazardous a design, and the conduct of the Italian
expedition was prudently entrusted to Ardaburius and his son Aspar, who
had already signalised their valour against the Persians. It was resolved
that Ardaburius should embark with the infantry, whilst Aspar, at the
head of the cavalry, conducted Placidia and her son Valentinian along
the seacoast of the Adriatic. The march of the cavalry was performed
with such active diligence that they surprised, without resistance, the
important city of Aquileia; when the hopes of Aspar were unexpectedly
confounded by the intelligence that a storm had dispersed the imperial
fleet; and that his father, with only two galleys, was taken and carried
a prisoner into the port of Ravenna. Yet this incident, unfortunate as it
might seem, facilitated the conquest of Italy. Ardaburius employed, or
abused, the courteous freedom which he was permitted to enjoy, to revive
among the troops a sense of loyalty and gratitude; and as soon as the
conspiracy was ripe for execution, he invited by private messages and
pressed the approach of Aspar. A shepherd, whom the popular credulity
transformed into an angel, guided the Eastern cavalry, by a secret and,
it was thought, an impassable road through the morasses of the Padus
(Po); the gates of Ravenna, after a short struggle, were thrown open;
and the defenceless tyrant was delivered to the mercy, or rather to the
cruelty, of the conquerors. His right hand was first cut off; and, after
he had been exposed, mounted on an ass, to the public derision, Joannes
was beheaded in the circus of Aquileia.
In a monarchy which, according to various precedents, might be considered
as elective, or hereditary, or patrimonial, it was impossible that the
intricate claims of female and collateral succession should be clearly
defined; and Theodosius, by the right of consanguinity or conquest,
might have reigned the sole legitimate emperor of the Romans. For a
moment, perhaps, his eyes were dazzled by the prospect of unbounded
sway; but his indolent temper gradually acquiesced in the dictates of
sound policy. He contented himself with the possession of the East;
and wisely relinquished the laborious task of waging a distant and
doubtful war against the barbarians beyond the Alps; or of securing the
obedience of the Italians and Africans, whose minds were alienated by the
irreconcilable difference of language and interest.
[Sidenote: [424-427 A.D.]]
Instead of listening to the voice of ambition, Theodosius resolved
to imitate the moderation of his grandfather, and to seat his
cousin Valentinian on the throne of the West. The royal infant was
distinguished at Constantinople by the title of _nobilissimus_: he was
promoted, before his departure from Thessalonica, to the rank and dignity
of Cæsar; and, after the conquest of Italy, the patrician Helion, by
the authority of Theodosius and in the presence of the senate, saluted
Valentinian III by the name of Augustus, and solemnly invested him
with the diadem and the imperial purple. By the agreement of the three
females who governed the Roman world, the son of Placidia was betrothed
to Eudoxia, the daughter of Theodosius and Athenais; and, as soon as the
lover and his bride had attained the age of puberty, this honourable
alliance was faithfully accomplished. At the same time, as a compensation
perhaps for the expenses of the war, the western Illyricum was detached
from the Italian dominions and yielded to the throne of Constantinople.
[Illustration: A HUN
(From a painting)]
The emperor of the East acquired the useful dominion of the rich and
maritime province of Dalmatia, and the dangerous sovereignty of Pannonia
and Noricum, which had been filled and ravaged above twenty years by a
promiscuous crowd of Huns, Ostrogoths, Vandals, and Bavarians. Theodosius
and Valentinian continued to respect the obligations of their public and
domestic alliance; but the unity of the Roman government was finally
dissolved. By a positive declaration, the validity of all future laws
was limited to the dominions of their peculiar author; unless he should
think proper to communicate them, subscribed with his own hand, for the
approbation of his independent colleague.
Valentinian, when he received the title of Augustus, was no more than
six years of age; and his long minority was intrusted to the guardian
care of a mother, who might assert a female claim to the succession
of the Western Empire. Placidia envied, but she could not equal, the
reputation and virtues of the wife and sister of Theodosius, the elegant
genius of Eudocia, the wise and successful policy of Pulcheria. The
mother of Valentinian was jealous of the power which she was incapable
of exercising. She reigned twenty-five years, in the name of her son;
and the character of that unworthy emperor gradually countenanced the
suspicion that Placidia had enervated his youth by a dissolute education,
and studiously diverted his attention from every manly and honourable
pursuit. Amidst the decay of military spirit her armies were commanded
by two generals, Aëtius and Boniface, who may be deservedly named as the
last of the Romans. Their union might have supported a sinking empire;
their discord was the fatal and immediate cause of the loss of Africa.
The invasion and defeat of Attila have immortalised the fame of Aëtius;
and though time has thrown a shade over the exploits of his rival, the
defence of Marseilles and the deliverance of Africa attest the military
talents of Count Boniface.
The abilities of Aëtius and Boniface might have been usefully employed
against the public enemies, in separate and important commands; but the
experience of their past conduct should have decided the real favour
and confidence of the empress Placidia. In the melancholy season of
her exile and distress, Boniface alone had maintained her cause with
unshaken fidelity; and the troops and treasures of Africa had essentially
contributed to extinguish the rebellion. The same rebellion had been
supported by the zeal and activity of Aëtius, who brought an army of
sixty thousand Huns from the Danube to the confines of Italy, for the
service of the usurper. The untimely death of Joannes compelled him to
accept an advantageous treaty; but he still continued, the subject and
the soldier of Valentinian, to entertain a secret, perhaps a treasonable
correspondence with his barbarian allies, whose retreat had been
purchased by liberal gifts and more liberal promises.
But Aëtius possessed an advantage of singular moment in a female reign;
he was present; he besieged, with artful and assiduous flattery, the
palace of Ravenna; disguised his dark designs with the mask of loyalty
and friendship; and at length deceived both his mistress and his absent
rival by a subtle conspiracy which a weak woman and a brave man could
not easily suspect. He secretly persuaded Placidia to recall Boniface
from the government of Africa; he secretly advised Boniface to disobey
the imperial summons. To the one he represented the order as a sentence
of death, to the other he stated the refusal as a signal of revolt; and
when the credulous and unsuspecting count had armed the province in his
defence, Aëtius applauded his sagacity in foreseeing the rebellion which
his own perfidy had excited.
A temperate inquiry into the real motives of Boniface would have restored
a faithful servant to his duty and to the republic; but the arts of
Aëtius still continued to betray and to inflame, and the count was urged,
by persecution, to embrace the most desperate counsels. The success with
which he eluded or repelled the first attacks could not inspire a vain
confidence that, at the head of some loose, disorderly Africans, he
should be able to withstand the regular forces of the West, commanded by
a rival whose military character it was impossible for him to despise.
After some hesitation, the last struggles of prudence and loyalty,
Boniface despatched a trusty friend to the court, or rather to the camp,
of Gonderic, king of the Vandals, with the proposal of a strict alliance
and the offer of an advantageous and perpetual settlement.
[Sidenote: [427-429 A.D.]]
The experience of navigation, and perhaps the prospect of Africa,
encouraged the Vandals to accept the invitation which they received from
Count Boniface; and the death of Gonderic served only to forward and
animate the bold enterprise. In the room of a prince not conspicuous
for any superior powers of the mind or body, they acquired his bastard
brother, the terrible Genseric, a name which, in the destruction of
the Roman Empire, has deserved an equal rank with the names of Alaric
and Attila. The king of the Vandals is described to have been of a
middle stature, with a lameness in one leg, which he had contracted by
an accidental fall from his horse. His slow and cautious speech seldom
declared the deep purposes of his soul; he disdained to imitate the
luxury of the vanquished, but he indulged the sterner passions of anger
and revenge.
The ambition of Genseric was without bounds and without scruples; and the
warrior could dexterously employ the dark engines of policy to solicit
the allies who might be useful to his success, or to scatter among his
enemies the seeds of hatred and contention. Almost in the moment of his
departure he was informed that Hermanric, king of the Suevi, had presumed
to ravage the Spanish territories, which he was resolved to abandon.
Impatient of the insult, Genseric pursued the hasty retreat of the Suevi
as far as Augusta Emerita (Merida); precipitated the king and his army
into the river Anas, and calmly returned to the seashore to embark his
victorious troops. The vessels which transported the Vandals over the
modern straits of Gibraltar, a channel only twelve miles in breadth, were
furnished by the Spaniards, who anxiously wished their departure, and by
the African general, who had implored their formidable assistance.
Our fancy, so long accustomed to exaggerate and multiply the martial
swarms of barbarians that seemed to issue from the north, will perhaps
be surprised by the account of the army which Genseric mustered on the
coast of Mauretania. The Vandals, who in twenty years had penetrated from
the Elbe to Mount Atlas, were united under the command of their warlike
king; and he reigned with equal authority over the Alani, who had passed,
within the term of human life, from the cold of Scythia to the excessive
heat of an African climate. The hopes of the bold enterprise had
excited many brave adventurers of the Gothic nation; and many desperate
provincials were tempted to repair their fortunes by the same means which
had occasioned their ruin.
Yet this various multitude amounted only to fifty thousand effective
men; and though Genseric artfully magnified his apparent strength
by appointing eighty _chiliarchs_, or commanders of thousands, the
fallacious increase of old men, of children, and of slaves would scarcely
have swelled his army to fourscore thousand persons. But his own
dexterity and the discontents of Africa soon fortified the Vandal powers
by the accession of numerous and active allies. The parts of Mauretania
which border on the great desert and the Atlantic Ocean were filled
with a fierce and untractable race of men, whose savage temper had been
exasperated, rather than reclaimed, by their dread of the Roman arms.
The wandering Moors, as they gradually ventured to approach the
seashore and the camp of the Vandals, must have viewed with terror and
astonishment the dress, the armour, the martial pride and discipline
of the unknown strangers who had landed on their coast; and the fair
complexions of the blue-eyed warriors of Germany formed a very singular
contrast with the swarthy or olive hue which is derived from the
neighbourhood of the torrid zone. After the first difficulties had in
some measure been removed, which arose from the mutual ignorance of their
respective languages, the Moors, regardless of any future consequence,
embraced the alliance of the enemies of Rome; and a crowd of naked
savages rushed from the woods and valleys of Mount Atlas, to satiate
their revenge on the polished tyrants who had injuriously expelled them
from their native sovereignty of the land.
[Sidenote: [429-430 A.D.]]
The persecution of the Donatists was an event not less favourable to
the designs of Genseric. Seventeen years before he landed in Africa a
public conference was held at Carthage by the order of the magistrate.
The Catholics were satisfied that, after the invincible reasons which
they had alleged, the obstinacy of the schismatics must be inexcusable
and voluntary; and the emperor Honorius was persuaded to inflict the most
rigorous penalties on a faction which had so long abused his patience
and clemency. Three hundred bishops, with many thousands of the inferior
clergy, were torn from their churches, stripped of their ecclesiastical
possessions, banished to the islands, and proscribed by the laws, if
they presumed to conceal themselves in the provinces of Africa. By these
severities, which obtained the warmest approbation of St. Augustine,
great numbers of Donatists were reconciled to the Catholic church; but
the fanatics, who still persevered in their opposition, were provoked to
madness and despair; the distracted country was filled with tumult and
bloodshed. The armed troops of Circumcellions alternately pointed their
rage against themselves or against their adversaries; and the calendar
of martyrs received on both sides a considerable augmentation. Under
these circumstances Genseric, a Christian but an enemy of the orthodox
communion, showed himself to the Donatists as a powerful deliverer, from
whom they might reasonably expect the repeal of the odious and oppressive
edicts of the Roman emperors. The conquest of Africa was facilitated by
the active zeal or the secret favour of a domestic faction; the wanton
outrages against the churches and the clergy, of which the Vandals are
accused, may be fairly imputed to the fanaticism of their allies; and the
intolerant spirit which disgraced the triumph of Christianity contributed
to the loss of the most important province of the West.
The court and the people were astonished by the strange intelligence
that a virtuous hero, after so many favours and so many services, had
renounced his allegiance and invited the barbarians to destroy the
province intrusted to his command. The friends of Boniface, who still
believed that his criminal behaviour might be excused by some honourable
motive, solicited, during the absence of Aëtius, a free conference with
the count of Africa; and Darius, an officer of high distinction, was
named for the important embassy. In their first interview at Carthage,
the imaginary provocations were mutually explained; the opposite letters
of Aëtius were produced and compared, and the fraud was easily detected.
Placidia and Boniface lamented their fatal error; and the count had
sufficient magnanimity to confide in the forgiveness of his sovereign, or
to expose his head to her future resentment. His repentance was fervent
and sincere; but he soon discovered that it was no longer in his power
to restore the edifice which he had shaken to its foundations. Carthage
and the Roman garrisons returned with their general to the allegiance of
Valentinian, but the rest of Africa was still distracted with war and
faction; and the inexorable king of the Vandals, disdaining all terms of
accommodation, sternly refused to relinquish the possession of his prey.
The band of veterans who marched under the standard of Boniface and his
hasty levies of provincial troops were defeated with considerable loss;
the victorious barbarians insulted the open country; and Carthage, Cirta,
and Hippo Regius were the only cities that appeared to rise above the
general inundation.
[Sidenote: [430-431 A.D.]]
On a sudden the seven fruitful provinces, from Tingis (Tangier) to
Tripolis, were overwhelmed by the invasion of the Vandals, whose
destructive rage has perhaps been exaggerated by popular animosity,
religious zeal, and extravagant declamation. War, in its fairest
form, implies a perpetual violation of humanity and justice; and the
hostilities of barbarians are inflamed by the fierce and lawless spirit
which incessantly disturbs their peaceful and domestic society. The
Vandals, where they found resistance, seldom gave quarter; and the deaths
of their valiant countrymen were expiated by the ruin of the cities under
whose walls they had fallen. Careless of the distinctions of age, or sex,
or rank, they employed every species of indignity and torture to force
from the captives a discovery of their hidden wealth. The stern policy of
Genseric justified his frequent examples of military execution. He was
not always the master of his own passions, nor of those of his followers;
and the calamities of war were aggravated by the licentiousness of the
Moors and the fanaticism of the Donatists. Yet I shall not easily be
persuaded that it was the common practice of the Vandals to extirpate the
olive and other fruit trees of a country where they intended to settle;
nor can I believe that it was a usual stratagem to slaughter great
numbers of their prisoners before the walls of a besieged city, for the
sole purpose of infecting the air and producing a pestilence of which
they themselves must have been the first victims.
The generous mind of Count Boniface was tortured by the exquisite
distress of beholding the ruin which he had occasioned, and whose rapid
progress he was unable to check. After the loss of a battle he retired
into Hippo Regius, where he was immediately besieged by an enemy who
considered him as the real bulwark of Africa. By the skill of Boniface,
and perhaps by the ignorance of the Vandals, the siege of Hippo was
protracted above fourteen months; the sea was continually open; and
when the adjacent country had been exhausted by irregular rapine, the
besiegers themselves were compelled by famine to relinquish their
enterprise. The importance and danger of Africa were deeply felt by the
regent of the West. Placidia implored the assistance of her Eastern ally;
and the Italian fleet and army were reinforced by Aspar, who sailed from
Constantinople with a powerful armament. As soon as the force of the
two empires was united under the command of Boniface, he boldly marched
against the Vandals; and the loss of a second battle irretrievably
decided the fate of Africa. He embarked with the precipitation of
despair; and the people of Hippo were permitted, with their families and
effects, to occupy the vacant place of the soldiers, the greatest part of
whom were either slain or made prisoners by the Vandals. The count, whose
fatal credulity had wounded the vitals of the republic, might enter the
palace of Ravenna with some anxiety, which was soon removed by the smiles
of Placidia.
Boniface accepted with gratitude the rank of patrician and the dignity of
master-general of the Roman armies; but he must have blushed at the sight
of those medals in which he was represented with the name and attributes
of Victory. The discovery of his fraud, the displeasure of the empress,
and the distinguished favour of his rival, exasperated the haughty and
perfidious soul of Aëtius. He hastily returned from Gaul to Italy with a
retinue, or rather with an army, of barbarian followers; and such was the
weakness of the government that the two generals decided their private
quarrel in a bloody battle. Boniface was successful; but he received in
the conflict a mortal wound from the spear of his adversary, of which he
expired within a few days, in such Christian and charitable sentiments
that he exhorted his wife, a rich heiress of Spain, to accept Aëtius for
her second husband. But Aëtius could not derive any immediate advantage
from the generosity of his dying enemy; he was proclaimed a rebel by
the justice of Placidia; and though he attempted to defend some strong
fortresses erected on his patrimonial estate, the imperial power soon
compelled him to retire into Pannonia, to the tents of his faithful Huns.
The republic was deprived by their mutual discord of the service of her
two most illustrious champions.[66]
[Sidenote: [431-439 A.D.]]
It might naturally be expected, after the retreat of Boniface, that
the Vandals would achieve without resistance or delay the conquest of
Africa. Eight years, however, elapsed from the evacuation of Hippo to
the reduction of Carthage. In the midst of that interval, the ambitious
Genseric, in the full tide of apparent prosperity, negotiated a treaty
of peace, by which he gave his son Hunneric for a hostage and consented
to leave the Western emperor in the undisturbed possession of the
three Mauretanias.[67] The vigilance of his enemies was relaxed by the
protestations of friendship which concealed his hostile approach; and
Carthage was at length surprised by the Vandals, 585 years after the
destruction of the city and republic by the younger Scipio.
The king of the Vandals severely reformed the vices of a voluptuous
people; and the ancient, noble, ingenuous freedom of Carthage (these
expressions of Victor are not without energy) was reduced by Genseric
into a state of ignominious servitude. After he had permitted his
licentious troops to satiate their rage and avarice, he instituted a more
regular system of rapine and oppression. An edict was promulgated, which
enjoined all persons, without fraud or delay, to deliver their gold,
silver, jewels, and valuable furniture or apparel to the royal officers;
and the attempt to secrete any part of their patrimony was inexorably
punished with death and torture, as an act of treason against the state.
The lands of the proconsular province, which formed the immediate
district of Carthage, were accurately measured and divided among the
barbarians; and the conqueror reserved, for his peculiar domain, the
fertile territory of Byzacium and the adjacent parts of Numidia and
Gætulia.
It was natural enough that Genseric should hate those whom he had
injured; the nobility and senators of Carthage were exposed to his
jealousy and resentment, and all those who refused the ignominious terms,
which their honour and religion forbade them to accept, were compelled
by the Arian tyrant to embrace the condition of perpetual banishment.
Rome, Italy, and the provinces of the East were filled with a crowd of
exiles, of fugitives, and of ingenuous captives, who solicited the public
compassion.
After the death of his rival Boniface, Aëtius had prudently retired
to the tents of the Huns; and he was indented to their alliance for
his safety and his restoration. Instead of the suppliant language of
a guilty exile, he solicited his pardon at the head of sixty thousand
barbarians; and the empress Placidia confessed, by a feeble resistance,
that the condescension which might have been ascribed to clemency was the
effect of weakness or fear. She delivered herself, her son Valentinian,
and the Western Empire into the hands of an insolent subject; nor could
Placidia protect the son-in-law of Boniface, the virtuous and faithful
Sebastian, from the implacable persecution which urged him from one
kingdom to another, till he miserably perished in the service of the
Vandals. The fortunate Aëtius, who was immediately promoted to the rank
of patrician and thrice invested with the honours of the consulship,
assumed, with the title of master of the cavalry and infantry, the whole
military power of the state; and he is sometimes styled, by contemporary
writers, the duke, or general, of the Romans of the West. His prudence,
rather than his virtue, engaged him to leave the grandson of Theodosius
in the possession of the purple; and Valentinian was permitted to enjoy
the peace and luxury of Italy, while the patrician appeared in the
glorious light of a hero and a patriot, who supported near twenty years
the ruins of the Western Empire.
The barbarians, who had seated themselves in the western provinces,
were insensibly taught to respect the faith and valour of the patrician
Aëtius. He soothed their passions, consulted their prejudices, balanced
their interests, and checked their ambition. A seasonable treaty, which
he concluded with Genseric, protected Italy from the depredations of the
Vandals; the independent Britons implored and acknowledged his salutary
aid; the imperial authority was restored and maintained in Gaul and
Spain; and he compelled the Franks and the Suevi, whom he had vanquished
in the field, to become the useful confederates of the republic.
From a principle of interest as well as gratitude, Aëtius assiduously
cultivated the alliance of the Huns. While he resided in their tents
as a hostage, or an exile, he had familiarly conversed with Attila
himself, the nephew of his benefactor; and the two famous antagonists
appear to have been connected by a personal and military friendship,
which they afterwards confirmed by mutual gifts, frequent embassies, and
the education of Carpilio, the son of Aëtius, in the camp of Attila.
By the specious professions of gratitude and voluntary attachment, the
patrician might disguise his apprehensions of the Scythian conqueror, who
pressed the two empires with his innumerable armies. His demands were
obeyed or eluded. When he claimed the spoils of a vanquished city--some
vases of gold, which had been fraudulently embezzled--the civil and
military governors of Noricum were immediately despatched to satisfy his
complaints; and it is evident, from their conversation with Maximin and
Priscus in the royal village, that the valour and prudence of Aëtius had
not saved the western Romans from the common ignominy of tribute. Yet
his dexterous policy prolonged the advantages of a salutary peace; and
a numerous army of Huns and Alani, whom he had attached to his person,
was employed in the defence of Gaul. Two colonies of these barbarians
were judiciously fixed in the territories of Valence and Orleans, and
their active cavalry secured the important passages of the Rhone and
of the Loire. These savage allies were not indeed less formidable to
the subjects than to the enemies of Rome. Their original settlement was
enforced with the licentious violence of conquest; and the province
through which they marched was exposed to all the calamities of a hostile
invasion. Strangers to the emperor or the republic, the Alani of Gaul
were devoted to the ambition of Aëtius; and though he might suspect that,
in a contest with Attila himself, they would revolt to the standard of
their national king, the patrician laboured to restrain, rather than to
excite, their zeal and resentment against the Goths, the Burgundiones,
and the Franks.
[Sidenote: [418-439 A.D.]]
The kingdom established by the Visigoths, in the southern provinces of
Gaul, had gradually acquired strength and maturity; and the conduct of
those ambitious barbarians, either in peace or war, engaged the perpetual
vigilance of Aëtius. After the death of Wallia the Gothic sceptre
devolved to Theodoric, the son of the great Alaric; and his prosperous
reign, of more than thirty years, over a turbulent people may be allowed
to prove that his prudence was supported by uncommon vigour, both of
mind and body. Impatient of his narrow limits, Theodoric aspired to the
possession of Arles, the wealthy seat of government and commerce; but the
city was saved by the timely approach of Aëtius; and the Gothic king,
who had raised the siege with some loss and disgrace, was persuaded
for an adequate subsidy to divert the martial valour of his subjects
in a Spanish war. Yet Theodoric still watched, and eagerly seized the
favourable moment of renewing his hostile attempts. The Goths besieged
Narbo Martius (Narbonne), while the Belgic provinces were invaded by the
Burgundiones; and the public safety was threatened on every side by the
apparent union of the enemies of Rome. On every side the activity of
Aëtius and his Scythian cavalry opposed a firm and successful resistance.
Twenty thousand Burgundiones were slain in battle, and the remains of the
nation humbly accepted a dependent seat in the mountains of Savoy.
The walls of Narbo had been shaken by the battering engines, and the
inhabitants had endured the last extremities of famine, when Count
Litorius, approaching in silence, and directing each horseman to carry
behind him two sacks of flour, cut his way through the entrenchments of
the besiegers. The siege was immediately raised, and the more decisive
victory, which is ascribed to the personal conduct of Aëtius himself, was
marked with the blood of eight thousand Goths. But in the absence of the
patrician, who was hastily summoned to Italy by some public or private
interest, Count Litorius succeeded to the command; and his presumption
soon discovered that far different talents are required to lead a wing of
cavalry or to direct the operations of an important war. At the head of
an army of Huns, he rashly advanced to the gates of Tolosa (Toulouse),
full of careless contempt for an enemy whom misfortune had rendered both
prudent and desperate.
The predictions of the augurs had inspired Litorius with the profane
confidence that he should enter the Gothic capital in triumph; and the
trust which he reposed in his pagan allies encouraged him to reject the
fair conditions of peace, which were repeatedly proposed by the bishops
in the name of Theodoric. The king of the Goths exhibited in his distress
the edifying contrast of Christian piety and moderation; nor did he lay
aside his sackcloth and ashes till he was prepared to arm for the combat.
His soldiers, animated with martial and religious enthusiasm, assaulted
the camp of Litorius. The conflict was obstinate, the slaughter was
mutual. The Roman general, after a total defeat, which could be imputed
only to his unskilful rashness, was actually led through the streets of
Tolosa, not in his own, but in a hostile triumph. [His captors in a few
days put an end to his shame and his life.]
Such a loss, in a country whose spirit and finances were long since
exhausted, could not easily be repaired; and the Goths, assuming, in
their turn, the sentiments of ambition and revenge, would have planted
their victorious standards on the banks of the Rhone, if the presence
of Aëtius had not restored strength and discipline to the Romans. The
two armies expected the signal of a decisive action; but the generals,
who were conscious of each other’s force and doubtful of their own
superiority, prudently sheathed their swords in the field of battle;
and their reconciliation was permanent and sincere. Theodoric, king of
the Visigoths, appears to have deserved the love of his subjects, the
confidence of his allies, and the esteem of mankind. His throne was
surrounded by six valiant sons, who were educated with equal care in the
exercises of the barbarian camp and in those of the Gallic schools; from
the study of the Roman jurisprudence, they acquired the theory, at least,
of law and justice, and the harmonious sense of Virgil contributed to
soften the asperity of their native manners.
[Illustration: COSTUME OF A GOTH WOMAN]
[Sidenote: [439-450 A.D.]]
The two daughters of the Gothic king were given in marriage to the eldest
sons of the kings of the Suevi and of the Vandals, who reigned in Spain
and Africa; but these illustrious alliances were pregnant with guilt
and discord. The queen of the Suevi bewailed the death of a husband,
inhumanly massacred by her brother. The princess of the Vandals was
the victim of a jealous tyrant, whom she called her father. The cruel
Genseric suspected that his son’s wife had conspired to poison him; the
supposed crime was punished by the amputation of her nose and ears, and
the unhappy daughter of Theodoric was ignominiously returned to the court
of Tolosa in that deformed and mutilated condition. This horrid act,
which must seem incredible to a civilised age, drew tears from every
spectator; but Theodoric was urged, by the feelings of a parent and a
king, to revenge such irreparable injuries.
The imperial ministers, who always cherished the discord of the
barbarians, would have supplied the Goths with arms, and ships, and
treasures, for the African War; and the cruelty of Genseric might
have been fatal to himself, if the artful Vandal had not armed in his
cause the formidable power of the Huns. His rich gifts and pressing
solicitations inflamed the ambition of Attila; and the designs of Aëtius
and Theodoric were prevented by the invasion of Gaul.
[Sidenote: [429-450 A.D.]]
The Franks, whose monarchy was still confined to the neighbourhood of the
lower Rhine, had wisely established the right of hereditary succession
in the noble family of the Merovingians. These princes were elevated
on a buckler, the symbol of military command, and the royal fashion
of long hair was the ensign of their birth and dignity. Their flaxen
locks, which they combed and dressed with singular care, hung down in
flowing ringlets on their backs and shoulders; while the rest of the
nation were obliged, either by law or custom, to shave the hinder part
of their head, to comb their hair over the forehead, and to content
themselves with the ornament of two small whiskers. The lofty stature of
the Franks, and their blue eyes, denoted a Germanic origin; their close
apparel accurately expressed the figure of their limbs; a weighty sword
was suspended from a broad belt; their bodies were protected by a large
shield. And these warlike barbarians were trained, from their earliest
youth, to run, to leap, to swim; to dart the javelin or battle-axe with
unerring aim; to advance without hesitation against a superior enemy; and
to maintain, either in life or death, the invincible reputation of their
ancestors.
Clodion, the first of their long-haired kings, whose name and actions
are mentioned in authentic history, held his residence at Dispargum, a
village or fortress, whose place may be assigned between Louvain and
Brussels. From the report of his spies, the king of the Franks was
informed that the defenceless state of the second Belgic must yield, on
the slightest attack, to the valour of his subjects. He boldly penetrated
through the thickets and morasses of the Carbonarian forest, occupied
Turnacum (Tournay) and Camaracum (Cambray), the only cities which
existed in the fifth century, and extended his conquests as far as the
river Samara (Somme), over a desolate country, whose cultivation and
populousness are the effects of more recent industry (429).
While Clodion lay encamped in the plains of Artois, and celebrated with
vain and ostentatious security the marriage perhaps of his son, the
nuptial feast was interrupted by the unexpected and unwelcome presence
of Aëtius, who had passed the Samara at the head of his light cavalry.
The tables, which had been spread under the shelter of a hill, along
the banks of a pleasant stream, were rudely overturned; the Franks were
oppressed before they could recover their arms or their ranks; and their
unavailing valour was fatal only to themselves. The loaded wagons which
had followed their march afforded a rich booty; and the virgin bride,
with her female attendants, submitted to the new lovers who were imposed
on them by the chance of war. This advantage, which had been obtained
by the skill and activity of Aëtius, might reflect some disgrace on the
military prudence of Clodion; but the king of the Franks soon regained
his strength and reputation, and still maintained the possession of his
Gallic kingdom from the Rhine to the Samara.
Under his reign, and most probably from the enterprising spirit of
his subjects, the three capitals, Mogontiacum, Augusta Trevirorum,
and Colonia Agrippina, experienced the effects of hostile cruelty and
avarice. The distress of Colonia Agrippina was prolonged by the same
barbarians who evacuated the ruins of Augusta Trevirorum; and Augusta
Trevirorum, which in the space of forty years had been four times
pillaged, was disposed to lose the memory of her afflictions in the vain
amusements of the circus. The death of Clodion, after a reign of twenty
years, exposed his kingdom to the discord and ambition of his two sons.
Merovæus, the younger, was persuaded to implore the protection of Rome;
he was received at the imperial court as the ally of Valentinian, and the
adopted son of the patrician Aëtius; and dismissed to his native country,
with splendid gifts and the strongest assurances of friendship and
support. During his absence, his elder brother had solicited with equal
ardour the formidable aid of Attila; and the king of the Huns embraced an
alliance which facilitated the passage of the Rhine and justified by a
specious and honourable pretence the invasion of Gaul.
When Attila declared his resolution of supporting the cause of his allies
the Vandals and the Franks, at the same time and almost in the spirit
of romantic chivalry, the savage monarch professed himself the lover
and the champion of the princess Honoria. The sister of Valentinian
was educated in the palace of Ravenna; and as her marriage might be
productive of some danger to the state, she was raised by the title of
Augusta above the hopes of the most presumptuous subject. But the fair
Honoria had no sooner attained the sixteenth year of her age than she
detested the importunate greatness which must forever exclude her from
the comforts of honourable love; in the midst of vain and unsatisfactory
pomp, Honoria sighed, yielded to the impulse of nature, and threw
herself into the arms of her chamberlain Eugenius. Her guilt and shame
(such is the absurd language of imperious man) were soon betrayed by
the appearances of pregnancy; but the disgrace of the royal family was
published to the world by the imprudence of the empress Placidia, who
dismissed her daughter, after a strict and shameful confinement, to a
remote exile at Constantinople. The unhappy princess passed twelve or
fourteen years in the irksome society of the sisters of Theodosius and
their chosen virgins; to whose crown Honoria could no longer aspire, and
whose monastic assiduity of prayer, fasting, and vigils she reluctantly
imitated. Her impatience of long and hopeless celibacy urged her to
embrace a strange and desperate resolution.
The name of Attila was familiar and formidable at Constantinople; and his
frequent embassies entertained a perpetual intercourse between his camp
and the imperial palace. In the pursuit of love, or rather of revenge,
the daughter of Placidia sacrificed every duty and every pretence; and
offered to deliver her person into the arms of the barbarian, of whose
language she was ignorant, whose figure was scarcely human, and whose
religion and manners she abhorred. By the ministry of a faithful eunuch,
she transmitted to Attila a ring, the pledge of her affection; and
earnestly conjured him to claim her as a lawful spouse, to whom he had
been secretly betrothed. These indecent advances were received however
with coldness and disdain; and the king of the Huns continued to multiply
the number of his wives, till his love was awakened by the more forcible
passions of ambition and avarice.
The invasion of Gaul was preceded and justified by a formal demand
of the princess Honoria, with a just and equal share of the imperial
patrimony. His predecessors, the ancient Tanjous, had often addressed, in
the same hostile and peremptory manner, the daughters of China; and the
pretensions of Attila were not less offensive to the majesty of Rome. A
firm but temperate refusal was communicated to his ambassadors. The right
of female succession, though it might derive a specious argument from the
recent examples of Placidia and Pulcheria, was strenuously denied; and
the indissoluble engagements of Honoria were opposed to the claims of her
Scythian lover. On the discovery of her connection with the king of the
Huns, the guilty princess had been sent away as an object of horror from
Constantinople to Italy. Her life was spared; but the ceremony of her
marriage was performed with some obscure and nominal husband, before she
was immured in a perpetual prison, to bewail those crimes and misfortunes
which Honoria might have escaped, had she not been born the daughter of
an emperor.
A native of Gaul, and a contemporary, the learned and eloquent Sidonius,
who was afterwards bishop of Clermont, had made a promise to one of his
friends that he would compose a regular history of the war of Attila.
If the modesty of Sidonius had not discouraged him from the prosecution
of this interesting work, the historian would have related with the
simplicity of truth those memorable events to which the poet, in vague
and doubtful metaphors, has concisely alluded. The kings and nations
of Germany and Scythia, from the Volga perhaps to the Danube, obeyed
the warlike summons of Attila. From the royal village, in the plains
of Hungary, his standard moved towards the west and, after a march of
seven or eight hundred miles he reached the conflux of the Rhine and the
Nicer (Neckar); where he was joined by the Franks, who adhered to his
ally, the elder of the sons of Clodion. A troop of light barbarians, who
roamed in quest of plunder, might choose the winter for the convenience
of passing the river on the ice; but the innumerable cavalry of the Huns
required such plenty of forage and provisions as could be procured only
in a milder season; the Hercynian forest supplied materials for a bridge
of boats; and the hostile myriads were poured, with resistless violence,
into the Belgic provinces.
[Sidenote: [450-451 A.D.]]
The consternation of Gaul was universal; and the various fortunes of
its cities have been adorned by tradition with martyrdoms and miracles.
Tricassæ (Troyes) was saved by the merits of St. Lupus; St. Servatius was
removed from the world, that he might not behold the ruin of Aduataca
Tungrorum (Tongres); and the prayers of St. Genevieve diverted the march
of Attila from the neighbourhood of Lutetia Parisiarum (Paris). But as
the greatest part of the Gallic cities were alike destitute of saints
and soldiers, they were besieged and stormed by the Huns, who practised,
in the example of Mettis (Metz), their customary maxims of war. They
involved, in a promiscuous massacre, the priests who served at the
altar, and the infants, who, in the hour of danger, had been providently
baptised by the bishop; the flourishing city was delivered to the flames,
and a solitary chapel of St. Stephen marked the place where it formerly
stood. From the Rhine and the Mosella (Moselle), Attila advanced into the
heart of Gaul, crossed the Sequana (Seine) at Autesiodorum (Auxerre),
and, after a long and laborious march, fixed his camp under the walls of
Orleans. He was desirous of securing his conquests by the possession of
an advantageous post, which commanded the passage of the Loire; and he
depended on the secret invitation of Sangiban, king of the Alani, who had
promised to betray the city and to revolt from the service of the empire.
But this treacherous conspiracy was detected and disappointed. Orleans
had been strengthened with recent fortifications; and the assaults of the
Huns were vigorously repelled by the faithful valour of the soldiers or
citizens, who defended the place.
The pastoral diligence of Anianus, a bishop of primitive sanctity and
consummate prudence, exhausted every art of religious policy to support
their courage till the arrival of the expected succours. After an
obstinate siege, the walls were shaken by the battering-rams; the Huns
had already occupied the suburbs; and the people who were incapable of
bearing arms lay prostrate in prayer. Anianus, who anxiously counted
the days and hours, despatched a trusty messenger to observe, from the
rampart, the face of the distant country. He returned twice, without
any intelligence that could inspire hope or comfort; but in his third
report he mentioned a small cloud which he had faintly descried at the
extremity of the horizon. “It is the aid of God!” exclaimed the bishop,
in a tone of pious confidence; and the whole multitude repeated after
him, “It is the aid of God!” The remote object, on which every eye was
fixed, became each moment larger and more distinct; the Roman and Gothic
banners were gradually perceived; and a favourable wind blowing aside the
dust discovered, in deep array, the impatient squadrons of Aëtius and
Theodoric, who pressed forward to the relief of Orleans.
The facility with which Attila had penetrated into the heart of Gaul may
be ascribed to his insidious policy, as well as to the terror of his
arms. His public declarations were skilfully mitigated by his private
assurances; he alternately soothed and threatened the Romans and the
Goths; and the courts of Ravenna and Tolosa, mutually suspicious of each
other’s intentions, beheld with supine indifference the approach of
their common enemy. Aëtius was the sole guardian of the public safety;
but his wisest measures were embarrassed by a faction which, since the
death of Placidia, infested the imperial palace; the youth of Italy
trembled at the sound of the trumpet; and the barbarians, who, from
fear or affection, were inclined to the cause of Attila, awaited with
doubtful and venal faith the event of the war. The patrician passed the
Alps at the head of some troops, whose strength and numbers scarcely
deserved the name of an army. But on his arrival at Arelate, or Lugdunum
he was confounded by the intelligence that the Visigoths, refusing to
embrace the defence of Gaul, had determined to expect within their own
territories the formidable invader whom they professed to despise.
The senator Avitus, who after the honourable exercise of the prætorian
prefecture had retired to his estate in Auvergne, was persuaded to accept
the important embassy, which he executed with ability and success. He
represented to Theodoric that an ambitious conqueror, who aspired to the
dominion of the earth, could be resisted only by the firm and unanimous
alliance of the powers whom he laboured to oppress. The lively eloquence
of Avitus inflamed the Gothic warriors by the description of the injuries
which their ancestors had suffered from the Huns; whose implacable
fury still pursued them from the Danube to the foot of the Pyrenees.
He strenuously urged that it was the duty of every Christian to save
from sacrilegious violation the churches of God and the relics of the
saints; that it was the interest of every barbarian, who had acquired
a settlement in Gaul, to defend the fields and vineyards which were
cultivated for his use against the desolation of the Scythian shepherds.
Theodoric yielded to the evidence of truth; adopted the measure at once
the most prudent and the most honourable, and declared that, as the
faithful ally of Aëtius and the Romans, he was ready to expose his life
and kingdom for the common safety of Gaul.
The Visigoths, who at that time were in the mature vigour of their fame
and power, obeyed with alacrity the signal of war; prepared their arms
and horses, and assembled under the standard of their aged king, who was
resolved with his two eldest sons Torismond and Theodoric, to command
in person his numerous and valiant people. The example of the Goths
determined several tribes or nations, that seemed to fluctuate between
the Huns and the Romans. The indefatigable diligence of the patrician
gradually collected the troops of Gaul and Germany, who had formerly
acknowledged themselves the subjects, or soldiers, of the republic,
but who now claimed the rewards of voluntary service and the rank of
independent allies--the Læti, the Armoricans, the Breones, the Saxons,
the Burgundiones, the Sarmatians or Alani, the Ripuarians, and the Franks
who followed Meroveus as their lawful prince. Such was the various army
which, under the conduct of Aëtius and Theodoric, advanced by rapid
marches to relieve Orleans and to give battle to the innumerable host of
Attila.
On their approach, the king of the Huns immediately raised the siege,
and sounded a retreat to recall the foremost of his troops from the
pillage of a city which they had already entered. The valour of
Attila was always guided by his prudence; and as he foresaw the fatal
consequences of a defeat in the heart of Gaul, he repassed the Seine,
and expected the enemy in the plains of Châlons, whose smooth and level
surface was adapted to the operations of his Scythian cavalry. But in
this tumultuary retreat the vanguard of the Romans and their allies
continually pressed, and sometimes engaged, the troops which Attila had
posted in the rear; the hostile columns, in the darkness of the night
and the perplexity of the roads, might encounter each other without
design; and the bloody conflict of the Franks and Gepids, in which
fifteen thousand barbarians were slain, was a prelude to a more general
and decisive action. The Catalaunian fields spread themselves round
Châlons,[68] and extend, according to the vague measurement of Jordanes,
to the length of 150 and the breadth of 100 miles over the whole
province, which is entitled to the appellation of a champaign country.[b]
[Illustration: ANCIENT SPEAR HEADS]
THE GOTHIC HISTORIAN JORDANES ON THE BATTLE OF CHÂLONS
But before entering upon the actual encounter, we had better here refer
to some preliminary details, all the more that this battle was no less
ample in scale and complicated in details than the day of its date
was famous. Sangiban, king of the Alans, solicitous for his future,
promised Attila submission and to hand over his then residence, Aureliani
(Orleans). This treacherous move coming to the ears of Theodoric and
Aëtius, they constructed great outworks around the city, keeping the
suspected Sangiban under surveillance, and posted him and his people
among their own auxiliaries. Consequently Attila, impressed by this
occurrence and distrustful of his own strength, hesitated to join action.
Yet fearing flight as he did death, he resolved to scan the future by
help of augury.
As usual the augurs pried into the entrails of a sheep, and inspected its
bones and veins as the latter showed on some scraped bones, announcing,
as a result, misfortune to the Huns. A morsel of contentment was added,
however, in the prediction that the enemy’s commander-in-chief should
die in the hour of victory, and sully his laurels. Now Attila, in his
eager desire for the death of Aëtius even at the risk of his own, and his
army’s defeat, although disturbed by the prospect held out by the augurs,
yet, being skilled in the refinements of military tactics, after some
hesitation resolved to join battle about three in the afternoon and thus
obviate suspicion of yielding by trusting to darkness in case of defeat.
The field, from a gentle slope, gradually assumed the character of a
hill. As the advantages presented by such conformation were by no means
slight, both parties made this slope their objective, the Huns with their
auxiliaries seizing upon the right flank, the Romans and Visigoths the
left, leaving the crest for future decision. The contest commences,
Aëtius on the left with his Romans, with the Visigoths as his right
support, and Sangiban leader of the Alans between--a piece of military
precaution by which they doubly flanked this rather doubtful leader,
since fighting is the more probable where flight is impossible.
The battle array of the Huns was on a different plan. Attila with his
bravest held the centre. By this arrangement he had his personal safety
in view, trusting that a stand amid the valiant of his race would insure
himself, at least as king, from imminent danger. On the flanks there
deployed in disorder multitudes of subject nations and people, chief
among whom were the Ostrogoths’ forces under the leadership of the three
brothers, Walamir, Theodomir, and Widemir, nobler than the very king
himself whom they served, since resplendent with the hereditary glories
of the Amal race. There might be seen also at the head of countless bands
of the Gepidæ their most renowned king, Ardaric, who from his all too
great loyalty to Attila was of his inner counsels. For Attila, well aware
of his wisdom, prized him and Walamir of the Ostrogoths above all the
pettier royalties--Walamir, the reticent, the affable, the guileless, and
Ardaric the knightly and the loyal. Not without reason was it that Attila
trusted them to match their Visigothic kindred.
As for the rest,--the kingly mob, if I am not irreverent,--and the
chiefs of this nation and that, retainers rather than kings, they hung
on each move of Attila’s; and did his eye beckon them, then, speechless,
terrified, and trembling they stood at call, or at least were subservient
to his every order. Yet king of kings though he was, was Attila solitary
amid all, and over all solicitous.
The battle began over the possession of the ridge already mentioned.
Leading his men on to secure this summit, Attila was in this forestalled
by Torismund and Aëtius who, striving with all their might to reach
the crest, first won it, and from their superior vantage ground easily
dispersed the Huns. When Attila beheld his troops disorganised by this
occurrence, he thought a harangue at this juncture would rally them and
said:
“Victorious so often over so many nations, and masters of the world,
if to-day you flinch not, I should think myself a fool to rouse you to
courage by speech as if you were raw recruits. Consign such conduct to
the juvenile general and the untrained militia. It as little befits me to
deal in commonplace as you to listen. You are warriors, or nothing, and
what to such is more satisfying than to carve out his vengeance by the
sword? Ah! Revenge, nature’s first gift and sweetest soother of the soul!
Let your feet then be swift to the attack since ever is the attacker
the bolder! Heed not that mongrel mass of foreign speech, who but prove
their fear by herding together. Look at them! Look! how even before
our first charge they are swayed to and fro from fear; they make for
hill and height; again, too late for regret, are back for safety to the
battle-field. You need no telling as to the flimsiness of Roman defence,
or how, not a wound, but a speck of dust merely lays them low. Be your
old selves, and, while they are punctiliously peddling away at formations
and shield-locking, charge with your unflinching courage, laugh at their
‘formations.’ On against Visigoth and down with the Alans! There lies
speedy victory for us, and there the struggle lies. Sunder the sinew and
the limbs collapse; hack the bones and the body falls!
“Huns of mine! Rouse your rage, and let your fury swell as of old!
Craftily now, and by the sword-stroke then! Some death mid the enemy let
the wounded man seek, and the scatheless fight till he sicken with the
slaughter! The child of victory the dart will not smite, but fate deals
the doomed one his death at the board. Nor did fortune deal the Hun such
a roll of victories, if not to make him blithe over this one victory
the more. Who unbared the Mœtic swamp, the secret of the centuries?
Who weaponless vanquished the weaponed? These herded outcasts dare not
confront the Hun! That this shall be my new field of victory, the long
tale of my former assures me! Yea! and first am I whose shaft shall be
sped! And doomed is he who fights not when Attila leads the fight.”
Spurred on by this dithyramb, headlong into fight they rush.
The juncture had its terrors, yet the king’s presence overcame the fear
even of the coward. It was soon a case of man to man. It was a battle,
savage, tangled, widespread, dogged. Antiquity has not its parallel. Such
deeds are told of, that he who has not been privileged to witness them,
though witnessing much that is marvellous, yet must ever lack the marvel
of this. For, to believe tradition, a brook whose feeble current rolled
through the plain already spoken of, swollen by the blood of the wounded
and enlarged not as usual by rains but by an all too rare flood, was
converted into a torrent by this sanguine contribution. Those, moreover,
parched by loss of blood, who were driven to its bank, were reduced to
drinking this gruesome draught--drinking by an enforced fate the very
gushings of their own wounds.
Then, too, King Theodoric, riding up and down his ranks in cheering
exhortation, fell from his steed and was trampled under foot by his own
soldiery, terminating his career at an advanced age. Another tale has it
that he fell by the javelin of Andagis, Attila’s lieutenant. Thus was
accomplished the prediction of Attila’s augurs, which Attila had set down
to Aëtius.
Next the Visigoths, leaving the Alans, fell on the Hunnish bands with
fury, and Attila himself were as good as dead, had not his prudence
led him to take refuge with his followers within his camp and its
fortification of wagons. Weak as was this shelter, yet there, for
protection of their lives, trooped the warriors whom but a little
previously no ordinary obstacle could withstand.
Torismond, son of Theodoric, who, with Aëtius, had seized the hill and
repelled the enemy from its summit, in the belief that he was rejoining
his men, and misled by the darkness of the night, stepped inside the
wagon enclosure of the Huns. While fighting bravely, he fell to the
ground from his wounded horse, but though rescued by his men he was
persuaded to give up further fighting. Aëtius, too, during the night’s
confusion, wandered amid the enemy. Dreading some disaster to the Goths,
he persisted in his search for the correct way, arriving at length at the
allied camp, where under the protection of shields he passed the night.
At dawn a plain is seen heaped and covered with corpses, but the Huns do
not venture to issue from their retreat, and so the confederates judge
the victory theirs. They judged, too, that it was no common disaster
which had induced the flight of Attila from the battle-field. Yet was his
action not that of one who acknowledged defeat.
He showed his usual courage, for within his camp was the clash of
arms, the brattle of the trumpet, ever threatening a sortie; as a
lion might, when hard beset by the hunters, ramp and rave at entrance
to his den, without venturing to emerge, yet nevertheless terrifying
the neighbourhood by his roaring, so did the warlike king, secure in
his retreat, supply a source of fear to his conquerors. These latter
resolved to wear him out by a siege, since he lacked provisions, and as
he could from his archers placed inside the barrier rain down showers of
missiles on them should they attempt an assault by force. It is reported,
however, that the king, haughty as ever even in a situation so desperate,
had formed a pyre from saddlery, having resolved to throw himself into
its flames should the enemy force his camp, that none might boast of
having wounded him, or that the lord of so many nations should have ever
been in an enemy’s power.
[Illustration: GALLIC WEAPONS]
Whilst this siege bred delay, the Visigoths busied themselves in search
for their king,--the father of Torismond,--wondering at his absence while
success had crowned their arms. When after long search they found him,
as is not infrequent among brave men, amid a dense heap of bodies, they
honoured him in song, bearing away his body under the eyes of the enemy.
Then it was possible to see crowds of Goths, with uncouth accent that
rent the air in song, render the last and most sacred rites to the dead
while all around was war. Tears there were, but such as a warrior merits.
The death was ours, to be sure, but even to the Hun it was glorious,
nor did Attila’s pride feel aught but humbled to see the Goths bear to
burial with all its trappings the body of a mighty king. These Goths,
while paying last and merited honours to Theodoric, at the same hour made
over to his son the royal dignity, and amid clash of arms the brave and
glorious warrior Torismond followed the funeral rites of his dear father
as was fitting for a son.
These rites accomplished, urged by grief through his bereavement and
impelled by natural valour, Torismond resolved to avenge the death of
his father upon the remnant of the Huns. On this point he consulted the
patrician Aëtius, his senior in years and of riper experience, and craved
advice as to his action. He in his fear lest the thorough overthrow of
the Huns might leave the Roman power at the mercy of the Goths, advised
him as follows:
That he should retrace his steps to his own state, and firmly secure
the throne now vacant by his father’s death, as otherwise his brothers
might seize upon the royal treasure, and usurp the regal power over the
Visigoths, in which case was no alternative left but a laborious contest
made all the more squalid as being between relatives. Torismond listened
to this advice not as to a piece of duplicity but as if it advanced
his own interests, and leaving the Huns behind him, he returned to his
district of Gaul. Thus does man’s weakness give way to suspicion, and
amid momentous events lose the opportune hour.
In this most famous battle, waged between the bravest of races, report
says that one hundred and sixty-five thousand men fell on both sides,
not to mention fifteen thousand of the Gepids and Franks, who one night
before the general engagement meeting by chance fell by mutual assault,
the Franks siding with Romans, the Gepids with the Huns.
On Attila’s learning the departure of the Goths, he pursued such course
as is customary in abnormal circumstances. He suspected a ruse, and so
for some time longer lurked in camp. But when the enemy’s absence was
conjoined to lengthened quiet, the spirit of a victor returned to him,
gaiety gained the upper hand, and the musings of this mighty monarch
resumed the path of their ancient destiny.
Meanwhile Torismond, who had succeeded to the throne, marched into
Tolosa, and none was found to dispute his succession.[d]
THE INVASION OF ITALY: THE FOUNDATION OF VENICE
[Sidenote: [451-452 A.D.]]
Neither the spirit, nor the forces, nor the reputation of Attila were
impaired by the failure of the Gallic expedition. In the ensuing spring,
he repeated his demand of the princess Honoria and her patrimonial
treasures. The demand was again rejected, or eluded; and the indignant
lover immediately took the field, passed the Alps, invaded Italy,
and besieged Aquileia with an innumerable host of barbarians. Those
barbarians were unskilled in the methods of conducting a regular siege,
which, even among the ancients, required some knowledge, or at least
some practice, of the mechanical arts. But the labour of many thousand
provincials and captives, whose lives were sacrificed without pity, might
execute the most painful and dangerous work. The skill of the Roman
artists might be corrupted to the destruction of their country. The walls
of Aquileia were assaulted by a formidable train of battering-rams,
movable turrets, and engines, that threw stones, darts, and fire; and
the monarch of the Huns employed the forcible impulse of hope, fear,
emulation, and interest to subvert the only barrier which delayed the
conquest of Italy.
Aquileia was at that period one of the richest, the most populous, and
the strongest of the maritime cities of the Adriatic coast. The Gothic
auxiliaries, who appeared to have served under their native princes
Alaric and Antala, communicated their intrepid spirit; and the citizens
still remembered the glorious and successful resistance which their
ancestors had opposed to a fierce, inexorable barbarian who disgraced the
majesty of the Roman purple. Three months were consumed without effect in
the siege of Aquileia; till the want of provisions and the clamours of
his army compelled Attila to relinquish the enterprise, and reluctantly
to issue his orders that the troops should strike their tents the next
morning, and begin their retreat. But, as he rode round the walls,
pensive, angry, and disappointed, he observed a stork preparing to leave
her nest in one of the towers, and to fly with her infant family towards
the country. He seized, with the ready penetration of a statesman,
this trifling incident which chance had offered to superstition, and
exclaimed, in a loud and cheerful tone, that such a domestic bird, so
constantly attached to human society, would never have abandoned her
ancient seats unless these towers had been devoted to impending ruin and
solitude.
The favourable omen inspired an assurance of victory; the siege was
renewed and prosecuted with fresh vigour; a large breach was made in
the part of the wall from whence the stork had taken her flight; the
Huns mounted to the assault with irresistible fury; and the succeeding
generation could scarcely discover the ruins of Aquileia. After this
dreadful chastisement, Attila pursued his march; and, as he passed, the
cities of Altinum, Concordia, and Patavium (Padua) were reduced into
heaps of stones and ashes. The inland towns, Vicentia (Vicenza), Verona,
and Bergomum (Bergamo) were exposed to the rapacious cruelty of the
Huns. Mediolanum and Ticinum submitted without resistance to the loss
of their wealth; and applauded the unusual clemency which preserved
from the flames the public as well as private buildings, and spared the
lives of the captive multitude. The popular traditions of Comum, Turin,
or Modena may justly be suspected; yet they concur with more authentic
evidence to prove that Attila spread his ravages over the rich plains of
modern Lombardy, which are divided by the Po, and bounded by the Alps and
Apennine. When he took possession of the royal palace of Mediolanum, he
was surprised and offended at the sight of a picture, which represented
the Cæsars seated on their throne and the princes of Scythia prostrate at
their feet. The revenge which Attila inflicted on this monument of Roman
vanity was harmless and ingenious. He commanded a painter to reverse
the figures and the attitudes; and the emperors were delineated, on the
same canvas, approaching in a suppliant posture to empty their bags of
tributary gold before the throne of the Scythian monarch. The spectators
must have confessed the truth and propriety of the alteration; and were
perhaps tempted to apply, on this singular occasion, the well-known fable
of the dispute between the lion and the man.
It is a saying worthy of the ferocious pride of Attila that the grass
never grew on the spot where his horse had trod. Yet the savage destroyer
undesignedly laid the foundation of a republic which revived, in the
feudal state of Europe, the art and spirit of commercial industry. The
celebrated name of Venice, or Venetia, was formerly diffused over a large
and fertile province of Italy, from the confines of Pannonia to the
river Addua, and from the Po to the Rætian and Julian Alps. Before the
irruption of the barbarians, fifty Venetian cities flourished in peace
and prosperity; Aquileia was placed in the most conspicuous station,
but the ancient dignity of Patavium was supported by agriculture and
manufactures; and the property of five hundred citizens who were entitled
to the equestrian rank must have amounted, at the strictest computation,
to 1,700,000 pounds. Many families of Aquileia, Patavium, and the
adjacent towns, who fled from the sword of the Huns, found a safe though
obscure refuge in the neighbouring islands.
At the extremity of the gulf, where the Adriatic feebly imitates the
tides of the ocean, near a hundred small islands are separated by shallow
water from the continent, and protected from the waves by several long
slips of land, which admit the entrance of vessels through some secret
and narrow channels. Till the middle of the fifth century, these remote
and sequestered spots remained without cultivation, with few inhabitants,
and almost without a name. But the manners of the Venetian fugitives,
their arts and their government, were gradually formed by their new
situation; and one of the epistles of Cassiodorus, which describes their
condition about seventy years afterwards, may be considered as the
primitive monument of the republic.
THE RETREAT OF ATTILA
[Sidenote: [452-453 A.D.]]
The Italians, who had long since renounced the exercise of arms, were
surprised, after forty years’ peace, by the approach of a formidable
barbarian, whom they abhorred as the enemy of their religion as well as
of their republic. Amidst the general consternation, Aëtius alone was
incapable of fear; but it was impossible that he should achieve, alone
and unassisted, any military exploits worthy of his former renown. The
barbarians, who had defended Gaul, refused to march to the relief of
Italy; and the succours promised by the Eastern emperor were distant
and doubtful. Since Aëtius, at the head of his domestic troops, still
maintained the field, and harassed or retarded the march of Attila, he
never showed himself more truly great than at the time when his conduct
was blamed by an ignorant and ungrateful people.
If the mind of Valentinian had been susceptible of any generous
sentiments, he would have chosen such a general for his example and his
guide. But the timid grandson of Theodosius, instead of sharing the
dangers escaped from the sound of war; and his hasty retreat from Ravenna
to Rome, from an impregnable fortress to an open capital, betrayed his
secret intention of abandoning Italy, as soon as the danger should
approach his imperial person. This shameful abdication was suspended,
however, by the spirit of doubt and delay, which commonly adheres to
pusillanimous counsels and sometimes corrects their pernicious tendency.
The Western emperor, with the senate and people of Rome, embraced the
more salutary resolution of deprecating, by a solemn and suppliant
embassy, the wrath of Attila. This important commission was accepted
by Avienus, who, from his birth and riches, his consular dignity, the
numerous train of his clients, and his personal abilities, held the first
rank in the Roman senate.
[Illustration: A ROMAN COFFER]
The specious and artful character of Avienus was admirably qualified
to conduct a negotiation either of public or private interest; his
colleague Trigetius had exercised the prætorian prefecture of Italy;
and Leo, bishop of Rome, consented to expose his life for the safety of
his flock. The genius of Leo was exercised and displayed in the public
misfortunes; and he has deserved the appellation of “great,” by the
successful zeal with which he laboured to establish his opinions and his
authority, under the venerable names of orthodox faith and ecclesiastical
discipline. The Roman ambassadors were introduced to the tent of Attila,
as he lay encamped at the place where the slow-winding Mincius is lost in
the foaming waves of the lake Benacus, and trampled, with the Scythian
cavalry, the farms of Catullus and Virgil. The barbarian monarch listened
with favourable, and even respectful, attention; and the deliverance of
Italy was purchased by the immense ransom, or dowry, of the princess
Honoria. The state of his army might facilitate the treaty and hasten his
retreat. Their martial spirit was relaxed by the wealth and indolence of
a warm climate.
The shepherds of the north, whose ordinary food consisted of milk and raw
flesh, indulged themselves too freely in the use of bread, of wine, and
of meat prepared and seasoned by the arts of cookery; and the progress
of disease revenged in some measure the injuries of the Italians. When
Attila declared his resolution of carrying his victorious arms to the
gates of Rome, he was admonished by his friends as well as by his enemies
that Alaric had not long survived the conquest of the Eternal City. His
mind, superior to real danger, was assaulted by imaginary terrors; nor
could he escape the influence of superstition, which had so often been
subservient to his designs. The pressing eloquence of Leo, his majestic
aspect and sacerdotal robes, excited the veneration of Attila for the
spiritual father of the Christians. The apparition of the two Apostles,
St. Peter and St. Paul, who menaced the barbarian with instant death if
he rejected the prayer of their successor, is one of the noblest legends
of ecclesiastical tradition. The safety of Rome might deserve the
interposition of celestial beings; and some indulgence is due to a fable
which has been represented by the pencil of Raphael and the chisel of
Algardi.
Before the king of the Huns evacuated Italy, he threatened to return
more dreadful and more implacable, if his bride, the princess Honoria,
were not delivered to his ambassadors within the term stipulated by
the treaty. Yet, in the meantime, Attila relieved his tender anxiety
by adding a beautiful maid, whose name was Ildico, to the list of his
innumerable wives. Their marriage was celebrated with barbaric pomp and
festivity, at his wooden palace beyond the Danube; and the monarch,
oppressed with wine and sleep, retired at a late hour from the banquet
to the nuptial bed. His attendants continued to respect his pleasures
or his repose the greatest part of the ensuing day, till the unusual
silence alarmed their fears and suspicions; and, after attempting to
awaken Attila by loud and repeated cries, they at length broke into the
royal apartment. They found the trembling bride sitting by the bedside,
hiding her face with her veil, and lamenting her own danger as well as
the death of the king, who had expired during the night. An artery had
suddenly burst; and as Attila lay in a supine posture, he was suffocated
by a torrent of blood, which, instead of finding a passage through the
nostrils, regurgitated into the lungs and stomach. His body was solemnly
exposed in the midst of the plain, under a silken pavilion, and the
chosen squadrons of the Huns, wheeling round in measured evolutions,
chanted a funeral song to the memory of a hero glorious in his life,
invincible in his death, the father of his people, the scourge of his
enemies, and the terror of the world. According to their national custom,
the barbarians cut off a part of their hair, gashed their faces with
unseemly wounds, and bewailed their valiant leader as he deserved, not
with the tears of women but with the blood of warriors (453).
[Sidenote: [453-454 A.D.]]
The remains of Attila were enclosed within three coffins, of gold, of
silver, and of iron, and privately buried in the night: the spoils of
nations were thrown into his grave; the captives who had opened the
ground were inhumanly massacred; and the same Huns who had indulged such
excessive grief, feasted with dissolute and intemperate mirth about the
recent sepulchre of their king. It was reported at Constantinople that,
on the fortunate night on which he expired, Marcian beheld in a dream the
bow of Attila broken asunder; and the report may be allowed to prove how
seldom the image of that formidable barbarian was absent from the mind of
a Roman emperor.
The revolution which subverted the empire of the Huns established the
fame of Attila, whose genius alone had sustained the huge and disjointed
fabric. After his death the boldest chieftains aspired to the rank of
kings; the most powerful kings refused to acknowledge a superior; and the
numerous sons whom so many various mothers bore to the deceased monarch
divided and disputed, like a private inheritance, the sovereign command
of the nations of Germany and Scythia. The bold Ardaric felt and resented
the disgrace of this servile partition; and his subjects, the warlike
Gepidæ, with the Ostrogoths, under the conduct of three valiant brothers,
encouraged their allies to vindicate the rights of freedom and royalty.
In a bloody and decisive conflict on the banks of the river Netad, in
Pannonia, the lance of the Gepidæ, the sword of the Goths, the arrows
of the Huns, the Suevic infantry, the light arms of the Heruli, and the
heavy weapons of the Alani, encountered or supported each other; and the
victory of Ardaric was accompanied with the slaughter of thirty thousand
of his enemies. Ellac, the eldest son of Attila, lost his life and
crown in the memorable battle of Netad; his early valour had raised him
to the throne of the Acatzires, a Scythian people whom he subdued, and
his father, who loved the superior merit, would have envied the death
of Ellac. His brother Dengisich, with an army of Huns, still formidable
in their flight and ruin, maintained his ground above fifteen years on
the banks of the Danube. The palace of Attila, with the old country of
Dacia, from the Carpathian hills to the Euxine, became the seat of a new
power which was erected by Ardaric, king of the Gepidæ. The Pannonian
conquests, from Vindobona to Sirmium, were occupied by the Ostrogoths;
and the settlements of the tribes who had so bravely asserted their
native freedom were irregularly distributed, according to the measure
of their respective strength. Surrounded and oppressed by the multitude
of his father’s slaves, the kingdom of Dengisich was confined to the
circle of his wagons; his desperate courage urged him to invade the
Eastern Empire; he fell in battle; and his head, ignominiously exposed
in the Hippodrome, exhibited a grateful spectacle to the people of
Constantinople.
Attila had fondly or superstitiously believed that Irnac, the youngest
of his sons, was destined to perpetuate the glories of his race. The
character of that prince, who attempted to moderate the rashness of
his brother Dengisich, was more suitable to the declining condition of
the Huns; and Irnac, with his subject hordes, retired into the heart
of the Lesser Scythia. They were soon overwhelmed by a torrent of new
barbarians, who followed the same road which their own ancestors had
formerly discovered. The Geougen or Avars, whose residence is assigned
by the Greek writers to the shores of the ocean, impelled the adjacent
tribes; till at length the Igours of the north, issuing from the cold
Siberian regions, which produce the most valuable furs, spread themselves
over the desert, as far as the Borysthenes and the Caspian gates; and
finally extinguished the empire of the Huns.
Such an event might contribute to the safety of the Eastern Empire, under
the reign of a prince who conciliated the friendship without forfeiting
the esteem of the barbarians. But the emperor of the West, the feeble
and dissolute Valentinian, who had reached his thirty-fifth year without
attaining the age of reason or courage, abused this apparent security
to undermine the foundations of his own throne by the murder of the
patrician Aëtius. From the instinct of a base and jealous mind, he hated
the man who was universally celebrated as the terror of the barbarians,
and the support of the republic; and his new favourite, the eunuch
Heraclius, awakened the emperor from the supine lethargy which might be
disguised, during the life of Placidia, by the excuse of filial piety.
The fame of Aëtius, his wealth and dignity, the numerous and martial
train of barbarian followers, his powerful dependents, who filled the
civil offices of the state, and the hopes of his son Gaudentius, who was
already contracted to Eudoxia, the emperor’s daughter, had raised him
above the rank of a subject.
The ambitious designs of which he was secretly accused, excited the
fears, as well as the resentment, of Valentinian. Aëtius himself,
supported by the consciousness of his merit, his services, and perhaps
his innocence, seems to have maintained a haughty and indiscreet
behaviour. The patrician offended his sovereign by a hostile declaration;
he aggravated the offence, by compelling him to ratify with a solemn oath
a treaty of reconciliation and alliance; he proclaimed his suspicions;
he neglected his safety; and from a vain confidence that the enemy whom
he despised was incapable even of a manly crime, he rashly ventured his
person in the palace of Rome. Whilst he urged, perhaps with intemperate
vehemence, the marriage of his son, Valentinian, drawing his sword, the
first sword he had ever drawn, plunged it in the breast of a general who
had saved his empire; his courtiers and eunuchs ambitiously struggled to
imitate their master; and Aëtius, pierced with a hundred wounds, fell
dead in the royal presence. Boethius, the prætorian prefect, was killed
at the same moment; and before the event could be divulged, the principal
friends of the patrician were summoned to the palace and separately
murdered. The horrid deed, palliated by the specious names of justice and
necessity, was immediately communicated by the emperor to his soldiers,
his subjects, and his allies.
[Sidenote: [454-455 A.D.]]
The nations who were strangers or enemies to Aëtius generously deplored
the unworthy fate of a hero; the barbarians who had been attached to his
service dissembled their grief and resentment; and the public contempt
which had been so long entertained for Valentinian, was at once converted
into deep and universal abhorrence. Such sentiments seldom pervade the
walls of a palace; yet the emperor was confounded by the honest reply
of a Roman, whose approbation he had not disdained to solicit: “I am
ignorant, sir, of your motives or provocations; I only know that you have
acted like a man who cuts off his right hand with his left.”
The luxury of Rome seems to have attracted the long and frequent visits
of Valentinian; who was consequently more despised at Rome than in any
other part of his dominions. A republican spirit was insensibly revived
in the senate, as their authority, and even their supplies, became
necessary for the support of his feeble government. The stately demeanour
of an hereditary monarch offended their pride; and the pleasures of
Valentinian were injurious to the peace and honour of noble families. The
birth of the empress Eudoxia was equal to his own, and her charms and
tender affection deserved those testimonies of love which her inconstant
husband dissipated in vague and unlawful amours.
Petronius Maximus, a wealthy senator of the Anician family, who had
been twice consul, was possessed of a chaste and beautiful wife; her
obstinate resistance served only to irritate the desires of Valentinian,
and he resolved to accomplish them either by stratagem or force. Deep
gaming was one of the vices of the court; the emperor, who by chance or
contrivance had gained from Maximus a considerable sum, uncourteously
exacted his ring as a security for the debt; and sent it by a trusty
messenger to his wife, with an order in her husband’s name that she
should immediately attend the empress Eudoxia. The unsuspecting wife of
Maximus was conveyed in her litter to the imperial palace; the emissaries
of her impatient lover conducted her to a remote and silent bedchamber;
and Valentinian violated, without remorse, the laws of hospitality.
Her tears when she returned home, her deep affliction, and her bitter
reproaches against her husband, whom she considered as the accomplice of
his own shame, excited Maximus to a just revenge; the desire of revenge
was stimulated by ambition; and he might reasonably aspire by the free
suffrage of the Roman senate to the throne of a detested and despicable
rival. Valentinian, who supposed that every human breast was devoid, like
his own, of friendship and gratitude, had imprudently admitted among
his guards several domestics and followers of Aëtius. Two of these, of
barbarian race, were persuaded to execute a sacred and honourable duty
by punishing with death the assassin of their patron; and their intrepid
courage did not long expect a favourable moment. Whilst Valentinian
amused himself in the Field of Mars with the spectacle of some military
sports, they suddenly rushed upon him with drawn weapons, despatched the
guilty Heraclius, and stabbed the emperor to the heart, without the least
opposition from his numerous train, who seemed to rejoice in the tyrant’s
death.
Such was the fate of Valentinian III, the last Roman emperor of the
family of Theodosius. He faithfully imitated the hereditary weakness of
his cousin and his two uncles, without inheriting the gentleness, the
purity, the innocence, which alleviate in their characters the want of
spirit and ability. Valentinian was less excusable, since he had passions
without virtues; even his religion was questionable; and though he never
deviated into the paths of heresy, he scandalised the pious Christians by
his attachment to the profane arts of magic and divination.[b]
FOOTNOTES
[66] [This story of the feud between Boniface and Aëtius was the subject
of a severe onslaught by Freeman, who calls it “the Procopian legend.”
Hodgkin, however, thinks that it “has still a reasonable claim to be
accepted as history.” _Italy and her Invaders_, Vol. I, pp. 889-898.]
[67] [See Procopius _de Bell. Vandal._ I. 1. c. 4, p. 186. Valentinian
published several humane laws, to relieve the distress of his Numidian
and Mauretanian subjects; he discharged them, in a great measure, from
the payment of their debts, reduced their tribute to one-eighth, and gave
them a right of appeal from the provincial magistrates to the prefect of
Rome.]
[68] [The place which we now call Châlons was probably under the Romans
named Duro-Catalaunum. It was the chief place of the Catalauni, a tribe
who dwelt next to the Suessiones. In Roman miles (10 of which are about
equal to 9 English), and by the Roman roads, Châlons was 170 miles
distant from Metz, and 51 from Troyes.[c]]
[Illustration: ROMAN TERRA-COTTA FIGURES]
[Illustration]