NOVEMBER, 1862.

Secretary Chase -- French Mediation -- the Decembriseur --

Diplomatic Bendings.

_November 18._--In the street a soldier offered to sell me the pay

already several months overdue to him. As I could not help him, as

gladly I would have done, being poor, he sold it to a curb-stone

broker, a street note-shaver. I need not say that the poor soldier

sustained a loss of twenty-five per cent. by the operation! He

wanted to send the money home to his poor wife and children; yet one

fourth of it was thus given into the hands of a stay-at-home

speculator. Alas, for me! I could not save the poor fellow from the

remorseless shaver, but I could and did join him in a very energetic

cursing of Chase, that at once pompous and passive patriot.

This induced me to enter upon a further and more particular

investigation, and I found that hundreds of similar cases were of

almost daily occurrence; and that this cheating of the soldiers out

of their nobly and patriotically earned pay, may quite fairly be

denounced as rather the rule than as the exception. The army is

unpaid! Unspeakable infamy! Before,--long before the intellectually

poor occupant of the White House, long before _any_ civil employe,

big or little, the ARMY ought to be paid. Common humanity, common

sense, and sound policy affirm this; and common decency, to say

nothing about chivalric feelings, adds that when paymasters are sent

to the army at all, their first payments should be made to the rank

and file; the generals and their subordinate officers to be paid,

not before, but afterwards. Oh! for the Congress, for the Congress

to meet once again! My hope is in the Congress, to resist, and

sternly put an end to, such heaven-defying and man-torturing

injustice as now braves the curses of outraged men, and the anger of

God. How this pompous Chase disappoints every one, even those who at

first were inclined to be even weakly credulous and hopeful of his

official career. And why is Stanton silent? He ought to roar. As for

Lincoln--he, ah! * * * * The curses of all the books of all the

prophets be upon the culprits who have thus compelled our gallant

and patriotic soldiery to mingle their tears with their own blood

and the blood of the enemy!

_Nov. 18._--Again Seward assures Lord Lyons that the national

troubles will soon be over, and that the general affairs of the

country "stand where he wanted them." Seward's crew circulate in the

most positive terms, that the country will be pacified by the State

Department! England, moved by the State papers and official

notes--England, officially and non-officially, will stop the

iron-clads, built and launched in English ports and harbors for the

use of the rebels, and for the annoyance and injury of the United

States. England, these Americans say, England, no doubt, has said

some hard words, and has been guilty of some detestably treacherous

actions; but all will probably be settled by the benign influence of

Mr. Seward's despatches, which, as everyone knows, are perfectly

irresistible. How the wily Palmerston must chuckle in Downing

Street.

The difference between Seward and a real statesman, is this: that a

statesman is always, and very wisely, chary about committing himself

in writing, and only does it when compelled by absolutely

irresistible circumstances, or by temptations brilliant enough to

overrule all other considerations; for, such a statesman never for

one moment forgets or disregards the old adage which saith that

"_Verba volant, scripta manent_." But Seward, on the contrary,

literally revels in a flood of ink, and fancies that the more he

writes, the greater statesman he becomes.

At the beginning of this month, I wrote to the French minister, M.

Mercier, a friendly and respectful note, warning him against

meddling with politicians and busybodies. I told him that, before he

could even suspect it, such men would bring his name before the

public in a way neither pleasant nor profitable to him. M. Mercier

took it in good part, and cordially thanked me for my advice.

_Nov. 19._--Burnside means well, and has a good heart; but something

more is required to make a capable captain, more especially in such

times as those in which we are living. It is said that his staff is

well organized; God be praised for that, if it really is so. In that

case, Burnside will be the first among the loudly-lauded and

self-conceited West-Point men, forcibly to impress both the military

and the civilian mind in America, with a wholesome consciousness of

the paramount importance to an army of a thoroughly competent and

trustworthy staff.

The division of the army into three grand corps is good; it is at

once wise and well-timed, following the example set by Napoleon,

when he invaded Russia in 1812. If his subordinate generals will but

do well, I have entire confidence in Hooker. He is the man for the

time and for the place. As a fighting man, Sumner is fully and

unquestionably reliable; but I have my doubts about Franklin. He is

cold, calculating, and ambitious, and he has the especially bad

quality of being addicted to the alternate blowing of hot and cold.

Burnside did a good thing in confiding to General Siegel a separate

command.

The _New York Times_ begins to mend its bad ways; but how long will

it continue in the better path?

_Nov. 20._--England stirs up and backs up rebellion and disunion

here; but, in Europe, for the sake of the unity of barbarism,

Islamism, and Turkey, England throttles, and manacles, and lays

prostrate beneath the feet of the Osmanli, the Greeks, the Sclavi,

the heroic Montenegrins. England is the very incarnation of a

treachery and a perfidy previously unexampled in the history of the

world. The _Punica fides_, so fiercely denounced and so bitterly

satirized by the historians and poets of old Rome, was truthful if

compared to the _Fides Anglica_ of our own day.

_Nov. 22._--Our army seems to be massed so as to be able to wedge

itself in between Jackson in the valley and Lee at Gordonsville. By

a bold manoeuvre, each of them could be separately attacked, and, I

firmly believe, destroyed. But, unfortunately, boldness and

manoeuvre, that highest gift, that supreme inspiration of the

consummate captain, have no abiding place in the bemuddled brains of

the West-Pointers, who are a dead weight and drag-chain upon the

victimised and humiliated Army of the Potomac.

_Nov. 25._--The Army is stuck fast in the mud, and the march towards

Fredericksburgh is not at all unlikely to end in smoke. There seems

to be an utter absence of executive energy. Why not mask our

movements before Gordonsville from the observation of Lee? Or, if

preferable, what is to hinder the interposition of _un rideau

vivant_, a _living curtain_, in the form of a false attack, a feint

in considerable force, behind which the whole army might be securely

thrown across the Rappahannock, by which at least two days' march

would be gained on Lee, and our troops would be on the direct line

for Fredericksburg, if Fredericksburg is really to be the base for

future operations. In this way, the army would have marched against

Fredericksburg on both sides of the river. Or, supposing those plans

to be rejected, why not throw a whole army corps at once, say 40,000

to 50,000 strong, across the Rappahannock. On either plan, I repeat

it, at least two days' march would have been stolen upon Lee; three

or four days of forced marches would have been healthy for our army,

and a bloodless victory would have been obtained by the taking of

the seemingly undefended Fredericksburg. A dense cloud enveloped

this whole enterprise, and it is not even improbable, that the

campaign may become a dead failure even before it has accomplished

the half of its projected and loudly vaunted course. But bold

conceptions, and energetic movements to match them, are just about

as possible to Halleck or Burnside as railroad speed to the tedious

tortoise.

_Nov. 25._--Oh! So Louis Napoleon could not keep quiet. He offers

his mediation, which, in plain English, means his moral support to

the South. Oh! that enemy to the whole human race. That

_Decembriseur_.[1] Our military slowness, if nothing else is the

matter, our administrative and governmental helplessness, and

Seward's lying and all-confusing foreign policy have encouraged

foreign impertinence and foreign meddling. I have all along

anticipated them as an at least very possible result of the above

mentioned causes. [See vol. I of the Diary.] Nevertheless, I

scarcely expected such results to appear so soon. Perhaps this same

impertinent French action may prove a second French _faux pas_, to

follow in the wake of the first and very egregious _faux pas_ in

Mexico. The best that we can say for the _Decembriseur_ is, that he

is getting old. England refuses to join in his at once wild and

atrocious schemes, and makes a very Tomfool of the bloody Fox of the

Tuileries. My, Russia--ah! I am very confident of that--will refuse

to join in the dirty and treacherous conspiracy for the

preservation of slavery. Well for mediation. But Mr. _Decembriseur_,

what think you and your diplomatic lackeys; what judgment and what

determination do you and they form as to the terms and the

termination, too, of your diabolical scheme? Descend, sir, from your

shilly-shally generalities and verbal fallacies. Is it to be a

commercial union, this hobby of your minister here? What is it; let

us in all plainness of speech know what it is that you really and

positively intend. Propound to us the plain meaning and scope of

your imperial proposition.

[Footnote 1: The men who, in the great French revolution,

and under the leadership of Danton and of the municipality

of Paris, massacred the political prisoners in September,

1792, are recorded in history under the name of

_Septembriseurs_. Louis Napoleon may no less justly be

called the _Decembriseur_, from that frightful massacre on

the 2nd of December, from which he dates his despotism.]

_Nov. 27._--Lee, with his army, marches or marched on the south side

of the river, in a parallel to the line of Burnside on the north

side of the river, and Jackson quietly, but quickly follows. They

are at Fredericksburg, and our army looms up, calm, but stern;

still, but defiant and menacing. I heartily wish that Burnside may

be successful, and that I may prove to have been a false prophet.

But the great _Fatum_, FATE, seems to declare against Burnside, and

Fate generally takes sides with bold conceptions and their energetic

execution.

_Nov. 28._--The French despatch-scheme reads very like a Washington

concoction, and does not at all bear the marks of Parisian origin. I

find in it whole phrases which, for months past, I have repeatedly

heard from the French minister here. Perhaps Mr. Mercier, in his

turn, may have caught many of Mr. Seward's much-cherished

generalities, unintelligible, very probably, even to himself, and

quite certainly so to every one but himself. Perhaps, I say, Mr.

Mercier may have caught up some of them, and making them up at

hap-hazard into a _macedoine_, a hash, a hotch-potch, has served up

the second-hand and heterogeneous mess to his master in Paris. The

despatch expresses the fear of a servile war; this may very well

have been copied from Mr. Seward's despatch to Mr. Adams, (May,

1862,) wherein Seward attempted to frighten England by a prophecy of

a servile war in this country.

_Nov. 30._--Mr. Seward semi-officially and conveniently accepts the

French impudence. Computing the time and space, the scheme

corresponds with McClellan's inactivity after Antietam, and with the

raising of the banner of the Copperheads. I spoke of this before,

(see Diary for November and December, 1861, in Vol. I.) and

repeatedly warned Stanton.

_Nov. 30._--Mercier, the French diplomat, rapidly gravitates towards

the Copperheads--Democrats. Is he acting thus _in obedience to

orders_? After all, some of the diplomats here, and especially those

of what call themselves the "three great powers," almost openly

sympathize and side with secessionists, and patronize Copperheads,

traitors, and spies. The exceptions to this rule are but few;

strictly speaking, indeed, I should except only one young man. Some

diplomats justify this conduct on the plea that the Republican

Congressmen are "great bores," who will not play at cards, or dine

and drink copiously; accomplishments in which the Secesh was so

pre-eminent as to win his way to the inner depths of the diplomatic

heart. The people, I am sure, will heartily applaud those of its

representatives for thus incurring the contempt of dissipated

diplomats.

Some persons maintain that Stanton breaks down, perhaps that he

suffers, physically as well as mentally, from his necessitated

contact with his official colleagues and his and their persistent,

inevitable and inexorable hangers-on and supplicants. I do not

perceive the alleged failure of his health or powers, and I do not

believe it; but assuredly, it were no marvel if such really were the

case. It must be an adamantine constitution and temper that could

long bear with impunity the daily contact with a Lincoln, a Seward,

a Halleck, and others less noted, indeed, but not the less

contagious.

Diary from November 12, 1862, to October 18, 1863 · 第 25 / 41 题