CHAPTER XXVI.

HYDROPTERIDEAE ╭ Marsiliaceae.

╰ Salviniaceae.

The unsatisfactory and meagre records in regard to the past history

of these heterosporous Filicales render superfluous more than a brief

reference to the recent species.

Marsiliaceae.

This family is usually spoken of as including the two genera _Marsilia_

and _Pilularia_. Lindman[1202] has however founded a third genus,

_Regnellidium_, on a Brazilian plant which is distinguished by some

well-defined characters from all species of _Marsilia_. The members

of the Marsiliaceae live for the most part in swampy situations.

_Marsilia_ is represented in Europe by _M. quadrifoliata_ L. which

occurs in Portugal, France, Germany and other parts of the Continent,

extending also to Kashmir, Northern China, and Japan. Of the other 53

species, 17 are recorded from different regions in Africa, while others

occur in South America, Asia[1203], Australia, and elsewhere.

_Pilularia globulifera_ L. is the only British representative of the

Hydropterideae. The remaining four species of the genus occur in South

America, California, New Zealand, Australia, and _P. minuta_ Dur. is

met with in the South of France, Algeria, and Asia Minor in subtropical

or warm temperate regions.

The Marsiliaceae are regarded as more nearly related to the

Schizaeaceae than to any other family of homosporous ferns[1204].

Their heterospory, the production of sporangia in closed fruit-like

sporocarps, and the anatomical features associated with existence in

marshy habitats, tend to obscure the resemblances to the true ferns.

• • • • •

The genus _Marsilidium_ proposed by Schenk[1205] for a piece of an

axis, bearing apparently a whorl of six leaflets, from the Wealden of

Osterwald, cannot be regarded as satisfactory evidence of the existence

of the Marsiliaceae in the Wealden flora of North Germany.

The six leaflets of _Marsilidium speciosum_, having a length of 5

cm., are similar in shape to the four leaflets of recent species of

_Marsilia_, but they differ in the repeated dichotomy of the veins from

the reticulate venation of the recent forms. It is worthy of note,

however, that in Lindman’s Brazilian type _Regnellidium diphyllum_

(fig. 326, A), the leaflets are characterised by dichotomous and not by

anastomosing veins.

Hollick[1206] has described some impressions of imperfect orbicular

leaves with a “finely flabellate obscurely reticulated(?) venation”

from Cretaceous rocks of Long Island as _Marsilia Andersoni_, but

these are too fragmentary to be accorded this generic designation. My

friend Dr Krasser informs me that he is describing some well-preserved

leaves from Cretaceous beds of Grünbach in Lower Austria as _Marsilia

Nathorsti_[1207]. He compares these with the recent form _Marsilia

elata_, a variety of _M. Drummondi_.

Another Lower Cretaceous species _Marsilia perucensis_ has been figured

by Frič and Bayer[1208] as a stalked fruit-like body from Bohemia. This

was originally described by Velenovský as _M. cretacea_, but under

this name Heer[1209] had previously recorded a supposed sporocarp from

Greenland. These fossils have little claim to recognition as examples

of Marsiliaceous plants.

The fragment figured by Heer[1210] from Tertiary rocks of Oeningen

as _Pilularia pedunculata_ is too small to determine with reasonable

accuracy. Other supposed representatives of the family mentioned in

palaeobotanical literature are not of sufficient importance to describe.

Salviniaceae.

The two genera of Salviniaceae, _Salvinia_ and _Azolla_, are water

plants, and are usually described as annuals which survive the less

favourable season in the form of detached sporocarps. Goebel[1211]

states that all the tropical species of _Salvinia_ known to him have an

unlimited existence.

_Salvinia natans_, Hoffm., the only European species, extends from the

South of France to Northern China and the plains of India: the other

twelve species are mostly tropical. _Azolla_, represented by four

species, occurs in Western and Southern North America, South America,

Madagascar, Australia, New Zealand, and is widely spread in tropical

Asia and Africa.

Species of _Azolla_ frequently form a considerable proportion of the

floating carpet of vegetation on inland waters[1212] growing under

conditions which might be supposed favourable for preservation in a

fossil state.

The Salviniaceae, though probably rather farther removed than the

Marsiliaceae from the homosporous Filicineae, are considered by

Bower[1213] to be related to the Gradatae, but modified in consequence

of their aquatic habit and the assumption of heterospory.

No undoubted examples of fossil species of _Azolla_ have been

described. _Salvinia_, on the other hand, is represented by several

Tertiary species, for the most part founded on leaves only, and

Hollick[1214], who published a list of fossil Salvinias, has described

detached leaves as _Salvinia elliptica_ Newb. from what may be Upper

Cretaceous rocks from Carbonado, Washington. Some of the leaves

figured as Tertiary Salvinias are of no value as evidence of the former

distribution of the genus[1215].

From the Coal-beds of Yen-Bäi (Tonkin), probably of Miocene age,

Zeiller[1216] has figured some well-preserved impressions of oval or

orbicular leaves, 15 mm. long and 10–20 mm. broad, characterised by

reticulate venation and by cordate bases, which he refers to Heer’s

Swiss species _Salvinia formosa_[1217].

Dr Zeiller[1218] in the most recently published part of his series of

valuable résumés of palaeobotanical literature refers to a description

by Brabenec of specimens of this species from Bohemian Tertiary beds

showing both microspores and megaspores.

One of the most complete specimens so far discovered has recently

been described by Fritel[1219] from Eocene beds of the Paris Basin

as _Salvinia Zeilleri_. This species, founded on portions of stems

bearing floating leaves, submerged root-like leaves, and sporocarps, is

compared with a recent tropical American species _S. auriculata_.

It is noteworthy that no authentic records of Hydropterideae have been

discovered in Palaeozoic rocks[1220]. Comparisons have been made in

the case of the genera _Traquairia_ Carr. and _Sporocarpon_ Will. with

the reproductive organs of _Azolla_[1221], but these rest on a wholly

insufficient basis.

Dawson[1222] proposed the generic name _Protosalvinia_ for some spores

of Devonian age, which he regarded on inadequate grounds as evidence of

Palaeozoic Hydropterideae.

Zeiller[1223], in discussing the possible relationships of the

problematical type _Chorionopteris gleichenioides_ Cord., suggests a

possible alliance with the Hydropterideae. Corda founded the genus

_Chorionopteris_[1224] on some small fragments of pinnules, 6–7 mm.

long, found in the Carboniferous rocks of Radnitz in Bohemia.

The lobes of the pinnules are incurved distally to form a capsule,

containing four sporangia, which apparently opened on dehiscence into

four valves; the spores are of one size. The material is however

insufficient for accurate determination.

There is no evidence contributed by fossil records which indicates

a high antiquity for the Hydropterideae. It is unsafe to base any

conclusion on the absence of undoubted Palaeozoic representatives of

this group; but the almost complete absence of records in pre-Tertiary

strata is a fact which may be allowed some weight in regard to the

possible evolution of the heterosporous filicales at a comparatively

late period in the earth’s history.

A description of the Mesozoic genus _Sagenopteris_ may be conveniently

included in this chapter, though as in many other instances the

inclusion of a genus under the heading of a recent family name does not

by any means imply that the position of the extinct type is regarded as

settled.

Sagenopteris.

This generic name was applied by Presl[1225] to small fronds composed

of four or rarely two palmately disposed leaflets with a more or less

distinct midrib and anastomosing secondary veins. Schimper[1226]

compared _Sagenopteris_ with _Marsilia_, but did not regard the

resemblance as evidence of relationship. Nathorst[1227] expressed

the opinion that certain fruit-like bodies obtained from the Rhaetic

beds of Scania are of the nature of sporocarps and were borne by

_Sagenopteris_, with the leaves of which they were associated. He

published a drawing of part of a fruit showing on its partially

flattened surface some raised oval bodies which are considered to

be spores. Dr Nathorst kindly placed at my disposal the drawings

reproduced in fig. 325 made from some of his specimens found at Bjuf in

Scania.

In contour and superficial features, e.g. the veining on the wall,

these bodies bear a fairly close resemblance to the sporocarps of

recent species of _Marsilia_. They were found in association with

the leaves of _Sagenopteris undulata_ Nath., an abundant Scania type

similar in form to the English Jurassic species _S. Phillipsi_ (figs.

327, 328). Heer was independently led by an examination of some

examples of the Swedish “fruits” to compare them with the sporocarps

of _Marsilia_. A small spherical body is figured by Zigno[1228] close

to a leaf of his species _S. angustifolia_, which may be a sporocarp.

In a recent paper, Salfeld[1229] says that he found fructification

on the lower face of the leaflets of _S. Nilssoniana_ Brongn. from

German Jurassic rocks, but he brings forward no evidence in support

of this statement. The systematic position of _Sagenopteris_ is by

no means settled. In a previous account of the genus I expressed the

view that it is probably a member of the true ferns[1230], but the

resemblance of Dr Nathorst’s drawings to the Marsilian sporocarps

influences me in favour of his opinion that _Sagenopteris_ may belong

to the Hydropterideae. The evidence, as Solms-Laubach[1231] states,

is not wholly satisfactory: Schenk points out that the frequent

occurrence of detached _Sagenopteris_ leaflets suggests that they

easily fell off the petiole, whereas in _Marsilia_ the leaflets do not

fall off independently. The discovery of a new type of Marsiliaceae in

Brazil, which Lindman has described as _Regnellidium diphyllum_[1232]

(fig. 326, A), affords an additional piece of evidence bearing on

the comparison of _Sagenopteris_ with members of this family. In

_Regnellidium_ the leaves differ from those of _Marsilia_ in bearing

two instead of four leaflets, and in the former the veins are

repeatedly forked, and do not anastomose as in _Marsilia_. In the

possession of only two leaflets _Regnellidium_ agrees with some forms

of _Sagenopteris_ (fig. 328).

[Illustration: FIG. 325. Sporocarp-like bodies found in association

with the leaves of _Sagenopteris_. (Nat. size. From drawings

supplied by Dr Nathorst.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 326.

A. _Regnellidium diphyllum_ Lind. Single leaf and stalked sporocarp.

(⅞ nat. size. After Lindman.)

B. Cuticle of _Sagenopteris rhoifolia_. (After Schenk.)]

_Sagenopteris Phillipsi_ (Brongniart)[1233]. Figs. 327, 328.

1828. _Glossopteris Phillipsi_, Brongniart, Hist. vég. foss. p. 225,

Pls. LXI. _bis_, LXIII.

1838. _Sagenopteris Phillipsi_, Presl, in Sternberg’s Flor. Vorwelt,

vii. p. 69.

[Illustration: FIG. 327. _Sagenopteris Phillipsi._

A. From the type-specimens of Lindley and Hutton (_Glossopteris

Phillipsi_). Gristhorpe Bay, Yorkshire. British Museum, No.

39221. Slightly reduced. M.S.

B. From a specimen in the British Museum (39222). Nat. size.

Figured by Lindley and Hutton as _Glossopteris Phillipsi_.]

The fronds of this common Jurassic species, which is recorded from

many European localities, from North America, Australia, the Antarctic

regions[1234], and elsewhere, are very variable as regards the form,

size, and number of the leaflets.

Frond petiolate, in some forms the petiole bears four linear or

oval-lanceolate leaflets having a distinct midrib and oblique

anastomosing veins. In others a shorter winged petiole bears one

or two shorter and broader, somewhat obcuneate, leaflets without a

midrib.

It is probable that Bunbury[1235] was correct in his opinion that the

specimen figured by Lindley and Hutton[1236] as _Otopteris cuneata_,

characterised by two leaflets (fig. 328), is not specifically distinct

from the normal form with four leaflets (fig. 327).

Similarly, such specimens as that represented in Pl. XVIII., fig.

3 of the first part of my _Jurassic Flora_, in which a short stalk

bears only one leaflet may, provisionally at least, be included in

Brongniart’s species. Yabe[1237] describes a form with two leaflets

from Jurassic rocks of Korea as _Sagenopteris bilobata_ which resembles

_S. Phillipsi_; and Moeller[1238] records a specimen similar to that

represented in fig. 328 from Bornholm as _S. cuneata_ (Lind. and Hutt.).

[Illustration: FIG. 328. _Sagenopteris Phillipsi._ From a specimen in

the Manchester University Museum. Nat. size.]

The leaf shown in fig. 327, A, in which the longest segments are 4·5

cm. in length, represents the most abundant form and illustrates the

very close agreement between _S. Phillipsi_ and the Rhaetic species

_S. rhoifolia_. Fig. 327, B, which is drawn from a specimen figured by

Lindley and Hutton[1239], shows a leaf with longer (6·5 cm.) and much

narrower segments. Broader leaflets are occasionally met with in which

the lamina reaches a length of 11 cm.[1240]

Leaves with leaflets narrower (3 mm. broad) than those represented in

fig. 327, B, are described by Zigno[1241] from Jurassic beds of Italy

as _S. angustifolia_ and by Moeller[1242] from the Jurassic of Bornholm

as _S. Phillipsi_ f. _pusilla_. A coarser type of venation than that of

_S. Phillipsi_ is occasionally found in Jurassic examples, as in _S.

grandifolia_ Font.[1243] from Oregon and _S. Nathorsti_ Barth. from

Bornholm[1244].

• • • • •

_Sagenopteris_ is recorded also from several Rhaetic floras. The best

known species, _S. rhoifolia_ Presl[1245], is hardly distinguishable

from some forms of _S. Phillipsi_ or from the Italian Jurassic species

described by Zigno as _S. Goeppertiana_[1246], though the leaflets are

usually rather larger. This species was first described by Brongniart

as _Filicites Nilssoniana_[1247], and a few authors[1248] have adopted

this specific name because of its priority over Presl’s designation.

As Nathorst remarks, to give up the well-known name _S. rhoifolia_ for

_S. Nilssoniana_ is “mere pedantry.” The epidermis of _S. rhoifolia_

as figured by Schenk[1249] consists of cells with straight and not

undulating walls: stomata occur on the lower surface (fig. 326, B).

Rhaetic leaves of the type represented by _S. rhoifolia_ have a wide

geographical distribution.

The specimens described by Feistmantel from the Damuda series of India

as _Sagenopteris longifolia_ are no doubt fronds of _Glossopteris

longifolia_[1250].

The Wealden species _Sagenopteris Mantelli_ (Dunk.)[1251] agrees

closely in habit and in the form of the leaflets with _S. Phillipsi_

and _S. rhoifolia_. It is probable that some of the leaves described by

Velenovský[1252] from Lower Cretaceous rocks in Bohemia as _Thinnfeldia

variabilis_ are portions of _Sagenopteris_ fronds. _S. Mantelli_ is

recorded from several European localities, from California[1253], and

elsewhere.

_Sagenopteris_ appears to have been widely distributed during

the Rhaetic, Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous floras. The very great

similarity between the specimens recorded from these three formations

renders the genus an uncertain guide in regard to geological age.

Decisive evidence as to its position in the plant kingdom is at present

lacking: the inclusion of the genus as a possible member of the

Hydropterideae has still to be justified.

Fossil plants, Vol. 2 · 第 16 / 19 章