I have, &c.,

(Signed) WESTMORLAND.

No. 6.

_Sir Stratford Canning to the Earl of Aberdeen_.--(_Received

November_ 2.)

My Lord, _Buyukderé, October_ 11, 1843.

The Prussian Minister has communicated to me an instruction

addressed to him by Baron Bülow in reply to his representations on

the subject of the Armenian youth, whose execution and its natural

consequences were brought under your Lordship's notice in my

despatch of August the 27th.

The French Minister has also communicated to me a note, transmitted

to him from Paris for presentation to the Porte, with reference to

the same deplorable act of the Turkish Government.

Copies of these two papers have not been given to me; but I

understand that the Prussian instruction has been sent to your

Lordship, and it is probable that the same degree of confidence has

been shewn to your Lordship by M. Guizot. I have only to remark that

the terms in which these documents are respectively expressed,

appear to me highly creditable to the Cabinets from which they have

issued, and, should your Lordship see fit to instruct me in a

similar sense, it would afford me great satisfaction to repeat to

the Turkish Minister, with the immediate authority of Her Majesty's

Government, what I ventured at the time to intimate by anticipation

on my own suggestion. Baron Bülow and M. Guizot appear to be equally

impressed with the dangerous character of that policy to which the

Armenian execution is traceable, and their reprobation of the act

itself is proportionally strong. Baron de Bourqueney is prepared to

give in his note without waiting for the concurrence of his

colleagues. M. Le Coq is instructed to act simultaneously with the

other Representatives of the Five Powers.

With respect to the Austrian and Russian Ministers, I am informed by

M. de Titow that the Emperor of Russia's absence from St.

Petersburgh has prevented his receiving an immediate answer to his

despatches; and I hear that the Internuncio refers to a

communication made by Prince Metternich to the Turkish Ambassador at

Vienna as sufficiently expressive of the sentiments of his Court and

superseding the necessity of any step on his part without further

instructions.

I would venture humbly to submit that a concurrent expression of the

sentiments of the Five Courts on such an occasion would hardly fail

of producing a most beneficial effect upon the counsels of the

Porte.

Correspondence Relating to Executions in Turkey for Apostacy from Islamism · 第 18 / 41 题