CHAPTER XII.

Sir Humphry Davy suggests a chemical method for unrolling

the ancient Papyri.--He is encouraged by the Government

to proceed to Naples for that purpose.--He embarks at

Dover.--His experiments on the Rhine, the Danube, the Raab,

the Save, the Ironzo, the Po, and the Tiber, in order to

explain the formation of mists on rivers and lakes.--His

arrival and reception at Naples.--He visits the excavations

at Herculaneum.--He concludes that it was overwhelmed by

sand and ashes, but had never been exposed to burning

matter.--He commences his attempt of unrolling the Papyri.--His

failure.--He complains of the persons at the head of the

department in the Museum.--He analyses the waters of the

Baths of Lucca.--His return to England.--Death of Sir Joseph

Banks.--He is elected President of the Royal Society.--Some

remarks on that event.--He visits Penzance.--Is honoured by

a public dinner.--Electro-magnetic discoveries of Oersted

extended by Davy.--He examines Electrical Phenomena in

vacuo.--The results of his experiments questioned.--He enquires

into the state of the water, and aëriform matter in the

cavities of crystals.--The interesting results of his enquiry

confirm the views of the Plutonists.

Our history now proceeds to exhibit Sir Humphry Davy in quite a new

field of enquiry;--engaged in investigating, amidst the ruins of

Herculaneum, the nature and effects of the volcanic eruption which

overwhelmed that city in the reign of Titus; and in attempting, by

the resources of modern science, to unfold and to render legible

the mouldering archives which have been recovered from its

excavations, and deposited in the Museum at Naples.

Having witnessed the unsuccessful attempts of Dr. Sickler to unroll

some of the Herculaneum manuscripts, it occurred to him that a

chemical examination of their nature, and of the changes they had

undergone, might suggest some method of separating the leaves from

each other, and of rendering legible the characters impressed

upon them. On communicating this opinion to Sir Thomas Tyrwhitt,

he immediately placed at his disposal fragments which had been

operated upon by Mr. Hayter and by Dr. Sickler: at the same time,

Dr. Young presented him with some small pieces, which he himself

had formerly attempted to unroll.

Davy was very soon convinced by the products of their distillation,

that the nature of these manuscripts had been generally

misunderstood; that they had not, as was usually supposed, been

carbonized by the operation of fire, but were in a state analogous

to peat, or to Bovey coal, the leaves being generally cemented

into one mass by a peculiar substance which had formed, during the

fermentation and chemical change of the vegetable matter composing

them, in a long course of ages. The nature of this substance being

once known, the destruction of it would become a subject of obvious

chemical investigation.

It occurred to him, that as chlorine and iodine do not exert any

action upon pure carbonaceous substances, while they possess a

strong attraction for hydrogen, these bodies might probably be

applied with success for the purpose of destroying the adhesive

matter, without the possibility of injuring the letters of the

Papyri, the ink of the ancients, as it is well known, being

composed of charcoal. He accordingly exposed a fragment of a

brown manuscript, in which the layers were strongly adherent, to

an atmosphere of chlorine; there was an immediate action, the

papyrus smoked, and became yellow, and the letters appeared much

more distinct. After which, by the application of heat, the layers

separated from each other, and fumes of muriatic acid were evolved.

The vapour of iodine had a less distinct, but still a very sensible

action. By the simple application of heat to a fragment in a close

vessel filled with carbonic acid, or with the vapour of ether,

so regulated as to raise the temperature very gradually, and as

gradually to reduce it, there was a marked improvement in the

texture of the papyrus, and its leaves were more easily unrolled.

In all these preliminary trials, however, he found that the success

of the experiment absolutely depended upon the nicety with which

the temperature was regulated.

Different papyri having exhibited different appearances, he

concluded that the same process would not apply in all cases; but

even a partial success he considered as a step gained, and it

served to increase his anxiety to examine in detail the numerous

specimens preserved in the Museum at Naples, as well as to visit

the excavations that still remained open at Herculaneum.

Mr. Hamilton, to whom these views were communicated, with that

ardour which belongs to his character, entered warmly into a plan

which might enable Sir Humphry Davy to accomplish his objects; and

on his representation of them, the Earl of Liverpool and Viscount

Castlereagh placed at his disposal such funds as were requisite for

paying the persons whom it was necessary to engage in the process.

At the same time, Sir Humphry Davy had the honour of an audience

of his late Majesty, then Prince Regent; and on witnessing the

results, his Royal Highness was pleased to express his approbation,

and graciously condescended to patronize the undertaking. Exulting

in the prospect of success, and sanguine as to the importance

of its results to literature, Davy embarked at Dover for the

Continent, in order to proceed to Naples, on the 26th of May 1818.

During his journey, he was engaged in making observations on the

comparative temperature of air incumbent upon land and water,

with a view to account for the formation of mists over the beds

of rivers and lakes. The results of this enquiry were embodied in

a memoir, which was read before the Royal Society on the 25th of

February 1819, and published in the Philosophical Transactions

of that year. This paper, while it records the course of his

observations, informs us of the direction of his route to the

southern shores of Italy.

On the 31st of May, while passing along the Rhine from Cologne to

Coblentz, we find him examining the relative temperature of the

air, and of the water of that river. On the 9th, 10th, and 11th of

June, he was making similar observations on the Danube, during

a voyage from Ratisbonne to Vienna. On the 11th of July, he was

similarly engaged on the Raab, near Kermond in Hungary. In the

end of August he was on the Save in Carniola; in the middle of

September on the Ironzo in the Friul; in the end of that month, on

the Po, near Ferrara; and in the beginning of October, repeatedly

on the Tiber, and on the small lakes in the Campagna of Rome,

extending and multiplying his observations upon the formation of

mists: from the results of which he established the law, that the

formation of mist, on a river or lake, never takes place, if the

temperature of the water be lower than that of the atmosphere; not

even though the latter should be even saturated with vapour.

Possessed of this fact, he was enabled to explain a phenomenon

which all persons who have been accustomed to the observation of

Nature must have frequently witnessed, although it had never yet

been philosophically explained, nor even fully discussed, viz.--the

formation of mists over the beds of rivers and lakes, in calm and

clear weather, after sunset.

Sir Humphry Davy thinks that whoever has considered the phenomena

in relation to the radiation and communication of heat and nature

of vapour, since the publication of the researches of MM. Rumford,

Leslie, Dalton, and Wells, can scarcely have failed to discover

their true causes.

"As soon as the sun has disappeared from any part of the globe,

the surface begins to lose heat by radiation, and in greater

proportions as the sky is clearer; but the land and water are

cooled by this operation in a very different manner: the

impression of cooling on the land is limited to the surface, and

very slowly transmitted to the interior; whereas in water above 45°

Fah., as soon as the upper stratum is cooled, whether by radiation

or evaporation, it sinks in the mass of fluid, and its place is

supplied by warmer water from below, and till the temperature of

the whole mass is reduced nearly to 40°, the surface cannot be

the coolest part.[62] It follows, therefore, that wherever water

exists in considerable masses, and has a temperature nearly equal

to that of the land, or only a few degrees below it, and above 45°

at sunset, its surface during the night, in calm and clear weather,

will be warmer than that of the contiguous land; and the air above

the land will necessarily be colder than that above the water; and

when they both contain their due proportion of aqueous vapour, and

the situation of the ground is such as to permit the cold air from

the land to mix with the warmer air above the water, mist or fog

will be the result; which will be so much the greater in quantity,

as the land surrounding or inclosing the water is higher, the water

deeper, and the temperature of the water, which will coincide with

the quantity or strength of vapour in the air above it, greater."

[62] Water, when cooled down to 40°, expands in volume, and thus

becomes specifically lighter; and therefore at that temperature

remains at the surface.

It will be remembered, that the rivers Inn and Ilz flow into

the Danube below Passau; a circumstance which afforded Davy

an excellent opportunity of confirming, by observation and

experiment, the truth of his theory. On examining the temperature

of these rivers, at six o'clock A. M. June 11, that of the Danube

was found to be 62°, that of the Inn 56.5°, and that of the Ilz

56°: the temperature of the atmosphere on the banks, where their

streams mixed, was 54°. The whole surface of the Danube was covered

with a thick fog; on the Inn there was a slight mist; and on the

Ilz barely a haziness, indicating the deposition of a very small

quantity of water. About one hundred yards below the conflux of

the rivers, the temperature of the central part of the Danube was

59°; and here the quantity of mist was less than on the bed of the

Danube before the junction; but about half a mile below, the warmer

water had again found its place at the surface, and the mist was as

copious as before the union of the three rivers.

After mists have been formed above rivers and lakes, Davy considers

that their increase may not only depend upon the constant operation

of the cause which originally produced them, but likewise upon the

radiation of heat from the superficial particles of water composing

the mist, which produces a descending current of cold air in the

very body of the mist, while the warm water continually sends up

vapour. It is to these circumstances, he says, that the phenomena

must be ascribed of mists from a river or lake sometimes arising

considerably above the surrounding hills. He informs us that he

had frequently witnessed such an appearance during the month of

October, after very still and very clear nights, in the Campagna of

Rome above the Tiber, and on Monte Albano, over the lakes existing

in the ancient craters of this extinguished volcano; and in one

instance, on the 17th of October, before sunrise, there not being a

breath of wind, a dense white cloud, of a pyramidal form, was seen

on the site of Alban Lake, and rising far above the highest peak of

the mountain. Its form gradually changed after sunrise; its apex

first disappeared, and its body, as it were, melted away in the

sunbeams.

Great dryness of the air, or a current of dry air passing across

a river, he found, as we might have expected, to prevent the

formation of mist even when the temperature of the water was much

higher than that of the atmosphere.

Thus did our philosopher, during the course of his journey to

Naples, by a series of observations and experiments, investigate

a phenomenon connected with the deposition of water from the

atmosphere, and which is not without an effect in the economy of

nature; for verdure and fertility, in hot climates, generally

follow the courses of rivers, and by the operation of the law he

established, they are extended to the hills, and even to the plains

surrounding their banks.

On his arrival at Naples, Sir H. Davy found that a letter from his

Royal Highness the Prince Regent to the King, and a communication

made from the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs to the

Neapolitan Government, had prepared the way for his enquiries, and

procured for him every possible facility in the pursuit of his

objects.

The different rolls of papyri presented very various appearances.

They were of all shades, from a light chestnut brown to a deep

black; some externally were of a glossy black, like jet, which

the superintendents called "varnished;" several contained the

umbilicus, or rolling-stick, in the middle, converted into dense

charcoal. In their texture, also, they were as various as in their

colours.

The persons to whom the care of these MSS. are confided, or who

have worked upon them, have always attributed these different

appearances to the action of fire, more or less intense, according

to the proximity of the lava, which has been imagined to have

covered the part of the city in which they were found; but the

different conclusion at which Davy had arrived, from a chemical

examination in England, was confirmed by a visit to the excavations

that still remained open at Herculaneum.

These excavations are in a loose _tufa_, composed of sand, volcanic

ashes, stones, and dust, cemented by the operation of water, which,

at the time of its action, was probably in a boiling state. The

theatre, and the buildings in the neighbourhood, are incased in

this _tufa_, and, from the manner in which it is deposited in the

galleries of the houses, there can be little doubt that it was

the result of torrents laden with sand and volcanic matter, and

descending, at the same time, with showers of ashes and stone still

more copious than those that covered Pompeii. The excavation in

the house in which the MSS. were found, had been filled up; but

a building, which was said by the guides to be this house, and

which, as is evident from the engraved plan, must at least have

been close to it, at once convinced Davy that the parts nearest

the surface, and, _à fortiori_, those more remote from it, had

never been exposed to any considerable degree of heat. He found a

small fragment of the ceiling of one of the rooms, containing lines

of gold leaf and vermilion, in an unaltered state, which never

could have happened had they been acted upon by any temperature

sufficiently great to convert vegetable matter into charcoal.

The different states of the MSS. exactly coincide with this view,

and furnish evidence of their having undergone a gradual process

of decomposition. The loose chestnut papyri, he observes, were

probably never wetted, but merely changed by the reaction of their

elements, assisted by the operation of a small quantity of air; the

black ones, which easily unroll, may be supposed to have remained

in a moist state, without any percolation of water; while it is

likely that the dense ones, containing earthy matter, have been

acted on by warm water, which not only carried into the folds

earthy matter suspended in it, but likewise dissolved the starch

and gluten used in preparing the papyrus and the glue of the ink,

and distributed them through the substance of the MSS.

As many of the papyri appear to have been strongly compressed when

moist, in different positions, he thinks it probable that they

had been placed on shelves of wood, which were broken down when

the roofs of the houses yielded to the superincumbent mass. That

the operation of fire is not at all necessary for producing such

an imperfect carbonization of vegetable matter as that displayed

by the MSS., is at once proved by an inspection of the houses at

Pompeii, which was covered by a shower of ashes that must have

been cold, as they fell at the distance of seven or eight miles

from the crater of Vesuvius; and yet the wood of its buildings

is uniformly found converted into charcoal, while the colours on

the walls, most of which would have been destroyed or altered by

heat, are perfectly fresh. Where papyri have been found in these

houses, they have appeared in the form of white ashes, as of burnt

paper, an effect produced by the slow action of the air penetrating

through the loose ashes, and which has been impeded or prevented in

Herculaneum by the _tufa_, which, as it were, hermetically sealed

up the town, and prevented any decay, except such as occurs in the

spontaneous decomposition of vegetable substances exposed to the

limited operation of water and air--for instance, peat and Bovey

coal.

Davy ascertained, that what the Neapolitans called varnish,

was decomposed skin that had been used to infold some of the

papyri, and which by chemical changes had produced a brilliant

animal carbonaceous substance, which afforded by distillation a

considerable quantity of ammonia, and left ashes containing much

phosphate of lime.

Only one method, and that a simple and mechanical, though a highly

ingenious one, had been adopted for unrolling the MSS. It was

invented, in the middle of the last century, by Padre Piaggi,

a Roman, and consists in attaching a thin animal membrane, by

a solution of glue, to the back of the MSS. and then carefully

elevating the layers by silk threads, which are gradually moved by

the revolution of wooden pegs. Davy, shortly after his arrival,

desired that the process of unrolling might be continued in his

presence; and in considering the method in its general application,

it occurred to him that some expedient might be used to facilitate

the separation of the layers. For this purpose, he proposed to

mix the solution of glue with a sufficient quantity of alcohol to

gelatinize it, in order that it might not penetrate through three

or four layers, which it was liable to do, when the texture of

the papyrus was loose or broken, and the glue employed was in a

liquid state. He also suggested the application of warm air for

drying the papyrus, in the operation of attaching the membrane. It

is not my intention to follow the chemist through all the various

processes which he instituted for accomplishing his object; they

may, however, be found in his paper entitled "Some Observations and

Experiments on the Papyri found in the Ruins of Herculaneum," which

was read before the Royal Society on the 15th of March 1821, and

published in the Transactions of that year.

It only remains to be stated that Davy was not successful; but

though the process of unrolling hitherto applied may not have

received any considerable improvement from his science, and though

he may not have succeeded in rendering any of the manuscripts

legible, the failure is not to be attributed to his want of zeal,

or to his want of skill, but solely, as it is generally admitted,

to the unfortunate condition of the papyri.

It will be readily supposed that a failure in an investigation,

from which he had anticipated so much advantage, was not sustained

by a person naturally quick and irritable, without some

demonstrations of impatience and dissatisfaction.

It was probably under the influence of such feelings, that he

composed the conclusion of his memoir. "During the two months that

I was actively employed in experiments on the papyri at Naples, I

had succeeded, with the assistance of six of the persons attached

to the Museum, and whom I had engaged for the purpose, in partially

unrolling twenty-three MSS., from which fragments of writing were

obtained, and in examining about one hundred and twenty others,

which afforded no hopes of success; and I should gladly have gone

on with the undertaking, from the mere prospect of a possibility

of discovering some better result, had not the labour, in itself

difficult and unpleasant, been made more so, by the conduct of the

persons at the head of this department in the Museum. At first,

every disposition was shown to promote my researches; for the

papyri remaining unrolled were considered by them as incapable

of affording any thing legible by the former methods, or, to use

their own word, _disperati_; and the efficacy and use of the new

processes were fully allowed by the _Svolgatori_, or unrollers of

the Museum; and I was some time permitted to choose and operate

upon the specimens at my own pleasure. When, however, the Reverend

Peter Elmsley, whose zeal for the promotion of ancient literature

brought him to Naples for the purpose of assisting in the

undertaking, began to examine the fragments unrolled, a jealousy

with regard to his assistance was immediately manifested; and

obstacles, which the kind interference of Sir William A'Court was

not always capable of removing, were soon opposed to the progress

of our enquiries; and these obstacles were so multiplied, and made

so vexatious towards the end of February, that we conceived it

would be both a waste of the public money and a compromise of our

own characters to proceed."

* * * * *

While in Italy, Sir H. Davy visited the baths of Lucca, and

examined the waters which have given to that place so much

celebrity. The results of his analysis formed the subject of a

paper, which was published in the Memoirs of the Royal Academy of

Sciences at Naples, of which Society he was a member.

At the spot where the temperature of the water was the highest,

that is, in what are termed the _Caldi_, or hot baths, a

considerable quantity of a substance is ejected, which produces a

deposit of a brownish-yellow colour. Having collected a quantity

of this deposit, he ascertained it to consist of oxide of iron

and silica, in the proportion of about four parts of the former

to three of the latter; and although the iron, at the time of

its deposition, proved to be a _peroxide_, he thinks it probable

that it existed in the water in the state of _protoxide_. He also

supposes, that the oxide of iron and the silica had been dissolved

together in the water, and been deposited from it in combination.

He conceives that the fact which he had some years before noticed,

of the analogy between the base of silica, and that of boracic

acid, together with those observed by Berzelius, furnish sufficient

reasons for classing silica amongst the acids, and for rendering

it probable, that the oxide of iron and silica undergo a real

chemical combination in the warm water, and that they are separated

from the latter in consequence of the reduction of its temperature,

after it has issued from the mountain.

A small portion of oxide of iron, he observes, is found in the

waters of Bath, in which case it is also accompanied by silica;

and he believes that, in many other instances, the oxide of iron

is dissolved in water through the same agency: he moreover regards

such facts as throwing considerable light upon the manner in which

ochre is generated.

Sir Humphry Davy returned to England in 1820; and, on the 19th of

June, in the same year, his venerable friend Sir Joseph Banks,

who, notwithstanding his increasing infirmities, had continued

to discharge the duties of President of the Royal Society to the

latest period of his life, expired at his villa at Spring Grove, at

the advanced age of seventy-seven.

Discussions necessarily arose as to the appointment of a proper

successor, when persons of high and even exalted rank were proposed

as candidates; but the more influential members of the Society at

once found, in their own Council-chamber, two philosophers, whom

they considered equally entitled to the honour of the situation,

and equally well calculated for the discharge of its duties--Sir

Humphry Davy, and Dr. Wollaston; but the latter having signified

his fixed determination to decline competition, gave the whole

weight of his influence to the former; and, under that arrangement,

he received from the Council the compliment of being placed in

the chair, until the general election of officers at the ensuing

anniversary.

As the period of election approached, a few Fellows of the Society

attempted to raise a clamour in favour of some more aristocratic

candidate. To this circumstance, Davy alludes in the following

letter.

TO THOMAS POOLE, ESQ.

Grosvenor Street, June 1820.

MY DEAR POOLE,

I regret very much that you could not join me at dinner this

day. To-morrow and the following day I shall be occupied

by pressing affairs; but I shall be at home to-morrow till

half-past eleven, and be most happy to see you.

I am not very anxious to remove "mists," for I feel that the

President's chair, after Sir Joseph, will be no light matter;

and unless there is a strong feeling in the majority of the

body that I am the most proper person, I shall not sacrifice my

tranquillity for what cannot add to my reputation, though it

may increase my power of being useful.

I feel it a duty that I owe to the Society to offer myself; but

if they do not feel that they want me, (and the most active

members, I believe, do) I shall not force myself upon them.

I am, my dear Poole, very sincerely yours,

H. DAVY.

On the day of election, (November 30, 1820,) there was a feeble

expression in favour of Lord Colchester, who was abroad at the

time, and had not even been made acquainted with the intention

of his supporters. Davy was therefore elected by an immense

majority of votes. He was conducted into the meeting-room by his

two friends, Mr. Davies Gilbert and Mr. Hatchett, and, to the

gratification of every lover of science, he ascended the chair of

Newton.

The value which he himself attached to this triumph, may be seen in

his answer to a letter of congratulation from his friend Mr. Poole.

TO THOMAS POOLE, ESQ.

Grosvenor Street, Dec. 10.

MY DEAR POOLE,

I am much obliged to you for your congratulations. The contest

to my election defeated itself, for there were only thirteen

votes for Lord Colchester out of nearly one hundred and sixty;

and, had it been known that the attempt would have been made,

I should have had at least double the number. The overwhelming

majority has, however, shown the good opinion of the Society,

which I trust and feel has not been diminished by my conduct in

the chair.

I have never needed any motive to attach me to science, which

I have pursued with equal ardour under all circumstances, for

its own sake, and for the sake of the public, uninfluenced by

the fears of my friends, or the calumnies of my enemies. I

glory in being in the chair of the Royal Society, because I

think it ought to be a reward of scientific labours, and not an

appendage to rank or fortune; and because it will enable me to

be useful in a higher degree in promoting the cause of science.

To this cause, however, I should have been always attached,

even had I not been in such good humour with the public, as I

have reason to be.

Dr. Wollaston, my only formidable opponent in the beginning of

the business, behaved like a true philosopher and friend of

science; and Mr. Gilbert gave me his warmest support.

I am sorry that I have said so much about myself, but

your long letter called for something. I wish I could say

anything satisfactory on the subject of Captain Parry and his

officers.[63] I have every reason to believe Lord Melville

will do all he can on the occasion; no recommendation will

be wanting from the Royal Society that can be given; but the

Admiralty is bound by certain general rules, and will not do

more in this instance than they would do in the case of a

brilliant combat; but these brave and scientific navigators

will be rewarded by a more durable species of glory.

Lady Davy joins me in kind remembrances.

I am, my dear Poole, sincerely yours,

H. DAVY.

[63] Mr. Poole informs me, that he "had been anxious to interest

him, as President of the Royal Society, in favour of those brave

and scientific navigators, particularly Lieutenant, now Captain,

Liddon, who commanded the Griper, in Captain Parry's first

voyage."

It was a question anxiously discussed by the friends of Davy, how

far his elevation to the chair of the Royal Society was calculated

to advance the cause of science, or to increase the lustre of his

own fame. It will be readily perceived that this is a question

perplexed by various conflicting interests, for it not only

involves considerations relating to the character of the person,

but to that also of the constitution and objects of the Society

over which he is called upon to preside.

It is still doubtful whether the Royal Society, in the present

advanced state of science, can derive advantage from possessing in

its President, a philosopher actively engaged in any one branch of

experimental enquiry. Sir Humphry Davy, in his first address from

the chair, took occasion to observe, that "in the early periods of

the establishment, when apparatus was procured with difficulty,

when the greatest philosophers were obliged to labour with their

own hands to frame their instruments, it was found expedient to

keep in the rooms of the Society a collection of all such machines

as were likely to be useful in the progress of experimental

knowledge; and curators and operators were employed, by whom many

capital experiments were made under the eyes of the Society.[64]

But since the improvement of the mechanical and chemical arts

has afforded greater facilities as to the means of carrying on

experimental research, the transactions of the Fellows, recorded

by the Society, have, with some few exceptions, been performed in

their own laboratories, and at their own expense."

[64] The Charter of the Royal Society states that it was

established for the improvement of NATURAL science. This epithet

"_natural_" was originally intended to imply a meaning of

which very few persons, I believe, are aware. At the period of

the establishment of the Society, the arts of witchcraft and

divination were very extensively encouraged; and the word natural

was therefore introduced, in contradistinction to _super_-natural.

Although Sir Walter Scott, in his Demonology, alludes to

the influence of this Society in diminishing the reigning

superstition, he does not appear to have been acquainted with the

circumstance here alluded to.

In deciding upon the qualifications necessary for a President, this

altered state of the Society must not be overlooked; nor can it be

concealed, that the great discoveries of modern science have been

achieved without any direct assistance from the Royal Society. Davy

would have discovered the laws of electro-chemistry, and applied

them for the decomposition of the alkalies--and the genius of

Dalton would, by his atomic doctrine, have "snatched the science

from the chaos of indefinite combination, and have bound it in the

chains of number," had the Society never existed. At the same time,

it must be allowed that, although it may not have directly advanced

the progress of science, it has materially assisted its cause, by

perpetuating the spirit of philosophical enquiry, and the love of

scientific glory--by keeping alive upon the altar the sacred flame

that genius may have kindled.

In the present state of science, the Royal Society imparts an

inspiring principle to its various branches, by affording a

rallying point, a centre of communication, to the philosophers

of all nations, to whom kindred pursuits may render personal

intercourse beneficial; and it becomes the paramount duty of the

chief of this great republic so to preside over its arrangements,

as to foster and encourage such an alliance. To this end, he

must promote feelings of mutual kindness and liberality; and as

the friend and umpire to all parties, it is his office to settle

disagreement, to soothe disappointment, to kindle hope, and to

subdue the vehemence which "engenders strife," in order that

rivalship shall not pass into hostility, nor emulation degenerate

into envy. It is evident that the talents and qualifications

necessary for the discharge of such duties are of the highest

order, extensive in their range, and diversified in their

character. To which, however harshly the word may grate upon the

ear of the philosopher, WEALTH must be considered as an essential

and indispensable condition.

It may be fairly asked, whether a philosopher actively engaged

in the pursuit of any branch of science, is so well adapted

for the performance of such varied duties, as the person who

possesses a general acquaintance with every department, but is not

exclusively devoted to the investigation of any one branch; for,

however correct may be his decisions, or unbiassed his judgment,

the conduct of the former will ever be open to the charge of

partiality, and the bare existence of such a suspicion, though it

may be wholly groundless, will carry with it a train of evils. It

is not in human nature to believe that the looker-on, and he who

plays the game, are alike indifferent to the cards.[65]

[65] I state this opinion with the greater confidence, from a

conviction that it is not singular. On conversing lately upon

the subject with a gentleman to whom the Royal Society is deeply

indebted for the sound judgment and discretion he displayed on

occasions greatly affecting its interests, he replied, "Sir, we

require not an Achilles to fight our battles, but an Agamemnon to

command the Greeks."

On the other hand, it may be urged with some force, that the

Presidency of the Royal Society should be reserved as the fair

reward of scientific labours, and not as an appendage to rank or

to wealth:--that in England, we may in vain search amongst the

aristocracy for one who feels a dignified respect for the sciences,

and who is willing to afford that time which the faithful discharge

of its duties would require.

To assert that Davy retained his popularity, or to deny that he

retired from the office under the frown of a considerable party,

would be dishonest. I would willingly dismiss this part of his life

without too nice an examination; but I am writing a history, not an

eloge.

As a philosopher, his claims to admiration and respect were

allowed in all their latitude; but when he sought for the homage

due to patrician distinction, they were denied with indignation.

How strange it is, that those whom Nature has placed above their

fellow men by the god-like gift of genius, should seek from their

inferiors those distinctions which are generally the rewards

of fortune. When we learn that Congreve, in his interview with

Voltaire, prided himself upon his fashion rather than upon his wit;

that Byron was more vain of his heraldry than of his "Pilgrimage

of Childe Harold;" that Racine pined into an atrophy, because the

monarch passed him without a recognition in the ante-room of the

palace, and that Davy sighed for patrician distinction in the chair

of Newton, we can only lament the weakness from which the choicest

spirits of our nature are not exempt. Will philosophers never feel,

with Walpole, that "a genius transmits more honour by blood than

he can receive?" Had the blood of forty generations of nobility

flowed in the veins of Davy, would his name have commanded higher

homage, or his discoveries have excited greater admiration? But

great minds have ever had their points of weakness: an inordinate

admiration of hereditary rank was the cardinal deformity of Davy's

character; it was the centre from which all his defects radiated,

and continually placed him in false positions; for the man who

rests his claims upon doubtful or ill-defined pretensions, from

a sense of his insecurity, naturally becomes jealous at every

apparent inattention, and he is suspicious of the sincerity of

that respect which he feels may be the fruit of usurpation. If

with these circumstances we take into consideration the existence

of a natural timidity of character, which he sought to conquer by

efforts that betrayed him into awkwardness of manner, and combine

with it an irritability of temperament which occasionally called up

expressions of ill-humour, we at once possess a clue by which we

may unravel the conduct of our philosopher, and the consequences it

brought upon himself during his presidency of the Royal Society.

Nor must we leave out of sight that inattention to certain forms

which, amongst those who are incapable of penetrating beyond

the surface of character, passes for the offensive carelessness

of superiority. Davy, after the example of Sir Joseph Banks,

opened his house on one evening of the week for the reception of

the Fellows of the Royal Society, and of other persons who were

actively engaged in any scientific pursuit; but the invitations to

these _soirées_ were so irregularly managed, that they frequently

gave offence, where they were intended to convey a compliment.

Conflicting opinions, respecting the management of the Royal

Institution, most unfortunately also arose, and the President of

the Royal Society, presuming upon his former alliance with that

establishment, and upon the high obligations conferred upon it

by the splendid discoveries he had achieved within its walls,

was encouraged to exercise an authority which provoked an angry

dissatisfaction;--schisms arose, and the party-spirit thus kindled

in Albemarle Street soon spread to Somerset House.--But let us

turn to the brighter part of the picture. In the discharge of the

more important duties of his office, the Society received the

full benefit of his talents and his virtues. At its meetings,

he was constant in attendance, and dignified in his conduct and

deportment; in its councils, he was firm in his resolves, correct

in his judgments, zealous in his plans,[66] and impartial in his

decisions. It has been said that he unduly favoured the pursuits of

chemistry, to the injury and depression of the other branches of

science: this is not the fact, as a reference to the Philosophical

Transactions will amply testify; and the awards of the Copley

medals will moreover show, that he alike extended the animating

influence of his patronage to every part of natural philosophy.

I am authorised by Sir James South to state, that during his

negotiations with the Government, for the purpose of securing to

the British Nation the unalienable use of his splendid instruments,

by the erection of a permanent observatory, Sir Humphry Davy was

indefatigable in his exertions to accomplish so important an

object; and that on one occasion, in the midst of severe illness,

he travelled at no inconsiderable risk to London, from the distant

seat of his friend Mr. Knight, to advocate a cause so essential, in

his judgment, to the interests of Astronomy.

[66] It was well known to his friends that, had his health not

declined, he would have carried into effect a reform which he

had long contemplated, and by which the Royal Society would have

become, at once, more dignified and more useful.

* * * * *

In the Autumn of 1821, Davy visited his mother and relatives at

Penzance; upon which occasion he received from the inhabitants of

the town, and from the gentlemen resident in its neighbourhood,

a flattering testimony of respect, which made a deep and lasting

impression upon his heart.

At a General Meeting, summoned for the purpose of taking into

consideration some mode by which his fellow-townsmen might express

their sense of his transcendent talents, and of the lustre which

his genius had cast upon the place of his nativity:--It was

unanimously RESOLVED--

"That a public dinner be given to Sir Humphry Davy, and that

the Mayor be desired to wait upon him forthwith, in order to

communicate the Resolution, and respectfully to request that he

would appoint the day, on which it would be agreeable to him to

meet their wishes."

On the day appointed, a deputation of Gentlemen proceeded in

their carriages to the house of his mother, for the purpose of

conducting him to the hotel, where an appropriate entertainment had

been provided for the occasion.

The following letter evinces the sincere satisfaction which this

visit afforded him.

TO THOMAS POOLE, ESQ.

Penzance, July 28, 1821.

MY DEAR POOLE,

An uncontrollable necessity has brought me here. Close to the

Land's-end I am enjoying the majestic in nature, and living

over again the days of my infancy and early youth.

The living beings that act upon me are interesting subjects

for contemplation. Civilization has not yet destroyed in their

minds the semblance of the great Parent of good.

Nature has done much for the inhabitants of Mount's Bay, by

presenting to their senses all things that can awaken in the

mind the emotions of greatness and sublimity. She has placed

them far from cities, and given them forms of visible and

audible beauty.

I am now reviving old associations, and endeavouring to attach

old feelings to a few simple objects.

I am, &c.

H. DAVY.

Although the letter which follows is without date, I am unwilling

to withhold it.

TO THOMAS POOLE, ESQ.

MY DEAR POOLE,

I have been for some weeks absent from London, and have only

just received your letter. When I return in the winter, I shall

be glad to see Mr. A.--I regret that your niece is so much

indisposed. Lady Davy has been obliged to change her climate in

consequence of a long-continued cough, but I am happy in being

able to say she is now quite well.

After the fatigues of a long season in London, I am now

enjoying the Highland scenery and sports with a purer pleasure,

and I find, after the Alps and Pyrenees, even the mountains of

Scotland possessing some peculiar beauties. You ought to come

and see this country, which you would enjoy, both as a lover of

nature and of man. The one is grand and beautiful; the other,

moral, active, and independent.

I am, my dear Poole, your obliged friend,

H. DAVY.

The Philosophical Transactions, during the Presidency of Sir

Humphry Davy, evince the alacrity with which he redeemed the pledge

given to the Society in his address on taking the chair--

"And though your good opinion has, as it were, honoured me with a

rank similar to that of General, I shall be always happy to act as

a private soldier in the ranks of Science."

* * * * *

Many years before even the identity of lightning and electricity

was suspected, it had been observed, on several occasions, that

the magnetism of the compass needle was not only destroyed, which

might have been attributed to heat, but that it was even reversed

by lightning.[67]

[67] Davy observes, that there are many facts recorded in the

Philosophical Transactions, which prove the magnetising powers

of lightning: one in particular, where a stroke of lightning

passing through a box of knives, rendered most of them powerful

magnets.--_Philosophical Transactions_, No. 157, p. 520, and No.

437, p. 57.

In the progress of electrical discoveries, the similarity between

electricity and magnetism had not escaped observation,[68] and

some philosophers had even attempted to establish the existence

of an identity or intimate relation between these two forces.

The experiments of Ritter, however, alone appeared to offer any

confirmation of the supposed analogy; but so obscure was his

language, and so wild and hypothetical his views, that few, if

any, of them were repeated either in France or England, and their

results were for a long time wholly disregarded.

[68] The phenomena of many crystallized minerals which become

electric by heat, and develope opposite electric poles at

their two extremities, offered an analogy so striking to the

polarity of the magnet, that it seemed hardly possible to doubt

a closer connection of the two powers. The developement of a

similar polarity in the Voltaic pile pointed strongly to the

same conclusion; and experiments had even been made with a view

to ascertain whether a pile in a state of excitement might

not manifest a disposition to place itself in the magnetic

meridian.--_Herschel's Discourse_, p. 340.

In a work, entitled "Recherches sur l'identité des Forces Chimiques

et Electriques," published by M. Oersted in the year 1807, the

subject was resumed, and the author advanced the hypothesis,[69]

which twelve years afterwards conducted him to one of the most

important discoveries of the present age, and which has given

origin to a new science, termed ELECTRO-MAGNETISM.[70]

[69] The hypothesis was this:--"In galvanism, the force is more

_latent_ than in electricity, and still more so in magnetism

than in galvanism; it is therefore necessary to try whether

electricity, in its _latent_ state, will not affect the needle."

This passage may be thus explained: When the Voltaic circuit

is interrupted, it possesses opposite electrical poles; and

when continuous, it no longer affects the electrometer, or

the electricity becomes _latent_, which is the condition

theoretically required for the manifestation of its magnetic

action: and the fundamental experiment of Oersted proved that,

under these circumstances, the compass needle was affected.

[70] Mr. Herschel, in speaking of the pertinacity with which

Oersted adhered to the idea of a necessary connection between

electricity and magnetism, observes, that there is something in

it which reminds us of the obstinate adherence of Columbus to his

notion of the necessary existence of the New World.

In the winter of 1819, Professor Oersted, Secretary to the Royal

Society of Copenhagen, published an account of some experiments, in

which the electric current, such as is supposed to pass from the

positive to the negative pole of a Voltaic battery, along a wire

which connects them, caused a magnetic needle near it to deviate

from its natural position, and to assume a new one, the direction

of which was observed to depend upon the relative position of the

needle and the wire.[71]

[71] For this discovery, the President and Council of the Royal

Society adjudged to M. Oersted the medal on Sir Godfrey Copley's

Donation for the year 1820.

It may be necessary to premise, that these experiments were

conducted in a form which had never before suggested itself to the

enquirer; _viz. with the two ends of the pile in communication with

each other_,--a condition which enabled it to discharge itself

freely: this circumstance will, at once, explain the reason of all

preceding failures. It was never before suspected that the electric

current, passing _uninterruptedly_ through a wire, connecting the

two ends of a Voltaic battery, was capable of being manifested

by any effect; the experiments, however, in question furnished

an unequivocal test of its passage by its action on the magnetic

needle; and which may be shortly stated as follows:

The opposite poles of a battery, in full action, were joined by a

metallic wire, which, to avoid circumlocution, has been called the

_uniting conductor_, or the _uniting wire_.

On placing the wire above the magnet and parallel to it, the pole

next the negative end of the battery always moved westward, and

when the wire was placed under the needle, the same pole went

towards the east. If the wire was on the same horizontal plane with

the needle, no declination whatever took place, but the magnet

showed a disposition to move in a vertical direction; the pole next

the negative side of the battery being depressed when the wire was

to the west of it, and elevated when it was placed on the east side.

The extent of the declination occasioned by a battery, depends

upon its power, and the distance of the uniting wire from the

needle. If the apparatus is powerful, and the distance small, the

declination will amount to an angle of forty-five degrees or more;

but this deviation does not give an exact idea of the real effect

which may be produced by galvanism; for the motion of the needle

is counteracted by the magnetism of the Earth. When the influence

of this latter power is destroyed by means of another magnet, the

needle will place itself directly across the connecting wire: so

that the real tendency of a magnet is to stand at right angles to

an electric current. Such phenomena, being wholly at variance with

the laws of simple electrical attraction and repulsion, are only to

be explained upon the supposition that a new energy is generated

by the action of the current of electricity thus brought into

conflict, and which must be identical with, or nearly related to,

magnetism.

It would also appear from the motions of the magnet, when

differently placed with regard to the _uniting wire_, that this

energy circulates, or performs a circular movement around the axis

of the conductor, and thus drives the magnetic pole according to

the direction of the needle with reference to such a current.

This important discovery was no sooner announced to the

philosophical world, than Sir Humphry Davy, with his characteristic

zeal, proceeded to repeat the experiments; and, with his usual

sagacity, so to vary and extend them, as to throw new light upon

this novel department of science. The facts he thus discovered, and

the reasonings founded upon them, were communicated by him to the

Royal Society in three successive memoirs.

THE FIRST, "On the Magnetic Phenomena produced by Electricity," was

read on the 16th of November 1820.

THE SECOND, entitled "Farther Researches on the Magnetic Phenomena

produced by Electricity; with some new Experiments on the

properties of Electrified bodies, in their relations to conducting

powers and Temperature," read July 5th, 1821.

THE THIRD, "On a new Phenomenon of Electro-magnetism," read March

6th, 1823.

The principal experiments communicated in these memoirs were

performed with the battery belonging to the London Institution,[72]

the once powerful apparatus at the Royal Institution having become

old and feeble in his service.

[72] I find from a note addressed to Mr. Pepys, that on the 21st

of June, 1822, Davy worked the two batteries of 1000 plates each

at the London Institution, before the Prince Royal of Denmark.

The experiments were principally electro-magnetic.

The following letter contains an invitation to his friend Mr.

Pepys, to witness his first experiment; a document so far valuable,

as it fixes a date of some importance in the history of discovery.

TO WILLIAM HASLEDINE PEPYS, ESQ.

Grosvenor Street, Oct. 20, 1820.

DEAR PEPYS,

The experiment I wish to show you is no less than the

conversion of electricity into magnetism; but it is a secret as

yet.

I will come to you at twelve on Monday, in the Poultry. If

you will be so good as to order the battery to be charged

to-morrow, it will be ready for us on Monday.

Have you a dipping needle? This, and an air-pump, and the globe

for taking sparks _in vacuo_ by points of charcoal, are all we

shall want.

Perhaps you will invite Dr. Babington, and our worthy friend

Allen.

I will show you the opening of quite a new field of experiment.

Ever yours very sincerely,

H. DAVY.

The discovery of Professor Oersted was limited to the action of

the electric current on needles previously magnetised. Davy

ascertained that the _uniting conductor itself became magnetic_,

during the passage of the electricity through it.[73] It was in

consequence of having observed some anomaly, with respect to the

way in which the uniting wire altered the direction of the magnet,

that he was led to a conjecture which he immediately verified by

a very simple experiment. He threw some iron filings on a paper,

and brought them near the uniting wire, when immediately they

were attracted by the wire, and adhered to it in considerable

quantities, forming a mass round it ten or twelve times the

thickness of the wire: on breaking the communication, they

instantly fell off, proving that the magnetic effect entirely

depended upon the passage of electricity through the wire.

[73] It would appear that M. Arago likewise discovered this fact

at about the same period; but it is evident that the French and

English philosophers arrived at the result independently of each

other; for the experiments which led to it were made by Sir H.

Davy in October 1820; while the September number of the "Annales

de Physique," containing the first account of the Researches of

M. Arago, was not received in London until the 24th of November

in that year; and it may be farther observed, that the numbers of

this journal were very commonly published several months after

the affixed date.

Davy observes, it was easy to imagine that such magnetic effects

could not be exhibited by the electrical wire, without its being

capable of permanently communicating them to steel; and that, in

order to ascertain whether such was the fact, he fastened several

steel needles, in different directions, to the uniting wire, when

those parallel to it were found to act like the wire itself,

while each of those placed across it acquired two poles. Such

as were placed _under_ the wire, the positive end of the battery

being east, had north poles on the south of the wire, and south

poles to the north. The needles _above_ were in the opposite

direction; and this was constantly the case, whatever might be the

inclination of the needle to the wire. On breaking the connexion,

the steel needles, placed _across_ the uniting wire, retained their

magnetism,[74] while those placed _parallel_ to it lost it at the

moment of disunion. The most extraordinary circumstances, however,

connected with these experiments were, first, that _contact_ with

the uniting wire was not found necessary for the production of

the effect,--indeed, it was even produced, though thick glass

intervened; and, secondly, that a needle which had been placed in a

transverse direction to the wire, merely for an instant, was found

as powerful a magnet as one that had been long in communication

with it.

[74] M. Arago also, nearly at the same time, succeeded in

communicating magnetism to the needle; but, at the suggestion

of M. Ampère, it was effected in a different manner. A copper

wire, by being rolled round a solid rod, was twisted into a

spiral, so as to form a _helix_. It was easy, by passing the

wire round the rod, in one direction or the other, to form a

_dextrorsal_ helix, proceeding from the right hand towards the

left, as in the tendrils of many plants; or a _sinistrorsal_,

or left helix, proceeding downwards from the left hand to the

right above the axis. Into the cavity of a spiral thus formed,

connecting the two poles of a battery, a steel needle wrapped

in paper was introduced; and, in order to exclude all influence

of the magnetism of the earth, the conchoidal part of the wire

was kept constantly perpendicular to the magnetic meridian. In a

few minutes the needle had acquired a sufficiently strong dose

of magnetism; and the position of the north and south poles

exactly agreed with M. Ampère's notion, that the electric current

traverses the connecting wire in a direction from the zinc

extremity of the pile to the copper extremity.

The distance to which magnetism is communicated by electricity,

and the fact of its taking place equally through conductors and

non-conductors, are circumstances which, in the opinion of Davy,

are unfavourable to the idea of the identity of electricity and

magnetism.

Davy subsequently ascertained by experiment, that the magnetic

result was proportional to the quantity of electricity passing

through a given space; and this fact led him to believe, that

a wire electrified by the common machine would not occasion a

sensible effect; and this he found to be the case, on placing very

small needles across a fine wire connected with a prime conductor

of a powerful machine and the earth. But as a momentary exposure

in a powerful electrical circuit was sufficient to give permanent

polarity to steel, it appeared equally obvious, that needles placed

transversely to a wire at the time that the electricity of a common

Leyden battery was discharged through it, ought to become magnetic;

and this he found was actually the fact, and according to precisely

the same laws as in the Voltaic circuit; the needle _under_ the

wire, the positive conductor being on the right hand, offering its

north pole to the face of the operator, and the needle _above_,

exhibiting the opposite polarity.

The facility with which experiments are made with the common

Leyden battery, enabled him to ascertain various other important

facts, respecting the communication of magnetism, which it would

be inconsistent with the nature and limits of this work to

particularize. I have merely offered a notice of the more prominent

discoveries communicated by him in his first paper to the Royal

Society, and which he concludes by observing, that "in consequence

of the facts lately developed, a number of curious speculations

cannot fail to present themselves to every philosophical mind;

such as whether the magnetism of the earth may not be owing to its

electricity, and the variation of the needle to the alterations

in the electrical currents of the earth, in consequence of its

motions, internal changes, or its relations to solar heat; and

whether the luminous effects of the auroras at the poles are not

shown, by these new facts, to depend on electricity. This is

evident, that if strong electrical currents be supposed to follow

the apparent course of the sun, the magnetism of the earth ought to

be such as it is found to be."[75]

[75] A very ingenious piece of apparatus was contrived to

illustrate this theory by experiment; but I am uncertain as

to whom the credit of it belongs. It consisted of a globe,

containing metallic wires, arranged in relation to each other

according to the electro-magnetic theory, when, by passing an

electric current in the direction of the ecliptic, the poles

became magnetic.

Davy never overlooked an occasion of applying theory to practice,

and he therefore proposes, upon the principles developed in this

paper, to make powerful magnets, by fixing bars of steel, or

circular pieces of steel, fitted for making horse-shoe magnets,

round the electrical conductors of buildings in elevated and

exposed situations.

His second paper contains an account of experiments instituted

with a view to gain some distinct knowledge on the subject of the

relations of the different conductors to the magnetism produced

by electricity. The results were decisive; but, without entering

minutely into the theory of the subject which they so ably

illustrated, these experiments cannot be clearly described, or

successfully explained. The same observation will apply to the

researches detailed in his third paper, announcing the discovery

of a _new electro-magnetic phenomenon_; for, since they are

inseparably connected with Mr. Faraday's beautiful experiments on

_Magnetic Rotation_, I could scarcely expect to render my analysis

of the memoir sufficiently intelligible, without entering at length

upon that curious subject; I am unwilling, however, to refer the

reader to the original paper in the Transactions, without offering

a remark upon the _phenomenon_, which he says "is the _principal_

object of the paper," but which we might conclude, from the hasty

and imperfect manner in which he dismisses it, to have occupied a

very subordinate place in his estimation. In his anxiety to examine

and describe the rotations produced during this experiment, he

bestows far too little attention upon the more, indeed I might say

the _only_, important phenomenon of the cone of mercury which was

elevated above each of the wires proceeding from the battery; and

which, arising as it evidently did from a repulsive influence,

clearly shows that the presence of electricity establishes between

the particles of matter a repulsive energy, whether that matter

be conducting, or non-conducting in its functions. This law, M.

Ampère subsequently illustrated by a different form of experiment,

and unfairly, as I must think, omitted even to notice Davy's prior

result.

On the 20th of December 1821, Davy communicated to the Royal

Society a memoir "On the Electrical Phenomena exhibited _in vacuo_."

It had been stated by Mr. Walsh, and the opinion had been

subsequently supported by the researches of Mr. Morgan, that the

electrical light was not producible in a perfect Torricellian

vacuum; the latter gentleman also concluded that such a vacuum

prevented the charging of coated glass.

An enquiry of greater importance can scarcely be imagined;

involving in its train several of the most abstruse and difficult

questions of corpuscular philosophy; as, whether electricity be

a subtile fluid, or electrical effect the mere exhibition of the

attractive powers of the particles of bodies; for, if it can be

shown that these effects take place in a perfect vacuum, we shall

advance towards the conclusion, that electrical phenomena depend

upon the agency of an ethereal and transcendental fluid. It was

under such an impression that Davy proceeded to determine, if

possible, "the relations of electricity to space, as nearly void of

matter as it can be made on the surface of the earth."

He was, in the first instance, led to suspect the accuracy of those

conclusions at which Mr. Walsh and Mr. Morgan had arrived, from

considering that, "in the most perfect vacuum which can be obtained

in the Torricellian tube, vapour of mercury, though of extremely

small density, must still always exist." I propose to follow our

philosopher through the paths of this enquiry; and then, with all

the deference due to such high authority, to state the objections

which may be urged against his results.

First, then, as to the results he obtained with quicksilver in

an apparatus simple, but well adapted at once to insure the most

completely attainable vacuum, and to exhibit its capability of

receiving a charge. In all cases where this vacuum was perfect,

he found it to be permeable to electricity, and to be rendered

luminous, either by the common spark, or by the shock from a Leyden

jar; and, moreover, that the coated glass surrounding it became

charged under such circumstances; but the intensity of the light in

these experiments was always in proportion to the temperature, or,

in other words, to the density of the mercurial vapour; and that

at 20° below zero of Fahrenheit, it became so faint as to require

considerable darkness to render it perceptible.

The great brilliancy, on the other hand, of the electrical light

in pure, dense vapour of mercury, was beautifully displayed during

the operation of boiling the metal in an exhausted tube. "In the

formation and condensation of the globules of mercurial vapour, the

electricity produced by the friction of the mercury against the

glass, was discharged through the vapour with sparks so bright as

to be visible in daylight."

The charge likewise communicated to the tinfoil was higher, the

higher the temperature; at 0° Fahrenheit it was extremely feeble.

This, like the phenomenon of the electric light, must, he thinks,

depend upon the different density of the vapour of mercury.

But he was desirous of still farther refining his experiments,

so as to exclude, as far as it was possible, the presence of any

volatile matter; and in this part of the enquiry he displayed,

in a very masterly manner, that happy talent in which he so

far surpassed his contemporaries, of suggesting expedients

and contriving new apparatus in order to vanquish practical

difficulties.

To get rid of a portion of mercurial vapour, he employed a

difficultly fusible amalgam of mercury and tin, which was made to

crystallize by cooling in the tube; but, in this case, the results

were precisely the same as when pure mercury had been used. He then

attempted to make a vacuum above the fusible alloy of bismuth, but

he found it so liable to oxidate and soil the tube, that he soon

renounced farther attempts of this kind. Nothing discouraged, he

determined to try the effects of a comparatively fixed metal in

fusion. By melting freshly cut pieces of grain tin, in a tube made

void after having been filled with hydrogen, and by long-continued

heat and agitation, he obtained a column of fixed metal which

appeared to be entirely free from gas; and yet the vacuum made

above this exhibited the same phenomena as the mercurial vacuum,

except that they were not perceptibly increased by heat: a fact

which Davy must have anticipated, as he attributed the greater

display of electrical light, at high temperatures, to the effect

of increased density of vapour; it is therefore a matter of

surprise that he did not give more importance to the phenomenon.

He made two experiments on electrical and magnetic repulsions and

attractions in the mercurial vacuum, and he found that two balls,

the one of platinum, the other of steel, properly arranged for the

purpose, repelled each other, when the conducting wire to which

they were attached was electrified in the most perfect mercurial

vacuum, as they would have done in the usual cases: and that the

steel globules were as obedient to the magnet as in the air; which

last result, he observes, it was easy to have anticipated.

He also made some comparative experiments, with the view of

ascertaining, whether below the freezing point of water the

diminution of the temperature of the Torricellian vacuum diminished

its power of transmitting electricity, or of being rendered

luminous by it. To about twenty degrees, this appeared to be the

case; but between twenty degrees above, and twenty degrees below

zero, the lowest temperature he could produce by pounded ice and

muriate of lime, it seemed stationary; and, as well as he could

determine, the electrical phenomena were very nearly of the same

intensity as those produced in the vacuum above tin.

"It is evident," he says, "from these general results, that

the light (and probably the heat) generated in electrical

discharges depends _principally_ on some properties or substances

belonging to the ponderable matter through which it passes: but

they prove likewise that space, where there is no appreciable

quantity of this matter, is still capable of exhibiting electric

phenomena--viz. those of attraction and repulsion, &c.: a fact

unquestionably favourable to the idea of the phenomena of

electricity being produced by a highly subtile fluid or fluids, of

which the particles are repulsive with respect to each other, and

attractive of the particles of other matter."

However much we may admire the experimental address displayed in

this paper, we must confess that its results are very far from

being satisfactory. His having assumed, without proof, and even

without examination, the theory that a perfect vacuum cannot be

produced in the Torricellian tube, and made it the foundation of

his reasonings, appears to me to have vitiated all his conclusions.

Mr. Faraday has rendered it extremely probable, that a _limit_

does actually exist to the production of vapour by bodies placed

_in vacuo_,[76] beneath which they are perfectly fixed; and if

this be true, it is evident that, at low temperatures, a perfect

vacuum may be produced in the Torricellian tube; and it is highly

probable that Davy did thus actually produce one in several of his

experiments; especially in those where he found that, by a farther

reduction of temperature, no farther diminution of electrical

effect was perceptible: he had in fact arrived at this limit to

vaporization, and therefore a farther reduction of temperature

could not possibly influence the phenomena. In this point of view,

the electrical light would seem to be _primary_, or independent of

foreign matter.--But though the premises be granted, let the reader

pause before he hastens to any conclusion; for the cloud of mystery

has not been dissipated, it has only changed its place. At the

termination of his paper, Davy indulges in a conjecture subversive

of every conclusion deduced from experiments _in vacuo_. "When the

intense heat," says he, "produced by electricity, and the strong

attractive powers of differently electrified surfaces, and the

rapidity of the changes of state, are considered, it does not seem

at all improbable, that the superficial particles of bodies, which,

when detached by the repulsive power of heat, form vapour, may be

likewise detached by electrical powers, and that they may produce

luminous appearances in a vacuum free from all other matter, by the

annihilation of their opposite electrical states."

[76] "On the Existence of a Limit to Vaporization. By M. Faraday,

F.R.S. Corresponding Member of the Royal Academy of Sciences at

Paris." Phil. Trans. 1826. See also a more recent paper by the

same Philosopher in the first number of the new Journal of the

Royal Institution.

During the course of the enquiry, Davy is led to suppose that air

may exist in mercury, in the same invisible state as it does in

water, that is, distributed through its pores; and that absorption

of air may, therefore, explain the difference of the heights of

the mercury in different barometers. This, it must be confessed,

if true, is a most disheartening fact, as it at once precludes the

possibility of any thing like accuracy in our barometers; but Mr.

Daniell, to whom on all subjects of meteorology we are bound to pay

the greatest deference, differs altogether from our philosopher

upon this point, and he adduces a single observation which he

thinks nearly disproves the supposition. "All fluids," says he,

"which are known to absorb air into their pores, invariably emit

it when the pressure of the atmosphere is removed; but, upon an

extensive examination of large bodies of mercury, variously heated

in the vacuum of an air-pump, I never saw a bubble of air given off

from the surface of the metal." Davy, it must be stated, obtained

a far different result; but an observation of Mr. Daniell explains

the cause of it. "Air," he continues, "will rise from the contact

of the mercury with the glass in which it is contained, in exact

inverse proportion to the care with which it has been filled,

but it _never rises from the surface of the mercury alone_. The

difficulty of properly filling a barometer tube, I attribute to the

attraction between the glass and the air--not to that between the

mercury and the air."[77]

[77] "Meteorological Essays and Observations," p. 363.--See

also Bellani's experiments upon this subject, which are so

satisfactory as to remove every doubt from the subject.

On the 13th of June 1822, a memoir was read before the Royal

Society, "On the state of Water and Aëriform matter in cavities

found in certain Crystals. By Sir Humphry Davy, Bart. P.R.S."

It is generally admitted by Geologists, that the greater number of

the crystalline substances of the mineral kingdom must have been

previously in a liquid state; but different schools have assumed

different causes for their solution; some attributing the effect

principally to the agency of water, others to that of heat.

In the paper under consideration, the author very freely avows

himself as the champion of the latter doctrine.

"When it is considered," says he, "that the solvent power of water

depends upon its temperature, and its deposition of solid matters

upon its change of state or of temperature, and that, being a

gravitating substance, the same quantity must always belong to the

globe, it becomes difficult to allow much weight to the arguments

of the Wernerians, or Neptunists, who have generally neglected, in

their speculations, the laws of chemical attraction.

"There are many circumstances, on the contrary, favourable to that

part of the views of the Huttonians, or Plutonists, relating to the

cause of crystallization; such as the form of the earth, that of

an oblate spheroid flattened at the poles; the facility with which

heat, being a radiating substance, may be lost and dissipated in

free space; and the observations which seem to show the present

existence of a high temperature in the interior of the globe."

He had often, he tells us, in the course of his chemical

researches, looked for facts, or experiments, which might throw

some light on this interesting subject, but without success, till

it occurred to him, as he was considering the state of the fluid

and aëriform matters which are found included in certain crystals,

that these curious phenomena might be examined in a manner to

afford some important arguments as to the formation of the crystal

itself.

Having obtained, through the liberality of his friends, a variety

of appropriate specimens of rock-crystal, he proceeded to submit

them to experiment. Their cavities were opened by means of diamond

drills, under either distilled water, oil, or mercury; the gas was

then expelled from them by the introduction of slender wires, and

the included fluids were drawn out by the aid of fine capillary

tubes.

As soon as an opening was effected, the fluid under which the

operation had been performed rushed into the cavity, and the

globule of elastic fluid contracted so as to appear from six to ten

times less than before the experiment. The fluid was found to be

nearly pure water,--the gas appeared to be azote.

It was an interesting point to ascertain whether the same

circumstances occurred in productions found in rocks which have

been generally considered as of igneous origin, such as the

basaltic rocks in the neighbourhood of Vicenza, the chalcedonies

of which so often afford water. On examining such specimens, when,

to obviate the possibility of any fallacy, they were previously

ascertained to be impermeable to the atmosphere, analogous results

were obtained: water, containing very minute quantities of saline

impregnations, was found to be the fluid, and the gas, as in the

former instances, was ascertained to be azote; but it was in a much

more rarefied state than in the rock-crystals, being between sixty

and seventy times as rare as atmospheric air.

The fact of azote being found in these cavities, he explains, by

supposing that atmospheric air might have been originally included

in the crystals, and that the oxygen had been separated from it by

the attraction of the water; a conjecture which a direct experiment

appeared to confirm.

In reasoning upon the vacuum, or rarefied state of the aëriform

matter in the cavities of rock-crystals and chalcedonies, he very

justly states, that the phenomenon cannot be easily accounted for,

except on the supposition of their having been formed at a higher

temperature than that now belonging to the surface of the globe:

and he thinks it most probable that the water and the silica were

in chemical union, and separated from each other by cooling, since

there are strong grounds for believing that a liquid _hydrate of

silica_ would exist at high temperatures under pressure, and that,

like all liquid bodies in the atmosphere, it would contain small

quantities of atmospheric air. If this be granted, we may readily

explain the phenomena presented by the gaseous and liquid matters

in rock-crystal and chalcedony.

Thus then did Davy assail the Neptunists in their own camp, and

vanquish them with their own weapons; for the fact, which had been

confidently considered by the disciples of Werner, as, above all

others, hostile to the idea of the igneous origin of crystalline

rocks, namely, the existence of water in them, has been made to

afford a decisive argument in favour of the very opinion it had

been brought forward to oppose.[78]

[78] I well remember with what triumph the late Dr. Clarke, in

his popular lectures on Mineralogy at Cambridge, paraded a fine

crystal containing water in its cavity. "Gentlemen," said he,

"there is water enough in the very crystals in my cabinet to

extinguish all the fires of the Plutonists."

In an appendix to the foregoing paper, the examination of two other

crystals is detailed; the results afforded were very different from

those of the preceding ones, but not less favourable to the theory

of igneous origin. One of these crystals was found to contain a

bituminous fluid; on piercing it under distilled water, the water

rushed in, and entirely filled the cavity, so that no aëriform

matter but the vapour of the substance could have been present. The

fact of almost a perfect vacuum existing in a cavity containing an

expansible but difficultly volatile substance, must be considered

as highly favourable to the theory of the igneous origin of

crystals.

In the other crystal, the quantity of aëriform matter was unusually

small in proportion to the quantity of fluid, and from the

peculiarity of its motion, it appeared to be more likely to be

compressed than rarefied elastic fluid; and in piercing the sides

of the cavities, Davy found that this was the case; it enlarged in

volume from ten to twelve times; the fluid was water, but the gas

was too minute in quantity to be examined. There is but one mode of

accounting for this phenomenon. The crystal must have been formed

under an immense weight of atmosphere or fluid, sufficient to

produce a compression much more than adequate to compensate for the

expansive effects of heat.[79]

[79] An explanation which the experiments of Mr. Faraday, on the

condensation of the gases, to be immediately described, will most

fully justify.

The Life of Sir Humphry Davy, Bart. LL.D., Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 4 / 8 章