I shall be glad to make a few remarks on some of the passages noticed by L.

P. 25.--Of this piece of carelessness--for which I do not the less feel

that I deserved a rebuke because L. has not administered it--I had already

been made aware by the kindness of a friend. I confess I had never heard of

Osorius, which is perhaps no great matter for wonder; but I looked for his

name both in Bayle and the catalogue of the library of the British Museum,

and by some oversight missed it. I have since found it in both. I cannot

help, however, remarking that this is a good example of the advantage of

noting _every_ deviation from the received text. Had I tacitly transposed

three letters of the word in question (a small liberty compared with some

that my predecessors have taken), my corruption of the text might have

passed unnoticed. I have not had much experience in these things; but if

the works of English writers in general have been tampered with by editors

as much as I have found the _Advancement_ and _Essays_ of Lord Bacon to be,

I fear they must have suffered great mutilation. I rather incline to think

it is the case, for I have had occasion lately to compare two editions of

Paley's _Horae Paulinae_, and I find great differences in the text. All this

looks suspicious.

P. 34.--I spent some time in searching for this passage in Aristotle, but I

could not discover it. I did not look elsewhere.

P. 60.--In the forthcoming edition of the _Essays_ I have referred to

Plutarch, _Gryll._, 1., which I incline to think is the passage Bacon had

in his mind. The passage quoted from Cicero I merely meant to point out for

comparison.

P. 146.--The passage quoted is from Sen. _ad Lucil._, 52.

P. 147.--_Ad Lucil._, 53.

P. 159.--_Ad Lucil._, 71.

Two or three other passages from Seneca will be found without any

reference. One of them, p. 13., "Quidam sunt tam umbratiles ut putent in

turbido esse quicquid in luce est," I have taken some pains to hunt for,

but hitherto without success. Another noticeable one, "Vita sine proposito

languida et vaga est," is from _Ep. ad Lucil._, 95.

For the reference to Aristotle I am much obliged. I was anxious to trace

all the quotations from Aristotle, but could not find this one.

P. 165.--I cannot answer this question. Is it possible that he was thinking

of St. Augustine? In the _Confessions_, i. 25., we kind the expression

_vinum erroris_.

P. 177.--No doubt Bacon had read the treatise of Sallust quoted, but my

impression is that he thought the proverb had grown out of the line in

Plautus.

P. 180.--I have searched again for "alimenta socordiae," as it is quoted in

the _Colours of Good and Evil_, but cannot fix upon any passage from which

I can say it was taken, though there are many which might have suggested

it. One at p. 19. of the _Advancement_, which I missed at first, I have

since met with. It is from the _Cherson._, p. 106.

Notes and Queries, Number 188, June 4, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 80 / 141 题