TWO QUESTIONS.

They are these: First, was Polytheism or Monotheism the primitive

religion? Second, is religion human or Divine in its origin? In

answering these questions I shall gather facts, and from them deduce my

conclusion, after the inductive method. First, universal history and

tradition as far back as they can be traced, without one dissenting

voice, locate the origin of man in Asia. From this point men migrated in

every direction. Here, in Asia, their language and religion, if they had

any, would be one and the same. This would, in the nature of the case,

be true, whether religion was at first human or Divine. Again, as all

derivative languages are found to be shaded by one primitive language,

so all derivative religions will, on examination, be found to be shaded

by the one primitive religion. That is, the leading or fundamental idea

will be found more or less unclouded in all the more modern religions.

Now, which is it that shades all religions? Is it Polytheism or

Monotheism? Is the fundamental thought of either found in all the

others? Will any one pretend that Polytheism is the primitive religion?

Is its leading thought of many gods, found in all religions? It is not

in Judaism, Christianity, nor Mahomedanism. These are one in their

advocacy of one living and true God. This fact breaks the chain of

Polytheism and ruins its claim to be considered the first religion. Here

we must leave Polytheism and look after the claim of Monotheism. If this

is the first form of religion, it must, according to our rule, shade all

other religions; if it does not, then, from this stand-point all is yet

in the dark.

The Christian Foundation, Or, Scientific and Religious Journal, Volume I, No. 11, November, 1880 · 第 6 / 29 题