ELECTRIC POWER.

Just now nothing save electricity is talked about in scientific circles.

During the meeting of the British Association the greatest possible

prominence was given to electrical questions and propositions The

success of the electric light, the introduction of the Faure battery

with a great flourish of trumpets, and the magnificent display of

electrical instruments and machinery at Paris, have all operated to the

same end. The daily press has taken the subject up, and journals which

were nothing hitherto if not political, now indulge in magnificent

rhapsodies concerning the future of electricity. Even eminent engineers,

carried away by the intoxication of the moment, have not hesitated to

say that the steam engine is doomed, and that its place will be taken by

the electricity engine. In the midst of all this noise and clamor and

blowing of personal trumpets, it is not easy to keep one's head clear,

and mistakes may be made which will cause disappointment to many and

retard the progress of electrical science. We confidently expect that

electricity will prove a potent agent by and by in the hands of the

speculator for extracting gold from the pockets of the public, and we

write now to warn our readers in time, and to endeavor to clear the air

of some of the mists with which it is obscured. There is, no doubt,

a great future before electricity; but it is equally certain that

electricity can never do many things which the half informed may be

readily made to believe it will do. We propose here to say enough

on this point to enlighten our readers, without troubling them with

perplexing problems and speculations.

No one at this moment knows what electricity is; but for our present

purpose we may regard it as a fluid, non-elastic, and without weight,

and universally diffused through the universe. To judge by recently

published statements, a large section of the reading public are taught

that this fluid is a source of power, and that it may be made to do the

work of coal. This is a delusion. So long as electricity remains in what

we may call a normal state of repose, it is inert. Before _we can get

any work out of electricity a somewhat greater amount of work must be

done upon it_. If this fundamental and most important truth be kept in

view it will not be easy to make a grave mistake in estimating the value

of any of the numerous schemes for making electricity do work which will

ere long be brought before the public. To render our meaning clearer,

we may explain that in producing the electric light, for instance, a

certain quantity of electricity passes in through one wire to the lamp,

and precisely the same quantity passes out through the other wire, and

on to the earth or return wire completing the circuit. Not only is the

quantity the same, the velocity is also unchanged. But in going through

the lamp the current has done something. It has overcome the resistance

of the carbons, heated them to a dazzling white heat, and so performed

work. In doing this the current of electricity has lost something. Led

from the first lamp to a second, it is found powerless--if the first

lamp be of sufficient size. What is it that the electricity has lost?

It has parted with what electricians would term "potential," or the

capacity for performing work. What this is precisely, or in what way the

presence or absence of potential modifies the nature of the electric

current, no one knows; but it is known that this potential can only be

conferred on electricity by doing work on the electricity in the first

instance. The analogy between electricity and a liquid like water will

now be recognized. So long as the water is at rest, it is inert. If we

pump it up to a height, we confer on it the equivalent of potential.

We can let the water fall into the buckets of an overshot wheel. Its

velocity leaving the tail race may be identical with that at which it

left the supply trough to descend on the wheel. Its quantity will be

the same. It will be in all respects unchanged, just as the current

of electricity passing through a lamp is unchanged; but it has,

nevertheless, lost something. It has parted with its potential--capacity

for doing work--and it becomes once more inert. But the duty which it

discharged in turning the mill wheel was somewhat less than the precise

equivalent of the work done in pumping it up to a level with the top of

the wheel. In the same way the electric current never can do work equal

in amount to the work done on it in endowing it with potential.

It will thus be seen that electricity can only be used as a means of

transmitting power from one place to another, or for storing power up

at one time to be used at a subsequent period; but it cannot be used to

originate power in the way coal can be used. It possesses no inherent

potential. It is incapable of performing work unless something is done

to it first. We have spoken of it as a fluid, but only for the sake of

illustration. As we have said, no one knows what it is, but the theory

which bids fair for acceptance is that it is a mode of motion of the

all-pervading ether. Very curious and instructive experiments are now

being carried out in Paris by Dr. Bjerkness, of Christiania, in the

Norwegian section of the electrical exhibition. This gentleman submerges

thin elastic diaphragms in water, and causes them to vibrate, or rather

pulsate, by compressed air. He finds that if they pulsate synchronously

they attract each other. If the pulsations are not simultaneous, the

disks repel each other. From this and other results he has obtained,

it may be argued that the ether plays the part of the water in Dr.

Bjerkness' tank, and that when special forms of vibration are set up

in bodies they become competent to attract or repel other bodies. This

being so, it will be seen that the power of attraction or repulsion of

an electrical body depends in the first instance on the motion set up

in the body attracted or repulsed, and this motion is, of course, some

function of the work originally done on the body. We need not pursue

this argument further. Among the most scientific investigators of the

day it is admitted that the efficiency of electricity as a doer of work,

or a producer of action at a distance, must depend for its value on the

performance of work in some one way or another on the electricity itself

in the first instance. It may be worth while here to dispel a popular

delusion. It is held very generally that electricity can be made, as,

for instance, by the galvanic battery. There is no reason to believe

anything of the kind; but whether it is or is not true that electricity

is actually made by the combustion of zinc in a galvanic trough, it is

quite certain that this electricity, unless it possesses potential, can

do no work, no matter how great its quantity. Of course, it is to be

understood that all electric currents possess potential. If they did

not, their presence would be unknown; but the potential of a current

is in all cases the result of work done on electricity, either by the

oxidation of zinc, or in some other way. This is a broad principle, but

it is strictly consistent in every respect with the truth. Electricity,

then, is, as we have said, totally different from coal; and it can never

become a substitute for it alone. Water power, air power, or what we

may, for want of a better phrase, call chemical power, combined with

electricity, can be used as a substitute for coal; but electricity

cannot of itself be employed to do work. It is true, however, that

electricity, on which work has already been done, may be found in

nature. Atmospheric electricity, for example, may perhaps yet be

utilized. It is by no means inconceivable that the electricity contained

in a thunder cloud might be employed to charge a Faure battery; but up

to the present no one has contemplated the obtaining of power from the

clouds, and whether it is or is not practicable to utilize a great

natural force in this way does not affect our statement. The use of

electricity must be confined to its power of transmitting or storing up

energy, and this truth being recognized, it becomes easy to estimate the

future prospects of electricity at something like their proper value.

It has been proved to a certain extent that electricity can be used to

transmit power to a distance, and that it can be used to store it up.

Thus far the man of pure science. The engineer now comes on the stage

and asks--Can practical difficulties be got over? Can it be made to pay?

In trying to answer these questions we cannot do better than deal with

one or two definite proposals which have been recently made. That with

which we shall first concern ourselves is that trains should be worked

by Faure batteries instead of by steam. It is suggested that each

carriage of a train should be provided with a dynamo motor, and that

batteries enough should be carried by each to drive the wheels, and so

propel the train. Let us see how such a scheme would comply with working

conditions. Let us take for example a train of fifteen coaches on the

Great Northern Railway, running without a stop to Peterborough in one

hour and forty minutes. The power required would be about 500 horses

indicated. To supply this for 100 minutes, even on the most absurdly

favorable hypothesis, no less than 25 tons of Faure batteries would be

required. Adding to these the weight of the dynamo motors, and that

unavoidably added to the coaches, it will be seen that a weight equal to

that of an engine would soon be reached. The only possible saving would

be some 28 to 30 tons of tender. In return for this all the passengers

would have to change coaches at Peterborough, as the train could not be

delayed to replace the expended with fresh batteries. This is out of

the question. The Faure batteries must all be carried on one vehicle or

engine, which could be changed for another, like a locomotive. Even then

no advantage would be gained. As to cost, it is very unlikely that the

stationary engines which must be provided to drive the dynamo machines

for charging the batteries would be more economical than locomotive

engines; and if we allow that the dynamo machine only wasted 10 per

cent. of the power of the engine, the Faure batteries 10 per cent. of

the power of the dynamo machines, and the dynamo motors 10 per cent. of

the power of the batteries--all ridiculously favorable assumptions--yet

the stationary engines would be handicapped with a difference in net

efficiency between themselves and the locomotive--admitting the original

efficiency per pound of coal in both to be the same--of some 27 per

cent., we think we may relegate this scheme to the realms of oblivion.

Another idea is that by putting up turbines and dynamo machines the

steam engine might be superseded by water power. Now it so happens that

if all the water power of England were quadrupled it would not nearly

suffice for our wants. It may be found worth while perhaps to construct

steam engines close to coalpits and send out power from these engines by

wire; but the question will be asked, Which is the cheaper of the two,

to send the coal or to send the power? On the answer to this will

depend the decision of the mill owners. Another favorite scheme is that

embodied in the Siemens electrical railway. We believe that there is a

great future in store for electricity as a worker of tramway traffic;

but the traffic on a great line like the Midland or Great Northern

Railway could not be carried on by it. As Robert Stephenson said of the

atmospheric system, it is not flexible enough. The working of points

and crossings, and the shunting of trains and wagons, would present

unsurmountable difficulties. We have cited proposals enough, we think,

to illustrate our meaning. Sir William Armstrong, Sir Frederick

Bramwell, Dr. Siemens, Sir W. Thomson, and many others may be excused if

they are a little enthusiastic. They are just now overjoyed with success

attained; but when the time comes for sober reflection they will, no

doubt, see good reason to moderate their views. No one can say, of

course, what further discoveries may bring to light; but recent speakers

and writers have found in what is known already, materials for sketching

out a romance of electricity. It is but romancing to assert that the end

of the steam engine is at hand. Wonderful and mystical as electricity

is, there are some very hard and dry facts about it, and these facts are

all opposed to the theory that it can become man's servant of all work.

Ariel-like, electricity may put a girdle round the earth in forty

minutes; but it shows no great aptitude for superseding the useful old

giant steam, who has toiled for the world so long and to such good

purpose--_The Engineer_.

* * * * *

ON A METHOD OF OBTAINING AND MEASURING VERY HIGH VACUA WITH A MODIFIED

FORM OF SPRENGEL-PUMP.

By Ogden N. Rood, Professor of Physics in Columbia College.

In the July number of this Journal for 1880, I gave a short account of

certain changes in the Sprengel-pump by means of which far better vacua

could be obtained than had been previously possible. For example, the

highest vacuum at that time known had been reached by Mr. Crookes, and

was about 1/17,000,000, while with my arrangement vacua of 1/100,000,000

were easily reached. In a notice that appeared in _Nature_ for August,

1880, p. 375, it was stated that my improvements were not new, but had

already been made in England four years previously. I have been unable

to obtain a printed account of the English improvements, and am willing

to assume that they are identical with my own; but on the other hand,

as for four years no particular result seems to have followed their

introduction in England, I am reluctantly forced to the conclusion that

their inventor and his customers, for that period of time, have remained

quite in ignorance of the proper mode of utilizing them. Since then I

have pushed the matter still farther, and have succeeded in obtaining

with my apparatus vacua as high as 1/390,000,000 without finding

that the limit of its action had been reached. The pump is simple in

construction, inexpensive, and, as I have proved by a large number of

experiments, certain in action and easy of use; stopcocks and grease are

dispensed with, and when the presence of a stopcock is really desirable

its place is supplied by a movable column of mercury.

_Reservoir_.--An ordinary inverted bell-glass with a diameter of 100 mm.

and a total height of 205 mm. forms the reservoir; its mouth is closed

by a well-fitting cork through which passes the glass tube that forms

one termination of the pump. The cork around tube and up to the edge of

the former is painted with a flexible cement. The tube projects 40 mm.

into the mercury and passes through a little watch-glass-shaped piece of

sheet-iron, W, figure 1, which prevents the small air bubbles that creep

upward along the tube from reaching its open end; the little cup is

firmly cemented in its place. The flow of the mercury is regulated

by the steel rod and cylinder, CR, Figure 1. The bottom of the steel

cylinder is filled out with a circular piece of pure India-rubber,

properly cemented; this soon fits itself to the use required and answers

admirably. The pressure of the cylinder on the end of the tube is

regulated by the lever, S, Figure 1; this is attached to a circular

board which again is firmly fastened over the open end of the

bell-glass. It will be noticed that on turning the milled head, S, the

motion of the steel cylinder is not directly vertical, but that it tends

to describe a circle with c as a center; the necessary play of the

cylinder is, however, so small, that practically the experimenter does

not become aware of this theoretical defect, so that the arrangement

really gives entire satisfaction, and after it has been in use for a few

days accurately controls the flow of the mercury. The glass cylinder is

held in position, but not supported, by two wooden _adjustable_ clamps,

_a a_, Figure 2. The weight of the cylinder and mercury is supported by

a shelf, S, Figure 2, on which rests the cork of the cylinder; in this

way all danger of a very disagreeable accident is avoided.

[Illustration: MODIFIED FORM OF SPRENGEL PUMP.]

_Vacuum-bulb_.--Leaving the reservoir, the mercury enters the

vacuum-bulb, B, Figure 2, where it parts with most of its air and

moisture; this bulb also serves to catch the air that creeps into the

pump from the reservoir, even when there is no flow of mercury; its

diameter is 27 mm. The shape and inclination of the tube attached to

this bulb is by no means a matter of indifference; accordingly Figure

3 is a separate drawing of it; the tube should be so bent that a

horizontal line drawn from the proper level of the mercury in the bulb

passes through the point, _o_, where the drops of mercury break off. The

length of the tube, EC, should be 150 mm., that of the tube, ED, 45 mm.;

the bore of this tube is about the same as that of the fall-tube.

_Fall-tube and bends_.--The bore of the fall-tube in the pump now used

by me is 1.78 mm.; its length above the bends (U, Figure 2) is 310 mm.;

below the bends the length is 815 mm. The bends constitute a fluid valve

that prevents the air from returning into the pump; beside this, the

play of the mercury in them greatly facilitates the passage of the

air downward. The top of the mercury column representing the existing

barometric pressure should be about 25 mm. below the bends when the pump

is in action. This is easily regulated by an adjustable shelf, which is

also employed to fill the bends with mercury when a measurement is taken

or when the pump is at rest. On the shelf is a tube, 160 mm. high and 20

mm. in diameter, into which the end of the fall-tube dips; its side has

a circular perforation into which fits a small cork with a little tube

bent at right angles. With the hard end of a file and a few drops of

turpentine the perforation can be easily made and shaped in a few

minutes. By revolving the little bent tube through 180° the flow of the

mercury can be temporarily suspended when it is desirable to change the

vessel that catches it.

_Gauge_.--For the purpose of measuring the vacua I have used an

arrangement similar to McLeod's gauge, Figure 4; it has, however, some

peculiarities. The tube destined to contain the compressed air has a

diameter of 1.35 mm. as ascertained by a compound microscope; it is not

fused at its upper extremity, but closed by a fine glass rod that fits

into it as accurately as may be, the end of the rod being ground flat

and true. This rod is introduced into the tube, and while the latter

is gently heated a very small portion of the cement described below is

allowed to enter by capillary attraction, but not to extend beyond the

end of the rod, the operation being watched by a lens. The rod is

used for the purpose of obtaining the compressed air in the form of a

cylinder, and also to allow cleansing of the tube when necessary. The

capacity of the gauge-sphere was obtained by filling it with mercury;

its external diameter was sixty millimeters; for measuring very high

vacua this is somewhat small and makes the probable errors rather

large; I would advise the use of a gauge-sphere of about twice as great

capacity. The tube, CB, Figure 4, has the same bore as the measuring

tube in order to avoid corrections for capillarity. The tube of the

gauge, CD, is not connected with an India-rubber tube, as is usual,

but dips into mercury contained in a cylinder 340 mm. high, 58 mm. in

diameter, which can be raised and lowered at pleasure. This is best

accomplished by the use of a set of boxes of various thicknesses, made

for the purpose and supplemented by several sheets of cardboard and even

of writing-paper. These have been found to answer well and enable the

experimenter to graduate with a nicety the pressure to which the gas is

exposed during measurement. By employing a cylinder filled with mercury

instead of the usual caoutchouc tubing small bubbles of air are

prevented from entering the gauge along with the mercury. An adjustable

brace or support is used which prevents accident to the cylinder when

the pump is inclined for the purpose of pumping out the vacuum-bulb. The

maximum pressure that can be employed in the gauge used by me is 100 mm.

All the tubing of the pump is supported at a distance of about 55 mm.

from the wood-work; this is effected by the use of simple adjustable

supports and adjustable clamps; the latter have proved a great

convenience. The object is to gain the ability to heat with a Bunsen

burner all parts of the pump without burning the wood-work. Where glass

and wood necessarily come in contact the wood is protected by metal or

simply painted with a saturated solution of alum. The glass portions

of the pump I have contrived to anneal completely by the simple means

mentioned below. If the glass is not annealed it is certain to crack

when subjected to heat, thus causing vexation and loss of time. The

mercury was purified by the same method that was used by W. Siemens

(Pogg. Annalen, vol. ex., p. 20), that is, by a little strong sulphuric

acid to which a few drops of nitric acid had been added; it was dried by

pouring it repeatedly from one hot dry vessel to another, by filtering

it while quite warm, the drying being completed finally by the action of

the pump itself. All the measurements were made by a fine cathetometer

which was constructed for me by William Grunow; see this Journal, Jan.,

1874, p. 23. It was provided with a well-corrected object-glass having a

focal length of 200 mm. and as used by me gave a magnifying power of 16

diameters.

_Manipulation_.--The necessary connections are effected with a cement

made by melting Burgundy pitch with three or four per cent of gutta

percha. It is indispensable that the cement when cold should be so hard

as completely to resist taking any impression from the finger nail,

otherwise it is certain to yield gradually and finally to give rise to

leaks. The connecting tubes are selected so as to fit as closely as

possible, and after being put into position are heated to the proper

amount, when the edges are touched with a fragment of cold cement which

enters by capillary attraction and forms a transparent joint that can

from time to time be examined with a lens for the colors of thin plates,

which always precede a leak. Joints of this kind have been in use by me

for two months at a time without showing a trace of leakage, and the

evidence gathered in another series of unfinished experiments goes to

show that no appreciable amount of vapor is furnished by the resinous

compound, which, I may add, is never used until it has been repeatedly

melted. As drying material I prefer caustic potash that has been in

fusion just before its introduction into the drying tube; during the

process of exhaustion it can from time to time be heated nearly to the

melting point: if actually fused in the drying tube the latter almost

invariably cracks. The pump in the first instance is to be inclined at

an angle of about 10 degrees, the tube of the gauge being supported by

a semicircular piece of thick pasteboard fitted with two corks into the

top of the cylinder. This seemingly awkward proceeding has in no case

been attended with the slightest accident, and owing to the presence of

the four leveling-screws, the pump when righted returns, as shown by the

telescope of the cathetometer, almost exactly to its original place. In

the inclined position the exhaustion of the vacuum bulb is accomplished

along with that of the rest of the pump. The exhaustion of the

vacuum-bulb when once effected can be preserved to a great extent for

use in future work, merely by allowing mercury from the reservoir to

flow in a rapid stream at the time that air is allowed to re-enter the

pump. During the first process of exhaustion the tube of the gauge is

kept hot by moving to and fro a Bunsen burner, and is in this way

freed from those portions of air and moisture that are not too firmly

attached. After a time the vacuum-bulb ceases to deliver bubbles of

air; it and the attached tube are now to be heated with a moving Bunsen

burner, when it will be found to furnish for 15 or 20 minutes a large

quantity of bubbles mainly of vapor of water. After then production

ceases the pump is righted and the exhaustion carried farther. In spite

of a couple of careful experiments with the cathetometer I have not

succeeded in measuring the vacuum in the vacuum bulb, but judge from

indications, that is about as high as that obtained in an ordinary

Geissler pump. Meanwhile the various parts of the pump can be heated

with a moving Bunsen burner to detach air and moisture, the cement being

protected by wet lamp-wicking. In one experiment I measured the amount

of air that was detached from the walls of the pump by heating them for

ten minutes somewhat above l00° C., and found that it was 1/1,000,000

of the air originally present. I have also noticed that a still larger

amount of air is detached by electric discharges. This coincides with an

observation of E. Bessel-Hagen in his interesting article on a new form

of Töpler's mercury-pump (Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 1881, vol.

xii.). Even when potash is used a small amount of moisture always

collects in the bends of the fall tube; this is readily removed by a

Bunsen burner; the tension of the vapor being greatly increased, it

passes far down the fall-tube in large bubbles and is condensed. Without

this precaution I have found it impossible to obtain a vacuum higher

than 1/25,000,000; in point of fact the bends should always be heated

when a high exhaustion is undertaken even if the pump has been standing

well exhausted for a week; the heat should of course never be applied at

a late stage of the exhaustion. Conversely, I have often by the aid of

heat completely and quickly removed quite large quantities of the vapor

of water that had been purposely introduced. The exhaustion of the

vacuum-bulb is of course somewhat injured by the act of using the pump

and also by standing for several days, so that it has been usual with me

before undertaking a high exhaustion to incline the pump and re-exhaust

for 20 minutes; I have, however, obtained very high vacua without using

this precaution.

During the process of exhaustion not more than one-half of the mercury

in the reservoir is allowed to run out, other wise when it is returned

bubbles of air are apt to find their way into the vacuum-bulb. In order

to secure its quiet entrance it is poured into a silk bag provided with

several holes. When the reservoir is first filled its walls for a day

or two appear to furnish air that enters the vacuum-bulb; this action,

however, soon sinks to a minimum and then the leakage remains quite

constant for months together.

_Measurement of the vacuum_.--The cylinder into which the gauge-tube

dips is first elevated by a box sufficiently thick merely to close the

gauge, afterwards boxes are placed under it sufficient to elevate the

mercury to the base of the measuring tube; when the mercury has reached

this point, thin boards and card-boards are added till a suitable

pressure is obtained. The length of the inclosed cylinder of air is

then measured with the cathetometer, also the height of the mercurial

"meniscus," and the difference of the heights of the mercurial columns

in A and B, figure 4. To obtain a second measure an assistant removes

some of the boxes and the cylinder is lowered by hand three or four

centimeters and then replaced in its original position. In measuring

really high vacua, it is well to begin with this process of lowering and

raising the cylinder, and to repeat it five or six times before taking

readings. It seems as though the mercury in the tube, B, supplies to the

glass a coating of air that allows it to move more freely; at all events

it is certain that ordinarily the readings of B become regular, only

after the mercury has been allowed to play up and down the tube a number

of times. This applies particularly to vacua as high 1/50,000,000 and to

pressures of five millimeters and under. It is advantageous in making

measurements to employ large pressures and small volumes; the correct

working of the gauge can from time to time be tested by varying the

relations of these to each other. This I did quite elaborately, and

proved that such constant errors as exist are small compared with

inevitable accidental errors, as, for example, that there was no

measurable correction for capillarity, that the calculated volume of the

"meniscus" was correct, etc. It is essential in making a measurement

that the temperature of the room should change as little as possible,

and that the temperature of the mercury in the cylinder should be at

least nearly that of the air near the gauge-sphere. The computation is

made as follows

n = height of the cylinder inclosing the air;

c = a factor which, multiplied by n, converts it into cubic

millimeters;

S = cubic contents of the meniscus;

d = difference of level between A and B, fig. 4;

= the pressure the air is under;

N = the cubic contents of the gauge in millimeters;

x = a fraction expressing the degree of exhaustion obtained; then

x=1/([N (760/d)]/[nc - S])

It will be noticed that the measurements are independent of the actual

height of the barometer, and if several readings are taken continuously,

the result will not be sensibly affected by a simultaneous change of the

barometer. Almost all the readings were taken at a temperature of about

20° C., and in the present state of the work corrections for temperature

may be considered a superfluous refinement.

_Gauge correction_.--It is necessary to apply to the results thus

obtained a correction which becomes very important when high vacua are

measured. It was found in an early stage of the experiments that the

mercury, in the act of entering the highly exhausted gauge, gave out

invariably a certain amount of air which of course was measured along

with the residuum that properly belonged there; hence to obtain the true

vacuum it is necessary to subtract the volume of this air from nc. By a

series of experiments I ascertained that the amount of air introduced by

the mercury in the acts of entering and leaving the gauge was sensibly

constant for six of these single operations (or for three of these

double operations), when they followed each other immediately. The

correction accordingly is made as follows: the vacuum is first measured

as described above, then by withdrawing all the boxes except the lowest,

the mercury is allowed to fall so as nearly to empty the gauge; it is

then made again to fill the gauge, and these operations are repeated

until they amount in all to six; finally the volume and pressure are a

second time measured. Assuming the pressure to remain constant, or that

the volumes are reduced to the same pressure,

v = the original volume; v' = the final volume;

V' = volume of air introduced by the first entry of the mercury;

V = corrected volume; then

V' = (v'-v)/6

V = v - [(v'-v)/6]

It will be noticed that it is assumed in this formula that the same

amount of air is introduced into the gauge in the acts of entry and

exit; in the act of entering in point of fact more fresh mercury is

exposed to the action of the vacuum than in the act exit, which might

possibly make the true gauge-correction rather larger than that given by

the formula. It has been found that when the pump is in constant use the

gauge-correction gradually diminishes from day to day; in other words,

the air is gradually pumped out of the gauge-mercury. Thus on December

21, the amount of air entering with the mercury corresponded to an

exhaustion of

1/27,308,805 .......Dec. 21.

1/38,806,688 ...... Dec. 29.

1/78,125,000 .......Jan. 15.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881 · 第 19 / 47 题