"Well," I said, very timidly, not knowing but I was quite in

Produced by Fritz Ohrenschall, Martin Pettit and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net

+-------------------------------------------------+

|Transcriber's note: |

| |

|Obvious typographical errors have been corrected |

+-------------------------------------------------+

Vol. I. MAY, 1906 No. 3

MOTHER EARTH

[Illustration]

P. O. Box 217 EMMA GOLDMAN, Publisher 10c. a Copy

CONTENTS

PAGE

Tidings of May 1

Envy WALT WHITMAN 2

Observations and Comments 3

"This Man Gorky" MARGARET GRANT 8

Comrade MAXIM GORKY 17

Alexander Berkman E. G. 22

Poem VOLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE 25

The White Terror 25

Paternalistic Government THEODORE SCHROEDER 27

Liberty in Common Life BOLTON HALL 34

Statistics H. KELLY 35

Gerhart Hauptmann with the Weavers of Silesia MAX BAGINSKI 38

Disappointed Economists 47

Vital Art ANNY MALI HICKS 48

Kristofer Hansteen VOLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE 52

Fifty Years of Bad Luck SADAKICHI HARTMANN 56

10c. A COPY $1 A YEAR

MOTHER EARTH

Monthly Magazine Devoted to Social Science and Literature

Published Every 15th of the Month

EMMA GOLDMAN, Publisher, P. O. Box 217, Madison Square Station,

New York, N. Y.

Vol. I MAY, 1906 No. 3

TIDINGS OF MAY.

The month of May is a grinning satire on the mode of living of human

beings of the present day.

The May sun, with its magic warmth, gives life to so much beauty, so

much value.

The dead, grayish brown of the forest and woods is transformed into a

rich, intoxicating, delicate, fragrant green.

Golden sun-rays lure flowers and grass from the soil, and kiss branch

and tree into blossom and bloom.

Tillers of the soil are beginning their activity with plough, shovel,

rake, breaking the firm grip of grim winter upon the Earth, so that the

mild spring warmth may penetrate her breast and coax into growth and

maturity the seeds lying in her womb.

A great festival seems at hand for which Mother Earth has adorned

herself with garments of the richest and most beautiful hues.

What does civilized humanity do with all this splendor? It speculates

with it. Usurers, who gamble with the necessities of life, will take

possession of Nature's gifts, of wheat and corn, fruit and flowers, and

will carry on a shameless trade with them, while millions of toilers,

both in country and city, will be permitted to partake of the earth's

riches only in medicinal doses and at exorbitant prices.

May's generous promise to mankind, that they were to receive in

abundance, is being broken and undone by the existing arrangements of

society.

The Spring sends its glad tidings to man through the jubilant songs

that stream from the throats of her feathered messengers. "Behold," they

sing, "I have such wealth to give away, but you know not how to take.

You count and bargain and weigh and measure, rather than feast at my

heavily laden tables. You crawl about on the ground, bent by worry and

dread, rather than drink in the free balmy air!"

The irony of May is neither cold nor hard. It contains a mild yet

convincing appeal to mankind to finally break the power of the Winter

not only in Nature, but in our social life,--to free itself from the

hard and fixed traditions of a dead past.

[Illustration]

ENVY.

By WALT WHITMAN.

_When I peruse the conquered fame of heroes, and the victories of

mighty generals, I do not envy the generals,

Nor the President in his Presidency, nor the rich in his great

house;

But when I hear of the brotherhood of lovers, how it was with them,

How through life, through dangers, odium, unchanging, long and long

Through youth, and through middle and old age, how unfaltering, how

affectionate and faithful they were,

Then I am pensive--I hastily walk away, filled with the bitterest

envy._

OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS.

A young man had an Ideal which he cherished as the most beautiful and

greatest treasure he had on earth. He promised himself never to part

with it, come what might.

His surroundings, however, repeated from morn till night that one can

not feed on Ideals, and that one must become practical if he wishes to

get on in life.

When he attempted the practical, he realized that his Ideal could never

become reconciled to it. This, at first, caused him deep suffering, but

he soon conceived a pleasant thought: "Why should I expose my precious

jewel to the vulgarity, coarseness and filth of a practical life? I will

put it into a jewel case and hide it in a secluded spot."

From time to time, especially when business was bad, he stole over to

the case containing his Ideal, to delight in its splendor. Indeed, the

world was shabby compared with that!

Meanwhile he married and his business began to improve. The members of

his party had already begun to discuss the possibility of putting him up

as a candidate for Alderman.

He visited his Ideal at longer intervals now. He had made a very

unpleasant discovery,--his Ideal had lessened in size and weight in

proportion to the practical opulence of his mind. It grew old and full

of wrinkles, which aroused his suspicions. After all, the practical

people were right in making light of Ideals. Did he not observe with his

own eyes how his Ideal had faded?

It had been overlooked for a long time. Once more he stole over to the

safety vault containing his Ideal. It was at a time when he had suffered

a severe business loss. With great yearning in his breast, he lifted the

cover of the case. He was worn from practical life and his heart and

head felt heavy. He found the case empty. His Ideal had vanished,

evaporated!--It dawned upon him that he had proven false to the Ideal,

and not the Ideal to him.

[Illustration]

Pity and sympathy have been celebrating a great feast within the last

few weeks. When they look into the mirror of public opinion they find

their own reflex touchingly beautiful, big, very human. Want was about

to commit self-destruction in abolishing poverty, tears and the despair

of suffering humanity forever.

The "heart" of New York, the "heart" of the country, the "heart" of the

entire world throbs for San Francisco. The press says so, at least.

No doubt a large amount in checks and banknotes was sent to the city of

the Golden Gate. Money, in these days, is the criterion of emotions and

sentiments; so that the pity of one who gives $10,000 must appear

incomparably greater than the pity of one who contributes a small sum

which was perhaps intended to buy shoes for the children, or to pay the

grocery bill. A large sum is always loud and boastful in the way it

appears in the newspapers. The delicate tact and fine taste of the

various editors see to it that the names of the donors of large sums be

printed in heavy type.

After all, can not one every day and in every large city observe the

same phenomenon that has followed the disaster in San Francisco? Surely

there were homeless, starved, despaired, wretched beings in San

Francisco before the earthquake and the fire, yet the public's pity and

sympathy haughtily passed them by; and official sympathy and compassion

had nothing but the police station and the workhouse to give them.

And now,--what is really being done now? Humanitarianism is exhibiting

itself in a low and vulgar manner, and superficiality and bad taste are

stalking about in peacock fashion.

The newspapers are full of praise for the bravery of the militia in

their defense of property. A man was instantly shot as he walked out of

a saloon with his arms full of champagne bottles, and another was shot

for carrying off a sack of coffee, etc. How strange that the "brave

boys" of the militia,--who, by the way, had to be severely disciplined

because of their beastly drunkenness,--showed so much noble indignation

against a few clumsy thieves! During the strikes and labor conflicts it

is usually their mission to protect the property of skillful

thieves,--legal thieves, of course.

Finally what is going to be the end of the great display of superficial

sentimentality for the stricken city? An all-around good deal: Moneyed

people, contractors, real estate speculators will make large sums of

money. Indeed it is not at all unlikely that within a few months good

Christian capitalists will secretly thank their Lord that he sent the

earthquake.

[Illustration]

As an employer, the United States Government is certainly tolerant and

liberal, especially so far as the highly remunerative offices are

concerned.

The President, for instance, loves to deliver himself of moral sermons.

Recently he spoke of the people who criticise government and society and

breed discontent. He considers them dangerous and entertains little

regard for them. He ought not be blamed for that, since, as the first

clerk of the State, it is his duty to represent its interests and

dignity.

The most ordinary business agent, though he may be convinced of the

corruption of his firm, will take good care to keep this fact from the

public. Business morals demand it.

Besides, no one will expect or desire that the President should become a

Revolutionist. This would certainly be no gain of ours, nor would the

State suffer harm. Surely there are enough professional politicians who

do not lack talent for the calling of doorkeepers on a large scale.

As to the moral sermons against the undesirable and obnoxious element,

all that can be said, from a practical standpoint, is, that their

originality and wisdom are in no proportion to the salary the sermonizer

receives. Competition among preachers of penitence and servility is

almost as great as among patent medicine quacks. Four or five thousand a

year can easily buy the services of a corpulent, reverend gentleman of

some prominence.

[Illustration]

The dangers of the first of May, when France was to be ruined by the

"mob" of socialists and anarchists, was very fantastically described by

the Paris correspondents of the American newspapers. These gentlemen

seem to have known everything. They discovered that the cause of the

threatened revolution was to be found in the irresponsible good nature

and kindness of the French government.

Just show "Satan" Anarchy a finger, and straightway he will seize the

entire arm. Especially M. Clemenceau was severely censured as being

altogether too good a fellow to make a reliable minister. There he is

with France near the abyss of a social revolution! That is the manner in

which history is being manufactured for boarding-school young ladies.

The social revolution may come, but surely not because of the kindness

or good nature of the government. France needed a newspaper boom for her

elections: "The republic is in danger; for goodness' sake give us your

vote on election day!"

In order that the citizens might feel the proper horror, trade-union

leaders, anarchists and even a few royalistic scare-crows were arrested;

at the same time the sympathy and devotion of the government for its

people manifested itself in the reign of the military terror in the

strike regions.

The real seriousness of the situation, the correspondents failed to

grasp. How could they? since they got their wisdom in the ante-chamber

of the ministry.

The revolutionary labor organizations care little for the good will or

the Jesuit kindness of the authorities. They continue with their work,

propagate the idea of direct action, and strengthen the anti-military

movement, the result of which is already being felt among the soldiers

and officers.

The officer who jumped upon the platform at the Bourse du Travail,

expressing his solidarity with the workers and declaring that he would

not fire on them, was immediately arrested; but this will only influence

others to follow the good example.

[Illustration]

In the old fables the lion is described as supreme judge and not the

mule or the wether.

In Cleveland things are different. Several weeks ago Olga Nethersole

gave a performance of Sappho there. Whereupon the police felt moved to

perform an operation on the play, for moral reasons, of course. The

staircase scene was ordered to be left out altogether.

Ye poor, depraved artists, how low ye might sink, were the police and

Comstock not here to watch over the moral qualities of your productions!

If one observes one of these prosaic fellows on the corner, terribly

bored, and with his entire intellect concentrated on his club, and how

out of pure ennui he is constantly recapitulating the number of his

brass buttons, one can hardly realize that such an individual has been

entrusted with the power to decide the fate of an artistic production.

[Illustration]

1792 the French people marched through the streets singing:

O, what is it the people cry?

They ask for all equality.

The poor no more shall be

In slavish misery;

The idle rich shall flee.

O, what is it the people need?

They ask for bread and iron and lead.

The iron to win our pay,

The lead our foes to slay,

The bread our friends to feed.

The soldiers at Mount Carmel, Pennsylvania, who were ordered by their

superiors to fire into a crowd of strikers and wounded and killed

innocent men and women, do not sing the Carmagnole; they sing:

"My country, 'tis of thee,

Sweet land of Liberty!"

If the ruling powers continue to maintain peace and order with iron and

blood it may happen that the meaningless national hymn may be drowned by

the Carmagnole, pealing forth like thunder from the throats of the

masses.

[Illustration]

To the credit of human nature be it said, it is not altogether hopeless.

Since tyranny has existed, human nature has ever rebelled against it.

Real slavery exists only when the oppressed consider their fate as

something normal, something self-evident.

There is greater security for tyranny in slavish thoughts, indifference

and pettiness than in cannons and swords.

[Illustration]

"THIS MAN GORKY."

By MARGARET GRANT.

THE women of America are aroused as never before. They always are

aroused to the defense of their firesides. Even those women who live in

flats are awake to the need for defending their radiators or their gas

stoves; it is inherent in the nature of woman, it seems.

Most of the women's societies and clubs have spoken in no uncertain

terms concerning the outrage that has been put upon the civilization of

this great country by the conduct of this man Gorky. And, in fact, it is

a thing not to be borne.

As for me, I belong to the Woman's Association for the Regulation of the

Morals of Others, a society which is second to none in its activity and

usefulness, but which has seen fit to defer its own discussion of this

man Gorky's conduct until most of the other women's societies have

spoken.

We have just had our meeting, and I think that if this man Gorky should

read an account of our proceedings, he would certainly get out of this

outraged country with all the celerity of which he is capable. But, of

course, he is only a foreigner after all and probably will not

comprehend the exquisite purity of our morals.

I want to say that in our meetings we do not slavishly follow those

parliamentary rules which men have made for their guidance, but allow

ourselves some latitude in discussion. And we do not invite some man to

come and do all the talking, as is the case in some women's clubs.

Mrs. Blanderocks was in the chair. We began with an informal discussion

of the best way of preventing the common people from dressing so as not

to be distinguished from the upper classes, but there was no heart in

the talk, for we all felt that it was only preliminary. It was my friend

Sarah Warner who changed the subject.

"The Woman's State Republican Association held its annual meeting at

Delmonico's yesterday," she said, quietly drawing a newspaper clipping

from her pocket-book.

"And had some men there to amuse them and to tell them what to do," said

Mrs. Blanderocks with cutting irony.

We all laughed heartily. We meet at Mrs. Blanderocks' house, and she

always provides a beautiful luncheon.

"But Mrs. Flint said some things that I would like to read to you," said

Sarah. "It won't take long. I cut this out of the 'Times' this morning."

"What is it about?" some one asked.

"Gorky," Sarah answered, closing her eyes in a way to express volumes.

You could hear all the members catch their breath. This was what they

had come for. I broke the oppressive silence.

"I foresee," I said, "that in the discussion of this subject there will

be said things likely to bring a blush to the cheek of innocence, and I

move that all unmarried women under the age of twenty-five be excluded

from the meeting for as long as this man is under discussion."

A fierce cry of rage rose from all parts of the crowded room. I did not

understand. I could see no one who would be affected by the rule. Mrs.

Blanderocks raised her hand to command silence and said coldly:

"The motion is out of order. By a special provision of our constitution

it is the inalienable right of all unmarried women to be under

twenty-five. We will be as careful in our language as the subject will

permit. Mrs. Warner will please read the words of Mrs. Flint."

I was shocked to think I had made such a mistake. Sarah rose and read in

a clear, sharp voice from the clipping:

"Should not we as women take some action against this man? People of

such character should not be allowed in this country. Of course when he

arrived it was not known how he was living, but he came here and

expected to be received; and I think he should be deported. Gorky is the

embodiment of Socialism."

Everybody applauded violently. I was puzzled and asked a question as

soon as I could make myself heard.

"Suppose Gorky is a Socialist," I said; "what has that to do with his

morals?"

"Everything," replied Mrs. Blanderocks, haughtily.

"Socialists don't believe in marriage," said Sarah Warner, taking

another clipping from her pocket-book and reading: "'Mrs. Cornelia

Robinson said: When the question of uniform divorce law is taken up, we

shall find that the Socialists are against it as a body. It is not that

they are opposed to divorce, but they do not believe in marriage.'"

"And does she know?" I asked.

"Would she say it publicly if it were not true?" demanded Mrs.

Blanderocks, glaring disapprovingly at me.

I rose to my feet. I will say for myself that my desire for knowledge is

greater even than my shyness, and usually overcomes it.

"I want to make a motion," I said, "that this man Gorky be deported--"

(loud applause)--"but before doing so I would like some one to explain

in as plain words as the nature of the subject will permit, just what he

has been guilty of." Dead silence broken by a voice saying: "He's a

foreigner."

"I'll tell you what he has done," cried Sarah Warner; "he came into this

country pretending that the woman who was with him was his wife; he

allowed her to be registered at the hotel as his wife; he permitted her

to sleep under the same roof with pure men and women--"

"I would like to ask Mrs. Warner," said a lady in a remote corner of the

room, "if she will vouch for the purity of the men?"

"Perhaps," said Mrs. Blanderocks, gravely, "it will be better if the

word men be stricken from the record. Do you object, Mrs. Warner?"

"It was a slip of the tongue," Sarah answered, "and I am grateful to the

member who called attention to it; though I will say that I think there

are some pure men."

"We are discussing Gorky now," said Mrs. Blanderocks with an indulgent

smile.

"True," answered Sarah, beaming back at the chairwoman; "and I was

saying that he had subjected the pure women of the hotel to the

unspeakable indignity of having to sleep under the same roof with the

woman he called his wife."

"I would like to ask," I interposed timidly, "if it is right for a

woman to sleep under the same roof with an impure man, or is it only an

impure woman who is injurious?"

"A woman has to sleep under some roof," came in the voice of the woman

in the corner.

"I think Mrs. Grant would show better taste if she did not press such a

question," said another voice. "Will Mrs. Warner be good enough to

describe the exact status--I think status is right--of the woman he

tried to pass as his wife?"

"She was his----" Sarah had a fit of coughing, "she was not his wife. I

do not care to be more explicit."

"Perhaps," I said, groping for light, "it would be better if I made my

motion read that she should be deported from the country, since it is

her immorality that counts."

"And let those Republican Association women stand for more morality than

we do?" cried Mrs. Blanderocks. "No, you cannot make your motion too

strong."

"Oh, then," I said, with a sigh of relief, "I will move that Gorky and

all other men, immoral in the same way, shall be deported from the

country."

"Then who is to take care of us women?" demanded the voice in the

corner.

"Do be reasonable, Margaret," said Sarah Warner, "we can't drive all the

men out of the country, and don't want to, but we can fix a standard of

morals to astonish the world, and there could be no better way than by

making an example of this man Gorky. Don't you see that he is a

foreigner and can't very well know that our men are just as bad as he

is? Besides, isn't he a Socialist? We would have been willing to condone

his relations with that woman if only he'd hid them respectably as our

men do, but to come here with his free ideas---- Well, I'm willing to

let the Russians have all the freedom they want, and I would have given

my mite toward stirring up trouble over there, but we have all the

freedom we want over here, and a little more, too, if I know anything

about it."

"Very well," I replied, "I will withdraw the motion and make one to have

a committee appointed to investigate the matter and find out the whole

truth about it."

"What is there to find out?" demanded Sarah, aghast.

"Well, you know he insists that she is his wife. Maybe she is by

Russian law or custom."

"Perfectly absurd! His own wife and he separated because they couldn't

be happy together. Was ever anything more ridiculous?"

"As if happiness had anything to do with marriage!" said the voice from

the corner.

Everybody laughed and applauded as if something very funny had been

said.

"Well, anyhow," I insisted, for I can be obstinate when a thing isn't

clear to me, "if they both thought they were justified in calling

themselves man and wife, and if the people in Russia thought so, too,

why should we make any fuss about it?"

"Pardon me, Mrs. Grant," said Mrs. Blanderocks, suavely, "if I say that

your words are very silly. In the first place, the Russians are

barbarians, as we all know; and, in the next place, the law is the law,

and the law says that a man may not have two wives. A man who does is a

bigamist. A man who has a wife and yet lives with another woman is an

adulterer. Pardon me for using such a word, but it was forced from me.

Now, this man Gorky, who may be a very great genius for all I know--I

never read any of his stuff--but he isn't above the law: not above the

moral law anyhow, and the moral law is the same all over the world. He

says he and his wife parted because they were unhappy together, which is

a very flimsy excuse for immorality. Then he says that his wife is

living now with a man she loves and is happy with."

"Which makes a bad matter worse," interposed Sarah Warner. "No one has

any business to be happy in immorality."

"What is morality for," demanded the voice from the corner, "if it isn't

to make people unhappy?"

Everybody screamed with laughter over that, and Mrs. Blanderocks went so

far as to raise her eyebrows at Sarah Warner, who bit her lip to keep

from smiling.

"But," said I, for I had been reading the papers, too, "he says the

reason they were not divorced was because the Church would not permit

it."

"If the laws of his country were opposed to this divorce," said Mrs.

Blanderocks, triumphantly, "all the more reason why he should be

ashamed of living with this actress in such an open, defiant way."

"The Church has nothing to do with divorces in this country," I said,

"yet many of our best people are divorced."

"The law permits it," said Mrs. Blanderocks curtly.

"Who makes the law?" I asked, determined to get at the bottom of the

thing if I could.

"The people through the Legislature," was the prompt answer.

"Well," I said, very timidly, not knowing but I was quite in the wrong,

"it seems that the people of Russia not being able to make laws

nevertheless recognize the separation of a man and his wife as proper,

and permit them to take other husbands and wives without loss of

standing."

"A law's a law," said Sarah, sternly; "and a law should be sacred. The

very idea of anybody pretending to be above the law like this man Gorky!

I would like to know what would become of the holy institution of

matrimony if it could be trifled with in such a fashion?"

"You want Russia to be free from the rule of the Tsar, don't you?" I

asked.

"Certainly, he is a tyrant and an irresponsible weakling, unfit to

govern a great people. Of course, we want Russia to be free. The people

of Russia are entitled to be free, to govern themselves."

"Do you think they ought to be allowed to make their own laws?" I asked.

"Of course."

"Then, why do you say that Gorky is not properly divorced from his first

wife and married to his second? The people of Russia approve."

"Margaret Grant!" cried Sarah, outraged and voicing the horror of the

other members, "I sometimes wonder if you have any respect at all for

the law. How can you speak as you do? If men and women could dispense

with the law in that way what would become of society?"

"But this state used to permit men and women to live together without

any ceremony and so become man and wife," I said.

"Well, we don't permit it now," retorted Sarah, grimly.

"If they want to live together now," cried the voice from the corner,

"they must pretend they don't, even if everybody knows they do."

Some of the members laughed at that, but Mrs. Blanderocks thought that

was going too far and said so in her coldest manner.

"I see nothing funny in that. We cannot change the natures of men, but

we can insist upon their hiding their baser conduct and the degraded

portions of their lives from our view."

"But," said I, "Gorky evidently considers this woman his wife, and had

no idea that anybody would think otherwise."

"The point is," said Sarah Warner, in exasperation, "and I think I voice

the sentiments of this organization, that he was not legally divorced

from his first wife and that, therefore, he cannot be legally married to

this woman. A law is a law, no matter who makes it. The law is sacred

and must not be tampered with."

"How about the Supreme Court on divorces in Dakota?" demanded the voice

from the corner.

A dead silence fell on the meeting. Some of the members looked at each

other and showed signs of hysterics. Mrs. Blanderocks flashed a

withering glance at the corner, but rose to the occasion.

"Ladies," she said in a solemn tone, "I deeply regret that this subject

has been touched upon in a spirit of levity. It was my intention, at the

proper time, to introduce a resolution of sympathy for those ladies who

have been so summarily and I may say brutally unmarried by the unfeeling

wretches who sit upon the bench of the Supreme Court. It is awful to

think that our highly respected sisters, whose wealth alone should have

protected them, have been told by the highest court in the land that

they have been living in shame all this time, and that their children

are not legitimate. Ladies, I call your attention to the fact that many

of our own members are thus branded by those judges. It is infamous. It

is more than infamous--it is a reason why women should sit on the

judicial bench."

"Yes," I said, "it seems impossible for men to comprehend the mental or

emotional processes of women."

"True, too true," murmured our President, giving me a look of gratitude.

"I remember how the men of this country cried out against us a few

years ago because they could not understand why we send flowers and

tender letters to a poor, handsome negro who had first outraged and then

murdered a woman."

"Yes," I said, "and no doubt they will pretend not to understand our

indignation against this man Gorky, who thinks the customs of his own

country justify him his terrible conduct. But we must be careful how we

word our condemnation of this man lest he should somehow learn of what

our Supreme Court has so wickedly done and retort on us that these, our

wealthiest and most respected citizens, not being legally divorced and

hence not being legally married again, are no better than he and his

so-called wife."

The ladies looked at each other in consternation. Evidently the thought

had not suggested itself to them. Mrs. X. Y. Z. Asterbilt (née Clewbel)

rose and in a voice choked with emotion said:

"Speaking for myself as well as for some of the other ladies, members of

this organization, who are temporarily déclassée, so to speak, by this

decree of the Supreme Court, I beg that you will do nothing to call

undue attention to us, until we have arranged matters so that our wealth

will enable us to have that legislation which is necessary to make us

respectable women again."

"Is it true," I asked, "that you have sent an invitation to Madame

Andreieva to meet you to discuss the steps to be taken to reinstate

yourselves?"

"It is true, but the extraordinary creature returned word that as a lady

of good standing in her own country she did not feel that she could

afford to associate with women whom the courts of this country held to

be living in shame."

"Did you ever!" cried Mrs. Blanderocks. "But it shows us that we must be

careful. Mrs. Grant, you have had experience in such matters, suppose

you retire and draw up a set of resolutions that will not expose us to

the ribald and unseemly comments of the light-minded."

Of course I accepted the task, fully realizing its gravity, and

following is the resolution I brought back with me:

"_Whereas_, Maxim Gorky, recognized in the world of letters as a man of

genius, and in the world at large as a man of great soul, high purpose

and pure nature, having come to this country accompanied by a lady whom

he considers and treats as his wife; and

"_Whereas_, The wealthy, and therefore the better classes, tumbled all

over themselves in order to exploit him as a lion; and

"_Whereas_, He had not the wisdom and craft and sense of puritanical

respectability to pretend that he did not know the lady he believed his

wife, and to whom he believes himself united by a law higher than that

of man; and

"_Whereas_, He was guileless enough to believe he had come to a free

country where purity of motive and of conduct would take precedence of

hollow and rotten forms; and

"_Whereas_, He did not know that the American people practise polygamy

secretly, while condemning it in words, and that the United States

Senate has been nearly two years in pretending to try to find a

polygamist in their midst; and

"_Whereas_, He was so injudicious as to come here with a defective

divorce just at a time when our Supreme Court was making the divorce of

some of us, the gilded favorites of fortune, defective; and

"_Whereas_, He had the audacity to proclaim himself a Socialist, which

is the same thing as saying that he is opposed to special privilege, and

is in favor of the abolition of property in land and in the tools of

labor--in other and plainer words, is against Us; and

"_Whereas_, He is only a foreigner, anyhow, and no longer available as a

toy and plaything for us; therefore be it

"_Resolved_, That this man, Gorky, be used as a means of proclaiming our

extraordinary virtue to the world at large, as a robber cries stop thief

in order to direct attention from himself; that accordingly he be

treated with the utmost outrageous discourtesy and hounded from hotel to

hotel on the ground that such places by no chance harbor men and women

unless they have passed through the matrimonial mill; that we withdraw

our patronage from the revolution in Russia--not being seriously

interested in it anyhow--and that we will show our contempt for

revolutionary patriots by entertaining the rottenest grand duke in

Russia if only he will come over to us, bringing his whole harem if he

wish; that he is a reproach to us while he remains in this country, and

that it is the sense of this great organization that he and the lady who

is his wife in the highest sense shall be deported."

The resolution was not passed.

I have been expelled from the association.

[Illustration]

COMRADE.

By MAXIM GORKY.

Translated from the French translation by S. PERSKY, published in

"L'Aurore," Paris.

ALL in that city was strange, incomprehensible. Churches in great number

pointed their many-tinted steeples toward the sky, in gleaming colors;

but the walls and the chimneys of the factories rose still higher, and

the temples were crushed between the massive façades of commercial

houses, like marvelous flowers sprung up among the ruins, out of the

dust. And when the bells called the faithful to prayer, their brazen

sounds, sliding along the iron roofs, vanished, leaving no traces in the

narrow gaps which separated the houses.

They were always large, and sometimes beautiful, these dwellings.

Deformed people, ciphers, ran about like gray mice in the tortuous

streets from morning till evening; and their eyes, full of covetousness,

looked for bread or for some distraction; other men placed at the

crossways watched with a vigilant and ferocious air, that the weak

should, without murmuring, submit themselves to the strong. The strong

were the rich: everyone believed that money alone gives power and

liberty. All wanted power because all were slaves. The luxury of the

rich begot the envy and hate of the poor; no one knew any finer music

than the ring of gold; that is why each was the enemy of his neighbor,

and cruelty reigned mistress.

Sometimes the sun shone over the city, but life therein was always wan,

and the people like shadows. At night they lit a mass of joyous lights;

and then famishing women went out into the streets to sell their

caresses to the highest bidder. Everywhere floated an odor of victuals,

and the sullen and voracious look of the people grew. Over the city

hovered a groan of misery, stifled, without strength to make itself

heard.

Every one led an irksome, unquiet life; a general hostility was the

rule. A few citizens only considered themselves just, but these were the

most cruel, and their ferocity provoked that of the herd. All wanted to

live; and no one knew or could follow freely the pathway of his desires;

like an insatiable monster, the Present enveloped in its powerful and

vigorous arms the man who marched toward the future, and in that slimy

embrace sapped away his strength. Full of anguish and perplexity, the

man paused, powerless before the hideous aspect of this life: with its

thousands of eyes, infinitely sad in their expression, it looked into

his heart, asking him for it knew not what,--and then the radiant images

of the future died in his soul; a groan out of the powerlessness of the

man mingled in the discordant chorus of lamentations and tears from poor

human creatures tormented by life.

Tedium and inquietude reigned everywhere, and sometimes terror. And the

dull and somber city, the stone buildings atrociously lined one against

the other, shutting in the temples, were for men a prison, rebuffing the

rays of the sun. And the music of life was smothered by the cry of

suffering and rage, by the whisper of dissimulated hate, by the

threatening bark of cruelty, by the voluptuous cry of violence.

In the sullen agitation caused by trial and suffering, in the feverish

struggle of misery, in the vile slime of egoism, in the subsoils of the

houses wherein vegetated Poverty, the creator of Riches, solitary

dreamers full of faith in Man, strangers to all, prophets of seditions,

moved about like sparks issued from some far-off hearthstone of justice.

Secretly they brought into these wretched holes tiny fertile seeds of a

doctrine simple and grand;--and sometimes rudely, with lightnings in

their eyes, and sometimes mild and tender, they sowed this clear and

burning truth in the sombre hearts of these slaves, transformed into

mute, blind instruments by the strength of the rapacious, by the will of

the cruel. And these sullen beings, these oppressed ones, listened

without much belief to the music of the new words,--the music for which

their hearts had long been waiting. Little by little they lifted up

their heads, and tore the meshes of the web of lies wherewith their

oppressors had enwound them. In their existence, made up of silent and

contained rage, in their hearts envenomed by numberless wrongs, in their

consciences encumbered by the dupings of the wisdom of the strong, in

this dark and laborious life, all penetrated with the bitterness of

humiliation, had resounded a simple word:

Comrade.

It was not a new word; they had heard it and pronounced it themselves;

but until then it had seemed to them void of sense, like all other words

dulled by usage, and which one may forget without losing anything. But

now this word, strong and clear, had another sound; a soul was singing

in it,--the facets of it shone brilliant as a diamond. The wretched

accepted this word, and at first uttered it gently, cradling it in their

hearts like a mother rocking her new-born child and admiring it. And the

more they searched the luminous soul of the word, the more fascinating

it seemed to them.

"Comrade," said they.

And they felt that this word had come to unite the whole world, to lift

all men up to the summits of liberty and bind them with new ties, the

strong ties of mutual respect, respect for the liberties of others in

the name of one's own liberty.

When this word had engraved itself upon the hearts of the slaves, they

ceased to be slaves; and one day they announced their transformation to

the city in this great human formula:

I WILL NOT.

Then life was suspended, for it is they who are the motor force of life,

they and no other. The water supply stopped, the fire went out, the city

was plunged in darkness. The masters began to tremble like children.

Fear invaded the hearts of the oppressors. Suffocating in the fumes of

their own dejection, disconcerted and terrified by the strength of the

revolt, they dissimulated the rage which they felt against it.

The phantom of Famine rose up before them, and their children wailed

plaintively in the darkness. The houses and the temples, enveloped in

shadow, melted into an inanimate chaos of iron and stone; a menacing

silence filled the streets with a clamminess as of death; life ceased,

for the force which created it had become conscious of itself; and

enslaved humanity had found the magic and invincible word to express its

will; it had enfranchised itself from the yoke; with its own eyes it had

seen its might,--the might of the creator.

These days were days of anguish to the rulers, to those who considered

themselves the masters of life; each night was as long as thousands of

nights, so thick was the gloom, so timidly shone the few fires scattered

through the city. And then the monster city, created by the centuries,

gorged with human blood, showed itself in all its shameful weakness; it

was but a pitiable mass of stone and wood. The blind windows of the

houses looked upon the street with a cold and sullen air, and out on the

highway marched with valiant step the real masters of life. They, too,

were hungry, more than the others perhaps; but they were used to it, and

the suffering of their bodies was not so sharp as the suffering of the

old masters of life; it did not extinguish the fire in their souls. They

glowed with the consciousness of their own strength, the presentiment of

victory sparkled in their eyes. They went about in the streets of the

city which had been their narrow and sombre prison, wherein they had

been overwhelmed with contempt, wherein their souls had been loaded with

abuse, and they saw the great importance of their work, and thus was

unveiled to them the sacred right they had to become the masters of

life, its creators and its lawgivers.

And the lifegiving word of union presented itself to them with a new

face, with a blinding clearness:

"Comrade."

There among lying words it rang out boldly, as the joyous harbinger of

the time to come, of a new life open to all in the future;--far or near?

They felt that it depended upon them whether they advanced towards

liberty or themselves deferred its coming.

The prostitute who, but the evening before, was but a hungry beast,

sadly waiting on the muddy pavement to be accosted by some one who would

buy her caresses, the prostitute, too, heard this word, but was

undecided whether to repeat it. A man the like of whom she had never

seen till then approached her, laid his hand upon her shoulder and said

to her in an affectionate tone, "Comrade." And she gave a little

embarrassed smile, ready to cry with the joy her wounded heart

experienced for the first time. Tears of pure gaiety shone in her eyes,

which, the night before, had looked at the world with a stupid and

insolent expression of a starving animal. In all the streets of the city

the outcasts celebrated the triumph of their reunion with the great

family of workers of the entire world; and the dead eyes of the houses

looked on with an air more and more cold and menacing.

The beggar to whom but the night before an obol was thrown, price of the

compassion of the well-fed, the beggar also heard this word; and it was

the first alms which aroused a feeling of gratitude in his poor heart,

gnawed by misery.

A coachman, a great big fellow whose patrons struck him that their blows

might be transmitted to his thin-flanked, weary horse, this man imbruted

by the noise of wheels upon the pavement, said, smiling, to a passer-by:

"Well, Comrade!" He was frightened at his own words. He took the reins

in his hands, ready to start, and looked at the passer-by, the joyous

smile not yet effaced from his big face. The other cast a friendly

glance at him and answered, shaking his head: "Thanks, comrade; I will

go on foot; I am not going far."

"Ah, the fine fellow!" exclaimed the coachman enthusiastically; he

stirred in his seat, winking his eyes gaily, and started off somewhere

with a great clatter.

The people went in groups crowded together on the pavements, and the

great word destined to unite the world burst out more and more often

among them, like a spark: "Comrade." A policeman, bearded, fierce, and

filled with the consciousness of his own importance, approached the

crowd surrounding an old orator at the corner of a street, and, after

having listened to the discourse, he said slowly: "Assemblages are

interdicted ... disperse...." And after a moment's silence, lowering his

eyes, he added, in a lower tone, "Comrades."

The pride of young combatants was depicted in the faces of those who

carried the word in their hearts, who had given it flesh and blood and

the appeal to union; one felt that the strength they so generously

poured into this living word was indestructible, inexhaustible.

Here and there blind troops of armed men, dressed in gray, gathered and

formed ranks in silence; it was the fury of the oppressors preparing to

repulse the wave of justice.

And in the narrow streets of the immense city, between the cold and

silent walls raised by the hands of ignored creators, the noble belief

in Man and in Fraternity grew and ripened.

"Comrade."--Sometimes in one corner, sometimes in another, the fire

burst out. Soon this fire would become the conflagration destined to

enkindle the earth with the ardent sentiment of kinship, uniting all its

peoples; destined to consume and reduce to ashes the rage, hate and

cruelty by which we are mutilated; the conflagration which will embrace

all hearts, melt them into one,--the heart of the world, the heart of

beings noble and just;--into one united family of workers.

In the streets of the dead city, created by slaves, in the streets of

the city where cruelty reigned, faith in humanity and in victory over

self and over the evil of the world grew and ripened. And in the vague

chaos of a dull and troubled existence, a simple word, profound as the

heart, shone like a star, like a light guiding toward the future:

COMRADE.

[Illustration]

ALEXANDER BERKMAN.

By E. G.

ON the 18th of this month the workhouse at Hoboken, Pa., will open its

iron gates for Alexander Berkman. One buried alive for fourteen years

will emerge from his tomb. That was not the intention of those who

indicted Berkman. In the kindness of their Christian hearts they saw to

it that he be sentenced to twenty-one years in the penitentiary and one

year in the workhouse, hoping that that would equal a death penalty,

only with a slow, refined execution. To achieve the feat of sending a

man to a gradual death, the authorities of Pittsburg at the command of

Mammon trampled upon their much-beloved laws and the legality of court

proceedings. These laws in Pennsylvania called for seven years

imprisonment for the attempt to kill, but that did not satisfy the

law-abiding citizen H. C. Frick. He saw to it that one indictment was

multiplied into six. He knew full well that he would meet with no

opposition from petrified injustice and the servile stupidity of the

judge and jury before whom Alexander Berkman was tried.

In looking over the events of 1892 and the causes that led up to the act

of Alexander Berkman, one beholds Mammon seated upon a throne built of

human bodies, without a trace of sympathy on its Gorgon brow for the

creatures it controls. These victims, bent and worn, with the reflex of

the glow of the steel and iron furnaces in their haggard faces, carry

their sacrificial offerings to the ever-insatiable monster, capitalism.

In its greed, however, it reaches out for more; it neither sees the

gleam of hate in the sunken eyes of its slaves, nor can it hear the

murmurs of discontent and rebellion coming forth from their heaving

breasts. Yet, discontent continues until one day it raises its mighty

voice and demands to be heard:

Human conditions! higher pay! fewer hours in the inferno at Homestead,

the stronghold of the "philanthropist" Carnegie!

He was far away, however, enjoying a much needed rest from hard labor,

in Scotland, his native country. Besides he knew he had left a worthy

representative in H. C. Frick, who could take care that the voice of

discontent was strangled in a fitting manner,--and Mr. Carnegie had

judged rightly.

Frick, who was quite experienced in the art of disposing of rebellious

spirits (he had had a number of them shot in the coke regions in 1890),

immediately issued an order for Pinkerton men, the vilest creatures in

the human family, who are engaged in the trade of murder for $2 per day.

The strikers declared that they would not permit these men to land, but

money and power walk shrewd and cunning paths. The Pinkerton

blood-hounds were packed into a boat and were to be smuggled into

Homestead by way of water in the stillness of night. The amalgamated

steel workers learned of this contemptible trick and prepared to meet

the foe. They gathered by the shores of the Monongahela River armed with

sticks and stones, but ere they had time for an attack a violent fire

was opened from the boat that neared the shore, and within an hour

eleven strikers lay dead from the bullets of Frick's hirelings.

Every beast is satisfied when it has devoured its prey,--not so the

human beast. After the killing of the strikers H. C. Frick had the

families of the dead evicted from their homes, which had been sold to

the workingmen on the instalment plan and at the exorbitant prices usual

in such cases.

Out of these homes the wives and children of the men struggling for a

living wage were thrown into the street and left without shelter. There

was one exception only. A woman who had given birth to a baby two days

previous and who, regardless of her delicate condition, defended her

home and succeeded in driving the sheriff from the house with a poker.

Everyone stood aghast at such brutality, at such inhumanity to man, in

this great free republic of ours. It seemed as if the cup of human

endurance had been filled to the brim, as if out of the ranks of the

outraged masses some one would rise to call those to account who had

caused it all.

And some one rose in mighty indignation against the horrors of wealth

and power. It was Alexander Berkman!

Mother Earth, Vol. 1 No. 3, May 1906 Monthly Magazine Devoted to Social Science and Literature · 第 1 / 5 段