CHAPTER XXIV.

MEMORANDUM OF THE PROTESTANT MONARCHS

The London Convention of 1840――The new Treaty of London for

the pacification of the Levant――Viscount Ponsonby――Reshid

_Pasha_――Lord Shaftesbury’s “Exposé” addressed to Lord

Palmerston――The articles in _The Times_――A Memorandum to the

European Monarchs――“Enquiries about the Jews”――The _Allgemeine

Zeitung des Judentums_.

WE have to go back to the political changes which we indicated in

connection with Sir Moses’ activity.

After the Convention which was signed on the 15th July, 1840, in

London for the pacification of the Levant, the terms were duly

proposed to Mehemet Ali and were rejected on the 5th September. Then

the war intervened, Mehemet Ali was obliged to come to terms, and

on July 18th, 1841, the new “Treaty of London for the Pacification

of the Levant” was signed. Mehemet Ali abandoned his claim to Syria

on condition that the Khedivate of Egypt was made hereditary in his

family. This was a turning-point of much significance in the history

of Palestine. At that moment the Jews might have been able to regain

their ancient land, if only they had had an organization for carrying

out the plan.

The only country in the world where this idea found influential

expression at the time was England. The events in the East were

naturally of intense interest to Lord Shaftesbury, and stimulated him

to greater activity.

He writes in his _Diary_, on August 24th, 1840: “The _Times_ of 17th

August filled me with astonishment. I wish I had put down at the

moment what I felt at reading it; half satisfaction, half dismay;

pleased to see my opinions and projects so far taken up and approved;

――alarmed lest this premature disclosure of them should bring upon us

all the charge of fanaticism. Now who could have believed, a few years

ago, that this subject could have been treated in a newspaper of wide

circulation, gravely, sincerely, and zealously, yet so it is; and

who sees not the handwriting of God upon the wall? The very insults,

misrepresentations, and persecutions of the Jews at Damascus bring

forward the main question; and Mehemet Ali, ‘howbeit he thinketh not

so,’ is a mighty instrument for the benefit of this people!

“Palmerston told me that he has already written to Lord Ponsonby¹

(1780?‒1855) to direct him to open an intercourse with Reschid

_Pasha_ (1802‒1858) at ♦Constantinople respecting protection and

encouragement to the Jews. This is a prelude to the Antitype of the

decree of Cyrus, but, humanly speaking, we must pray for more caution.

Those gentlemen who have now got access to the columns of the _Times_

will, by over-zeal, bring a charge of fanaticism on the whole question.

O God, from whom _alone_ cometh all counsel, wisdom, and understanding,

be Thou our Guide, our Instructor, and our Friend” (_Ibid._, _p._ 311).

¹ John Viscount Ponsonby.

♦ “Constaninople” replaced with “Constantinople”

On August 29th, 1840, he writes:――

“The newspapers teem with documents about the Jews. Many assail,

and many defend them. I have as yet read nothing (except [the Rev.

Alexander] M’Caul’s (1799‒1863) treatise) which exhibits any statement

either new or clever. The motion of the _Times_ in this matter has

stirred up an immense variety of projects and opinions; everyone has

a thought, and everyone has an interpretation. What a chaos of schemes

and disputes is on the horizon, for the time when the affairs of

the Jews shall be really and fully before the world! What violence,

what hatred, what combination, what discussion. What a stir of every

passion, every feeling in men’s hearts!...” (_Ibid._, _p._ 311).

On September 25th, 1840, he writes:――

“Yesterday began my paper for Palmerston, containing in full the

propositions for the recall of the Jews to their ancient land.

‘Recall’ is too strong; it is simply a ‘permission,’ should they think

fit to avail themselves of it. I wish to prepare a short document,

which may refresh his memory, and exist as a record both of the

suggestion and the character of it” (_Ibid._, _p._ 312).

We may confess that at times we find Lord Shaftesbury’s ideas somewhat

too largely influenced by his religious zeal; yet he did succeed

in mastering his emotions and dealing with the problem in a sound

and statesmanlike manner. In this document of his we find not only

generous ideas but also excellent arguments, simply and convincingly

stated (Appendix liii).

On November 4th, 1840, he writes:――

“I hope I have done right in this: I have suppressed all party

considerations, and have used every effort to persuade the _Times_

to take just views of the Syrian question. I have been successful.

Lord Palmerston told me this evening that the concurrence of the Tory

papers had smoothed ten thousand difficulties....” (_Ibid._, _p._ 315).

The articles in _The Times_, to which Lord Shaftesbury refers,

appeared in that newspaper at various periods. On the 9th March, 1840

(_p._ 3), _The Times_ published the following notice:――

“_Restoration of the Jews._――A memorandum has been addressed to the

Protestant monarchs of Europe on the subject of the restoration of

the Jewish people to the land of Palestine. The document in question,

dictated by the peculiar conjuncture of affairs in the East, and the

other striking ‘signs of the times,’ reverts to the original covenant

which secures that land to the descendants of _Abraham_, and urges

upon the consideration of the powers addressed what may be the

probable line of Protestant Christendom to the Jewish people in the

present controversy in the East. The memorandum and correspondence

which has passed upon the subject have been published.”

This Memorandum (Appendix liv) is written entirely from a Christian

point of view. Lord Shaftesbury, although himself a staunch believer

in Christianity, was more inclined to give the project a practical

character.

On the 17th August, 1840, _The Times_ (_p._ 3) published the following

article:――

“_Syria.――Restoration of the Jews._

“The proposition to plant the Jewish people in the land of their

fathers, under the protection of the five Powers, is no longer a mere

matter of speculation, but of serious political consideration. In a

ministerial paper of the 31st of July an article appears bearing all

the characteristics of a feeler on this deeply interesting subject.

However, it has been reserved for a noble Lord opposed to Her

Majesty’s Ministers to take up the subject in a practical and

statesmanlike manner, and he is instituting inquiries, of which the

following is a copy:――

“1. What are the feelings of the Jews you meet with respect to their

return to the Holy Land?

“2. Would the Jews of station and property be inclined to return

to Palestine, carry with them their capital, and invest it in the

cultivation of the land, if by the operation of law and justice life

and property were rendered secure?

“3. How soon would they be inclined and ready to go back?

“4. Would they go back entirely at their own expense, requiring

nothing farther than the assurance of safety to person and estate?

“5. Would they be content to live under the Government of the country

as they should find it, their rights and privileges being secured to

them under the protection of the European Powers?

“Let the answers you procure be as distinct and decided and detailed

as possible: in respect as to the inquiries as to property, it will

of course be sufficient that you should obtain fair proof of the fact

from general report.

“The noble Lord who is instituting these inquiries has given deep

attention to the matter, and is well known as the writer of an able

article in the _Quarterly_ on the subject, in December, 1838.”

The adherents of the idea of Jewish assimilation in Germany started a

kind of opposition.

The _Allgemeine Zeitung des Judentums_ dealt with this matter on the

19th September, 1840, and admitted with regard to the articles in the

_Globe_, which it described as “a London Ministerial newspaper,” that

“the plans may all be classed among the things devoutly to be desired.”

On the other hand, this paper quotes from the _Courier Français_

of August 26th, 1840, a comparison between _M._ A. M. L. de P. de

Lamartine (1790‒1869) (the poet, and at that time Deputy) and Lord

Palmerston in the following words:――

“M. de Lamartine intends to form a Christian kingdom at the sources of

the _Jordan_, and at the foot of _Mount Lebanon_; if only _Jerusalem_,

the Holy City, came into the power of France, he would gladly leave

the rest of the world to England and Russia. But what is odd in the

whole affair is that Lord Palmerston has chosen the same spot. Where

the celebrated Deputy dreams of a Christian state, Lord Palmerston

projects a Jewish Republic.”

This jest caused the _Allgemeine Zeitung des Judentums_ to “protest

against the project in question,” and “to warn the young people.” All

we learn from this pronouncement is that the Jewish youth was at the

time inclined to listen to the Zionist idea.

History of Zionism, 1600-1918, Vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 24 / 53 章