This cultivation of form, this great facility of speech, degenerates

into vanity and bombast, and it is true that one must not search in the

Parliament of Madrid for examples of genuine political eloquence; but

it is none the less true, as is universally conceded, that this

Parliament, among all those of Europe, is richest in oratory in the

general acceptation of that word. One should hear a discussion on some

important political measure which stirs the passions of the deputies. It

is a veritable battle! There are no longer speeches, but torrents of

words which drive the stenographers mad and confuse the heads of those

in the galleries. There are tones, gestures, violent expressions, bursts

of inspired eloquence, which remind one of the French Assembly in the

turbulent days of the Revolution. There one hears Rios Rosas, a most

violent orator, who rules the tumult with a roar; a Martos, an orator of

distinguished figure, who destroys by ridicule; a Pi y Margall, a

venerable old man, who terrifies by his gloomy predictions; a Colantes,

an indefatigable speaker, who crushes the Chamber under an avalanche of

words; a Rodriguez, who with marvellous flexibility of argument and

illustration pursues, entangles, and strangles his enemies; and, in the

centre of a hundred others, a Castelar, who conquers and enslaves both

friends and enemies by a flood of poetry and harmony. And this Castelar,

famous throughout Europe, is really the most perfect expression of

Spanish eloquence. He carries the cultivation of form almost to

idolatry; his eloquence is music; his argument a slave to his ear; he

says a thing or leaves it unsaid, or says it in one sense rather than

in another, according as it turns or fails to turn a period; there is a

harmony in his mind which he follows and obeys, and to which he

sacrifices everything that can possibly offend; with him a period is a

strophe, and one must hear him to believe that human speech without the

cadence of poetry and the aid of song is able to approach so closely to

the harmony of song and poetry. He is more of an artist than a

politician, and he has not only the genius, but the heart, of an

artist--the heart of a child incapable of anger or resentment. In all

his speeches no one can find a ground of offence; in the Cortes he has

never provoked a serious dispute of a personal nature; he never has

recourse to satire and never uses irony; in his most violent philippics

there is no touch of bitterness; and this is a proof of these

assertions: although he is a Republican, an opponent of all the

ministers, an aggressive journalist, a continual adversary to every one

who exercises any power, and of every one who is not a fanatic on the

subject of liberty, he has never had an enemy. Consequently, his

speeches are enjoyed and are not feared; his words are too beautiful to

terrify; his character too ingenuous for him to exercise a political

influence; he does not know how to fight, to conspire, and to accomplish

his ends through bribery; it is his function only to please and to

shine: his eloquence even at his grandest is tender, his most beautiful

speeches make one weep. To him the Chamber is a theatre. Like an

improvisatore, to have a full and serene inspiration he is obliged to

speak at a given hour, at a predetermined moment, and with a certain

period of time at his disposal. Accordingly, on the day when he wishes

to speak he makes his arrangement with the president of the chamber; the

president so disposes the business that his speech may begin when the

galleries are crowded and all the deputies are in their seats; his

papers announce his speech on the previous evening in order that the

ladies may procure tickets, for he must have popular attention. Before

speaking he is restless and cannot be still for an instant; he enters

the Chamber, goes out, comes back, turns to go out again, hurries along

the corridors, goes to the library to consult a book, rushes into a café

for a glass of water, seems to be stricken with fever: he imagines that

he will not be able to pronounce two words--that he will appear

ridiculous and be hissed: not a single idea of his speech remains clear

in his mind; he has confused and forgotten everything. “How is your

pulse?” his friends ask him with a smile. The solemn moment arrives; he

rises from his seat with bowed head, trembling and pale, like a man

condemned to death, resigned to lose in a single day the glory won in so

many years and with so great labor. At that moment his very enemies pity

his condition. He raises his head, casts a glance around, and says,

“_Señores!_” He is saved; his courage is renewed; his mind clears, and

his speech takes form again like a forgotten air; the president, the

Cortes, the galleries vanish; he feels only the irresistible flame which

burns within him--the mysterious force which sustains him. It is fine to

hear him say these words. “I no longer see the walls of the Chamber,” he

says; “I see distant lands and people never seen before.” He speaks hour

after hour, and not a deputy leaves the hall, not a person moves in the

galleries, not a voice interrupts, not a motion disturbs him; not even

when he transgresses the rules has the president courage to stop him; he

pictures at his pleasure the image of his republic clothed in white and

crowned with roses, and the monarchists do not rise in protest, for when

so clothed they too find her beautiful. Castelar is the ruler of the

Assembly; he thunders, lightens, sings, roars, and flashes like

fireworks, provokes laughter, calls forth shouts of enthusiasm, ends in

a tremendous tumult of applause, and disappears with head erect. Such is

the famous Castelar, professor of history in the university--a most

fertile writer on politics, art, and religion; a publicist who annually

receives fifty thousand francs from the journals of America; an

academician unanimously elected a member of the _Academia

española_--pointed out in the streets, hailed with joy by the people,

loved by his enemies, noble, vain, generous, and happy.

While we are on the subject of political eloquence let us glance at

literature.

Imagine a hall in the Academy full of noise and confusion. A crowd of

poets, novelists, and writers of every sort, nearly all of them having a

French air in their expression and manner, although very studious to

conceal it. They are reading and declaiming from their own works, each

one trying to drown the voice of the others, to the end that he may make

himself heard by the people who crowd the galleries, while they, on

their part, put through the time by reading the papers and discussing

politics. Now and then a clear, sonorous voice rises above the tumult,

and then a hundred voices burst forth together from one corner of the

room, crying, “He is a Carlist!” and a flood of hisses drowns

the cry; or, on the other hand, “He is a Republican!” and another

flood of hisses from the other side drowns the clear, sonorous

voice. The academicians crush their papers into balls, throw

them at each other, and shout in each other’s ears,

“Atheist!”--“Jesuit!”--“Innovator!”--“Weathercock!”--“Traitor!”

By listening attentively to those who are reading one may catch

harmonious stanzas, well-turned periods, powerful phrases: the first

effect is agreeable; the prose and poetry are indeed full of fire, life,

flashes of light, and happy comparisons, drawn from everything that one

hears and sees in the sky, the earth, and the sea; and it is all dimly

lighted with the colors of the Orient and richly clothed in Italian

harmonies. But, alas! it is literature only for the eyes and the ears;

it is only music and painting; on rare occasions the Muse drops a gem of

thought in the midst of a shower of flowers, and of this bright shower

there remains only a lingering perfume in the air and the echo of a

dying murmur on the ear.

Meanwhile one hears in the street the shouts of the people, the firing

of guns, and the beating of drums; at every moment some artist deserts

the ranks and goes to wave a banner among the crowd; they separate in

twos and threes and in larger groups and go to swell the crowd of

journalists; the turmoil and the continuous turning of Fortune’s wheel

dissuade the most industrious from lengthy works; it is in vain that

some solitary figure in the crowd cries, “In the name of Cervantes,

stop!” A few strong voices are raised above this clamor, but they are

the voices of men who hold themselves apart, many of whom will soon make

that voyage from which there is no return. There is the voice of

Hartzenbusch, the prince of the drama; the voice of Breton de las

Herreros, the prince of comedy; the voice of Zorilla, the prince of

poetry; there is the Orientalist, Gayangos; the archeologist, Guerra; a

writer of comedies, called Tamayo; a novelist, Fernand Caballero by

name; Amador de los Rios, a critic; Fernandez y Gonzalez, a novelist;

and a host of other able and productive writers. In the midst of these

there still lives the memory of Quintana, the great poet of the

Revolution; of Espronceda, the Byron of Spain; of a Nicasio Gallego, a

Martinez della Rosa, and a duke di Rivas. But the tumult, the disorder,

and the discord burst through like a torrent and engulf everything.

To leave allegory, Spanish literature finds itself in a condition

similar to ours--a group of illustrious writers whose powers are

failing, but who have had two grand sources of inspiration, religion and

love of country, or both in one--men who have left a distinct and

enduring mark in the field of art; and, on the other hand, a body of

young men who are groping their way forward, asking what it is they have

to do, rather than actually doing it, wavering between faith and doubt;

either possessing faith without courage or taught by custom to simulate

it when they have it not; not even certain of their own language, and

vacillating between the academies, which cry, “Purity!” and the people,

who cry, “Truth!”--hesitating between the weight of traditions and the

need of the moment; thrust aside by the thousands who give fame or

spurned by the few who seal it; obliged to think in one way and to write

in another--to conceal their inmost self, to let the present escape so

as not to break with the past, to steer as best they can between

opposing obstacles. Good fortune may be able for a few years to keep

their names afloat amid the torrent of French books which is pouring in

upon the country. Hence arises the discouragement, first to their own

individual effort, and then to the national genius; and from this follow

imitation which sinks into mediocrity, and the abandonment of the

literature of broad scholarship and large hopes for the ease and

profitable scribbling for the newspapers.

Alone among so many ruins stands the theatre. The new dramatic

literature lacks the marvellous invention, the splendid form, and the

pristine impress of the nobility and grandeur of the old, which was the

expression of a people who ruled Europe and the New World. Still less

does it possess the incredible productiveness and the endless variety;

but, in compensation, it possesses a more wholesome influence, a deeper

observation, a finer delicacy, and a greater degree of conformity to the

true scope of the theatre, which is to purify manners and to ennoble the

heart and mind.

In all the forms of literature, moreover, as in the drama, in the

novels, the popular songs, the poems, and histories, there always lives

and rules the sentiment which informs the literature of Spain more

powerfully indeed than any other European literature, from the first

rude lyrics of Berseo to the noble martial hymns of Quintana--the

sentiment of national pride.

And here it is appropriate to speak of the Spanish character. The

national pride of the Spaniards is still so great to-day, after so many

misfortunes and so grave a fall, that the stranger who lives among them

is doubtful whether they are the Spaniards of three centuries ago or the

Spaniards of the nineteenth century. But it is an inoffensive pride, a

pride which runs to harmless rhetoric. They do not depreciate the other

nations which seem to rise higher than themselves. No; they respect,

praise, and admire them, but show a feeling of superiority which draws a

clear inference contradictory to their praise. They are benevolent

toward other nations, with that benevolence which Leopardi justly

remarks is peculiar to men full of self-conceit, who believe that they

are admired by all, and love their avowed admirers because they think

that a duty attendant upon the superiority with which they imagine fate

has blessed them. Surely there has never existed in the world a people

with greater enthusiasm for their history than the Spanish. It is

incredible. The boy who shines your boots, the porter who carries your

valise, the mendicant who begs for alms, raises his head with flashing

eyes at the names of Charles V., Philip II., Hernando Cortez, and Don

John of Austria, as if they are heroes of his own time, and as if he had

witnessed their triumphal entry into the city only the day before. The

people pronounce the word _España_ with an accent like that with which

the Romans of the most glorious times of the Republic would have

pronounced _Roma_. When they speak of Spain modesty is thrown aside,

even by men of extremely modest nature, without the least indication in

their faces of that exaltation because of which one may sometimes pardon

intemperate speech. They boast in cold blood, from habit, without being

conscious of so doing. In the speeches of Parliament, in the newspaper

articles, in the writings of the Academy, they speak of the Spanish

people without circumlocution as a nation of heroes, the great nation,

the wonder of the world, the glory of the ages. It is a rare thing to

hear any one speak or read a hundred words before an audience without

sooner or later recognizing the burden of the song in Lepanto, the

Discovery of America, or the War of Independence, the mention of which

always elicits a burst of applause.

And it is precisely this tradition of the War of Independence that

constitutes to the Spanish people a powerful inherent force. One who has

never lived in Spain for a long or short period cannot believe that a

war, however fortunate and glorious, could leave to the people so

steadfast a faith in their national valor. Baylen, Victoria, San

Marcial, are throughout Spain even more potent traditions than are

Marengo, Jena, and Austerlitz in France. Even the martial glory of the

armies of Napoleon, seen through the War of Independence, which shrouds

it like a veil, appears to the eyes of the Spanish less splendid than

to any other people in Europe. The idea of a foreign invasion provokes

among the Spaniards a smile of proud disdain; they do not believe it

possible to be conquered in their own country; one should hear the tones

in which they speak of Germany when it is rumored that the emperor

William has determined to uphold the throne of the duke d’Aosta with his

arms. And doubtless if they were obliged to fight a new war of

independence, they would fight, possibly with less fortunate success,

but with a bravery and constancy equal to those which they once so

marvellously displayed. 1808 is the ’93 of Spain; it is a date which

stands out before the eyes of every Spaniard in letters of fire; they

glory in it, from the women and the boys to the babies who are just

learning to lisp; it is the war-cry of the nation.

And they have a similar pride in their writers and artists. The beggar,

instead of saying _España_, says sometimes the _country of Cervantes_.

No writer in the world has ever gained such popularity among his own

people as the author of _Don Quixote_ in Spain. I believe that there is

not a peasant or a shepherd from the Pyrenees to the Sierra Nevada, from

the coast of Valencia to the hills of Estremadura, who if asked about

Cervantes will not reply with a smile of complacence, “He is the

immortal author of _Don Quixote_!” Spain is perhaps the country where

the anniversaries of the great writers are most generally celebrated;

from Juan de Mena to Espronceda, each one has his solemn day, when they

offer at his tomb a tribute of song and flowers. In the squares, the

cafés, the railway-carriages, wherever you are, you hear lines of the

famous poets repeated by all sorts of people; he who has not read them

has heard another read; he who has not heard them read repeats the

quotation as a proverb learned from others; and when any one repeats a

verse, they all prick up their ears. Any one who knows a little Spanish

literature may make a journey in that country with the assurance of

always having something to talk about and something with which to

inspire sympathy wherever and in whatever company he may happen to be.

The national literature is truly national.

The defect of the Spanish which from the first strikes the stranger is

this--that in their estimate of the affairs, the men, and the

achievements of their time and their country they over-estimate their

measure, if one may so speak. They exaggerate everything, they see

everything, as it were, through a lens that magnifies to vast

proportions. For a long time they have had no immediate part in the

common life of Europe, and hence they have lacked opportunity for

comparing themselves with other states and of judging themselves by such

comparison. On this account their civil wars, the wars in America,

Africa, and Cuba, are to them not what the little war of 1860 and ’61

against the Papal army, or even the revolution of 1860, are to us, but

what we regard the great Crimean War and the wars of 1859 and of 1866.

They speak of the combats--which exalt the Spanish armies in those wars,

sanguinary doubtless, but not great--as the French speak of Solferino,

the Prussians of Sadowa, and the Austrians of Custozza. Prim, Serrano,

and O’Donnell are generals who in comparison dwarf the most illustrious

commanders of other countries. I remember the to-do made at Madrid over

the report of the victory gained by General Merriones over four or five

thousand Carlists. The deputies in the lobby of the Cortes exclaimed

emphatically, “Ah! Spanish blood!” Some even said that if an army of

three hundred Spaniards had found itself in the position of the French

in 1870, it would have marched straight to Berlin. Certain it is, that

one cannot doubt the valor of the Spanish, which has been proved on so

many occasions, but one may safely assert that there is a great

difference between disorganized Carlists and Prussians in battle

array--between the soldiers of Europe, to speak more comprehensively,

and the soldiers of Africa--between great pitched battles, where

canister sweeps away its thousands, and the combats of ten thousand

soldiers on either side with great disparity in equipment and

discipline. And as they speak of war, so they speak of everything else;

and this is true not only of the common people, but of the upper

classes as well. They lavish high-sounding praises upon their writers;

they give the title of _grande poeta_ to many whose names are never

heard outside of Spain; adjectives of exalted sublimity and wonder are

current coin given and taken without the least doubt of its value as

legal tender. One may say that Spain regards and judges everything like

an American, rather than a European, people, and that it is separated

from Europe by an ocean instead of the Pyrenees, and joined to America

by an isthmus.

In other points how similar they are to us! To hear the people talk of

politics, one would think one was in Italy: they do not argue, they

express opinions; they do not censure, they condemn; a single argument

is enough for any judgment, and to form an argument an inference alone

is sufficient. As for this minister, he is a rascal; that one, a

traitor; and this one a hypocrite: they are all a pack of thieves. One

has sold the trees in the gardens of Aranguez; another has robbed the

Escurial of its treasures; a third has drained the coffers of the state;

a fourth has sold his soul for a bag of money. They have lost all faith

in the very men who have had a hand in all the political movements of

the last thirty years; even among the lowest people there is creeping in

a spirit of discouragement which gives rise to the expressions that one

hears very often and on every side: “Poor Spain! Unhappy country!

Wretched Spaniards!”

But the violence of the political passions and the fury of the civil

struggles have not changed the foundation of the ancient Spanish

character. Only that part of society known as the political world, only

this is corrupt; the people, though always inclined toward those blind

and at times savage impulses of passion which betray the mingling of the

Arabian and Latin blood, are good and loyal and capable of magnanimous

action and sublime bursts of enthusiasm. “The honor of Spain” is still a

motto which quickens every pulse. And, moreover, their manners are frank

and refined; perhaps less polished, but certainly more amiable and

ingenuous, than those for which the French are praised. Instead of

smiling at you, they offer you a cigar; instead of paying you a

compliment, they press your hand, and are more hospitable in actions

than in protestations. Nevertheless, the forms of address still preserve

their ancient courtliness; the gentleman says to the lady, “I am at your

feet;” the lady to the gentleman, “I kiss your hand.” Among themselves

the gentlemen sign their letters Q. B. S. M.--_que besa sus manos_ (I

kiss your hands), like a servant to his master; only friends say

_Adios_; and the people preserve their affectionate salutation, _Vaya

Usted con Dios!_ (God be with you!), which is worth more than all the

kissing of the hands.

With the warm, generous nature of this people it is impossible to spend

a month in Madrid without making a hundred friends, even though one does

not seek them. Think how many one might make if one did seek them! This

was my case. I cannot say that they were real friends, but I was

acquainted with so many persons that it did not seem at all like being

in a foreign city. Even the illustrious men are very easy to approach,

and hence there is no need, as elsewhere, of a pile of letters and

messages from friends in order to meet them. I had the honor of knowing

Tamayo, Hartzenbusch, Guerra, Saavedra, Valera, Rodriguez, Castelar, and

many others, some famous in letters and some in the sciences, and I

found them all alike--open, cordial, fiery; men with silvered hair, but

with the eyes and voices of young men of twenty; passionately devoted to

poetry, music, and art; cheerful and animated, with a fresh, ringing

laugh. How many of them did I see, as they read the lines of Quintana or

Espronceda, grow pale, weep, and spring to their feet as though touched

by an electric spark, revealing their whole soul in a radiant glance!

What youthful spirits! What ardent hearts! How delighted I was to see

and hear them--to belong to that same poor Latin race of which we now

say such hard things! and how happy I was in the thought that to a

greater or less degree we are all formed in the same mould, and that,

although we may accustom ourselves, little by little, to envy the

qualities of others, yet we are never wholly successful in obliterating

our own!

After three months and more of sojourning in Madrid I was obliged to

take my departure, in order that I might not be caught by the summer in

Southern Spain. I shall always remember that beautiful May morning when

I left, perhaps for ever, my dear Madrid. I was going to see Andalusia,

“the promised land” of travellers, the ideal Andalusia, whose wonders I

had so often heard sung by poets and romancers in Italy and Spain--that

Andalusia for whose sake, I may say, I had undertaken the journey; and

yet I was sad. I had passed so many happy days in Madrid! I was leaving

so many dear friends! On my way to the station to take the noon train I

passed along the Alcalá, saluted from a distance the gardens of the

Recoletos, passed the Museum of Painting, stopped to take a last look at

the statue of Murillo, and reached the station with an aching heart.

“Three months?” I asked myself a few moments before the train started.

“Have three months passed already? Has it not been a dream? Yes, it

seems as if I have been dreaming. Perhaps I shall never again see my

good landlady, nor Señor Saavedra’s little daughter, nor the sweet,

serene face of Guerra, nor my friends of the Café Fornos, nor any one

else. But what is this? Shall I not return? Return! Oh, no! I know well

that I shall not return. And so ... farewell, my friends! farewell,

Madrid! farewell, my little room in the street of Alduana!” At this

moment my heartstrings seem to be breaking and I must hide my face.

END OF VOL. I.

* * * * *

INDEX.

A.

Abdelasio reconstructs the Alcazar of Seville, ii. 121.

Abdurrahman I. builds the mosque of Cordova, ii. 68.

Abdurrahman I. builds Medina Az-Zahra, ii. 88;

his happy days, ii. 89.

Abencerrages, Hall of the, Alhambra, ii. 209.

Abrantes, duke d', at the bull-fights, 209.

Absolutist party, 96.

Academy, a dream of the, 280.

Academy of San Fernando, Madrid, 193.

Acquasola gardens, Genoa, 10.

Alameda, Granada, ii. 188, ii. 241.

Alarcon y Mendoza, Juan Ruiz de, dramatist, 169.

Alarmed travellers, ii. 9, ii. 55.

Albaicin at Granada, ii. 244;

courtyard in, ii. 246;

fortune-telling, ii. 253;

government of, ii. 255;

ignorance in, ii. 256;

Parisian quarter, ii. 245;

squalor of, ii. 251.

Albornoz, Gil Carillo de, tomb of, Toledo, ii. 29.

Alcaiceria, Granada, ii. 241.

Alcala street, Madrid, 156, 168.

Alcanadre, Roman aqueduct at, 91.

Alcantara, bridge of, Toledo, ii. 18.

Alcazar de San Juan, ii. 259;

of Seville, ii. 120;

of Toledo, ii. 39.

Alcayde of Saragossa's bold republicanism, 83.

Aleardi Gaetano, on the can-can, 171.

Alfonso and the Cid, 121.

Alfonso the Wise, MSS. of, ii. 118;

tomb of, ii. 109.

Alfonso VIII. defeats the Moors at las Navas de Tolosa, ii. 61.

Alfonso XII., favored by the Moderate party, 96.

Algaba, ii. 118.

Algeciras, Gulf of, ii. 168.

Alhambra, arabesques, ii. 197, 208, ii. 210, ii. 211;

baths, ii. 211;

cabinet of Linderaja, ii. 209;

Charles V.'s palace, ii. 192;

Court of Lions, ii. 201;

Court of Myrtles, ii. 194;

fascination of, ii. 205;

Gate of Justice, ii. 192;

grounds of ii. 190;

Hall of Abencerrages, ii. 209;

Hall of Barca, ii. 197;

Hall of Divans, ii. 210;

Hall of Justice, ii. 206;

Hall of Oranges, ii. 209;

Hall of the Ambassadors, ii. 198;

Hall of the Two Sisters, ii. 207;

Mirador de la Reina, ii. 212, ii, 215;

mosque, ii. 216;

paintings in, ii. 207;

Patio de la Reja, ii. 212;

realization of a dream, ii. 200;

situation of, ii. 190;

Tower of Commares, ii. 196;

Tower of the Ambassadors, ii. 196;

vastness of the, ii. 217;

view from, ii. 213.

Ali Pacha, relics of, 176.

Almago, Melchiorre, republican journalist, ii. 243.

Almansa, plain of, ii. 260.

Almansur builds Zahira, ii. 89.

Almodovar, castle of, ii. 99.

Altimura, Count d', possesses the fiscal accounts of Gonzalez di

Cordova, ii. 237.

Alvarez, Gen., house of, at Gerona, 16.

Amadeus at Gerona, 16;

at Logroño, 85;

at Madrid, 166, 194;

at Saragossa, 82;

at the bull-fights, 213;

at Valencia, ii. 262;

character of, 201;

courage of, 199;

court-life of, 194;

encourages bull-fights, 223, 235;

hostility of the newspapers to, 93, 200;

hostility of the soldiery to, 204;

prejudice against, 15, 33, 80.

Ambassadors, Hall of the, Alhambra, ii. 198;

at Seville, ii. 124;

Tower of the, Alhambra, ii. 196.

Amusements, 168.

Andalusian characteristics, 36;

dialect, ii. 93;

scenery, ii. 61, 100, ii. 177;

women, ii. 79, ii. 93, ii. 126.

Angels, convent of, Granada, ii. 238.

Ansurez, Pedro, tomb of, 137.

Aosta, duke d'. See Amadeus.

Aqueduct, Roman, at Segovia, 124.

Arabesques in the Alhambra, beauty of, ii. 197;

intricacy of design, ii. 197, ii. 208, ii. 210, ii. 211.

Aranjuez, arrival at, ii. 10;

gardens, ii. 12;

historic associations, ii. 11;

royal palace, ii. 11;

suburbs of, ii. 10.

Argamasilla de Alba, birthplace of Don Quixote, ii. 58.

Argensola, the brothers, 72;

sonnet by, 73.

Arjonilla, ii. 62.

Armory, royal, at Madrid, 174.

Arragon, decay of, 52;

dialect of, 54;

independence of, 49;

mountains of, 48.

Artillery museum at Madrid, 180.

Asturia, prince of, title instituted, 98.

Atocha, Church of Our Lady of, Madrid, 166, 204;

street of, Madrid, 174.

Avilo, 124.

"Awaiting her in heaven," ii. 227.

Ayala, d', dramatist, 169.

B.

Banderillas, de fuego, 226.

Barber of Seville, house of the, ii. 132.

Barcelona, arrival at, 20;

cafés, 30;

carnival masqueraders, 22;

Catalonian peculiarities, 35;

cathedral, 24;

cemetery, 27;

Cervantes on, 42;

circus, 235;

dialect, 21;

foreign hotel waiters, 20;

palaces, 26;

revolutionary proclivities, 35;

Roman ruins, 26;

streets, 22;

suburbs, 22;

theatre, 40;

women of, 41.

Baretti, Giuseppe, 206; ii. 82.

Barili, Anton Giulio, travelling companion, 10.

Batista, Juan, architect of the Escurial, 260.

Beatrice, Queen, tomb of, ii. 109.

Beggary, modest, 135.

Berruguete, Alonzo, carvings by, at Toledo, ii. 25;

at Valladolid, 146.

Berseo, poet, 283.

Blanca, Florida, tomb of, Seville, ii. 109.

Boabdil's helmet, 176.

Boccanegra, paintings by, at Granada, ii. 229.

Spain, v. 1 (of 2) · 第 15 / 17 段