PURSUIT OF A HUSBAND BY THE MODERN WOMAN.

After All, Says the New York "Times,"

It Is Doubtless Better for Man to Be

Chosen Than for Him to Choose.

Taking up a discussion inaugurated by the _St. James Gazette_, of London,

the New York _Times_ says what it has to say on the subject of choosing

wives.

The English paper said frankly that the title would better be "The Choice

of a Husband," inasmuch as the male, though unaware of the fact, is

generally not the pursuer, but the pursued. This condition, however, is by

no means to the discredit of woman.

As the _Times_ remarks, "A young woman whose intentions are both serious

and honorable has nothing at all to be ashamed of in endeavoring by all

womanly means to acquire the man whom she believes she can make happy and

knows that she means to try to."

In America and England there is objection to the man who marries for any

other reason than being in love. Yet the _mariage de convenance_ is not

altogether without legitimate recommendations. To quote the _Times_:

If one is really bent on making a marriage of reason instead

of waiting for a "call," excellent recipes may be given him.

A wise man once advised his son, who had shown some

disposition to choose instead of waiting to be chosen, to

"look for a good woman's daughter." It would be hard to find

any better basis for a happy union.

In general, of course, mixed marriages, whether the mixture

be of religion or of country, would be viewed by a wise

adviser with apprehension, although Lord Curzon's experience

is only one of very many as to the possible happiness of

marriages between persons of different nationalities, much

more alike as are the nationalities of Lord and Lady Curzon

than any other two nationalities.

Dr. Johnson's famous saying that marriages would be happier

if they were arranged by the Lord Chancellor, due regard

being paid to the ages and conditions of the parties, has

never been accepted as a working rule in his own country. In

France, again, there is the wholly "reasonable" and

extremely circumspect Count Boni Castellane, whose marriage

of reason has so lately been shown to be so far from a

success.

There are quite enough more failures of the same kind to

offset the unhappy marriages of romance. It is of these, of

course, that Burton declares that matches are made in

heaven, though matches of the sulfurous kind, of which all

of us know some instances, suggest a very different place of

manufacture.

The Marriage of Reason.

Swift's saying that the reason why so few marriages are

happy is that "young ladies spend their time in making nets,

not in making cages," is doubly outrageous. In the first

place, it is an outrageous begging of the question. The

testimony of less cynical observers in our day and country

is that most marriages are entitled to be called happy.

In the second place, it outrageously puts the whole blame

for unhappy marriages on the female partner, contrary alike

to probability and to fact. But at least as many of the

marriages are failures in which men "choose" their wives, or

think they do, as in cases in which men become the prey of

their own imaginations.

And there is this to be said from the point of view of

reason in favor of marriages with which reason has nothing

to do. In the first months of married life there are

necessarily very many differences to be adjusted and small

incompatibilities of ways of thinking and feeling to be

reconciled. That, as all experienced spouses know, is the

trying period.

Marriage is like life in that it is a school wherein whoso

does not learn must suffer. Now, to diminish the friction of

this trying time no better lubricant could possibly be

provided than the romantic love, which cannot be expected to

last forever, but which may very probably outlast this

greatest necessity for it of the early connubial period.

When the glamour of the romance "fades into the light of

common day," and a real man and a real woman take the places

of the creatures of each other's fancy, and passion cools

into at best the tenderest of friendships, both parties are

better off, and will acknowledge themselves to be better off

because the romance has been.

The Scrap Book, Volume 1, No. 4 June 1906 · 第 8 / 147 题