CHAPTER II.

THE MAJESTY OF TOOLS.

Tools the Highest Text-books. -- How to Use them the Test of

Scholarship. -- They are the Gauge of Civilization. -- Carlyle’s

Apostrophe to them. -- The Typical Hand-tools. -- The Automata of the

Machine-shop. -- Through Tools Science and Art are United. -- The

Power of Tools. -- Their Educational Value. -- Without Tools Man is

Nothing; with Tools he is All. -- It is through the Arts alone that

Education touches Human Life.

Sacred to the majesty of tools might be appropriately inscribed over the

entrance to this Ideal school; for its highest text-books are tools, and

how to use them most intelligently is the test of scholarship. To

realize the potency of tools it is only necessary to contrast the two

states of man--the one without tools, the other with tools. See him in

the first state, naked, shivering with cold, now hiding away from the

beasts in caves, and now, famished and despairing, gaunt and

hollow-eyed, creeping stealthily like a panther upon his prey. Then see

him in the poetic, graphic apostrophe of Carlyle:--“Man is a tool-using

animal. He can use tools, can devise tools; with these the granite

mountains melt into light dust before him; he kneads iron as if it were

soft paste; seas are his smooth highway, winds and fire his unwearying

steeds. Nowhere do you find him without tools; without tools he is

nothing, with tools he is all!”

What a picture of the influence of tools upon civilization! It is

through the use of tools that man has reached the place of absolute

supremacy among animals. As he increases his stock of tools he recedes

from the state of savagery. The great gulf between the aboriginal savage

and the civilized man is spanned by the seven hand-tools--the axe, the

saw, the plane, the hammer, the square, the chisel, and the file. These

are the universal tools of the arts, and the modern machine-shop is an

aggregation of them rendered automatic and driven by steam.

The ancients constructed automata which were exceedingly ingenious. In

the statues that could walk and talk, the Chinese puppets and the

marionettes of the Greeks there was a hint of the modern automatic

tools, which, driven by steam, fashion with equal accuracy the delicate

parts of the watch and the huge segments of the marine engine. The

ancients knew more of science than of art. They were familiar with the

power of steam, but knew not how to apply it to the wants of man. They

knew that steam would turn a spit, but they had not a sufficient

knowledge of art to convert the power they had discovered into a monster

of force, and train it to bear the burdens of commerce. They never

thought to apply the jet of steam used to turn a spit to great automatic

machines, and to fit into them saws and files, and needles and drills,

and gimlets and planes, and compel them to do the work of thousands of

men. But this is precisely what the modern mechanic has accomplished. In

making a slave of steam, science and art have combined to free mankind.

We marvel at the dulness of the ancients as shown in their failure to

utilize in the useful arts the discoveries of science. That they should

have studied the stars over their heads to the neglect of the earth

under their feet is incomprehensible to the modern mind. But will not

future generations marvel at us? Is it not an astounding fact that, with

a knowledge of the tremendous influence of tools upon the destiny of the

human race so graphically depicted by Carlyle, the nations have been so

slow in incorporating tool-practice into educational methods? The

distinguishing features of modern civilization sprang as definitively

from cunningly devised and skilfully handled tools as any effect from

its cause. And yet the world’s statesmen have failed to discover the

value of tool-practice as an educational agency. The face of the globe

has been transformed by the union of art and science, but the world’s

statesmen have not discerned the importance of uniting them in the

curriculum of the schools. If the ancients could see us as we see them,

they would doubtless laugh at us as we laugh at them.

We might take a lesson from the savage. He is taught to fight, to hunt,

and to fish, and in these arts the brain, the hand, and the eye are

trained simultaneously. He is first given object-lessons, as the pupil

of the kindergarten is taught. Then the tomahawk, the spear, and the bow

and arrow are placed in his hands, and he fights for his life, or fishes

or hunts for his dinner. The young Indian is taught all that it is

necessary for him to know, and he is educated, practically, in the

savage’s three workshops--the battle-field, the forest and plain, the

sea and lake. Thus the young savage enters upon the duties of his life

with an exact practical knowledge of them. He has not been taught a

theory of fighting, he has used the weapons of warfare; he has not

studied the arts of fishing and hunting, he has handled the spear and

the bow and arrow, and their use is as familiar to him as the

multiplication table is to the boy in the public school.

We have more and better tools than the savage possesses. With the aid of

science and art we harness steam to our chariot and compel it to draw us

whither we will. We steal fire from the clouds and make it serve us as a

messenger. We imprison the air, and with it stop the flying railway

train; with the aid of science and art we reduce the most subtile forces

of nature to servitude. But we neither teach our youth how to master

their elements nor how to use them.

Tools represent the steps of human progress--in architecture, from the

mud hut to the modern mansion; in agriculture, from the pointed stick

used to tear the turf to a thousand and one ingenious instruments of

husbandry; in ship-building, from the rudderless, sailless boat to the

ocean steamer; in fabrics, from the matted fleece of the shepherd to the

varied products of countless looms; in pottery, from the first rude

Egyptian cup to the exquisite vase of the Sevres factory. And so of

every art that contributes to the comfort and pleasure of man; the

development of each has been accomplished by tools in the hands of the

laborer.

Since, then, man owes so much to labor, he has doubtless educated the

laborer and showered honors upon him (?). On the contrary, the labor of

the world has been performed by the most ignorant classes, by bondmen,

by helots and captives, by serfs and slaves. The laborer has been held

in such contempt, and been so debased by ignorance, that he has often

violently protested against improvements in the tools of the trades, and

with vandal hands destroyed the mill, the factory, and the forge erected

to ameliorate his condition. At the top of the social scale the sage has

studied the stars and invented systems of abstract philosophy; at the

bottom ignorance has deified itself and starved. This divorce of

science from art has resulted in such incongruities as the Pyramids of

Egypt and periodical famines; as the hanging gardens of Babylon and the

horrors of Jewish captivity; as the Greek Parthenon and dwellings

without chimneys; as the statues of Phidias and Praxiteles, and royal

banquets without knives, forks, or spoons; as the Roman Forum and the

Roman populace crying for bread and circuses; as Socrates, Plato, Seneca

and Aurelius, and Caligula, Claudius, Nero and Domitian.

On the other hand the union of science with art tunnels the mountain,

bridges the river, dams the torrent, and converts the wilderness into a

fruitful field.

Science discovers and art appropriates and utilizes; and as science is

helpless without the aid of art, so art is dead without the help of

tools. Tools then constitute the great civilizing agency of the world;

for civilization is the art of rendering life agreeable. The savage may

own a continent, but if he possesses only the savage’s tools--the spear

and the bow and arrow--he will be ill-fed, ill-housed, ill-clothed, and

poorly protected both against cold and heat. He might be familiar with

all the known sciences, but if he were ignorant of the arts his state,

instead of being improved, would be rendered more deplorable; for with

the thoughts, emotions, sensibilities, and aspirations of a sage he

would still be powerless to steal from heaven a single spark of fire

with which to warm his miserable hut.

In the light of this analysis Carlyle’s rhapsody on tools becomes a

prosaic fact, and his conclusion--that man without tools is nothing,

with tools all--points the way to the discovery of the philosopher’s

stone in education. For if man without tools is nothing, to be unable to

use tools is to be destitute of power; and if with tools he is all, to

be able to use tools is to be all-powerful. And this power in the

concrete, the power to do some useful thing for man--this is the last

analysis of educational truth.

There is no better definition of education than that of Pestalozzi--“the

generation of power.” But what kind of power? Not merely power to think

abstractly, to speculate, to moralize, to philosophize, but power to act

intelligently. And the power to act intelligently involves the exertion,

in greater or less degree, of all the powers, both mental and physical.

Education, then, is the development of all the powers of man to the

culminating point of action. What kind of action? Action in art. What is

art? “The power of doing something not taught by nature or instinct;

power or skill in the use of knowledge; the practical application of the

rules or principles of science.” Again we have the last analysis of

education--“skill in the use of knowledge; the application of the rules

or principles of science.” And this is tool practice.

It is unnecessary, in an educational view, to divide the arts by the

employment of the terms “useful” and “fine;” for the fine arts can only

exist legitimately where the useful arts have paved the way. In a

harmonious development the artist will enter on the heels of the

artisan. Art is cosmopolitan. It is not less worthily represented by the

carpenter with his square, saw, and plane, and the smith with his

sledge, than by the sculptor with his mallet and chisel, and the painter

with his easel and brush; both classes contribute to the comfort and

pleasure of man; for comfort is enhanced by pleasure, and pleasure is

intensified by comfort. It follows that the ultimate object of education

is the attainment of skill in the arts. To this end the speculations

and investigations of philosophy and the experiments of chemistry lead.

At the door of the study of the philosopher and of the laboratory of the

chemist stands the artisan, listening for the newest hint that

philosophy can impart, waiting for the result of the latest chemical

analysis. In his hands these suggestions take form; through his skilful

manipulation the faint indications of science become real things, suited

to the exigencies of human life.

It is the most astounding fact of history that education has been

confined to abstractions. The schools have taught history, mathematics,

language and literature, and the sciences, to the utter exclusion of the

arts, notwithstanding the obvious fact that it is through the arts alone

that other branches of learning touch human life. As Bacon has so aptly

expressed it, “The real and legitimate goal of the sciences is the

endowment of human life with new inventions and riches.” In a word,

public education stops at the exact point where it should begin to apply

the theories it has imparted. At this point the school of mental and

manual training combined--the Ideal School--begins; not only books but

tools are put into the hands of the pupil, with this injunction of

Comenius; “Let those things that have to be done be learned by doing

them.”

Mind and Hand: Manual Training the Chief Factor in Education · 第 2 / 28 章