CHAPTER V.

CAROLINE’S FIRST REGENCY.

1729.

In May, 1729, the King, who had been for some time anxious to visit

his Hanoverian dominions, which he had not seen since 1714, got a

short Act passed through Parliament appointing the Queen to act as

Regent in his absence. The King’s visit to Hanover was very unpopular

with his English subjects, who hoped that they had heard of the last

of these journeys when George the First died. As Prince of Wales,

George the Second had always declared that he loved England far better

than Hanover, but this was only in opposition to his father, and soon

after he ascended the throne he avowed himself strongly Hanoverian in

his tastes and found fault with everything in England. In this mood

the best thing for him to do was to return to his own country for a

time, and Walpole no doubt was glad to get him out of the way, while

the Queen eagerly grasped at the authority which the deed of regency

granted her. But she showed none of this eagerness to the King, and

when he announced his intention of leaving England she deplored his

absence with tears, and received his commission on her knees with all

due humility. The King gave the royal assent to the Act of Regency on

May 14th, and three days later he set out for Hanover, accompanied by a

numerous retinue, and Lord Townshend as Minister in attendance.

The Queen appointed the Speaker of the House of Commons, Onslow, to be

her Chancellor during her Regency, and Keeper of the Great Seal. She

held her first Council as Regent five days after the King left. It was

reported in the _London Gazette_ as follows:--

“_At the Court at Kensington the 22nd day of May, 1729._

“Present.

“The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty,

“His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, Archbishop of Canterbury,

Lord Chancellor, Lord Privy Seal, Lord Steward, Lord Chamberlain,

Duke of Somerset, Duke of Bolton, Duke of Rutland, Duke of Argyll,

Duke of Montrose, Duke of Kent, Duke of Ancaster, Duke of Newcastle,

Earl of Westmoreland, Earl of Burlington, Earl of Scarborough, Earl

of Coventry, Earl of Grantham, Earl of Godolphin, Earl of Loudoun,

Earl of Findlater, Earl of Marchmont, Earl of Ilay, Earl of Uxbridge,

Earl of Sussex, Viscount Lonsdale, Viscount Cobham, Viscount

Falmouth, Lord Wilmington, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chancellor of the

Exchequer, Master of the Rolls, Sir Paul Methuen, and Henry Pelham,

Esq.

“The King’s Commission appointing Her Most Excellent Majesty the

Queen Regent over this Kingdom, by the Style and Title of Guardian

of the Kingdom of Great Britain, and His Majesty’s Lieutenant within

the same during His Majesty’s absence, was this day by Her Majesty’s

command, opened and read in His Majesty’s Most Honourable Privy

Council, after which His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, and all

the Lords and others of the Council who were present, had the honour

to kiss Her Majesty’s hand.”

Caroline entered with manifest enjoyment upon the duties of her office,

and discharged them with great ability; she had so long known the

essence of power that it was easy for her to adapt herself to its

outward manifestation. Townshend, who was jealous of Walpole’s favour

with the Queen, endeavoured to induce the King to modify her powers as

Regent, and urged him to send a despatch to that effect from the Hague,

but the King, though he listened, declined to do so; in fact, he knew

better than any one else that his interests were safe in his consort’s

hands.

[Illustration: LETTER OF QUEEN CAROLINE TO THE KING OF FRANCE.]

The Queen-Regent had the power of opening and proroguing Parliament,

signifying the royal assent to acts and measures, appointing bishops,

and of making other important appointments; she also received the

foreign ambassadors and envoys as though she were the King, and

corresponded with foreign sovereigns. Queen Caroline was especially

careful to cultivate and strengthen the good understanding between

England and France, and she wrote several letters to the King of

France, and sent him a present of a dozen hogsheads of perry and

cider.[39]

The most important negotiation in foreign affairs was the Treaty of

Seville, which was practically concluded during Caroline’s regency,

though it was not signed until a little later (November 9th, 1729).

This treaty terminated the long dispute between England and Spain. By

its provisions, English trade to America, which had been interrupted,

was restored. England was given back all that Spain had captured during

the war, and the Asiento Treaty (or contract for supplying negroes, of

establishing certain factories, and of sending one ship to the South

Sea) was confirmed to the South Sea Company. But the most important

feature of the treaty was that Gibraltar was tacitly relinquished by

Spain. It would be too much to claim for Caroline the credit of the

cession of Gibraltar to England, but there is no doubt that her wise

and temperate counsels, and her anxiety not to give needless offence to

Spanish susceptibilities by mentioning the fortress by name, materially

aided William Stanhope, the English plenipotentiary at Madrid, in

conducting the difficult and delicate negotiations which resulted in

the Treaty of Seville. Gibraltar was a question which touched Spanish

pride very nearly, and to see a fortress on its own shores held and

garrisoned by England was as great a humiliation to Spain as England’s

possession of Calais had once been to France.

Time had been, and not so long before, when English Ministers advised

the recession of Gibraltar to Spain, and George the First had written

a letter which contained a promise to restore the fortress at some

future time. This letter had been written upon the advice of Townshend

and Carteret in 1721, and so lately as 1728 we find that Townshend

was still in favour of the cession of Gibraltar. Writing to Poyntz he

declared: “What you proposed in relation to Gibraltar is certainly very

reasonable, and is exactly conformable to the opinion which you know I

have always entertained concerning that place; but you cannot but be

sensible of the violent and almost superstitious zeal which has of late

prevailed among all parties of this kingdom against any scheme for the

restitution of Gibraltar upon any conditions whatsoever.”[40] If the

matter had rested with Townshend, who had obtained the ear of the King

during his absence at Hanover, Gibraltar would probably have been ceded

to Spain.

To Caroline, therefore, acting in conjunction with Walpole, the credit

is due of having retained it for England. True, Gibraltar was not

mentioned by name in the Treaty of Seville, though the Opposition

clamoured for its explicit mention. But the Queen and the Prime

Minister were firm; they were content with the kernel and troubled not

about the husk. The result justified their wisdom. The treaty was

ultimately ratified without conditions, and Gibraltar henceforth became

a recognised possession of England.

In this, as in all other matters, the Queen worked in close accord with

Walpole, and by way of showing the Opposition how little she heeded

their attacks, she publicly marked her favour of the Prime Minister

by going to dine with him, accompanied by the Prince of Wales and

all the Royal Family, at his house at Chelsea, where a magnificent

entertainment was provided for her Majesty. The Queen and the Royal

Family dined in one room, and the rest of the party in another, Walpole

himself waiting on his illustrious guest. Nor did the Queen neglect the

ceremonial side of her office; she kept great state whilst she was at

St. James’s, and on the anniversary (June 11th) of the King’s Accession

she held a court at St. James’s which was one of the most largely

attended of the reign. She also frequently honoured the nobility with

her presence at their entertainments.

At Windsor Caroline kept much company, availing herself of the King’s

absence to go there. At Windsor she felt Queen of England indeed; she

occupied the rooms which had been used by the late Queen Anne, and her

favourite sitting room was the closet wherein Anne first heard of the

great victory of Blenheim, in which hung the banner annually presented

by the Duke of Marlborough, and now by his daughter, who was duchess

in her own right. Caroline held drawing-rooms in the state apartments,

of which the finest were the magnificent St. George’s Hall and the

ball room, hung with tapestry representing the seasons of the year.

The celebrated collection of beauties by Sir Peter Lely, afterwards

removed to Hampton Court, adorned one of the state apartments, and the

private chapel had some exquisite carved work by Grinling Gibbons. Here

Caroline attended divine service, and, seated in the royal closet hung

with crimson velvet, listened to lengthy discourses from Dr. Samuel

Clarke, or some other favourite divine.

It was from Windsor on a notable occasion that she drove to honour

the Earl and Countess of Orkney with a visit to their beautiful seat

at Clieveden. “Yesterday,” writes Peter Wentworth, “the Queen and all

the Royal Family went to dine and supper at Clieveden. How they were

diverted I know not, but I believe very well, for they did not come

home until almost four in the morning.”[41] According to all accounts

the entertainment was very successful, but Lady Orkney’s anxieties as a

hostess seem to have weighed heavily upon her, for we find her writing

a long letter a few days later to Mrs. Howard, expressing her “anguish”

because some little things had gone wrong. Perhaps, Lady Orkney only

wanted a more particular expression of the Queen’s satisfaction. Her

letter may be quoted as an expression of the fulsome servility to

royal personages then in vogue even among the high nobility.

“CLIEVEDEN, _August 5th, 1729_.

“MADAM,

“I give you this trouble out of the _anguish_ of my mind, to have

the Queen doing us the honour to dine here, and nothing performed in

the order it ought to have been! The stools which were set for the

Royal Family, though distinguished from ours, which I thought right,

because the Princess Royal sits so at quadrille, put away by Lord

Grantham,[42] who said there was to be no distinction from princes

and princesses and the ladies. He directed the table-cloths so that

there must be two to cover the table; for he used to have it so; in

short, turned the servants’ heads. They kept back the dinner too long

for her Majesty after it was dished, and was set before the fire,

and made it look not well dressed, the Duke of Grafton saying they

wanted a _maître d’hôtel_. All this vexed my Lord Orkney so--he tells

me he hopes I will never meddle more, if he could ever hope for the

same honour; which I own I did too much, as I see by the success,

but having done it for the late King,[43] and was told that things

were in that order, that it was as if his Majesty had lived here, I

ventured it now, but I have promised not to aim at it more.

“But what I have said shows the greater goodness in the Queen to be

so very easy. I have seen condescension in princesses, but none that

ever came up to her Majesty: nay, not all the good you have ever said

could make me imagine what I saw and heard. We all agreed her Majesty

must be admired; and, if I may use the term, it was impossible to see

her and not love her.

“If you hear of these mismanagements, pray be so good as to say

the house was too little for the reception of the Queen, and so

many great princes and princesses, who, without flattery, cannot

be but respectedly admired. I thought I had turned my mind in a

philosophical way of having done with the world, but I find I have

deceived myself; for I am vexed and pleased with the honours I have

received. I know from your discretion you will burn this, and I hope

will always believe me, etc.,

“E. ORKNEY.”[44]

From Windsor the Queen returned to Kensington, which she made her

headquarters for the rest of the summer, paying visits occasionally

to Hampton Court, Richmond, and Windsor, for the purpose of hunting.

The best idea of the social side of her regency may be gathered from

the letters that Peter Wentworth wrote during this period to Lord

Strafford.[45] They throw curious sidelights on the manners of the

time. To quote seriatim:--

“KENSINGTON, _July 25th, 1729_.

“I have been at Richmond again with the Queen and the Royal Family,

and I thank God they are all very well. We are to go there to-day,

and the Queen walks about there all day long. I shall be no more

her jest as a lover of drink at free cost, not only from her own

observation of one whom she sees every morning at eight o’clock, and

in the evening again at seven, walking in the gardens, and in the

drawing-room till after ten, but because she has my Lord Lifford

to play upon, who this day sen’night got drunk at Richmond. His

manner of getting so was pleasant enough; he dined with my good Lord

Grantham, who is well served at his table with meat, but very stingy

and sparing in his drink, for as soon as his dinner is done he and

his company rise, and no round of toasts. So my lord made good use

of his time whilst at dinner, and before they rose the Prince [of

Wales] came to them and drank a _bonpêre_ to my Lord Lifford, which

he pledged, and began another to him, and so a third. The Duke of

Grafton, to show the Prince he had done his business, gave him (Lord

Lifford) a little shove, and threw him off his chair upon the ground,

and then took him up and carried him to the Queen. Sunday morning

she railed at him before all the Court upon getting drunk in her

company, and upon his gallantry and coquetry with Princess Amelia,

running up and down the steps with her. When somebody told him the

Queen was there and saw him, his answer was: ‘What do I care for

the Queen?’ He stood all her jokes not only with French impudence,

but with Irish assurance. For all you say I don’t wonder I blushed

for him and wished for half his stock. I wonder at her making it

so public. Nobody has made a song; if Mr. Hambleton will make one

that shall praise the Queen and the Royal Family’s good humour, and

expose as much as he pleases the folly of Lord Grantham and Lord

Lifford, I will show it to the Prince, and I know he won’t tell whom

he had it from, for I have lately obliged him with the sight of _Mrs.

Fitzwilliam’s litany_, and he has promised he will not say he had it

from me. So I must beg you to say nothing of this to Lady Strafford,

for she will write it for news to Lady Charlotte Roussie, and then

I shall have Mrs. Fitz. angry with me, and the Prince laughing at

me for not being able to be my own councillor, as I fear you laugh

now. But if you betray me I make a solemn vow I never will tell you

anything again.

“The Queen continues very kind and obliging in her sayings to me, and

gave me t’other day an opportunity to tell her of my circumstances.

As we were driving by Chelsea she asked me what that walled place

was called. I told her Chelsea Park, and in the time of the Bubbles

’twas designed for the silkworms.[46] She asked me if I was not in

the Bubbles. With a sigh, I answered: ‘Yes, that, and my fire had

made me worse than nothing’. Some time after, when I did not think

she saw me, I was biting my nails. She called to me and said: ‘Oh

fie! Mr. Wentworth, you bite your nails very prettily’. I begged her

pardon for doing so in her presence, but said I did it for vexation

of my circumstances, and to save a crown from Dr. Lamb for cutting

them. She said she was sorry I had anything to vex me, and I did well

to save my money. The Prince told her I was one of the most diligent

servants he ever saw. I bowed and smiled as if I thought he bantered

me. He understood me, and therefore repeated again that he meant it

seriously and upon his word he thought that the Queen was happy in

having so good a servant. I told him ’twas a great satisfaction to me

to meet with his Royal Highness’s approbation. He clapped his hand

upon my shoulder and assured me that I had it.

“As we went to Richmond last Wednesday our grooms had a battle

with a carter that would not go out of the way. The good Queen had

compassion for the rascal and ordered me to ride after him and give

him a crown. I desired her Majesty to recall that order, for the

fellow was a very saucy fellow, and I saw him strike the Prince’s

groom first, and if we gave him anything for his beating ’twould be

an example to others to stop the way a purpose to provoke a beating.

The Prince approved what I said, for he said much the same to her

in _Dutch_, and I got immortal fame among the liverymen, who are no

small fools at this Court. I told her if she would give the crown to

anybody it should be to the Prince’s groom, who had the carter’s long

whip over his shoulders. She laughed, but saved her crown.”

“KENSINGTON, _August 14th, 1729_.

“The Queen has done me the honour to refer me for my orders to

her Royal Highness Princess Anne, and what is agreed by her will

please her Majesty; the height of my ambition is to please them

all. I flatter myself I have done so hitherto, for Princess Anne

has distinguished me with a singular mark of her favour, for she

has made me a present of a hunting suit of clothes, which is blue,

trimmed with gold, and faced and lined with red. The Prince of Wales,

Princess Anne, the Duke of Cumberland, Princess Mary and Princess

Louisa wear the same, and looked charming pretty in them. Thursday

se’nnight, Windsor Forest will be blessed with their presence again,

and since the forest _was_ a forest it never had such a fine set of

hunters, for a world of gentlemen have had the ambition to follow his

Royal Highness’s fashion.

“On Saturday last at Richmond Park, Major Sylvine made his appearance

by the Queen’s chaise, and she did him the honour to take notice

of him, telling him she was glad to see he could hunt. He thought

to be witty upon me by telling her Majesty I took such delight in

waiting that he thought it a pity to deprive me of that pleasure. My

good and gracious Queen answered him to my satisfaction and to his

mortification, for she said: ‘Does he? So ’tis a sign he loves me,

and I love him the better for’t.’ He replied he hoped her Majesty did

not think the worse of him. She had the goodness to say ‘No,’ but

repeated again that she loved me the better. Princess Amelia, who was

in the chaise with her, turned her head from Sylvine and smiled most

graciously upon me, which I could answer in no other way than by low

bows to mark the sense of the great honour that was done me. And for

my life I could not forbear getting behind the chaise to triumph over

and insult the major, telling him he had got much by being witty upon

me, which Princess Amelia heard, and laughed again upon me.”

“KENSINGTON, _August 21st, 1729_.

“Yesterday the Queen and all the Royal Family dined at Claremont,[47]

and I dined with the Duke (of Newcastle) and Sir Robert (Walpole),

etc. The Prince of Wales came to us as soon as his, and our, dinner

was over, and drank a bumper of rack-punch to the Queen’s health,

which you may be sure I devotedly pledged, and he was going on

with another, but her Majesty sent us word that she was going to

walk in the garden, so that broke up the company. We walked till

candle-light, being entertained with very fine French horns, then

returned to the great hall, and everybody agreed never was anything

finer lit.

“Her Majesty and Princess Caroline, Lady Charlotte Roussie and Mr.

Schütz played their quadrille. In the next room the Prince had the

fiddles and danced, and he did me the honour to ask me if I could

dance a country-dance. I told him ‘yes’; and if there had been a

partner for me, I should have made one in that glorious company--the

Prince with the Duchess of Newcastle, the Duke of Newcastle with

Princess Anne, the Duke of Grafton with Princess Amelia, Sir Robert

Walpole with Lady Catherine Pelham, who is with child--so they danced

but two dances. The Queen came from her cards to see that sight,

and before she said it, I thought he (Sir Robert Walpole) moved

surprisingly genteelly, and his dancing really became him, which I

should not have believed if I had not seen, and, if you please, you

may suspend your belief until you see the same. Lord Lifford danced

with Lady Fanny Manners; when they came to an easy dance my dear duke

took her from my lord, and I must confess it became him better than

the man I wish to be my friend, Sir Robert, which you will easily

believe. Mr. Henry Pelham[48] danced with Lady Albemarle, Lord James

Cavendish with Lady Middleton, and Mr. Lumley with Betty Spence.

“I paid my court sometimes to the carders, and sometimes to the

dancers. The Queen told Lord Lifford that he had not drunk enough

to make him gay, ‘and there is honest Mr. Wentworth has not drunk

enough’. I told her I had drunk her Majesty’s health; ‘And my

children’s too, I hope?’ I answered ‘Yes’. But she told me there

was one health I had forgot, which was the Duke and Duchess of

Newcastle’s, who had entertained us so well. I told her I had been

down among the coachmen to see they had obeyed my orders to keep

themselves sober, and I had had them all by the hand, and could

witness for them that they were so, and it would not have been decent

for me to examine them about it without I had kept myself sober, but

now that grand duty was over, I was at leisure to obey her Majesty’s

commands. There stood at the farther end of the room a table with

bottles of wine for the dancers to drink, and I went and filled a

bumper of burgundy and drank the duke’s and duchess’s health to Mr.

Lumley, and told him I did it by her Majesty’s command, and then I

went to the dancers, and he to the Queen, and told her I had done so.

When I came to her again she told me she was glad I had obeyed her

commands, and I thanked Mr. Lumley for the justice he had done me in

telling it to the Queen, which drew this compliment from him, that he

should always be ready to do me justice, or any service in his power.

I beg my son may have no occasion to grieve that I have now and again

taken a glass too much, for in my cups I shall call upon Mr. Lumley

to remember me, and ’tis through these merry companions, or through

rich friends that services are done for people.

“The Queen and the Prince have invited themselves to the Duke of

Grafton’s hunting seat, which lies near Richmond, Saturday. He fended

off for a great while, saying his house was not fit to receive them,

and ’twas so old he was afraid ’twould fall upon their heads. But his

Royal Highness, who is very quick at good inventions, told him he

would bring tents and pitch them in his garden, so his Grace’s excuse

did not come off; the thing must be Saturday.

“I have sent you enclosed a copy of my letter I wrote to Lord

Pomfret, which will explain to you how I am made secretary to the

Queen,[49] and before dinner, under pretence to know if I had taken

her Majesty’s sense aright, her Royal Highness (the Princess Royal)

being by when I received the orders, I desired leave to show it her.

She smiled and said: ‘By all means let me see it’. She kept it till

she had dined, read it to the Queen, her brothers and sisters, and

then sent for me from the gentlemen ushers’ table, and gave it to me,

again thanked me, and said it was very well writ, and she saw too

that I could dine at that table without being drunk at free cost.”

“KENSINGTON, _September 2nd, 1729_.

“Yesterday when the Queen was just got into her chaise there came a

messenger who brought her a packet of letters from the King with the

good news that his Majesty was very well. He had left him at the play

this day se’nnight. It also said the guards of Hanover were not to

march, for all differences were accommodated between the King and the

King of Prussia, so that I hope now the match will go forward[50] and

that we shall soon have the King here. The Queen opened the letter

and read it as she went along; the Princess [Anne] and the Duke [of

Cumberland] were riding on before, and neither saw nor heard anything

of this. Therefore I scoured away from the Queen to tell them the

good news, and then I rode back and told the Queen what I had done,

and that I had pleasure to be the messenger of good news. She and

they thanked me and commended what I had done. I have sent you a copy

of the orders I have been given to-day that you may see we go in for

a continual round of pleasure.”

“KENSINGTON, _September 16th, 1729_.

“There was one Mr. W(entworth) who had a very agreeable present

from the Queen. As he went over with her in the ferry boat Saturday

s’ennight she gave a purse to Princess Anne, and bade her give it to

Mr. W(entworth). Then she told him she wished him good luck, and in

order that she might bring it to him, she had given him silver and

gold, a sixpence, a shilling, and a half-guinea. He took the purse,

and gave her Majesty a great many thanks. ‘What,’ said she, ‘will you

not look into’t?’ His answer was: ‘Whatever comes from your Majesty

is agreeable to him;’ though if he had not felt in the purse some

_paper_, he could not have taken the royal jest with so good a grace.

There was a bank bill in’t, which raised such a contention between

him and his wife that in a manner he had better never have had it.

He was willing to give her half, but the good wife called in worthy

Madam Percade to her assistance, and she determined to give a third

to her.

“All this was told the Queen the next day, and caused a great laugh,

but put poor Mr. W(entworth) upon the thought of soliciting the great

Lord L(ifford) for a sum of £15 he had forgotten to pay him in the

South Sea. When the chase was over the Prince clapped Mr. W(entworth)

on the back and wished him joy of his present, and told him now

he would never be without money in his pocket. He replied if his

Highness had not told him so publicly of it, it might have been so,

but now his creditors would tease every farthing from him.”

[Illustration: THE ALTSTADT, HANOVER.]

The King who had been at Hanover five months now made ready to return

to England.[51] He had greatly enjoyed his visit to the Electorate,

and had given several fêtes, including a farewell masquerade in the

gardens of Herrenhausen, where the hedges of clipped hornbeam acted as

screens and the grass as a carpet; the whole scene was illuminated by

coloured lights.[52] The King followed at Hanover the same clockwork

rule he had established in England. “Our life is as uniform as that of

a monastery,” wrote one of the King’s English retinue who was lodged at

the Leine Schloss. “Every morning at eleven and every evening at six we

drive in the heat to Herrenhausen through an enormous linden avenue;

and twice a day cover our coats and coaches with dust. In the King’s

society there is never the least change. At table, and at cards, he

sees always the same faces, and at the end of the game retires into his

chamber. Twice a week there is a French theatre; the other days there

is a play in the gallery. In this way, were the King always to stop in

Hanover, one could take a ten years’ calendar of his proceedings, and

settle beforehand what his time of business, meals, and pleasure would

be.”

It was during this visit of George the Second to Hanover that his

dispute with the King of Prussia came to a crisis. The King of England

resented the King of Prussia’s connivance at his son Frederick’s

disobedience, but he could hardly make that the ostensible pretext for

a quarrel, so he raked up the old grievance of the Prussians having

kidnapped some of his tall Hanoverians for the Potsdam regiment of

guards, and so violent grew the altercation, and so insulting were the

messages of the King of Prussia, that the choleric little George sent

him word challenging him to single combat at any place he would name,

and leaving him the choice of weapons. It would have been a boon to

Europe in general, and to England and Prussia in particular, if these

two royal combatants had met and killed one another as they threatened

to do, but unfortunately such a desirable consummation was prevented

by Lord Townshend, whose remonstrances resulted in a compromise being

patched up between the illustrious cousins. In fact, so amicably were

matters settled that pretended negotiations were again set on foot

for the marriage of the Prince of Wales with Wilhelmina. The Prince

professed himself most eager for the match, and wrote to Hotham,

the special envoy at Berlin: “Please, dear Hotham, get my marriage

settled, my impatience increases daily, for I am quite foolishly in

love”. Wilhelmina, however, says that she did not credit these romantic

sentiments, and she thought they were due rather to obstinacy than

love. Her father was quite indifferent as to whether the Prince of

Wales’s desire to wed his daughter proceeded from love or obstinacy;

all he wished was that Wilhelmina should be taken off his hands, and

given a suitable establishment. King George had the same feeling about

Amelia, whom he still desired to marry to the Crown Prince. The King

of Prussia’s answer to this was: “I will agree to my son’s marriage

if he is made Regent of Hanover, and allowed to direct the management

of the electorate till my death, and if provision is made for his

maintenance”. These terms were, of course, impossible, and the matter

came to an end.

The King quitted Hanover with regret, and commanded that everything

should remain at Herrenhausen precisely the same as when he was there.

The pomp and circumstance of the electoral court suffered no abatement

in his absence; the splendid stables containing eight hundred horses

were maintained at their full strength, and the chamberlains, court

marshals, and others continued to receive their full salaries. The King

appointed no regent over the electorate in his absence; his uncle, the

Duke of York was dead, and his son, the Prince of Wales, was now in

England, so he placed the government of the electorate in the hands of

a council of regency, and as a substitute for his own most gracious

presence at the levées the King’s portrait as Elector was placed upon

the vacant throne in the state room at Herrenhausen. Every Saturday

a levée was held as though the Elector (for they did not officially

recognise the King of England at Hanover) had been there, and the

courtiers assembled and made their bow to the picture on the chair

of state just as though it had been the Elector himself. This absurd

ceremony continued through George the Second’s reign, except when he

was at Hanover.

The King landed at Margate on September 11th, and at once posted to

London, where his Queen and Regent was eagerly expecting him. So

anxious was she that when the outriders came on ahead to Kensington

Palace to announce that the King was nearing London, the Queen set out

on foot, accompanied by all her children, and walked from Kensington,

through Hyde Park, down Piccadilly to St. James’s Park where she met

the King’s coach. The King stopped, alighted, and heartily embraced

his consort in the sight of all the people. Then he helped her back

into the coach, when they drove off to Kensington together amid the

cheers of the populace, followed by other coaches containing the King’s

suite and the princes and princesses. The devotion which the Queen

showed to the King and the evident affection he bore her are the best

features (one might almost say the only good features), of the Court

of England at this period. Peter Wentworth, who writes to his brother

of this royal meeting, says: “The King is happily arrived.... You see

I am got into the prints by the honour the Queen did me, alone of all

her servants, to send me to meet the King. I was the only gentleman

servant with her when she walked, Monday se’nnight, with all her royal

children, from Kensington Gardens quite to the island of St. James’s

Park. Passages there are better told than writ, which I design myself

the honour to do very soon--though I find virtue retires no more to

cottages and cells, but secure of public triumph and applause, she

makes the British Court her imperial residence.”

The next day, at a meeting of the Privy Council, the Queen, kneeling,

delivered her commission of regency back into the King’s hands, and

rendered him an account of her stewardship.

FOOTNOTES TO BOOK III, CHAPTER V:

[39] _Daily Post_, 5th July, 1729.

[40] Lord Townshend to Poyntz, 14th June, 1728.

[41] Letter of Peter Wentworth to Lord Strafford, 31st July, 1729.

[42] Chamberlain to the Queen.

[43] On the 5th September, 1724, King George I., attended by many of

the nobility and gentry, dined with Lord Orkney at Clieveden, where he

was magnificently entertained.

[44] _Suffolk Correspondence._

[45] These letters are preserved in the Manuscript Department of the

British Museum. Some of them have been published in the _Wentworth

Papers_, but many of those quoted here have never been printed.

[46] One of the Bubble schemes.

[47] Claremont was one of the seats of the Duke of Newcastle.

[48] The Right Hon. Henry Pelham, son of Lord Pelham and brother of

Thomas Pelham, Duke of Newcastle, whose title had been revived in his

favour by George the First.

[49] This was probably a practical joke played on Peter Wentworth, as

he never held the office of secretary to the Queen.

[50] The double marriage scheme which had cropped up again for a brief

space.

[51] Thackeray inaccurately says that “in the year 1729 he (King George

II.) went over two whole years, during which time Caroline reigned

for him in England, and he was not in the least missed by his British

subjects”. The King was only away from March to September, 1729, and

then returned to England, where he remained until 1732, when he again

went to Hanover.

[52] _Vide_ Vehse, _Geschichte der Deutschen Höfe_.

Caroline the Illustrious, vol. 2 (of 2) · 第 5 / 16 章