He is quite right as to the old tombstone. When I was a boy, some five

or six and forty years ago, my father, one day as we were passing by

the churchyard, mentioned that stone to me; but as I had then several

cousins living whose claims were prior to mine, the matter made but

little impression upon my mind.

My father was Thomas, the second son of Garrett, who was the son of

Thomas, down to whom the genealogy from the first Earl was traced upon

the stone.

That stone and another, as I learn, were removed and destroyed, or

concealed, many years ago, doubtless through some interested motive;

and, unfortunately, no copies of the inscriptions have, that I can

discover, been preserved by any branch of the family.

When the late Earl became a claimant, it was not known whether

the descendants of Patrick, my father's elder brother, who had all

emigrated, were living or dead; which circumstance, it was considered,

would be an impediment to my claim.

Besides which it was also thought, the testimony on the stone having

been lost, that the traditions in the family would not be sufficient

to establish a claim: under these circumstances I refrained from

coming forward to oppose the claims of the late Earl. But now, as

it is believed that there are none of my cousins living, I am

endeavouring to collect evidence in support of my claim; and proof of

what your correspondent states would be exceedingly useful.

Garrett Dillon, M.D.

8. Queen's Parade, Bath.

_The Word "after" in the Rubric_ (Vol. ii., p. 424.).--In the edition

of the _Latin Common Prayer_, published in 12mo., Londini, 1574, which

must be a very early edition (probably the fourth or fifth), there is

a great verbal difference in the conclusion of the exhortation from

the English original. It stands thus:

"Quapropter omnes vos qui praesentes hic adestis, per Dei nomen

obtestor, ut interni sensus vestri, cum meo conjuncti pariter,

ad caelestis clementiae thronum subvolent, ut in hunc, qui

sequitur, sermonem, succedatur."

Then follows the rubric, "Generalis confessio, ab universa

congregatione dicenda, genibus flexis." It would appear from this,

that the confession was repented at the same time by the minister and

the congregation, and not by the congregation after the minister.

Of the authenticity of this edition there can be no doubt. It bears

the royal arms on the titlepage, and is printed "Cum privilegio Regiae

majestatis. Excudebat Thomas Vautrollerius." I have not seen the

earlier editions. A Greek version was printed with the Latin, in one

volume, one year before; and the Latin was republished in 1584. The

edition of 1574 was printed before the Catechism was completed by the

questions on the sacraments. In the rubrics of the Lord's Prayer, in

the Post Communion, and in the last prayers the Commination Service,

the word _after_ is rendered by _post_.

The difference between the Latin and the English in the exhortation

is very remarkable, for it does not make the priest dictate the

confession, but repeat it with them; whereas the English services of

Edward and Elizabeth, unaltered in any subsequent editions, distinctly

make the priest dictate the confession. There can be no doubt about

the sense of the word _after_, when we find it in the rubrics of the

Post Communion and Commination translated _post_. Some of your readers

may be able to give an account of the Latin versions, and explain by

what influence the alteration {499} was made, and how it came to be

sanctioned, while the English remained unchanged.

E.C.H.

_Disputed Passage in the Tempest_ (Vol. ii., pp. 259. 299. 337.

429.).--Allow me to remind Mr. George Stephens, who takes credit for

adhering to the "primitive" text of a certain disputed passage in

the _Tempest_, that neither he nor any one else does so; that the

"primitive" text, that is, the text of the first folio, is mere

nonsense, and that he simply adopts the first attempt at correction,

instead of the second, or the third, or the fourth.

Enough has been written, perhaps, on the meaning of this passage; and

opinion will always be divided between those who adopt the prosaical,

and those who prefer the more poetical reading: but when Mr. Stephens

says the construction is merely an instance of a "common ellipsis,"

I cannot but think it would be an advantage if he would inform us

whether he uses this term in its common acceptation, and if so, if he

would give the meaning stated at first. If this be a common ellipsis,

I must confess myself to be so stupid as not to understand it.

I dissent, too, altogether from the opinion that the comma is of

any importance in the construction of this passage. Assuming, as one

correspondent says, and as Mr. Stephens (for I don't quite understand

his brief judgment) seems to say, that "_most busie least_" means

_least busy_, the placing a comma between "least" and the conjunction

"when" can in no way affect the sense, though, as a matter of taste, I

should decidedly object to it.

To show that I am not wedded to any particular interpretation, I have

another suggestion to make which has struck me even while writing.

Taking "lest" for _least_, can it have been used for _at least_, or as

some people say, _leastwise_? The sense would still be the same as I

have contended for, expressed something like this: "But these sweet

thoughts do even refresh my labours: at least they are most busy when

I forget myself in my occupation."

Samuel Hickson.

_Lady Compton's Letter_ (Vol. ii., p. 424.).--Mr. C.H. Cooper inquires

whether this letter appeared before 1839? Gifford gives an extract

from it in Massinger's _City Madam_, Act II., where the daughters of

Sir John Frugal make somewhat similar stipulations from their suitors.

When speaking of this letter as "a modest and consolatory one,"

Gifford adds, "it is _yet extant_." The editor of a work entitled

_Relics of Literature_ (1823) gives it at length, with this reference,

"Harleian MSS. 7003." The property of Lady Compton's father, Sir John

Spencer, is stated variously from 300,000l. to 800,000l. In this case,

riches brought with them their customary share of anxieties. Lysons,

in his _Environs of London_, informs us that a plot was actually laid

for carrying off the wealthy merchant from his house at Canonbury, by

a pirate of Dunkirk, in the hope of obtaining a large ransom.

J.H.M.

_Midwives licensed_ (Vol. ii., p. 408.).--I have a manuscript volume

which belonged to Bishop Warburton, and apparently to other Bishops

of Gloucester before him; containing, amongst other Pontificalia, in

writing of various ages, a number of forms of licences, among which

occurs "Licentia Obstetricis," whereby the bishop

"eandem A.B. ad exercendam Artem et Officium Obstetricis in et

per totam Diocesin Gloucestrensem praedietam admisit et Literas

Testimoniales superiade fieri decrevit."

There is no mention of charms or incantations in the licence, but the

oath "de jure in hac parte requisito," is required to have been made.

The form is of the same writing as several others which bear dates

from 1709 to 1719. Below is a memorandum of the fees, amounting to

17s. 6d.

Thomas Kerslake.

Bristol.

_Echo Song_ (Vol. ii., p. 441.).--Although I cannot supply Llyd Rhys

Morgan with the name of the writer, I may refer him to D'Israeli's

_Curiosities of Literature_, p. 257. (Moxon's edit. 1840), where he

will find another Echo Song, by a certain Francis Cole, so similar to

the one he quotes as to induce me to think that they either come from

the same pen, or that the one is an imitation of the other.

Y.

_The Irish Brigade_ (Vol. ii., pp. 407. 452.).--It is understood John

C. O'Callaghan, Esq., author of the _Green Book_, contemplated a

much more copious work on the subject than that by the late Matthew

O'Connor, mentioned by your correspondent (p. 452.). The _Union

Quotidienne_ of 23rd April last announced a work by M. de la Ponce,

_Essai sur l'Irlande Ancienne, et sur les Brigades Irlandaises au

Service de France, depuis leur Organisation en 1691_; but whether

published or not I am not aware. Perhaps some of your correspondents

may know.

Drumlethglas.

_To save one's Bacon_ (Vol. ii., p. 424.).--May I venture to suggest

that this phrase has reference to the custom at Dunmow, in Essex, of

giving a flitch of bacon to any married couple residing in the parish,

who live in harmony for a year and a day. A man and his wife who

stopped short when on the verge of a quarrel might be said to have

"just saved their bacon;" and in course of time the phrase would be

applied to any one who barely escaped any loss or danger.

X.Z.

_"The Times" Newspaper and the Coptic Language_ (Vol. ii., p.

377.).--J.E. quotes a passage from _The Times_ newspaper respecting

the Coptic language, and asks if any correspondent can furnish a

clearer account of its structure than the writer of that article has

given. A reference to the work {500} which he was reviewing (Kenrick's

_Ancient Egypt under the Pharaohs_) will show the origin of the

apparent inconsistency on which J.E. animadverts. In that work it is

said (vol. i. p. 100.):

"The roots of the Coptic language appear to have been

generally monosyllabic, and the derivatives have been formed

by a very simple system of prefixing, inserting, and affixing

certain letters, which have usually undergone but little

change, not having been incorporated with the root, nor melted

down by crasis, nor softened by any euphonic rules."

Again (vol. i. p. 107.), speaking of the supposed connexion between

India and Egypt:

"The Sanscrit is the most polished and copious language ever

spoken by man; the Coptic, the most rude of all which were

used by the civilised nations of antiquity."

The writer in _The Times, currente calamo_, has thrown the contents

of these two sentences together, and somewhat strengthened the

expressions of his author, who does not call the Coptic system of

inflexion rude, nor assert that it is totally different from the

Syro-Arabian system, but quotes the opinion of Benfey, that they

differ so much that neither can have originated from the other, but

both from a parent language. The distinction between a system of

_inflexion_ and one of _affixes_ and _prefixes_ is not permanent. What

we call the inflexions of the Greek verb were once, no doubt, affixes;

but while, in the Greek, they have become incorporated with the root,

in the Coptic they stand rigidly apart from it.

Herampion.

_Luther's Hymns_ (Vol. ii., p. 327.).--A writer in the _Parish Choir_

of September last (p. 140.) has traced the words "In the midst of life

we are in death" to a higher source than the Salisbury Service-book.

It occurs in the choir-book of the monks of St. Gall in Switzerland,

and was probably composed by Notker, surnamed the Stammerer, about the

end of the ninth century, or the beginning of the tenth.

C.H.

St. Catherine's Hall, Cambridge.

_Osnaburg Bishopric_ (Vol. ii., pp. 358. 484.).--The occupiers of this

bishopric were princes ecclesiastical of the empire, and had not

only the ordinary authority of bishops in their dioceses, but were

sovereigns of their provinces and towns in the same manner as were the

princes temporal.

The bishopric of Osnaburg was founded by Charlemagne, and was filled

by various princes until 1625, when Cardinal Francis William, Count of

Wartemburg, was elected by the chapter.

By the Treaty of Osnaburg, 1642, which was ratified at the Peace of

Westphalia, 1648, the House of Brunswick resigned all claims to the

archbishoprics of Magdeburg and Bremen, and to the bishoprics of

Halberstadt and Ratzburg; and received the alternate nomination of

the bishopric of Osnaburg, which was declared to belong jointly to the

Catholic and the Protestant branch of Brunswick.

Under this arrangement, on the death of Count Wartemburg in 1662,

Ernest Augustus I., the sixtieth bishop, patriarch of the present

royal family of England, succeeded to the government of Osnaburg,

which he held for thirty-six years.

Ernest Augustus II, sixty-second bishop, Duke of Brunswick and

Lunenburg, was made Duke of York and Albany, and Bishop of Osnaburg,

in 1716, in the room of Charles Joseph of Lorraine. He died in 1748.

Frederick, second son of George III., was appointed bishop at an early

age; he being called, in a work dedicated to him in 1772, "An infant

bishop."

By the Treaty of Vienna, the bishopric of Osnaburg was made part of

the kingdom of Hanover.

The ancient territory of the Bishop of Osnaburg consisted of Osnaburg,

Iborg, Forstenau, Bostel, Quakenburg, Vorde Gronsburg, Hunteburg on

the lake Dummer, Witlage, Melle, and Holte.

In Halliday's _History of the House of Guelph_, 4to., 1821, at

p. 133., the conditions of the Treaty of Osnaburg relative to the

bishopric are given at length.

Whilst preparing the above I have seen the reply of F.E. at p. 447.,

and would beg to correct the following errors:--

The Treaty of Osnaburg was 1642, not 1624.

Halliday's _House of Guelph_ was published 1821, not 1820.

Reference to the conditions of the treaty at p. 133. is omitted.

F.B. Relton.

_Scandal against Queen Elizabeth_ (Vol. ii., p. 393.).--There is a

current belief in Ireland that the family of Mapother, in Roscommon,

is descended from Queen Elizabeth: and there are many other traditions

completely at variance with the ordinarily received opinion as to

her inviolate chastity. A discussion of the matter might discover the

foundation on which they rest.

R. Ts.

_Pretended Reprint of Ancient Poetry_ (Vol. ii., p. 463.).--The late

Rev. Peter Hall was the person at whose expense the two copies of the

work mentioned by Dr. Rimbault were reprinted. At the sale of that

gentleman's library, in May last, one of these two reprints was sold

for 20s.

Cato.

_Martin Family_ (Vol. ii., p. 392.).--If your correspondent Clericus

will refer to Morant's _History of Essex_, vol. ii. p. 188., he will

find some account of the family of Martin. There do not appear to

be any families of the name of Cockerell or Hopkins in the same

neighbourhood.

J.A.D.

"_Ge-ho_," _Meaning of_.--I am a little girl, only two years and five

months old, and my kind aunt Noo teaches me to spell. Now I hear the

men, when driving their horses, say "Ge-ho;" {501} and I think they

say so because G, O, spells "Go." Is it so, can anybody say?

I am, your youngest correspondent,

Katie.

[Better etymologists than Katie have made far worse guesses

than our youngest correspondent. But in Brand's _Popular

Antiquities_, by Ellis, vol. i. p. 294. ed. 1841 (the

passage is not in the last edition), is the following curious

illustration of the phrase _Ge-ho_.

"A learned friend, whose communications I have frequently had

occasion to acknowledge in the course of this work, says,

the exclamation '_Geho, Geho_,' which carmen use to their

horses, is probably of great antiquity. It is not peculiar to

this country, as I have heard it used in France. In the story

of the Milkmaid, who kicked down her pail, and with it all her

hopes of getting rich, as related in a very ancient collection

of apologues, entitled _Dialogus Creaturarum_, printed

at Gonda in 1480, is the following passage: 'Et cum sic

gloriaretur, et cogitaret cum quanta gloria duceretur ad illum

virum super equum dicendo _gio gio_, cepit percutere terram

quasi pungeret equum calcaribus.'"

Brand's learned correspondent was, doubtless, the late Mr.

Douce, from whom the writer of this Note has often heard the

same illustration.]

_Lady Norton_ (Vol. ii., p. 480.).--An account of lady Norton may be

seen in _Memoirs of several ladies of Great Britain, who have been

celebrated for their writings or skill in the learned languages arts

and sciences_. By George Ballard. Oxford, 1752. 4º. She is said to

have written two books, viz.: _The applause of virtue. In four parts._

etc. London, 1705. 4º. pp. 262; and _Memento mori: or meditations on

death_. London 1705. 4º. pp. 108. She was living in advanced years,

about 1720.

The same biographical repertory contains an account of her daughter,

lady Gethin--of whom some particulars were given by myself in a small

volume of essays printed for private circulation, under the title of

_Curiosities of literature illustrated_, in 1837. On that occasion

I ventured to express my belief that lady Gethin did not compose one

sentence of the _remains_ ascribed to her; but I hope the claims of

lady Norton to _patristic learning_ may more successfully bear the

test of critical examination.

Bolton Corney.

* * * * *

Miscellaneous.

NOTES ON BOOKS, SALES, CATALOGUES, ETC.

Honour to the University of Oxford, Honour to the Rev. Josiah

Forshall, and though last not least, Honour to the learned Keeper

of the Manuscripts in the British Museum, Sir Frederick Madden, for

giving us _The Holy Bible containing the Old and New Testaments with

the Apocryphal Books, in the earliest English versions made from the

Latin Vulgate, by John Wycliffe and his followers_. Never did the

University Press put forth a more valuable or more important work

than these four handsome quartos, (published, too, at the marvellously

small price of five guineas), in which are now printed, for the first

time, in an entire form, those Versions which may be regarded as

the earliest in the English language which embrace any considerable

proportion of the Holy Scriptures. By this publication, Oxford has

done her part towards wiping away the disgrace which has so long

attached to this country--which boasts, and justly and proudly boasts,

of being _the_ country of Bibles--for its long-continued neglect of

these early versions of the vernacular Scriptures. How great was

the influence which they exercised upon the religious opinions and

sentiments of the nation at large in the interval between the years

1382 and 1526, how great an amount of scriptural truth they diffused,

how effectually they supplied the opponents of the Papal system with

the means of exposing its abuses and errors, and how they thereby

laid a deep foundation for the reform of the sixteenth century, may be

clearly seen by a perusal of the Preface to this great work; on which

the learned editors have employed their learning and industry for two

and twenty years, to their own high credit, and to the vindication

of English scholarship. But our limited space will not admit of

our detailing all the claims which this _editio princeps_ of the

_Wycliffite Scriptures_ has upon the attention of our readers, or of

pointing out all the great services which its editors have rendered

to the literary, no less than to the religious world. When we state

briefly that in the work before us we have the _two_ versions, the

_earlier_ and _later_ versions, printed side by side; that these

are accompanied by various readings gathered from the collection of

upwards of one hundred different manuscripts; introduced by a preface

full of new and most interesting particulars of this first attempt to

give to this country the Scriptures in a tongue "understanded of the

people;" and the whole rendered complete by an extensive and most

valuable glossary, we feel persuaded our readers will agree with us in

giving honour to all who have had hand or heart in the production of

these deeply interesting volumes.

We have received the following Catalogues:--C.J. Stewart's (11.

King William Street, Strand) Catalogue of Doctrinal, Controversial,

Practical, and Devotional Divinity; a well-timed catalogue containing

some extraordinary Collections, as of Roman and Spanish Indexes of

Books prohibited and expurgated, and of Official and Documentary

Works on the Inquisition; B.R. Wheatley's (44. Bedford Street, Strand)

Catalogue of Scarce and Interesting Books for 1851; Joel Rowsell's

(28. Great Queen Street) Catalogue No. XL. of a Select Collection of

Second-hand Books; John Miller's (43. Chandos Street) Catalogue No.

15. for 1850 of Books Old and New.

* * * * *

BOOKS AND ODD VOLUMES

WANTED TO PURCHASE.

George Herbert, Jacula Prudentum; or, Outlandish Proverbs, etc. 12mo.

London. 1651.

N.R. Gent, Proverbs, English, French, Dutch, Italian, and Spanish.

12mo. London. 1659.

*** Letters, stating particulars and lowest price, _carriage free_,

to be sent to Mr. Bell, Publisher of "NOTES AND QUERIES," 186. Fleet

Street.

* * * * *{502}

Notices to Correspondents.

Our Christmas Number. _This week our able contemporary_, Household

Words, _treats his readers to a Christmas Number. It is one of the

many good things in which our popular friend has anticipated us.

Thanks, however, to the Peace Congress, we are content to be thus

anticipated without giving utterance to the time-honoured_ "Pereant

qui ante nos nostra dixerunt." _Still, as we earnestly desire to

close the year in peace with all the world, or, which is much the same

thing, with all the readers of_ Notes and Queries, _we propose, on

Saturday next, treating them to a_ Christmas Number, _rich in articles

on_ Folk Lore, Popular Literature, &c., _and to use as ballast for our

barque, which will at such occasion be of unwonted lightness, a number

of Replies which we have by us imploring for admittance into our

columns._

The Index to Volume the Second _will be ready early in January._

_All Catalogues, Bills, or Prospectuses intended for insertion in our

next Monthly Part, must be sent to the Office, 186. Fleet Street, by

Friday the 27th instant._

* * * * *

Seventeenth Thousand. Fcp., price 7s.

PROVERBIAL PHILOSOPHY. A Book of Thoughts and Arguments, originally

treated. By Martin Farquhar Tupper, Esq., D.C.L.F.R S., of Christ

Church, Oxford. With a Portrait.

London: Thomas Hatchard, 187. Piccadilly.

* * * * *

The concluding Volume of the Archbishop of Canterbury's Exposition of

the New Testament.

Just published, 8vo., or 2 vols. 12mo., price 9s.

A PRACTICAL EXPOSITION OF ST. PAUL'S EPISTLES to the THESSALONIANS, to

TIMOTHY, TITUS, PHILEMON, and to the HEBREWS, in the form of Lectures,

intended to assist the practice of Domestic Instruction and Devotion.

By John Bird Sumner, D.D., Archbishop of Canterbury.

London: Thomas Hatchard, 187. Piccadilly.

* * * * *

Now Ready, cloth, 1s.

THE GREEK CHURCH. A Sketch by the Author of "Proposals for Christian

Union."

"Like its predecessors, the volume is amiable and

interesting."--_Notes and Queries._

"Anything written by the Author of 'Proposals for Christian Union' is

sure to be distinguished by an excellent spirit. The 'Greek Church,'

a Sketch, is well put together; and, though slight, will be found to

contain as much real information as many a book of greater size and

more pretension."--_The Guardian_.

This Essay concludes the Series. The four preceding numbers on sale,

Second Edition, 1s. each.

London: James Darling, Great Queen Street, Lincoln's-Inn-Fields.

Edinburgh: 12. South St. Andrew's Street.

* * * * *

Price 1d., by Post 2d., or 5s. per Hundred for Distribution.

WESTMINSTER AND DR. WISEMAN; or, FACTS _v._ FICTION. By William

Page Wood, Esq., M.P., Q.C. Reprinted from _The Times_ with an

Advertisement on the subject of the Westminster Spiritual Aid Fund,

and more especially on the Duty and Justice of applying the Revenues

of the suspended Stalls of the Abbey for the adequate Endowment of the

District Churches in the immediate neighbourhood.

Second Edition, with an Appendix.

London: George Bell, 186. Fleet Street; Messrs. Rivington's, St.

Paul's Church-yard, and Waterloo Place; and Thomas Hatchard, 187.

Piccadilly and _by Order_, of all Booksellers.

* * * * *

MR. MURRAY'S

LIST OF BOOKS JUST READY.

* * * * *

I.

LAVENGRO. By George Borrow, Author of "The Bible in Spain." Portrait.

3 vols. Post 8vo.

II.

THE LEXINGTON PAPERS; or the Official and Private Correspondence of

Robert Sutton, while Minister at Vienna, 1694-98. 8vo. 14s.

III.

THE MILITARY EVENTS IN ITALY, 1848-9. From the German. By Lord

Ellesmere. Map. Post 8vo. 9s.

IV.

A MEMOIR OF BISHOP STANLEY, with his Addresses and Charges. By Rev.

A.P. Stanley, Author of "Life of Dr. Arnold." 8vo.

V.

A VOYAGE TO THE MAURITIUS AND BACK. By the Author of "Paddiana." Post

8vo.

VI.

THE LAW OF NAVAL COURTS MARTIAL, for the guidance of Naval Officers.

By William Hickman, R.N. 8vo.

VII.

ENGLAND AS IT IS: Political, Social, and Industrial. By William

Johnston. 2 vols. Post 8vo. Next Week.

VIII.

Notes and Queries, Number 60, December 21, 1850 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 2 / 3 段