CHAPTER XII

LIVE STOCK

General Mitre, in his _History of Belgrano_, has said of the River Plate

Territories:—

The natural pastures invited the inhabitants to the pastoral

industry. The vast littoral placed the country in contact

with the rest of the world by means of fluvial and maritime

navigation. Its salubrious and temperate climate rendered

life more pleasant and work more reproductive. It was indeed

a territory prepared for live-stock breeding, constituted for

commercial prosperity, and predestined by acclimatization to

be peopled by all the races of the earth. Thus we see that the

profitable occupation of its soil commences to be realized by

means of live stock brought overland from Peru and from Brazil;

that the commercial currents of the interior converge little by

little towards the River Plate; that abundance and well-being

are spread by this means; and that the first external act of

the colonists after the foundation of Buenos Aires in 1580 is

the exportation of a shipload of the fruits of their own work

(hides and sugar), which awakens immigration and the commerce

of importation.

This reference to the “commerce of importation” is an indication of the

limitations under which the colonists laboured under Spanish rule. They

might import from Spain as much as they could, but a very jealous guard

was put on their exports lest these might compete with the industries of

the Mother Country.

Seventy-two horses and mares were landed by Pedro de Mendoza when he

founded the first settlement of Santa Maria de los Buenos Aires in 1535.

Many of his followers were killed by the native Indians, but when Juan

de Garay coming down through Paraguay laid the real foundations of

the present capital of the Argentine Republic, he and those with him

were surprised to find wild horses grazing on the Pampa. These were the

descendants of those brought by Mendoza and the ancestors of the present

equine stock of the River Plate countries, a stock which has, however,

in common with all the live stock of these countries, been improved out

of all recognition in the course of the last half-century by imported

European strains. Still the wild descendants of Mendoza’s animals,

acclimatized through countless generations and become hardy in their free

life, were no bad raw material to improve upon.

The first appearance of cattle on the River Plate Pampa is, as has

already been mentioned, credited to seven cows and a bull said to

have been brought from Brazil, through Paraguay, by two Portuguese,

the brothers Cipriano and Vicente Goes, early in the last half of the

sixteenth century, but other cattle were introduced in far larger

quantities about the same time or a little later under the conditions of

the appointment of Juan de Galazary Espinoza as Treasurer of the River

Plate. To Nunflo de Chaves is credited the honour of the introduction of

the first goats and sheep in 1550.

Evidently large numbers of horses, cattle and sheep afterwards strayed in

a semi-wild condition down south from Peru and Brazil, attracted by the

wealth of pasturage.

The early history of the export trade of the River Plate colonists in

hides, tallow, wool and jerked beef, is one of smuggling and bribery of

officials. Nevertheless, even under such difficult circumstances and

costly methods many settlers contrived, by also trading in European

merchandise, to amass great wealth, the fortunes of many of them, says

Mr. Gibson, amounting to over £60,000 sterling.

Meanwhile the increase of cattle was astounding if one did not consider

the difficulties in the way of its utilization. In the middle of the

seventeenth century anyone could take all he wanted from the wild herds

up to 10,000 or 12,000 head, or more by obtaining licence to do so from

the Governor.

The rights of free export of animal produce from Buenos Aires to Spain

and open trade with the interior were first granted to the River Plate

Colonies in 1778, under the Vice-Regal rule. But it was the Independence

of the Colonies in 1810 which freed them from all commercial trammels

and was the real commencement of their present agricultural and pastoral

prosperity. Since then no events (except, of course, the advent of the

railway in 1857) in the annals of the export commerce of the River Plate

have been of greater importance than the founding of the Argentine Rural

Society in 1866, and the discovery by Tellier of the preservation of meat

at freezing point submitted to the Paris Academy of Science in 1872, and

of Ferdinand Carré’s improvements for the transport of _chilled_ meat.

The first freezing establishment in the River Plate was that erected by

Señor Eugenio Terrasson at San Nicolás, in the Province of Buenos Aires,

in 1883, and in the following year the legislature exempted frozen and

chilled meat from the payment of export duty.

Over 99% of the whole exports of frozen and chilled meat from Argentina

comes direct to the United Kingdom,[42] and we get quite one-half of the

whole of our overseas meat and grain supplies from the two River Plate

Republics.

The past half-century has seen amazing changes on the vast pasture

lands of Argentina and Uruguay. The first of these was the invasion of

what had formerly been the exclusive domains of cattle and sheep by

agriculture. Little by little, wheat, especially, ousted the flocks and

herds from an ever-increasing radius from the port of Buenos Aires.

Land values increased as agriculture flourished till the time came when

stock-breeders found themselves outbidden by wheat-growers or, rather,

landowners found it more profitable to grow wheat or maize on lands which

were economically accessible to transport. As the railways grew so did

this almost exclusively cereal area.

This tendency continued until what may almost be termed the “discovery”

in the River Plate Territories of the qualities of Alfalfa (Lucerne).

The double value of this crop as fodder and for improving the land by

collecting and depositing atmospheric nitrogen, caused it to be planted

by every intelligent estanciero, and brought back much of the cattle

to properties which had seemed for ever given over to wheat-growing.

Other contemporary reasons for the reappearance of cattle on the home

lands were the increased demand for good slaughter animals initiated

by the newly established cold-storage and export business and dawning

appreciation of the fact that one cannot for ever go on growing

immediately successive crops of wheat on the same land.

Thus were laid some foundations of scientific farming on more civilized

lines, in which stock-raising and agriculture combine for the profit of

the farmer. The cattle industry and horse-breeding also, gained fresh

impetus from the abundance of alfalfa now grown everywhere on a large

scale and on brackish land formerly considered valueless.

Sheep only, with their nomadic nature which demands large areas on which

to roam, their close-cropping manner of grazing and their faculty for

quickly ruining alfalfa fields on which they may be allowed to graze,

are still only found in comparatively small numbers on the high-priced

lands of the East-Central parts of Argentina and the South of Uruguay,

being chiefly relegated to outlying districts in which land is still of

comparatively small value and particularly, in Argentina, to those parts

of Patagonia the inclement climate of which suits them as it does little

else.

Nevertheless, the finest breeds of sheep are chiefly to be found on the

“model” estancias, where as good live stock as any in the world is bred

and intensive farming has begun to be appreciated for its own sake and

on account of the normally ever-increasing value of land in all the most

fertile and accessible rural districts of the River Plate Republics.

Durhams and Lincolns are the favourite breeds of cattle and sheep, though

many fine strains of Herefords, Polled Angus, Merinos, Romney Marsh and

Shropshires abound. No price is too high for the Argentine estanciero

to pay for imported animals for the still greater perfection of his

stock, and the great Show held under the auspices of the Rural Society

at Palermo, a park-like suburb of the city of Buenos Aires, comes as a

revelation to each expert breeder who travels, as many do every year,

from Europe to the River Plate to see it. Money and care can do no better

anywhere in the production of animals of the very highest quality. It may

be noted that the prizes (always awarded by impartial foreign, usually

British, judges) are more frequently gained by native Argentine breeders.

River Plate live stock suffers very little indeed from any of the

diseases which are the breeder’s dread in most other countries; with the

exception of sheep and pigs, the former being greatly subject to “fluke”

and the latter to fever. Horse-breeding is carried on very successfully.

The carriage horses exported by Señor Martinez de Hoz and others are

now well known in Europe and the race-courses of Argentina and Uruguay

are the constant scenes of the display of very fine horse-flesh indeed.

That Argentine-bred race-horses are more successful in South America

than freshly imported ones is no doubt due to climatic causes. Argentine

race-horses are here specified because horse-breeding has been brought to

a higher pitch of perfection in Argentina than has yet been attained in

Uruguay.

Poultry and pig farming may yet be said to be in their infancy in both

Republics, simply because both countries are still quite fully occupied

with the two great established industries of producing grain and meat for

export.

Given adequate population (how often must one ring the changes on this

phrase!) very many rich sources of prosperity would quickly be disclosed

to now almost unsuspecting European eyes. Poultry and pigs are two of

the richest, and the most obvious for mention, in this chapter, of such

almost latent sources.

The cold-storage establishment at Zárate, in the Province of Buenos

Aires, some years ago erected a scientifically equipped plant for the

curing of hams and bacon. But the difficulty is yet to obtain sufficient

pigs of first quality to make the curing industry a success. Throughout

the temperate zone of South America the climatic conditions are quite

favourable to pig-raising; and food in the shape of maize and alfalfa

is abundant at relatively small cost. When pigs and poultry receive the

care which is now acknowledged to be necessary to, and given for, the

best results from cattle, horses and sheep, River Plate poultry and pig

produce will loom large on the markets of the world, besides supplying a

daily increasing local demand.

What has been called the Alfalfa region because of the astounding yield

of that forage given by its brackish, saltpetre-impregnated waters and

sandy soil, lies to the West of the Province of Buenos Aires. Almost

the whole of the two Republics are now, however, largely planted with

alfalfa, the spread of which has grown rapidly since the several valuable

qualities of that crop have come to be understood.

In many districts wheat has been sown on wheat year after year ever since

the booming times of South American cereal export began. So that in many

parts of such districts the soil can do no more, and in consequence the

wheat yield has become unsatisfactory.

When these districts cease entirely to be able to yield any wheat at all,

someone will lay down alfalfa as an alternate crop and will find the

cost of having done so, and of reploughing, say, three years afterwards,

insignificant compared with the value of the quantity and quality of

wheat the same land will yield after that process of alternation; not to

mention the value of the three years’ three or quite likely four, annual

crops of alfalfa taken off it during that period.

This form of intensive farming will probably be the first to become

obligatory, for economic reasons, on the generality of owners of land

situated in the chief cereal areas.

Till to-day, landowners in these large favoured tracts have grown

wealthy with little trouble and no thought as far as purely agricultural

enterprise, as apart from stock-breeding, is concerned.

All this is, however, a digression from our present consideration of

stock-raising, except as regards the increasingly intimate connection

between stock-raising and agriculture in the most thickly populated

districts; for the Argentine Rural Statistics (more availably complete

than those of Uruguay) show that the much greater proportion of cattle is

in the Provinces of Buenos Aires, Santa Fé, Córdoba and Entre Rios which

are four of the chief cereal areas. And though there are more cattle

in the province of Corrientes than in either of the three last-named

Provinces, the vast herds of one of the largest meat-extract companies

account for much of this. So that it may be taken that the Provinces of

Buenos Aires (represented by a long way by the highest figures), Santa

Fé, Córdoba and Entre Rios, with the Territory of the Pampa Central in

respect of cereals, are the regions which, together, are the richest in

Live Stock and cereals in Argentina.[43]

The following interesting table of the difference in numbers of cattle,

sheep, and horses in 1895 and 1908 is taken from the Argentine National

Census taken in the latter year, the latest census of the kind taken

throughout the Republic.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 1895 AND 1908

More (+), less (-) in 1908

------------------------------+---------------------------------------

| SPECIES

PROVINCES AND TERRITORIES +------------+-------------+------------

| CATTLE | SHEEP | HORSES

------------------------------+------------+-------------+------------

Federal Capital and the | | |

Island of M. García |- 11,538 |- 7,072 |+ 7,367

Buenos Aires |+ 2,605,339 |- 18,025,479 |+ 844,568

Santa Fé |+ 1,098,439 |- 1,019,371 |+ 509,609

Corrientes |+ 1,382,639 |+ 1,733,462 |+ 187,039

Córdoba |+ 754,554 |- 602,552 |+ 579,080

San Luis |- 98,925 |+ 314,439 |+ 67,290

Tucumán |- 23,058 |+ 25,134 |+ 57,151

Entre Rios |+ 360,829 |+ 795,284 |+ 132,510

Salta |+ 9,398 |+ 63,670 |+ 26,115

Catamarca |- 7,357 |+ 28,899 |+ 19,050

Jujuy |- 16,337 |- 62,830 |+ 8,673

Mendoza |+ 61,252 |+ 120,186 |+ 51,268

La Rioja |+ 170,603 |+ 60,025 |+ 22,986

Santiago del Estero |+ 37,350 |+ 316,978 |+ 96,668

San Juan |+ 12,629 |+ 37,237 |+ 3,458

Central Pampa |+ 65,517 |- 486,100 |+ 52,534

Rio Negro |+ 197,409 |+ 3,715,067 |+ 142,875

Neuquen |+ 20,022 |+ 315,528 |+ 47,680

Chubut |+ 305,051 |+ 2,076,322 |+ 152,925

Santa Cruz |+ 14,778 |+ 2,018,302 |+ 28,524

Fireland |+ 11,055 |+ 1,335,186 |+ 9,910

Chaco |+ 181,327 |+ 2,318 |+ 13,163

Misiones |+ 24,102 |+ 3,382 |+ 10,895

Formosa |+ 192,300 |+ 20,044 |+ 13,058

The Andes |+ 905 |+ 54,133 |+ 121

------------------------------+------------+-------------+------------

Republic at large |+ 7,415,099 |- 7,167,808 |+ 3,084,517

------------------------------+------------+-------------+------------

The result of the comparison is to show that in the provinces and

territories of the Republic, the number of cattle has increased by

7,415,099 head, and that of horses by 3,084,517 head, whereas sheep have

fallen off by 7,167,808.

The following are the figures for Cattle and Sheep respectively as

calculated by Señor Emilio Lahitte, Director of the Division of

Rural Economy and Statistics in the Argentine National Ministry of

Agriculture, existing in each Province and Territory of that Republic on

the 31st December, 1911.

-----------------------------------------+------------+------------

| CATTLE | SHEEP

-----------------------------------------+------------+------------

Federal Capital | 14,338 | 1,222

Province of Buenos Aires | 7,045,523 | 28,934,475

” Santa Fé | 4,055,624 | 1,612,799

” Córdoba | 2,251,744 | 2,753,773

” Entre Rios | 2,260,078 | 6,721,976

” Corrientes | 5,030,396 | 5,937,432

” San Luis | 861,831 | 1,565,326

” Santiago del Estero | 1,121,374 | 1,344,024

” Mendoza | 395,327 | 745,701

” San Juan | 174,835 | 191,752

” La Rioja | 600,582 | 234,587

” Catamarca | 382,108 | 230,201

” Tucumán | 653,458 | 234,591

” Salta | 892,248 | 630,681

” Jujuy | 172,387 | 1,128,321

National Territory of Pampa Central | 399,460 | 5,751,856

” ” Misiones | 154,328 | 24,761

” ” Formosa | 359,139 | 46,397

” ” Chaco | 562,412 | 25,052

” ” Los Andes | 2,057 | 108,523

” ” Rio Negro | 379,312 | 8,476,993

” ” Neuquen | 295,770 | 1,099,161

” ” Chubut | 651,511 | 5,091,132

” ” Santa Cruz | 55,442 | 4,946,677

” ” Tierra del Fuego | 14,726 | 2,564,073

” ” Isla Martín García | 218 | —

-----------------------------------------+------------+------------

Totals | 28,786,168 | 80,401,486

-----------------------------------------+------------+------------

The 1908 Census showed that more than one-fourth of the whole cattle of

the Republic were Durhams, rather less than one-sixth Herefords and the

remainder made up of very much smaller quantities of Polled Angus, Dutch,

Red Polled, Jerseys, Flemish and Swiss, their numerical importance being

according to the order in which they are here stated, from a total of

125,829 Polled Angus to 3401 Swiss.

As has been said, Lincolns are still in most favour among sheep, followed

by Romney Marsh and other long-wool breeds, Shropshire, Hampshire and

Oxford Downs, Southdowns and Rambouillets and Merinos.

The reason for the great preference shown for Durhams is their reputation

for combined meat-carrying and milking qualities, in which latter

Herefords are relatively deficient. The dairy industries are already

developing on an important scale.

There are practically no parts of the River Plate Territories except

their forests, mountains and certain as yet unirrigated tracts, such as

the Valley of the Rio Negro, which are not naturally adapted to cattle

or sheep raising, or both, and at present Live Stock is to be found

in almost exclusive occupation of close on 96,000,000 hectares out of

the calculated total of 300 million hectares of cultivable land in the

Argentine Republic. These figures are taken from the 1908 Argentine

Census, above referred to.

The parallel figures for Uruguay are not available in such exact form

of statement, but it may be taken that there are very few parts of that

country in which cattle or sheep or both are not found.

Diseases of live stock are, as has been said, very conspicuous by their

relative total absence in both Republics, and farmers in both Argentina

and Uruguay are very sore about the sustained attitude of the British

Government which refuses to permit the entrance of River Plate live

stock on the hoof into British ports. The farmers are convinced that

this refusal is due to the influence of British breeders who, while

thus preventing what would otherwise be a serious menace to their own

industry, yet benefit by the South American acceptance of very high

priced animals imported from Great Britain for stud purposes. The weak

point of this argument is, of course, that such importation of prize

animals is in no way authoritatively enforced on the Argentine or

Uruguayan, his obligation to purchase such animals arising only from his

necessity to do so in his own best interests. The danger on his side

arises from the possibility of latent tuberculosis and other disease, but

this he now guards very effectually against, often at much pecuniary

loss to himself, by severe tests carried out by competent veterinary

surgeons on all imported animals and the unhesitating sacrifice of any

found to be infected.

The present writer is inclined to venture the opinion that the British

Government might rely with safety on the certificates of Argentine and

Uruguayan Government experts of the immunity of all cattle and sheep

leaving either Republic on the hoof. It does, in effect, accept such

certificates in regard to the condition of frozen or chilled carcases;

and, morality apart, it may safely be taken that every Argentine and

Uruguayan interested is much too fully aware of the importance to himself

individually of the countries’ export trade to risk the slightest laxity

in connection with the sure ascertainment of perfect immunity from

disease or contagion of all animals shipped from his Ports.

As this matter now stands, the British authorities refuse to permit the

importation of live cattle or sheep until such time as the Argentine

or Uruguayan Governments can give assurance of the _total absence_ of

disease in _every_ part of their Republics.

It can easily be understood that this practically postpones such

permission to the Millennium, since it is most highly improbable that

the whole of such vast areas of pasturage and the millions of head of

live stock in Argentina and Uruguay should ever be without one beast

affected in more or less degree by any contagious disease. One day,

probably (before the Millennium), other counsels will prevail with the

British Government and the whole people of Great Britain, as well as

Argentine and Uruguayan estancieros benefit by the removal of the present

comprehensive prohibition.

For his stock, the Argentine and Uruguayan farmer does not fear disease,

that he and his Governments can and do very efficiently guard against,

but he does fear drought which he yet has only inadequate means to combat.

The streams of the huge Pampean flat are few and far between, and are

apt to dry up in exceptionally dry seasons. Almost everywhere now the

sky-line is dotted with corrugated-iron windmills which draw water

from surface or artesian wells. But vast and costly irrigation (and

drainage) works are needed before the whole available pasturage of the

two Republics can defy the recurrence of times of drought which sometimes

much more than decimate the live stock of enormous districts. Uruguay is,

however, infinitely better provided with running rivers and streams than

Argentina.

It was a long time before the native Argentine small farmer could be got

to see the real economy of outlay on artesian wells and still in the more

illiterate outlying Provinces are to be found men as yet unconvinced in

that regard.

One of the agricultural instructors which the Argentine Government keeps

travelling all over the country to give advice and instruction to farmers

told the present writer not so very long ago that he had tried very hard

but without success to persuade a man in a remote corner of Argentina,

whose stock was daily dying of drought, to sink at least one artesian

well on his property, and even offered to erect a windmill for him free

of all cost except that of the actual mill.

At last, one evening, the farmer consented to this proposal, but the

following morning brought a cloudy sky. Pointing dramatically to this

he said, “Why should I sink wells? See! Rain is coming.” After that,

my friend, the expert, gave the matter up in disgust. It was of no use

telling the farmer that drought might come again. Sufficient for the day

had been the evil thereof; and, as for future troubles, why meet them

half-way?

Uruguay is relatively very rich in sheep, which thrive well on her

undulating lands, and exports wool to the annual value of well over

£4,000,000.

The value of Argentine annual wool exports now totals over £9,000,000.

The real commencement of the pastoral as well as the agricultural

industries of the River Plate in systematized form was the introduction

of fences by a landowner named Olivera, in 1838. As may be conjectured,

the erection of boundaries where none had ever been before, on properties

the titles to and limits of which were of the vaguest description, mostly

partook of the nature of an arbitrary proceeding. So evidently thought

Manuel Rozas, the tyrant; who summarily prevented Olivera from continuing

the fencing the latter had begun on his estancia “Los Remedios,” although

Olivera’s new boundaries were but ditches crowned with quick-set hedges

of “Añapinday” (_Acacias affinis_).

After the death of Rozas, however, in 1844, an English estanciero,

Richard Newton, first employed iron wire for some of the enclosures of

his property; and, later, another landowner, named Halbach, completely

enclosed the whole of his estancia.

The founder of the Argentine Rural Society, Dr. Eduardo Olivera, says in

one of his agricultural essays:—

To these three men (Olivera, Newton and Halbach) the Republic

owes the transformation of its pastoral and agricultural

industries.

It was only after the enclosing of lands that refining of stock became

possible. Previously, a stock-owner was always subject to invasion by

stray animals (often in large numbers) belonging to his neighbours.

Thus, as we have seen, the first step, the introduction of wire fencing,

towards the present development of the Live Stock industry of the River

Plate was initiated by an Englishman, and it was another Englishman, Mr.

John Miller, who, in 1848, imported from England, for a Mr. White, the

owner of the estancia “La Campana,” _Tarquin_, the first shorthorn bull

ever seen on the River Plate.

Therefore the River Plate Territories really owe their pastoral

development as well as their railways to the Anglo-Saxon race.

Some ten years later it became the fashion to import stallions of the

carriage and riding kinds; it not being foreseen that the heavier breeds

would also prove useful.

Then came the turn of sheep-breeding; first from imported Merinos. Later,

Rambouillets were introduced and a little later again the Lincoln began

to assert its right to the predominance it has since attained.

In 1866 the Argentine Rural Society was founded by a few leading

estancieros. Still a private society, its admirable and constantly

progressive efforts, usually crowned with success, have given it a status

which is practically official.

The Society has a Registration Office which keeps authoritative Herd and

Flock Books in which are entered the pedigrees of all the pure-breed

cattle, sheep and horses in the country whose owners have applied for

such registration; except thoroughbred horses and merino sheep, the

breeders of which last have not yet arrived at the definition of the

purity of that class of sheep. The walls of this Office are lined with

the Herd and Flock Books of the Breeding Societies of Great Britain and

her Colonies, and, as Mr. Herbert Gibson, himself a prominent member of

the Society, tells us, “there is not in the whole world an analogous

office which covers so diverse and numerous a registration.”

The latest (1908) official Argentine live stock Census gives the

following tables of, respectively, the importation of pedigree bulls and

cows and pedigree rams and ewes, from 1880 to 1907.

PEDIGREE BULLS AND COWS

Official

No. of values.

Head. $ gold.

From the United Kingdom 14,624 3,770,031

” France 583 120,724

” Belgium 325 75,235

” the United States 169 41,200

” Germany 153 27,770

” Chile 113 27,034

” Italy 62 9,553

” Holland 50 5,300

” Spain 40 5,700

” Other countries 40 13,870

------ ---------

16,156 4,492,372

------ ---------

PEDIGREE RAMS AND EWES

Official

No. of values.

Head. $ gold.

From the United Kingdom 65,724 3,141,971

” Germany 3,327 207,833

” France 1,184 60,154

” the United States 502 33,250

” British Possessions 223 15,500

” Belgium 209 19,829

” Australia 125 5,100

” Spain 128 8,165

” Italy 56 540

” Holland 10 30

------ ---------

71,488 3,492,372

------ ---------

Total value of cattle and sheep imported for breeding purposes during the

above indicated period $7,588,780 gold—£1,517,756. These animals have

proved worth vastly more than the prices paid for them.

Prior to this, in 1858, the first Rural Show was organized at Palermo.

It was not a success. As Dr. Zeballos has written, “It was held in the

midst of public indifference and passed utterly unnoticed by the press.”

However, it seems to have only been a sort of fair at which all kinds of

other wares jostled some rural produce. In face of this fiasco it is not

surprising that no other Rural Show was held until thirteen years later;

when a really Rural Show was held in the City of Córdoba. This appears to

have had as much success as was to be expected after taking difficulties

of transport into consideration.

The real commencement, however, of the series of great annual shows now

held at Palermo was made by the Rural Society in 1875.

The chief live stock exhibits at these shows consists of—

HORSES. “Criollos” (native breed).

Saddle and race horses.

Light draught.

Heavy draught (now in the majority).

CATTLE. Shorthorn (in a very large majority).

Hereford.

Polled Angus.

Dairy breeds.

SHEEP. Merino.

Lincoln-Merino crossbreds.

Lincoln.

Romney Marsh.

Shropshire Down.

Oxford Down.

Hampshire Down.

Leicester.

The majority of the sheep exhibits are Lincolns and Merinos.

Fine Pigs and Poultry of all kinds are also to be seen at these shows,

but they are chiefly contributed by the wealthier estancieros. As has

been indicated, the day of pig and poultry farming on a large practical

scale has not yet dawned on the River Plate.

Mr. Herbert Gibson shows us, in his valuable Monograph attached to the

Argentine National Agricultural and Live Stock Census of 1908, that the

coming of Cold Storage establishments, as well as the increase of the

export trade for animals on the hoof, was very largely instrumental in

securing the predominance of the Lincoln breed, most frequently crossed

with merino.

Merino for wool and Lincoln for mutton; and the cross which preserves the

best qualities of both is in effect the guiding rule of the River Plate

sheep-breeder of to-day. However, with the coming of alfalfa came also

the various black-faced or Down breeds which mature quickly into fine

meat carcases.

It may be said that barbed wire, iron water-drawing windmills and cold

storage establishments are the chief inanimate supports of the River

Plate Live Stock industries. Another should be trees; the prime necessity

of which to afford shade for animals which know no other roof but the

heavens, from which a very hot sun shines on the Pampa in summer time, is

not yet as generally appreciated as it should be. Still the planting of

trees on pasture lands began some years ago, and only could be wished to

spread more quickly and universally than it has yet done.

One is all too apt in dealing with the River Plate Republics to confine

one’s ideas regarding them to industries of a magnitude commensurate with

the huge extent of their Territories; but with the coming of the real

colonist, when he does come, the mixed farming which, necessarily for his

own comfort, he will bring with him will greatly enhance the importance

of milch breeds of cattle, pigs, poultry and the produce of the kitchen

garden in the rural economy of the River Plate.

ARGENTINE LIVE STOCK

(LAST CENSUS, 30TH MAY, 1908)

-------+------------+----------------------------------

| | OFFICIAL VALUATION.

| Number of |----------------------------------

| Head. | $ currency. | Equivalent in £.

-------+------------+---------------+------------------

Cattle | 29,116,625 | 938,685,834 | 81,981,295

Sheep | 67,211,758 | 287,359,076 | 25,096,863

Horses | 7,531,376 | 205,826,834 | 17,976,143

Mules | 465,037 | 22,561,075 | 1,970,399

Swine | 1,403,591 | 15,672,637 | 1,368,789

Goats | 3,945,086 | 8,321,839 | 726,798

Asses | 285,088 | 2,854,950 | 249,341

+---------------+------------------

| 1,481,282,245 | 129,369,628

+---------------+------------------

EXPORTS OF PRINCIPAL ARGENTINE ANIMAL PRODUCTS, 1885 TO 1913

------+----------+---------+----------+----------+-----------+-----------

| Salted | | | | Salted |

| Horse |Dry Horse|Goatskins.| Kidskins.| Ox and |Dry Ox and

YEARS.| Hides. | Hides. | $ gold. | $ gold. | Cow Hides.|Cow Hides.

| $ gold. | $ gold. | | | $ gold. | $ gold.

------+----------+---------+----------+----------+-----------+-----------

1885 | 682,260| 65,651| 1,081,762| 641,050| 4,488,204| 7,511,919

1886 | 587,271| 86,178| 306,577| 502,040| 3,649,287| 6,267,592

1887 | 523,128| 231,236| 460,140| 699,569| 3,639,095| 8,408,742

1888 | 815,840| 84,745| 585,478| 864,111| 4,584,728| 10,046,281

1889 | 759,588| 77,487| 821,590| 598,677| 5,260,945| 8,448,069

1890 | 519,483| 82,074| 1,023,478| 754,295| 5,171,473| 5,759,745

1891 | 908,912| 146,275| 676,329| 687,851| 3,782,143| 5,049,556

1892 | 380,274| 142,278| 493,647| 593,111| 3,901,454| 6,056,865

1893 | 673,936| 205,186| 392,958| 607,019| 3,073,310| 5,869,157

1894 | 758,393| 287,769| 588,458| 819,045| 3,553,198| 7,045,877

1895 | 1,381,719| 203,652| 648,600| 765,702| 6,332,204| 8,940,950

1896 | 360,109| 141,847| 689,031| 687,928| 4,598,515| 6,600,005

1897 | 515,708| 240,763| 779,750| 652,331| 4,605,572| 8,596,344

1898 | 522,368| 288,734| 1,282,816| 439,546| 5,171,440| 6,887,596

1899 | 459,824| 233,484| 1,211,087| 541,632| 4,334,832| 8,001,132

1900 | 389,625| 274,428| 770,499| 260,119| 5,285,819| 8,159,542

1901 | 390,826| 293,405| 791,745| 304,494| 5,281,756| 8,848,438

1902 | 406,794| 460,906| 823,328| 292,704| 6,384,955| 8,822,302

1903 | 453,237| 424,616| 847,465| 221,996| 5,360,748| 7,787,819

1904 | 507,450| 368,450| 1,078,196| 285,630| 5,367,610| 8,256,351

1905 | 160,799| 444,027| 1,080,305| 264,462| 9,147,153| 9,929,391

1906 | 68,933| 507,738| 1,116,762| 256,976| 8,458,664| 10,570,124

1907 | 51,691| 261,721| 574,204| 237,055| 8,345,410| 8,175,722

1908 | 18,740| 248,077| 934,174| 184,276| 7,232,842| 8,452,819

1909 | 28,026| 657,009| 1,124,524| 335,735| 14,214,746| 14,763,693

1910 | 15,526| 484,893| 1,001,824| 310,694| 16,953,372| 13,758,036

1911 | 33,374| 591,748| 998,631| 285,114| 19,642,362| 14,797,653

1912 | 23,112| 356,305| 1,231,906| 228,604| 24,844,075| 17,285,501

1913 | 20,394| 375,253| 1,162,878| 270,857| 24,543,795| 13,988,905

+----------+---------+----------+----------+-----------+-----------

Totals|12,417,340|8,265,934|24,578,142|13,592,623|228,209,707|263,086,126

+----------+---------+----------+----------+-----------+-----------

= £ | 2,463,757|1,640,066| 4,876,615| 2,696,954| 45,279,703| 52,199,628

------+----------+---------+----------+----------+-----------+-----------

------+-----------+-------------+----------+-----------+----------

| | | Horse | |

YEARS.|Sheepskins.| Wool. | hair. | Tallow. | Butter.

| $ gold. | $ gold. | $ gold. | $ gold. | $ gold.

------+-----------+-------------+----------+-----------+----------

1885 | 6,267,377| 35,950,111| 1,004,649| 3,489,169| —

1886 | 6,350,671| 31,711,604| 775,977| 1,715,158| —

1887 | 6,698,408| 32,749,315| 998,643| 788,777| —

1888 | 5,610,923| 44,858,606| 1,257,970| 2,140,393| —

1889 | 11,386,593| 56,709,774| 1,157,525| 3,297,471| 1,618

1890 | 6,787,108| 35,521,681| 929,686| 1,996,629| 9,608

1891 | 4,833,991| 36,037,518| 936,470| 2,391,388| 660

1892 | 9,618,175| 44,326,060| 790,227| 2,263,729| 3,045

1893 | 4,158,777| 25,006,348| 829,762| 2,549,763| 8,347

1894 | 4,915,384| 28,948,933| 996,468| 2,809,450| 5,850

1895 | 3,711,966| 31,029,522| 1,070,770| 3,807,751| 123,600

1896 | 4,061,055| 33,516,049| 902,441| 3,179,326| 225,771

1897 | 4,094,640| 37,450,244| 980,650| 2,656,048| 249,928

1898 | 6,194,267| 45,584,603| 1,099,465| 2,862,512| 231,626

1899 | 9,308,535| 71,283,619| 1,129,912| 2,205,593| 294,872

1900 | 7,472,988| 27,991,561| 1,136,107| 2,803,327| 263,939

1901 | 7,339,811| 44,666,483| 1,004,677| 3,902,715| 377,545

1902 | 8,487,078| 45,810,749| 1,064,646| 6,209,038| 1,277,969

1903 | 10,132,065| 50,424,168| 1,147,879| 4,755,579| 2,132,056

1904 | 8,676,025| 48,355,002| 1,025,580| 4,012,083| 2,117,761

1905 | 9,483,396| 64,312,927| 1,245,788| 5,321,099| 2,157,294

1906 | 8,513,910| 58,402,771| 1,243,812| 3,482,526| 1,762,130

1907 | 8,458,030| 59,252,948| 1,280,122| 4,806,835| 1,214,173

1908 | 5,626,416| 47,246,183| 1,143,615| 6,030,601| 1,419,867

1909 | 8,483,993| 59,921,151| 1,368,724| 7,573,230| 2,597,089

1910 | 8,623,922| 58,847,699| 1,335,160| 9,536,681| 1,150,610

1911 | 7,724,872| 50,494,027| 1,581,710| 11,768,900| 558,253

1912 | 7,657,157| 58,148,664| 2,111,177| 11,314,728| 1,470,682

1913 | 5,586,253| 45,270,016| 2,681,723| 9,944,642| 1,513,758

+-----------+-------------+----------+-----------+----------

Totals|206,263,786|1,309,828,336|34,221,335|129,617,141|21,068,053

+-----------+-------------+----------+-----------+----------

= £ | 40,925,354| 259,886,575| 6,789,947| 25,717,686| 4,180,169

------+-----------+-------------+----------+-----------+----------

------+-------------

|

YEARS.| Totals.

| $ gold.

------+-------------

1885 | 61,182,152

1886 | 51,952,355

1887 | 55,187,053

1888 | 70,849,074

1889 | 88,519,337

1890 | 58,555,260

1891 | 55,451,093

1892 | 68,568,865

1893 | 43,374,563

1894 | 50,728,825

1895 | 58,016,456

1896 | 54,962,077

1897 | 60,721,978

1898 | 70,564,973

1899 | 100,004,524

1900 | 54,809,954

1901 | 73,201,895

1902 | 80,040,469

1903 | 83,687,628

1904 | 80,050,138

1905 | 103,546,641

1906 | 94,384,346

1907 | 92,657,911

1908 | 78,537,610

1909 | 111,067,920

1910 | 112,018,417

1911 | 108,476,644

1912 | 124,671,911

1913 | 105,358,474

+-------------

Totals|2,251,148,523

+-------------

= £ | £446,656,453

------+-------------

The average annual value of the Live Stock products of Uruguay during

the five years ending 1913 was $39,682,850 (Uruguayan) = £8,443,315.

Similarly with Cereal Exports, Live Stock Exports dropped in 1914, but

have more than recovered during 1915. Evidently, however, no War-time

Export Statistics can be taken as indications of the true productiveness

of the countries concerned.

THE MEAT TRADE

The export of Meat from the River Plate Territories is no new thing; the

first of such exports being authorized by Philip III of Spain in 1602.

The export under this edict was entirely confined to jerked beef; the

salting industry only obtaining important development considerably later.

It was not until 1793 that we find another Royal Edict which granted

freedom from Export and Import duties for the salted meat and tallow of

Buenos Aires.

About three-fourths of the exports under these Edicts usually went to

Havana and the remainder to Spain.

The next development of this industry was begun when in 1841 a certain

Hipolito Doinnel established a salting factory at the foot of the Cerro

at Montevideo; at which he also manufactured soap, candles and sulphuric

acid.

During all this period the export of hides was constantly much greater

than that of meat.

The first mention of the export of horse hair relates to the year 1585,

when from 300 to 400 mares were ordered to be killed so that their tails

might be sent to the Guinea coast to be bartered for slaves.

The first privilege or patent granted in the now already independent

River Plate Territories for meat preservation was granted by the Congress

at Paraná, in 1854, to one Samuel Laffone Quevedo for the exclusive use

of a machine invented by him for the preparation and pressing of salted

beef.

Further experiment in preservation, by either heat, cold or in a vacuum,

led to many local patents being granted for various processes from the

year 1867 onward, to the present day in fact; in respect of alternative

systems or suggested improvements of those generally in use.

The historic beginning, however, of the present River Plate Meat Industry

was made in the year 1877 in the spring of which _La Frigorifique_ and in

the autumn of which _La Paraguay_, specially fitted boats, sailed from

Buenos Aires with cargoes of meat preserved by the freezing and chilling

systems discovered by Mr. Charles Tellier.

Thus, while in the past the River Plate Territories exported only

sun-dried meat for the slaves on the Brazilian and Havana sugar

plantations, now they supply meat to the most highly civilized and

exacting countries of the world.

The free export of frozen meat was sanctioned by the Argentine Congress

in 1884, two years after the first of the existing cold storage

establishments in Argentina had been started by Mr. Alfred Drabble. An

establishment which still continues to carry on business successfully

under the control of “The River Plate Fresh Meat Company.”

Other large companies which exploit this industry are the Sansinena

“La Negra” (est. 1883), the “Las Palmas Produce Co.” (est. 1892), the

“La Plata Cold Storage Co.” (est. 1902), the “La Blanca” Cold Storage

(est. 1902), the Sansinena “Cuatreros” (est. 1903), “The Smithfield and

Argentine Meat Co.” (est. 1905), and the “Frigorifico” (est. 1905).

The Meat Trade recognizes an average difference of weight between

Argentine and Uruguayan beef and between Argentine, Uruguayan and

“Patagonian” mutton. Argentine quarters of beef run about 12 to the ton

and Uruguayan about 14 to the ton. Argentine mutton carcases run about

40, Uruguayan about 45 to the ton, and mutton carcases from Patagonia (in

Argentina) some 2 or 3 lbs. lighter than Uruguayan.

Already in March, 1915, British Trade Reports showed that the meat trade

in Great Britain was particularly dull on account of the extremely

high prices ruling and the impossibility of retailers being able to

get an equivalent in their shops. Since then, through the fact of the

Governments of the belligerent powers being, as they are and are expected

to be, large buyers, the conditions of the British Trade have been

completely, if temporarily, changed by the War.[44]

MEAT TRADE EXPORTS FROM 1885 TO 1913

------+-----------+-----------+---------+----------+----------+----------

| Frozen | | Sundry | | |

| & chilled | Frozen | frozen |Preserved |Extract of| Powder of

| beef | mutton | meats | meats | beef | meat

YEARS | | | | | |

| $ gold | $ gold | $ gold | $ gold | $ gold | $ gold

------+-----------+-----------+---------+----------+----------+----------

1885 | 1,680| 75,323| — | — | — | —

1886 | 12,800| 360,508| 1,876| — | 169,991| —

1887 | — | 963,112| 8,837| — | 75,888| 15,250

1888 | 3,326| 1,459,839| 38,343| 13,809| 128,080| 117,457

1889 | 58,742| 1,322,604| 17,930| 101,714| 105,668| 19,830

1890 | 53,029| 1,633,105| — | 42,661| 375,132| 19,175

1891 | 5,902| 1,862,247| 31,211| 258,926| 389,454| 62,116

1892 | 22,695| 2,034,898| 49,217| 633,601| 520,892| 226,288

1893 | 222,279| 2,003,254| 34,324| 196,080| 198,070| 75,497

1894 | 12,400| 1,864,110| 59,645| 65,250| 134,393| 21,562

1895 | 63,482| 1,675,273| 16,120| 92,325| 208,399| 21,217

1896 | 119,863| 1,804,205| 24,204| 204,315| 683,487| 13,551

1897 | 169,644| 2,035,778| 27,903| 115,127| 257,772| 5,582

1898 | 234,681| 2,393,358| 38,839| 162,294| 605,522| 58,034

1899 | 363,141| 2,265,069| 36,863| 181,600| 765,504| —

1900 | 2,458,957| 4,512,973| 70,797| 140,480| 230,416| —

1901 | 4,490,447| 5,041,023| 91,648| 94,717| 433,590| —

1902 | 7,001,833| 6,405,804| 163,820| 164,404| 592,696| —

1903 | 8,151,956| 6,251,959| 203,973| 374,154| 693,174| —

1904 | 9,774,354| 7,089,287| 272,308| 242,861| 414,188| 4,885

1905 | 15,285,693| 6,268,059| 356,299| 248,826| 870,950| 599,460

1906 | 15,380,897| 5,391,055| 400,275| 125,908| 842,142| 959,203

1907 | 13,822,162| 5,582,781| 450,198| 159,477| 1,791,574| 1,536,828

1908 | 18,081,443| 6,307,688| 740,421| 178,057| 1,379,952| 1,239,918

1909 | 21,065,747| 5,319,612| 649,206| 639,013| 2,702,988| 1,057,675

1910 | 25,370,815| 6,008,133| 721,618| 1,215,370| 3,046,680| 1,267,964

1911 | 31,283,396| 6,873,285| 946,859| 1,541,333| 1,031,154| 904,730

1912 | 34,285,076| 5,613,971|1,017,992| 1,769,882| 1,223,860| 1,349,557

1913 | 36,622,889| 3,674,206| 910,311| 1,257,391| 1,598,136| 1,097,566

+-----------+-----------+---------+----------+----------+----------

Totals|244,419,329|104,092,519|7,381,037|10,219,575|21,469,752|10,673,945

+-----------+-----------+---------+----------+----------+----------

= £| 48,495,900| 20,653,277|1,464,480| 2,027,693| 4,259,871| 2,117,846

------+-----------+-----------+---------+----------+----------+----------

------+---------+----------------------+---------+----------+-----------

|Preserved| LIVE STOCK |Condensed| Jerked | Totals

YEARS | tongues |----------------------| soup | beef |

| | Cattle | Sheep | | |

| $ gold | $ gold | $ gold | $ gold | $ gold | $ gold

------+---------+----------------------+---------+----------+-----------

1885 | — | 2,345,313| 58,552| — | 4,204,077| 6,684,945

1886 | 27,267| 2,203,150| 41,557| — | 3,738,820| 6,555,969

1887 | 20,990| 1,415,625| 42,884| 8,257| 2,398,424| 4,949,267

1888 | 56,668| 1,798 251| 34,685| — | 3,456,787| 7,107,245

1889 | 58,706| 3,194,113| 66,526| 6,889| 6,139,875| 11,092,597

1890 | 185,412| 3,579,456| 159,428| 10,547| 3,913,304| 9,971,249

1891 | 195,753| 3,997,270| 387,545| 7,728| 3,566,854| 10,765,006

1892 | 198,813| 2,264,675| 170,422| 6,455| 4,100,488| 10,589,044

1893 | 171,584| 4,433,944| 362,904| — | 4,115,134| 11,813,070

1894 | 266,144| 4,540,160| 448,678| — | 4,564,447| 11,976,789

1895 | 158,911| 7,003,230| 1,292,527| 12,069| 4,225,419| 14,768,972

1896 | 127,980| 6,543,550| 1,536,056| 61,964| 3,217,541| 14,336,716

1897 | 112,270| 5,018,222| 1,512,684| 22,941| 2,466,313| 11,744,236

1898 | 112,044| 7,690,450| 1,733,963| 32,447| 2,116,468| 15,178,100

1899 | 116,439| 6,824,010| 1,631,041| 29,342| 2,038,413| 14,251,422

1900 | 204,196| 3,678,150| 594,675| 24,005| 1,979,557| 13,894,206

1901 | 205,525| 1,980,372| 78,248| 16,217| 2,879,455| 15,311,242

1902 | 167,854| 2,848,445| 368,656| 11,769| 2,647,450| 20,372,731

1903 | 142,170| 4,437,420| 503,241| 100,599| 1,542,018| 22,400,664

1904 | 189,400| 2,852,820| 85,219| 114,044| 1,391,931| 22,431,297

1905 | 155,615| 5,160,483| 364,209| 122,066| 3,738,444| 33,170,104

1906 | 91,200| 1,676,145| 315,359| 70,614| 596,643| 25,849,441

1907 | 227,119| 2,062,390| 331,701| 107,789| 1,178,056| 27,250,075

1908 | 262,058| 1,876,820| 311,376| 115,822| 772,819| 31,266,374

1909 | 360,444| 4,087,820| 265,908| 188,735| 1,325,053| 37,662,201

1910 | 284,352| 4,056,450| 231,540| 204,293| 1,033,020| 43,440,235

1911 | 214,150| 8,202,750| 332,070| 175,744| 1,661,615| 53,167,086

1912 | 189,523| 9,140,089| 314,694| 197,433| 1,400,748| 56,502,816

1913 | 131,952| 6,848,830| 311,991| 375,392| 658,097| 53,486,761

+---------+----------------------+---------+----------+-----------

Totals|4,634,539|122,120,394|13,888,339|2,023,161|77,067,270|617,989,860

+---------+----------------------+---------+----------+-----------

£| 919,551| 24,230,236| 2,755,622| 401,421|15,291,125|122,617,022

------+---------+----------------------+---------+----------+-----------

During 1914 the meat producers and importers were alarmed by the purchase

of most of the chief River Plate cold storage establishments by United

States companies, who were credited with the intention of forming a

“combine” to monopolize the industry. Certainly at the commencement of

1914 they were paying high prices to estancieros and selling considerably

increased exports at low prices in the British markets. It would appear,

however, as if matters were in the course of adjustment between all the

River Plate Cold Storage companies when the War came and, as has just

been indicated, altered all the conditions of the meat markets.

For all the above causes it is difficult to assign a _value_[45] to

recent River Plate Meat Exports. Exports which it must be remembered

leave no record as having paid _ad valorem_ export duty, since they are

duty-free exports.

As for the future of this trade there can be little doubt but that it

will continue to increase commensurately with the available quantity of

live stock of high quality. The Cold Storage Companies will buy no other

and thus have constantly encouraged and advanced scientific breeding on

the River Plate. It may safely be assumed that this trade is not likely

to lose by the occurrence or effects of the War.

Recently, in view of what seemed a threatened shortage of cattle for

export demands, producers commenced breeding from one-year-old cows;

instead of beginning only at two years of age, as formerly was the South

American custom.

Not only do the Cold Storage Companies export Meat but they also work

up into marketable forms the various by-products of the animals they

slaughter.

[Illustration: ARGENTINE MEAT TRADE 1888-1913

Progress of Exports in the last 26 years

NOTE.—As will be noticed from the subjoined tables, the decrease for 1913

was due to a falling off of the exports of frozen mutton and of cattle on

the hoof.]

[Illustration: FROZEN AND CHILLED BEEF

Progress of Argentine Exports compared with the principal exporting

countries]

Argentina and Uruguay · 第 13 / 15 章