During high freshets, this species of Perch seldom bites at anything;

but you may procure them with a cast-net or a seine, provided you are

well acquainted with the localities. On the contrary, when the waters

are clear and low, every secluded hole, every eddy under the lee of a

rock, every place sheltered by a raft of timber, will afford you

amusement. In some parts of the Southern States, the negroes procure

these fishes late in the autumn in shallow ponds or bayous, by wading

through the water with caution, and placing at every few steps a wicker

apparatus, not unlike a small barrel, open at both ends. The moment the

fishes find themselves confined within the lower part of this, which is

pressed to the bottom of the stream, their skippings announce their

capture, and the fisher secures his booty.

This species, the _Labrus auritus_ of Linnaeus, the _Pomotis vulgaris_ of

Cuvier, seldom exceeds five or six inches in length, but is rather deep

in proportion. The usual size is from four to five inches, with a depth

of from two to two and a half. They are not bony, and at all seasons

afford delicate eating. Having observed a considerable change in their

color in different parts of the United States, and in different streams,

ponds, or lakes, I was led to think that this curious effect might be

produced by the difference of color in the water. Thus the Sunfish

caught in the deep waters of Green River, in Kentucky, exhibit a depth

of olive-brown quite different from the general tint of those caught in

the colorless waters of the Ohio or Schuylkill; those of the

reddish-colored waters of the bayous of the Louisiana swamps look as if

covered with a coppery tarnish; and, lastly, those met with in streams

that glide beneath cedars or other firs, have a pale and sallow

complexion.

The Sun Perch, wherever found, seems to give a decided preference to

sandy, gravelly, or rocky beds of streams, avoiding those of which the

bottom is muddy. At the period of depositing their eggs this preference

is still more apparent. The little creature is then seen swimming

rapidly over shallows, the bed of which is mostly formed of fine gravel,

when after a time it is observed to poise itself and gradually sink to

the bottom, where with its fin it pushes aside the sand to the extent of

eight or ten inches, thus forming a circular cavity. In a few days a

little ridge is thus raised around, and in the cleared area the roe is

deposited. By wading carefully over the extent of the place, a person

may count forty, fifty, or more of these beds, some within a few feet of

each other, and some several yards apart. Instead of abandoning its

spawn, as others of the family are wont to do, this little fish keeps

guard over it with all the care of a sitting bird. You observe it poised

over the bed, watching the objects around. Should the rotten leaf of a

tree, a piece of wood, or any other substance, happen to be rolled over

the border of the bed, the Sunfish carefully removes it, holding the

obnoxious matter in its mouth, and dropping it over the margin. Having

many times witnessed this act of prudence and cleanliness in the little

sunny, and observed that at this period it will not seize on any kind of

bait, I took it into my head one fair afternoon to make a few

experiments for the purpose of judging how far its instinct or reason

might induce it to act when disturbed or harassed.

Provided with a fine fishing-line, and such insects as I knew were

relished by this fish, I reached a sand-bar covered by about one foot of

water, where I had previously seen many deposits. Approaching the

nearest to the shore with great care, I baited my hook with a living

ground-worm, the greater part of which was left at liberty to writhe as

it pleased, and, throwing the line up the stream, managed it so that at

last it passed over the border of the nest, when I allowed it to remain

on the bottom. The fish, I perceived, had marked me, and as the worm

intruded on its premises, it swam to the farther side, there poised

itself for a few moments, then approached the worm, and carried it in

its mouth over the side next to me, with a care and gentleness so very

remarkable as to afford me much surprise. I repeated the experiment six

or seven times, and always with the same result. Then changing the bait,

I employed a young grasshopper, which I floated into the egg-bed. The

insect was removed, as the worm had been, and two attempts to hook the

fish proved unsuccessful. I now threw my line with the hook bare, and

managed as before. The Sunny appeared quite alarmed. It swam to one

side, then to another, in rapid succession, and seemed to entertain a

fear that the removal of the suspicious object might prove extremely

dangerous to it. Yet it gradually approached the hook, took it

delicately up, and the next instant dropped it over the edge of the bed.

Reader, if you are one who, like me, have studied Nature with a desire

to improve your mental faculties, and contemplate the wonderful

phenomena that present themselves to the view at every step we take in

her wide domain, you would have been struck, had you witnessed the

actions of this little fish, as I was, with admiration of the Being who

gave such instincts to so humble an object. I gazed in amazement at the

little creature, and wondered that Nature had endowed it with such

feelings and powers. The irrepressible desire of acquiring knowledge

prompted me to continue the experiment; but with whatever dexterity I

could in those days hook a fish, all my efforts proved abortive, not

with this individual only, but with many others which I subjected to the

same trials.

Satisfied that at this period the Sunfish was more than a match for me,

I rolled up my line, and with the rod gave a rap on the water as nearly

over the fish as I could.

The Sunny darted off to a distance of several yards, poised itself

steadily, and as soon as my rod was raised from the water, returned to

its station. The effect of the blow on the water was now apparent, for I

perceived that the fish was busily employed in smoothing the bed; but

here ended my experiments on the Sunfish.

MY STYLE OF DRAWING BIRDS[61]

When, as a little lad, I first began my attempts at representing birds

on paper, I was far from possessing much knowledge of their nature, and,

like hundreds of others, when I had laid the effort aside, I was under

the impression that it was a finished picture of a bird because it

possessed some sort of a head and tail, and two sticks in lieu of legs;

I never troubled myself with the thought that abutments were requisite

to prevent it from falling either backward or forward, and oh! what

bills and claws I did draw, to say nothing of a perfectly straight line

for a back, and a tail stuck in anyhow, like an unshipped rudder.

Many persons besides my father saw my miserable attempts, and so many

praised them to the skies that perhaps no one was ever nearer being

completely wrecked than I by these mistaken, though affectionate words.

My father, however, spoke very differently to me; he constantly

impressed upon me that nothing in the world possessing life and

animation was easy to imitate, and that as I grew older he hoped I would

become more and more alive to this. He was so kind to me, and so deeply

interested in my improvement that to have listened carelessly to his

serious words would have been highly ungrateful. I listened less to

others, more to him, and his words became my law.

The first collection of drawings I made were from European specimens,

procured by my father or myself, and I still have them in my

possession.[62] They were all represented _strictly ornithologically_,

which means neither more nor less than in stiff, unmeaning profiles,

such as are found in most works published to the present day. My next

set was begun in America, and there, without my honored mentor, I betook

myself to the drawing of specimens hung by a string tied to one foot,

having a desire to show every portion, as the wings lay loosely spread,

as well as the tail. In this manner I made some pretty fair signs for

poulterers.

One day, while watching the habits of a pair of Pewees at Mill Grove, I

looked so intently at their graceful attitudes that a thought struck my

mind like a flash of light, that nothing, after all, could ever answer

my enthusiastic desires to represent nature, except to copy her in her

own way, alive and moving! Then I began again. On I went, forming,

literally, hundreds of outlines of my favorites, the Pewees; how good or

bad I cannot tell, but I fancied I had mounted a step on the high

pinnacle before me. I continued for months together, simply outlining

birds as I observed them, either alighted or on the wing, but could

finish none of my sketches. I procured many individuals of different

species, and laying them on the table or on the ground, tried to place

them in such attitudes as I had sketched. But, alas! they were _dead_,

to all intents and purposes, and neither wing, leg, nor tail could I

place according to my wishes. A second thought came to my assistance; by

means of threads I raised or lowered a head, wing, or tail, and by

fastening the threads securely, I had something like life before me;

yet much was wanting. When I saw the living birds, I felt the blood rush

to my temples, and almost in despair spent about a month without

drawing, but in deep thought, and daily in the company of the feathered

inhabitants of dear Mill Grove.

I had drawn from the "manikin" whilst under David, and had obtained

tolerable figures of our species through this means, so I cogitated how

far a manikin of a bird would answer. I labored with wood, cork, and

wires, and formed a grotesque figure, which I cannot describe in any

other words than by saying that when set up it was a tolerable-looking

Dodo. A friend roused my ire by laughing at it immoderately, and

assuring me that if I wished to represent a tame gander it might do. I

gave it a kick, broke it to atoms, walked off, and thought again.

Young as I was, my impatience to obtain my desire filled my brains with

many plans. I not infrequently dreamed that I had made a new discovery;

and long before day, one morning, I leaped out of bed fully persuaded

that I had obtained my object. I ordered a horse to be saddled, mounted,

and went off at a gallop towards the little village of Norristown,

distant about five miles. When I arrived there not a door was open, for

it was not yet daylight. Therefore I went to the river, took a bath,

and, returning to the town, entered the first opened shop, inquired for

wire of different sizes, bought some, leaped on my steed, and was soon

again at Mill Grove. The wife of my tenant, I really believe, thought

that I was mad, as, on offering me breakfast, I told her I only wanted

my gun. I was off to the creek, and shot the first Kingfisher I met. I

picked the bird up, carried it home by the bill, sent for the miller,

and bade him bring me a piece of board of soft wood. When he returned he

found me filing sharp points to some pieces of wire, and I proceeded to

show him what I meant to do. I pierced the body of the fishing bird,

and fixed it on the board; another wire passed above his upper mandible

held the head in a pretty fair attitude, smaller ones fixed the feet

according to my notions, and even common pins came to my assistance. The

last wire proved a delightful elevator to the bird's tail, and at

last--there stood before me the _real_ Kingfisher.

[Illustration: OLD MILL AND MILLER'S COTTAGE AT MILL GROVE ON THE

PERKIOMEN CREEK.

FROM A PHOTOGRAPH FROM W. H. WETHERILL, ESQ.]

Think not that my lack of breakfast was at all in my way. No, indeed! I

outlined the bird, aided by compasses and my eyes, colored it, finished

it, without a thought of hunger. My honest miller stood by the while,

and was delighted to see me pleased. This was what I shall call my first

drawing actually from nature, for even the eye of the Kingfisher was as

if full of life whenever I pressed the lids aside with my finger.

In those happy days of my youth I was extremely fond of reading what I

still call the delightful fables of La Fontaine. I had frequently

perused the one entitled "_L'hirondelle et les petits oiseaux_," and

thought much of the meaning imparted in the first line, which, if I now

recollect rightly, goes on to say that "_Quiconque a beaucoup vu, peut

avoir beaucoup retenu_." To me this meant that to study Nature was to

ramble through her domains late and early, and if I observed all as I

should, that the memory of what I saw would at least be of service to

me.

"Early to bed, and early to rise," was another adage which I thought,

and still think, of much value; 'tis a pity that instead of being merely

an adage it has not become a general law; I have followed it ever since

I was a child, and am ever grateful for the hint it conveyed.

As I wandered, mostly bent on the study of birds, and with a wish to

represent all those found in our woods, to the best of my powers, I

gradually became acquainted with their forms and habits, and the use of

my wires was improved by constant practice. Whenever I produced a better

representation of any species the preceding one was destroyed, and

after a time I laid down what I was pleased to call a constitution of my

manner of drawing birds, formed upon natural principles, which I will

try to put briefly before you.

The gradual knowledge of the forms and habits of the birds of our

country impressed me with the idea that each part of a family must

possess a certain degree of affinity, distinguishable at sight in any

one of them. The Pewees, which I knew by experience were positively

Flycatchers, led me to the discovery that every bird truly of that

genus, when standing, was usually in a passive attitude; that they sat

uprightly, now and then glancing their eyes upwards or sideways, to

watch the approach of their insect prey; that if in pursuit of this prey

their movements through the air were, in each and all of that tribe, the

same, etc., etc.

Gallinaceous birds I saw were possessed of movements and positions

peculiar to them. Amongst the water-birds also I found characteristic

manners. I observed that the Herons walked with elegance and

stateliness, that, in fact, every family had some mark by which it could

be known; and, after having collected many ideas and much material of

this kind, I fairly began, in greater earnest than ever, the very

collection of Birds of America, which is now being published.

The better I understood my subjects, the better I became able to

represent them in what I hoped were natural positions. The bird once

fixed with wires on squares, I studied as a lay figure before me, its

nature, previously known to me as far as habits went, and its general

form having been frequently observed. Now I could examine more

thoroughly the bill, nostrils, eyes, legs, and claws, as well as the

structure of the wings and tail; the very tongue was of importance to

me, and I thought the more I understood all these particulars, the

better representations I made of the originals.

[Illustration: AUDUBON.

FROM A PENCIL SKETCH AFTER DEATH, BY JOHN WOODHOUSE AUDUBON.

January 28, 1851.]

My drawings at first were made altogether in water-colors, but they

wanted softness and a great deal of finish. For a long time I was much

dispirited at this, particularly when vainly endeavoring to imitate

birds of soft and downy plumage, such as that of most Owls, Pigeons,

Hawks, and Herons. How this could be remedied required a new train of

thought, or some so-called accident, and the latter came to my aid.

One day, after having finished a miniature portrait of the one dearest

to me in all the world, a portion of the face was injured by a drop of

water, which dried where it fell; and although I labored a great deal to

repair the damage, the blur still remained. Recollecting that, when a

pupil of David, I had drawn heads and figures in different colored

chalks, I resorted to a piece of that material of the tint required for

the part, applied the pigment, rubbed the place with a cork stump, and

at once produced the desired effect.

My drawings of Owls and other birds of similar plumage were much

improved by such applications; indeed, after a few years of patience,

some of my attempts began almost to please me, and I have continued the

same style ever since, and that now is for more than thirty years.

Whilst travelling in Europe as well as America, many persons have

evinced the desire to draw birds in my manner, and I have always felt

much pleasure in showing it to any one by whom I hoped ornithological

delineations or portraitures would be improved.

[Illustration: BOWIE KNIFE.

Presented by Henry Carleton.]

FOOTNOTES:

[47] This was in 1810 or 1811.

[48] This was written in 1835.

[49] Vincent Nolte, in "Fifty Years in Both Hemispheres," gives an

account of his meeting on this occasion with Audubon, part of which is

as follows: "About ten o'clock I arrived at a small inn, close by the

falls of the Juniata River. The landlady showed me into a room and said

I perhaps would not mind taking my meal with a strange gentleman, who

was already there. This personage struck me as an odd fish. He was

sitting at a table before the fire, with a Madras handkerchief wound

around his head, exactly in the style of the French mariners of a

seaport town.... He showed himself to be an original throughout, but

admitted he was a Frenchman by birth, and a native of La Rochelle.

However, he had come in his early youth to Louisiana, had grown up in

the sea-service, and had gradually become a thorough American. This man,

who afterwards won for himself so great a name in natural history,

particularly in ornithology, was Audubon." It is needless to say that

the personal history of Audubon as here given is entirely erroneous; but

as the meeting was in 1811, and the book written _from memory_ in 1854,

Mr. Nolte must be pardoned for his misstatements, which were doubtless

unintentional.

[50] This was on the journey made by Audubon and his partner, Ferdinand

Rozier, from Louisville to St. Genevieve, then in Upper Louisiana. They

left Louisville in the autumn of 1810, and Audubon returned in the

spring of 1811.

[51] This incident occurred during Audubon's return trip to St.

Genevieve in the early spring of 1812.

[52] _Sylvia parus_, Hemlock Warbler; Ornith. Biog. vol. ii. page 205.

[53] Audubon and Mr. Irish met many times afterwards, the last being, I

believe, in Philadelphia, on the eve of Audubon's departure for his

Missouri River trip.

[54] Then Philadelphia.

[55] The name given by the wreckers and smugglers to the "Marion."

[56] Plate cclxxxi., ed. 1827-1839; plate ccclxviii., ed. 1843.

[57] The "Moose Hunt" was communicated to me by my young friend, Thomas

Lincoln, of Dennysville in Maine.

[58] The last Episode in vol. ii. of the "Ornithological Biographies."

[59] "On the 16th [June, 1778], before sunrise, I departed in the most

secret manner, and arrived at Boonesborough on the 20th, after a journey

of 160 miles, during which I had but one meal." (Letter of Daniel Boone,

who was then forty-three.)

[60] This bird [the White Ibis], to procure the Cray-fish, walks with

remarkable care to the mounds of mud which the latter throws up while

forming its hole, and breaks up the upper part of the fabric, dropping

the fragments into the deep cavity that has been made by the animal.

Then the Ibis retires a single step, and patiently waits the result. The

Cray-fish, incommoded by the load of earth, instantly sets to work anew,

and at last reaches the entrance of its burrow; but the moment it comes

in sight the Ibis seizes it with his bill. (The White Ibis, _Ibis Alba_,

Plate CCXXII., Ornith. Biog., vol. iii., p. 176).

[61] Audubon's drawings have been criticised for their _flatness_. Of

this, Cuvier says: "It is difficult to give a true picture of a bird

with the same effect of perspective as a landscape, and the lack of this

is no defect in a work on Natural History. Naturalists prefer the real

color of objects to those accidental tints which are the result of the

varied reflections of light necessary to complete picturesque

representations, but foreign and even injurious to scientific truth."

[62] This was in 1838; they have since been destroyed by fire, or, at

least, the greater number.

INDEX

Abert, Col. John, i. 70.

Abingdon, ii. 218.

Abyssinian, i. 199.

Academie des Sciences, i. 308, 312, 317.

Academy of Arts, Edinburgh, i. 177.

Academy of Sciences, Philadelphia, i. 55, 56, 90, 525.

Academy of Sciences, New York. _See_ New York Academy of Sciences.

Acer saccharinum, ii. 508.

Actitis macularia, i. 365.

Adams, Bernard, ii. 97.

Adams, John Quincy, i. 275.

Adamson, John, i. 230, 233, 235, 262-264, 437.

AEgialitis semipalmatus, i. 386.

Africa, i. 217.

Alabama, i. 329; ii. 445.

Alauda alpestris, i. 384, 419, 420, 424.

_See also_ Lark, Shore.

---- spragueii, ii. 41.

Albagash River, ii. 392.

Alca torda, i. 364-366, 369, 383, 384, 391, 428.

Alexis, i. 529, 530, 536; ii. 4, 7, 9, 16, 20, 23, 25, 36, 38, 39,

41, 42, 71.

Algiers, ii. 232.

Allan, William, i. 171, 189.

Alleghanies, Mountains, i. 62, 454, 459; ii. 437, 454.

Alligator, i. 87, 187, 205; ii. 251, 255, 258, 267, 309, 337, 354,

355.

Aln River, i. 228.

Alnwick, i. 228, 263.

Alnwick Castle, i. 262.

America, i. 66, 69, 91, 94, 228, 232, 235, 237, 245, 253-255, 270,

276, 277, 281, 289, 295-297, 301, 310, 313, 315, 329, 330, 331,

333, 339, 342; ii. 210, 231, 527.

American Fur Company, i. 72, 525; ii. 6, 47, 188.

American Harbor, i. 365, 380, 383, 384.

American Ornithological Union, i. 77.

Amherst Island, i. 354, 355.

Amiens, i. 305.

Ammodramus bairdi, ii. 117.

---- [Colurniculus] lecontei, i. 510.

Amsterdam, i. 301.

Anas fusca, i. 418.

---- glacialis, i. 414.

_See also_ Duck, Velvet.

---- obscura, i. 366.

Anatomical School, Oxford, i. 292.

Andes, i. 271.

"Andromache, The" (brig), i. 88.

Angel Inn, i. 275.

Anhingas, ii. 337.

Anser albifrons gambeli, i. 459.

---- canadensis, i. 370.

_See also_ Goose, Wild.

Antelope, i. 496, 499, 504, 505, 507-512, 525; ii. 9, 19, 36, 42-50,

56, 58, 60-65, 87, 90, 95, 102, 104-106, 108, 113, 114, 117,

118, 121, 122, 126, 128, 130-133, 138, 140, 154, 155, 166, 167,

169.

Anthus pennsylvanicus, i. 384.

---- spinoletta, i. 384, 391, 399.

_See also_ Lark, Brown.

---- [Neocorys] spraguei, ii. 41.

Anticosti Island, i. 363.

Antilocapra americana, ii. 42.

Antiquarian Society, Edinburgh, i. 169, 181, 205, 211.

Apple Creek, ii. 5, 158.

Apple White, i. 505.

Aquila chrysaetus, i. 415.

Archibald, George, i. 438.

Arctomys [cynomys] ludovicianus, i. 458, 522.

_See also_ Dog, Prairie.

---- monax, i. 461.

Ardea herodias, i. 27, 354.

---- occidentalis, ii. 370.

Arickaras, i. 532; ii. 3.

Arkansas River, i. 161, 291; ii. 215, 437.

Arkwright, Sir Thomas, i. 137, 138.

Armadillo, ii. 36.

Arrow Rock, ii. 174.

Arthur's Seat, i. 213, 266.

Artemisia, ii. 26, 39.

Artois, i. 305.

Arvicola pennsylvanica, i. 530; ii. 165.

---- riparius, i. 530.

Ashley, General, ii. 3.

Asia, i. 217.

Assiniboin, ii. 23, 25, 26, 38, 48, 51, 77, 78, 97, 107-109, 112,

121, 124, 126, 127, 133, 140, 145, 154, 156.

"Assiniboin" (steamer), ii. 7, 42.

_Astoria_, Irving's, i. 456, 486.

Athenaeum, Liverpool, i. 270.

Athenaeum, London, i. 253.

Athens, British, ii. 208.

Atherton, Mr., i. 271.

Atkinson, Mr., i. 243.

Atlantic Ocean, i. 91, 354, 440.

Auckland, Lord, i. 282.

Audubon, Georgiana, ii. 175.

----, Admiral Jean, i. 5, 9, 42.

----, John Woodhouse, i. 6, 32, 38, 47, 51, 60, 62, 66, 67, 69, 70,

73-76, 81, 120, 230, 232, 259, 291;

companion in Labrador, 345-445; 476; ii. 168, 176.

----, Mrs. Lucy, i. 18, 21, 26, 34, 35, 39-41, 48, 51, 52, 60, 63,

64, 66, 68, 70, 81, 449; ii. 158.

----, Lucy, infant, i. 37.

----, Rosa, i. 24, 35, 37.

----, Mrs. V. G. _See_ Audubon, Georgiana.

----, Victor Gifford, i. 10, 29, 30, 38, 47, 48, 51, 53, 54, 60,

62, 66-71, 73, 75, 76, 230, 291, 300, 302, 345, 453, 520; ii.

117, 168; 274, 277.

Audubon and Bakewell, i. 29.

Audubonian period, i. 64.

Audubon Park, i. 71.

Audubon's Bluff, ii. 107.

Audubon's Isle, ii. 338.

Auk, Great, ii. 131.

----, Razor-billed, i. 364.

Aux Cayes, i. 7, 8.

Avocet, i. 517.

Ayowah River, ii. 169.

Ayre River, i. 245, 246.

Ayres, W. O., ii. 41.

Baamchenunsgamook, Lake, ii. 392.

Bachman, John, D.D., i. 40, 56, 66-68, 70, 72, 76, 426, 441, 449,

467, 476, 510, 529; ii. 29, 97, 173, 378.

----, Maria R., i. 70.

Backhouse, John, i. 285.

Bad River, i. 526.

Badger, ii. 35, 36, 146, 147, 166, 168, 170, 173.

Baird, Spencer F., ii. 12, 117;

_Birds of North America_, ii. 117.

Bakewell, i. 135, 138.

----, Benjamin, i. 22, 26, 28.

----, Lucy. _See_ Audubon, Mrs. Lucy.

----, Thomas W., i. 20, 29, 32, 33, 35, 46.

----, William, i. 17, 18, 24, 28, 39.

----, William Gifford, i. 174, 454, 526.

Balacouda, i. 83; ii. 303, 305.

Balize, i. 87; ii. 301.

_Ball in Newfoundland_, i. 433.

Baltimore, i. 310, 449, 453, 477; ii. 219, 221.

Bamborough Castle, i. 225.

Bangor, ii. 390, 392, 393.

Bantams, i. 303.

Baptiste. _See_ Moncrevier, Jean Baptiste.

Barbier, Antoine Alexandre, i. 314.

Barclay, Mr., i. 101, 102, 260, 261.

Barro, ii. 218, 221.

Barry's Hotel, i. 190, 194.

Basil, ii. 93, 98-101.

Audubon and His Journals, Volume 2 · 第 41 / 45 段