FEB.]

‘The new market-cross of Edinburgh was founded by the community of

the said town, and within three months after was completed.’ ‘Also at

this time there was great preparations making for the coming of King

James into Scotland, baith in all his majesty’s palaces, castles, and

abbeys, and especially in his castle of Edinburgh, whereof the new fore

wark, with the great hall thereof, and many other rooms therein, was

biggit to his majesty’s great expenses by Sir Gideon Murray of Elibank,

knight, his majesty’s treasurer-depute.’--_Jo. Hist._

* * * * *

[Sidenote: MAY 13.]

[Sidenote: 1617.]

‘The king entered into Scotland, accompanied with the Duke of

Lennox, the Earls of Arundel, Southampton, Pembroke, Montgomery,

and Buckingham, Bishops of Ely, Lincoln, and Winchester, and sundry

barons, deans, and gentlemen. He stayed in Dunglass two nights, and

a night in Seaton. On Friday, the 16th, he came to Leith, and about

four afternoon, out of Leith to the West Port of Edinburgh, where he

made his entry on horseback, that he might the better be seen by the

people; whereas before he rode in the coach all the way. The provost,

bailies, and council, and a number of citizens arrayed in gowns [of

plain velvet], and others standing with speat staves,[364] received him

at the port.’ The provost, William Nisbet, and the town-clerk, John

Hay,[365] having severally harangued him, five hundred double angels

in a silver double-gilt basin, were presented to him--‘wha, with ane

mild and gracious countenance, receivit them with their propyne.’ ‘The

cannons of the Castle were shot. He was convoyed first to the great

kirk, where the Bishop of St Andrews had a flattering sermon upon the

21st Psalm, and thanked God for his prosperous journey. He knighted the

provost.... When he came to the palace of Holyroodhouse, the professors

and students of the College of Edinburgh presented to him some poems

made to his praise, and in sign of welcome.’--_Cal._

[Sidenote: MAY 17.]

‘... the English service was begun in the Chapel-royal, with the

singing of choristers, surplices, and playing on organs.’--_Cal._ Amid

the general feeling of satisfaction at seeing their native prince

amongst them once more, this exemplification of ceremonial worship

was allowed by the people to pass without tumult, yet not without

serious discontents and apprehensions. The bishops were so fearful of

the popular spirit, that they endeavoured to dissuade the king, but

without success. The common people in Edinburgh, as we are told by a

native historian, considered the service in the chapel as ‘staining

and polluting the house of religion by the dregs of popery. The more

prudent, indeed, judged it but reasonable that the king should enjoy

his own form of worship in his own chapel; but then followed a rumour,

that the religious vestments and altars were to be forcibly introduced

into all the churches, and the purity of religion, so long established

in Scotland, for ever defiled. And it required the utmost efforts

of the magistrates to restrain the inflamed passions of the common

people.’[366]

[Sidenote: 1616.]

[Sidenote: JUNE 8.]

Having to meet his parliament a few weeks after, the king went to

Falkland to hunt. But the park of his Fife palace did not content

him. Carnegie, Lord Kinnaird, son of a favourite minister of old,

and himself a friend of the king, dwelt in state in a noble castle

overlooking the embouchure of the South Esk in Forfarshire, with an

extensive muir full of game close by--Muirthrewmont or Muirromon (as

the country people call it). James gladly rode thither,[367] for

the sake of the abundant sport. The house of Kinnaird was furnished

on the occasion for various pleasures, and deficient in no sort of

enjoyment.[368] Two poets of temporary and local fame came with courtly

Latin strains suitable to the occasion.[369] His majesty tarried ten

days in the district, and then came to Dundee, which welcomed him with

poem and with speech. Returning to Edinburgh, he set himself to drive

his ends with the clergy, who were now less able or disposed to resist

his innovations than they had been twenty years before. At his command,

several of the Scottish councillors and bishops received the communion

in the English manner in the Chapel-royal, and William Summers, one of

the ministers of Edinburgh, officiated there, ‘observing the English

form in his prayer and behaviour.’ ‘On the 15th June, some noblemen and

bishops who had not communicat before, communicat kneeling, yet not

half of the noblemen that were required. The ministers of Edinburgh,

in the meantime, were silent; neither dissuaded the king privately,

nor opened their mouth in public against this innovation, or bad

example.’--_Cal._

On the 19th of June, the king formally visited the Castle of Edinburgh,

in order to celebrate his fifty-first birthday on the natal spot.

Andrew Kerr, a boy of nine years of age, welcomed him at the gate in

‘ane Hebrew speech.’ At the banquet in the great hall, the English and

Scottish nobility and the magistracy of Edinburgh met in the utmost

amity and satisfaction. By the desire of the king, who wished to

advance his native country in the eyes of the English, the wives and

children of the Scottish nobility appeared in their finest dresses,

shining with jewels, and were treated with great distinction. The feast

was not over till nine at night; and after its conclusion, the Castle

rang with a chorus of the ladies’ voices and a band of instruments.

On the return of the royal party to the Palace, a great multitude

assembled there to see ‘pastimes with firework.’[370]

On the 26th, ‘there was a timber house erected on the back of the Great

Kirk of Edinburgh [south side], which was decored with tapestry, where

the town prepared a banquet for the king and the nobility. The day

following, sundry knights and gentlemen of good note were banqueted in

the same house, and made burgesses. They danced about the Cross with

sound of trumpets and other instruments; throwed glasses of wine from

the Cross upon the people standing about, and ended with the king’s

scoll [health.]‘--_Cal._

* * * * *

[Sidenote: JUNE 20.]

[Sidenote: 1617.]

This day is dated from Leith a satire upon Scotland, heretofore

usually attributed to Sir Anthony Weldon, but upon doubtful evidence.

It was entitled, _A Perfect Description of the People and Country of

Scotland_, and was printed with the signature JOHNE E.

It seems the splenetic effusion of some Cockney who had been tempted to

follow the king’s train into Scotland, and had found himself a smaller

man there than he expected.

In the air, the soil, and the natural productions of Scotland, this

railer can find nothing goodly or agreeable. The thistle, he says, is

the fairest flower in their garden. Hay is a word unknown. ‘Corn is

reasonable plenty at this time; for, since they heard of the king’s

coming, it hath been as unlawful for the common people to eat wheat,

as it was of old for any but the priests to eat the show-bread....

They would persuade the footmen that oaten cakes would make them

well-winded; and the children of the chapel they have brought to

eat of them for the maintenance of their voices.... They persuade

the trumpeters that fasting is guid for men of their quality; for

emptiness, they say, causeth wind, and wind causeth a trumpet sound

sweetly.[371]...

[Sidenote: 1617.]

‘They christen without the cross, marry without a ring, receive the

sacrament without reverence, die without repentance, and bury without

divine service. They keep no holidays, nor acknowledge any saint but St

Andrew, who, they say, got that honour by presenting Christ with ane

oaten cake after his forty days’ fast.... They hold their noses if you

speak of bear-bating, and stop their ears if you speak of play.... I am

verily persuaded if [the] angels at the last day should come down in

their white garments, they would run away, and cry: “The children of

the chapel are come again to torment us!”... For the graven images in

the new beautified chapel, they threaten to pull them down after his

departure, and make of them a burnt-offering to appease the indignation

they imagine is conceived against them in the breast of the Almighty

for suffering such idolatry to enter their kingdom. The organs, I

think, will find mercy, because they say there is some affinity between

them and their bagpipes.[372] The shipper that brought the singing-men

with their papistical vestments, complains that he hath been much

troubled with a strange singing in his head ever since they came aboard

his ship; for remedy whereof the pastor of the parish hath persuaded

him to sell the profaned vessel, and distribute the money among the

faithful brethren.’

Our scribbler speaks of the women as huge-boned monsters, whereof the

upper class are ‘kept like lions in iron grates. The merchants’ wives

are likewise prisoners, but not in such strongholds. They have wooden

cages [meaning the timber galleries in front of the houses], through

which, peeping to catch the air, we are almost choked with the sight

of them.... To draw you down from the citizen’s wife to the country

gentlewomen, and so convey you to the common dames, were to bring you

from Newgate to Bridewell.’

In an answer to this satire, a strong defence is entered on the subject

of victuals and other materials of conviviality. ‘Except meat should

have rained down from heaven, it could not be imagined more cheap,

more plentiful. Ane of those twelve pies that were sold for a penny,

might have stopped your mouth for his quarrel.... What else would you

have had? You know there were some subjects that kept open butteries

and cellars from morning till night.... The man is angry that all the

taps were not pulled out, that every guid fellow might swim in sack and

claret.’[373]

* * * * *

[Sidenote: JUNE 30.]

[Sidenote: JULY 10.]

The king commenced a second excursion in his native dominions, by

Stirling, Perth, St Andrews--thence back to Stirling, where he received

a deputation of Edinburgh professors, who disputed before him in the

Chapel-royal of the Castle, in the presence of the English and Scottish

nobility and many learned men. Here the British Solomon was quite in

his element. The first question discussed ‘by the learned doctors was,

“Ought sheriffs and other inferior magistrates to be hereditary?”--a

question at this time agitated in the national senate, where it was the

earnest wish of King James that it should be decided in the negative.

As might have been expected, the oppugners of the question soon got the

advantage; for the weighty arguments of royalty were thrown into that

scale.

‘The king was highly delighted with their success; and turning to the

Marquis of Hamilton (hereditary sheriff of Clydesdale), who stood

behind his chair, said: “James, you see your cause is lost, and all

that can be said for it is clearly answered and refuted.”

[Sidenote: 1617.]

‘The second thesis was On the Nature of Local Motion. The opposition to

this was very great, and the respondent produced numerous arguments

from Aristotle in support of his thesis, which occasioned the king to

say: “These men know the mind of Aristotle as well as he did himself

when alive.”

‘The third thesis was Concerning the Origin of Fountains or Springs.

The king was so well pleased with this controversy, that, although the

three-quarters of an hour allotted for the disputation were expired,

he caused them to proceed, sometimes speaking for and against both

respondent and opponent, seldom letting an argument on either side pass

without proper remarks.

‘The disputations being over, the king withdrew to supper; after

which he sent for the disputants, whose names were John Adamson,

James Fairlie, Patrick Sands, Andrew Young, James Reid, and William

King, before whom he learnedly discoursed on the several subjects

controverted by them, and then began to comment on their several names,

and said: “These gentlemen, by their names, were destined for the acts

they had in hand this day;” and proceeded as followeth:

[Sidenote: 1617.]

“Adam was the father of all, and Adam’s son had the first part of

this act. The defender is justly called Fairlie;[374] his thesis had

some fairlies in it, and he sustained them very fairly, and with many

fair lies given to the oppugners. And why should not Mr Sands be the

first to enter the sands? But now I clearly see that all sands are not

barren, for certainly he hath shewn a fertile wit. Mr Young is very old

in Aristotle. Mr Reid need not be red with blushing for his acting this

day. Mr King disputed very kingly, and of a kingly purpose, concerning

the royal supremacy of reason above anger and all passions. I am so

well satisfied,” added his majesty, “with this day’s exercise, that I

will be godfather to the College of Edinburgh, and have it called _the

College of King James_, for, after its founding, it stopped sundry

years in my minority. After I came to knowledge, I held to it, and

caused it to be established; and although I see many look upon it with

an evil eye, yet I will have them know that, having given it my name,

I have espoused its quarrel, and at a proper time will give it a royal

god-bairn gift to enlarge its revenues.” The king being told that

there was one in company his majesty had taken no notice of--namely,

Henry Charteris, principal of the College, who, though a man of great

learning, yet, by his innate bashfulness, was rendered unfit to speak

in such an august assembly--his majesty answered: “His name agrees well

with his nature; for charters contain much matter, yet say nothing;

and, though they say nothing, yet they put great things into men’s

mouths.”

‘The king having signified that he would be pleased to see his remarks

on the professors’ names versified, it was accordingly done as follows:

‘As Adam was the first man, whence all beginning tak,

So Adamson was president, and first man in this act.

The thesis Fairlie did defend, which, though they lies contein,

Yet were fair lies, and he the same right fairlie did maintein.

The field first entered Mr Sands, and there he made me see

That not all sands are barren sands, but that some fertile be.

Then Mr Young most subtilie the thesis did impugn,

And kythed[375] old in Aristotle, although his name be Young.

To him succeeded Mr Reid, who, though Reid be his name,

Needs neither for his dispute blush, nor of his speech think shame.

Last entered Mr King the lists, and dispute like a king,

How reason, reigning like a king, should anger under bring.

To their deserved praise have I thus played upon their names,

And will their college hence be called _The College of King

James_.’[376]

[Sidenote: 1617.]

In the course of his excursion, the king had a hunt in the

neighbourhood of Dunfermline. At this time, the coal-works at Culross,

on the shore of the Firth of Forth, were conducted with great activity

under their enterprising proprietor, Sir George Bruce. James invited

his company to dine with him at a _collier’s house_, referring to an

elegant mansion which Sir George had built for his accommodation in

the town of Culross. They proceeded in the first place to examine

the coal-works, which were then wrought a considerable way under the

sea, issuing at some distance from shore in a little island or moat,

where the product of the mines was put directly on board vessels to

be transported to various places. The king and his courtiers, unaware

of this peculiar arrangement, were conducted along the mine till they

reached the sea-shaft, and here being drawn up, found themselves

suddenly surrounded by the waves. James, always apprehensive of

attempts on his life, was excited to great alarm by this unexpected

situation, and called out ‘Treason!’ His courteous host reassured

him by pointing to an elegant pinnace moored by the moat to carry

him ashore, in the event of his not wishing to return by the mine.

Doubtless the affair added a little zest to the banquet which the party

immediately after partook of in the hospitable mansion of Bruce.[377]

The king pursued his progress by Glasgow, Paisley, Hamilton, and

Dumfries, passing across the Border to Carlisle on the 5th of August,

amidst the general regrets of his subjects. It was remarkable how much

peace and good feeling prevailed amongst the people during the royal

visit. The Chancellor Dunfermline, in afterwards summing up the whole

affair to the king, said: ‘In all the time of your majesty’s remaining

in this kingdom, in sae great companies, and sae many noblemen and

great personages of twa nations convened, never ane action, word,

or appearance of any discord, variance, or offence betwix any of

the nations with other, for whatsomever cause. I doubt gif ever the

like has been seen, at sic occasion of so frequent a meeting of men,

strangers, and unknown to each other.’--_M. S. P._

It may be worth mentioning, that by warrant signed at Hitchinbroke,

October 23, 1618, the king gave to Sir Gideon Murray of Elibank ‘a

gilt basin which was given to us by our burgh of Edinburgh, with their

propine of money, at our first entry of the said burgh, at our last

being in our said kingdom; together with two gilt cups, one of them in

form of a salmon, presented to us by our burgh of Glasgow; and another

gilt cup which was given us by the town of Carlisle; together with some

remanent of musk and ambergrise, which was unspent at our being there;

and, lastly, ane large iron chest, which did sometime belong to the

late Earl of Gowrie.’--_An. Scot._

* * * * *

[Sidenote: 1618.

Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 182 / 198 题