MAR. 17.]

There was an ancient feud between the families of Glammis and Crawford,

but as the present lords were on the same side in politics, it was felt

by both as inexpedient that any hostility should take place between

them. Moreover, it would have been highly indecent of Lord Glammis, who

was chancellor of the kingdom, to allow any demonstration of rancour to

come from his side. Nevertheless, a fatal collision took place between

these two nobles.

[Sidenote: 1577-8.]

About the dusk of a spring day, Lord Glammis was coming down from

Stirling Castle to his own house in the town, attended as usual

by some of his friends and followers, when, in a narrow lane, he

encountered the Earl of Crawford similarly attended. The two nobles

bade their respective followers give way to the other; and the order

was obeyed by all except the two last, who either wilfully or by

accident jostled each other, and then immediately drew their swords and

fell a-fighting. A skirmish then took place between the two parties, in

the course of which Lord Glammis, whose stature made him overtop the

company, was shot through the head with a pistol, and many were hurt on

both sides.

‘Lord Glammis was a learned, godly, and wise man. He sent to Beza

when the work of policy was in hands, and craved his judgment in

some questions of policy; whereupon Beza wrote the book _De Triplici

Episopatu_, Of the threefold bishopric, divine, human, and devilish,

and his answers to his questions. Mr Andrew Melville made this epigram

upon him after his death:

Tu Leo magne jaces inglorius: ergo, manebunt

Qualia fata canes? qualia fata sues?

Since lowly lies thou, noble lyon fine,

What sall betide, behind? the dogs and swine?--_Cal._

The respective friends of Glammis and Crawford fell into active

hostilities after this event, and Crawford was seized and thrown into

prison. Being really free from blame, and befriended by many of the

nobility, he was soon liberated, to the great joy of his own people.

The general joy diffused by this event exasperated Thomas Lyon, a

nephew of the deceased chancellor, insomuch that ‘Crawford all his life

was glad to stand in a soldier’s posture.’--_Jo. Hist._

Godscroft relates that the slaughter of Lord Glammis, which was

committed at five in the afternoon in Stirling, was ‘reported

punctually and perfectly in Edinburgh at six, being twenty-four

[Scotch] miles distant.’ He perhaps means to insinuate that the deed

was premeditated. Under November 1585 will be found another instance of

miraculous-looking quickness in the communication of intelligence.

* * * * *

[Sidenote: 1578.

Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 91 / 198 题