CHAPTER IX

HOW, ALTHOUGH WE PREFERRED THE WORKS OF THE ANCIENTS, WE HAVE NOT

CONDEMNED THE STUDIES OF THE MODERNS

Although the novelties of the moderns were never disagreeable to our

desires, who have always cherished with grateful affection those who

devote themselves to study and who add anything either ingenious or

useful to the opinions of our forefathers, yet we have always desired

with more undoubting avidity to investigate the well-tested labours of

the ancients. For whether they had by nature a greater vigour of

mental sagacity, or whether they perhaps indulged in closer application

to study, or whether they were assisted in their progress by both these

things, one thing we are perfectly clear about, that their successors

are barely capable of discussing the discoveries of their forerunners,

and of acquiring those things as pupils which the ancients dug out by

difficult efforts of discovery. For as we read that the men of old

were of a more excellent degree of bodily development than modern times

are found to produce, it is by no means absurd to suppose that most of

the ancients were distinguished by brighter faculties, seeing that in

the labours they accomplished of both kinds they are inimitable by

posterity. And so Phocas writes in the prologue to his Grammar:

Since all things have been said by men of sense

The only novelty is--to condense.

But in truth, if we speak of fervour of learning and diligence in

study, they gave up all their lives to philosophy; while nowadays our

contemporaries carelessly spend a few years of hot youth, alternating

with the excesses of vice, and when the passions have been calmed, and

they have attained the capacity of discerning truth so difficult to

discover, they soon become involved in worldly affairs and retire,

bidding farewell to the schools of philosophy. They offer the fuming

must of their youthful intellect to the difficulties of philosophy,

and bestow the clearer wine upon the money-making business of life.

Further, as Ovid in the first book of the De Vetula justly complains:

The hearts of all men after gold aspire;

Few study to be wise, more to acquire:

Thus, Science! all thy virgin charms are sold,

Whose chaste embraces should disdain their gold,

Who seek not thee thyself, but pelf through thee,

Longing for riches, not philosophy.

And further on:

Thus Philosophy is seen

Exiled, and Philopecuny is queen,

which is known to be the most violent poison of learning.

How the ancients indeed regarded life as the only limit of study, is

shown by Valerius, in his book addressed to Tiberius, by many examples.

Carneades, he says, was a laborious and lifelong soldier of wisdom:

after he had lived ninety years, the same day put an end to his life

and his philosophizing. Isocrates in his ninety-fourth year wrote a

most noble work. Sophocles did the same when nearly a hundred years

old. Simonides wrote poems in his eightieth year. Aulus Gellius did

not desire to live longer than he should be able to write, as he says

himself in the prologue to the Noctes Atticae.

The fervour of study which possessed Euclid the Socratic, Taurus the

philosopher used to relate to incite young men to study, as Gellius

tells in the book we have mentioned. For the Athenians, hating the

people of Megara, decreed that if any of the Megarensians entered

Athens, he should be put to death. Then Euclid, who was a Megarensian,

and had attended the lectures of Socrates before this decree,

disguising himself in a woman's dress, used to go from Megara to Athens

by night to hear Socrates, a distance of twenty miles and back.

Imprudent and excessive was the fervour of Archimedes, a lover of

geometry, who would not declare his name, nor lift his head from the

diagram he had drawn, by which he might have prolonged his life, but

thinking more of study than of life dyed with his life-blood the figure

he was studying.

There are very many such examples of our proposition, but the brevity

we aim at does not allow us to recall them. But, painful to relate,

the clerks who are famous in these days pursue a very different course.

Afflicted with ambition in their tender years, and slightly fastening

to their untried arms the Icarian wings of presumption, they

prematurely snatch the master's cap; and mere boys become unworthy

professors of the several faculties, through which they do not make

their way step by step, but like goats ascend by leaps and bounds; and,

having slightly tasted of the mighty stream, they think that they have

drunk it dry, though their throats are hardly moistened. And because

they are not grounded in the first rudiments at the fitting time, they

build a tottering edifice on an unstable foundation, and now that they

have grown up, they are ashamed to learn what they ought to have

learned while young, and thus they are compelled to suffer for ever for

too hastily jumping at dignities they have not deserved. For these and

the like reasons the tyros in the schools do not attain to the solid

learning of the ancients in a few short hours of study, although they

may enjoy distinctions, may be accorded titles, be authorized by

official robes, and solemnly installed in the chairs of the elders.

Just snatched from the cradle and hastily weaned, they mouth the rules

of Priscian and Donatus; while still beardless boys they gabble with

childish stammering the Categorics and Peri Hermeneias, in the writing

of which the great Aristotle is said to have dipped his pen in his

heart's blood. Passing through these faculties with baneful haste and

a harmful diploma, they lay violent hands upon Moses, and sprinkling

about their faces dark waters and thick clouds of the skies, they offer

their heads, unhonoured by the snows of age, for the mitre of the

pontificate. This pest is greatly encouraged, and they are helped to

attain this fantastic clericate with such nimble steps, by Papal

provisions obtained by insidious prayers, and also by the prayers,

which may not be rejected, of cardinals and great men, by the cupidity

of friends and relatives, who, building up Sion in blood, secure

ecclesiastical dignities for their nephews and pupils, before they are

seasoned by the course of nature or ripeness of learning.

Alas! by the same disease which we are deploring, we see that the

Palladium of Paris has been carried off in these sad times of ours,

wherein the zeal of that noble university, whose rays once shed light

into every corner of the world, has grown lukewarm, nay, is all but

frozen. There the pen of every scribe is now at rest, generations of

books no longer succeed each other, and there is none who begins to

take place as a new author. They wrap up their doctrines in unskilled

discourse, and are losing all propriety of logic, except that our

English subtleties, which they denounce in public, are the subject of

their furtive vigils.

Admirable Minerva seems to bend her course to all the nations of the

earth, and reacheth from end to end mightily, that she may reveal

herself to all mankind. We see that she has already visited the

Indians, the Babylonians, the Egyptians and Greeks, the Arabs and the

Romans. Now she has passed by Paris, and now has happily come to

Britain, the most noble of islands, nay, rather a microcosm in itself,

that she may show herself a debtor both to the Greeks and to the

Barbarians. At which wondrous sight it is conceived by most men, that

as philosophy is now lukewarm in France, so her soldiery are unmanned

and languishing.

The Love of Books: The Philobiblon of Richard de Bury · 第 9 / 20 章