Anterior surface of incisors broad and flat, always smooth on lower

teeth, but either smooth or grooved on upper teeth depending on taxon;

cheek teeth hypsodont, becoming progressively higher crowned in modern

groups, rooted in primitive groups (late? Oligocene to middle

Pliocene), rootless and ever-growing in modern groups (late Pliocene

to Recent); upper and lower premolars persistently bicolumnar; upper

and lower molars bicolumnar only in primitive groups (late? Oligocene

and early Miocene), becoming progressively monocolumnar in advanced

groups (early Pliocene to Recent), primitive bicolumnar pattern being

retained on occlusal surface only in early stages of ontogeny and in

third molar throughout life; enamel pattern of occlusal surface of

cheek teeth based on sextituberculate prototype (see Wood and Wilson,

1936:388-391), having cusps arranged in two transverse rows of three

cusps each, excepting three anterior cusps of premolars that are

arranged in trefoil, especially on p4 (sometimes only one or two,

rather than three, cusps develop in a particular set, especially in

p4), conules absent; protostyle and endostyle in upper teeth and

protostylid and hypostylid in lower teeth formed from cingulum; cusps

of each row uniting with wear into transverse enamel lophs (or

lophids), each tooth having two lophs, one on anterior column,

protoloph and protolophid, and one on posterior column, hypoloph and

hypolophid, that unite with additional wear forming continuous enamel

band; enamel lacking on sides of each column in advanced lineages,

thereby restricting enamel to anterior and posterior walls; with

extreme reduction, posterior plates of upper teeth and, more commonly,

anterior plates of lower molars, missing. Dental formula: 1/1, 0/0,

1/1, 3/3.

Key to the Subfamilies of Geomyidae

A Angular process of ramus mostly below alveolar level of

mandibular tooth-row; pattern of premolar like that of molars,

consisting of two subequal crests united at one or both margins

of tooth; molars persistently bicolumnar; molariform teeth

always rooted. Subfamily Entoptychinae p. 513

A´ Angular process of ramus mostly above level of mandibular

tooth-row; pattern of permolar unlike that of molars,

consisting of two prisms differing in size and united at their

mid-points but never at either margin; molars progressively

monocolumnar, except for early Miocene forms; molariform teeth

rooted only in primitive genera (late? Oligocene to middle

Pliocene), and rootless and ever-growing in later genera (late

Pliocene to Recent). Subfamily Geomyinae p. 514

Subfamily ENTOPTYCHINAE Miller and Gidley, 1918

Anterior face of upper incisor usually smooth, sometimes bearing faint

groove in center or near medial margin of tooth, at least in

_Gregorymys_; cheek teeth hypsodont, medium to high crowned, and

rooted in all but _Entoptychus_ (has rootless, ever-growing teeth);

cheek teeth identical in form, premolars resembling molars and lower

cheek teeth mirror images of upper teeth; crowns biprismatic, having

two columns joined at edge of protomeres (for description of term, see

discussion of primitive morphotype on page 537) and with persistent

lateral fissure between them; lateral re-entrant fold deep,

penetrating at least half width of crown, from external side in upper

teeth and internal side in lower teeth (in specialized genus

_Entoptychus_ lophs, upon additional wear, join also at edge of

parameres, thus uniting columns at both ends and thereby enclosing

interior part of lateral fissure as a transverse fossette in center of

tooth); enamel investment of prisms usually complete, including

inflection bordering re-entrant folds, occlusal pattern becoming

interrupted with wear only in _Entoptychus_, where enamel disappears

first from sides of crowns (following union of anterior and posterior

columns at both sides) and later, in final stages of attrition, from

anterior wall of lower molars and posterior wall of upper molars.

Maxillary bone without pronounced vertical depth in part supporting

cheek teeth, its inferior border only slightly lower than inferior

border of premaxillary and alveolar lips of molariform teeth

consequently approximately level with, or slightly below, alveolar lip

of upper incisor; squamosal without lateral expansion, therefore,

meatal tube of auditory bulla separated from zygomatic process of

squamosal by deep, well-developed postglenoid notch; angular part of

mandible below alveolar level of mandibular cheek teeth; angular

process only slightly reflected laterally; coronoid process low, tip

only slightly above condyle.

For information concerning the structure and relationships of the

known genera, and for accounts of species, see Wood (1936). A list

of the named genera in order of specialization is as follows:

*_Pleurolicus_ Cope, 1878. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 18:66.

*_Gregorymys_ Wood, 1936. Amer. Mus. Novit., 866:9.

*_Grangerimus_ Wood, 1936. Amer. Mus. Novit., 866:13.

*_Entoptychus_ Cope, 1878. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 18:64.

Five new species have been described since Wood's (1936) revision.

They are: _Pleurolicus clasoni_ MacDonald (1963:180); _Gregorymys

kayi_ Wood (1950:335); _Gregorymys montanensis_ Hibbard and Keenmon

(1950:198); _Grangerimus dakotensis_ MacDonald (1963:182);

_Grangerimus sellardsi_ Hibbard and Wilson (1950:623).

Subfamily GEOMYINAE Baird, 1858

Anterior face of upper incisor primitively smooth, grooves

consistently developed only in one modern lineage (Geomyini); cheek

teeth hypsodont, primitively rooted and having crown of medium height

(late Oligocene to middle Pliocene), being higher crowned, rootless

and ever-growing in modern lineages (late Pliocene to Recent);

primitively crowns of cheek teeth biprismatic, having two columns

joined at mid-points by narrow isthmus and entire crown sheathed in

continuous band of enamel; premolars retaining primitive biprismatic

form, anterior and posterior columns never uniting at edge of

protomeres or parameres, and with both lateral re-entrant folds

persistent throughout life; primitive biprismatic pattern becoming

decidedly modified in molars (except in M3), having two prisms

progressively uniting into one column by reduction and loss of lateral

inflections, primitive biprismatic patterns being retained only in

early stages of ontogeny; third upper molars retaining, at least

partially, primitive bicolumnar pattern (except in Thomomyini), with

relatively broad isthmus and horizontally shallow re-entrant folds,

lingual fold sometimes wanting; enamel pattern becoming discontinuous

(late Pliocene to Recent) owing to loss of enamel from sides of each

column; remaining enamel restricted to anterior and posterior plates,

or cutting blades, and enamel bordering lateral inflections in

premolars (considering both sides together, these plates constitute

essentially two transverse cutting blades); enamel pattern of M3

varying, depending on taxon; with specialization, anterior plates of

lower molars and posterior plates of upper premolar and molars may be

reduced or lost; except in primitive species (early Miocene), no

enamel fossettes retained in adult dentitions.

Maxillary bone having pronounced vertical depth in part supporting

cheek teeth, inferior border arching downward well below inferior

border of premaxillary; consequently, alveolar lips of molariform

teeth decidedly below level of alveolar lip of upper incisor;

squamosal with marked lateral expansion at expense of postglenoid

notch; notch compressed and reduced between meatal tube of auditory

bulla and zygomatic process of squamosal; angular part of mandible

mostly above alveolar level of mandibular cheek teeth; angular process

reflected laterally at right angles to axis of ramus and developed

into heavy knoblike projection; coronoid process well developed, tip

decidedly higher than condyle; fossorial specializations remarkably

well developed in advanced lineages, degree of specialization of

primitive Miocene species unknown but probably only semi-fossorial as

in Entoptychinae.

Key to the Tribes of the Geomyinae

A Enamel investment complete and uninterrupted, even in final

(adult) stages of wear; cheek teeth rooted, with crowns of medium

height; third lower molar biprismatic, the two columns separated

by inner and outer re-entrant folds as in lower premolar.

Tribe Dikkomyini p. 515

A´ Enamel investment incomplete and discontinuous, reduced, at least

in final (adult) stages of wear, to interrupted enamel plates;

cheek teeth rootless and ever-growing (except in extinct genus

_Pliogeomys_), crowns of maximum height; third lower molar

monoprismatic, without trace of inner and outer re-entrant folds

as in first and second lower molars.

B Upper incisors smooth, occasionally with a fine indistinct

groove near inner margin of tooth; form of third upper molar

same as M1 and M2, monoprismatic, anteroposteriorly compressed,

and having transverse enamel plates on both anterior and

posterior faces, and without suggestion of either labial or

lingual re-entrant folds; basitemporal fossa absent (except

for a shallow depression in one Recent species, _T. townsendii_);

forefoot small and narrow with claws not elongated for digging.

Tribe Thomomyini p. 518

B´ Upper incisors grooved, bearing either one or two sulci; form of

third upper molar distinctly different from M1 and M2, fully or

partially biprismatic (with a few exceptions discussed beyond),

without marked anteroposterior compression (either subtriangular,

elongated, suborbicular or quadriform in cross-section, but not

elliptical as in M1 and M2), and having typical transverse

anterior plate and two lateral plates (varying in their

development, depending on taxa), but no posterior plate, and with

lateral re-entrant folds usually developed, especially labial

inflection (although sometimes minute in a few species, as

described beyond); basitemporal fossa well-developed, although

occasionally shallow or absent (primitive species of _Zygogeomys_);

forefoot large and broad, with elongated claws for digging.

Tribe Geomyini p. 521

Tribe DIKKOMYINI, new tribe

_Genotype._--_Dikkomys_ Wood, 1936.

_Chronologic and geographic range._--Early to Middle Pliocene (early

Arikareean to mid-Hemphillian) in western United States. Known from

Miocene fossil sites in Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska and

Pliocene sites in South Dakota, Oregon, Nevada, and southern

California. For precise localities see accounts of _Dikkomys_ and

_Pliosaccomys_ beyond.

_Diagnosis._--Small Geomyinae; lacking specializations of more

advanced tribes; upper incisors smooth, at least in _Pliosaccomys_;

molariform teeth always rooted and having crowns of medium height;

enamel investment of cheek teeth complete and uninterrupted in all

stages of wear; crowns of molars primitively biprismatic, having two

columns united at mid-points, thus forming narrow isthmus separating

lateral re-entrant folds as in premolars, and, with wear, also uniting

secondarily at protomeres (with exception of third lower molars),

consequently, isolating remnant of that inflection as shallow fossette

(columns uniting first at protomeres in _Pliosaccomys_); anterior and

posterior columns of first and second molars, both above and below,

becoming progressively united into one column in advanced Dikkomyini

(early and middle Pliocene), but m3 (M3 unknown) retaining primitive

biprismatic pattern, with columns joined at centers but never at

protomeres (for details of dentition see generic accounts); mandible

stout, its angle mostly above mandibular tooth-row; masseteric ridge

low; basitemporal fossa barely discernable in some fragments of

_Pliosaccomys_; postcranial skeleton unknown.

Key to the Genera of the Tribe Dikkomyini

A Molars biprismatic throughout life; anterior and posterior

lophs of first and second molars in pre-final stages of wear

uniting first at their mid-points and later at edge of

protomeres; anterior lophid of lower premolar having distinct

anteroexternal inflection. Genus _Dikkomys_ p. 516

A' First and second molars becoming monoprismatic in final

(adult?) stages of wear, biprismatic only in pre-final stages

of wear; third molars persistently biprismatic; anterior and

posterior lophs of first and second molars uniting first at

edge of protomeres; anterior lophid of lower premolar lacking

anteroexternal inflection. Genus _Pliosaccomys_ p. 517

Genus =Dikkomys= Wood

1936. _Dikkomys_ Wood, Amer. Mus. Novit., 866:26, July 2.

_Type._--_Dikkomys matthewi_ Wood, 1936, from Lower Harrison deposits

near Agate, Sioux County, Nebraska.

_Chronologic range._--Early Miocene, from early Arikareean (Lower

Harrison local fauna of Nebraska) to middle Miocene, late

Hemingfordian (Upper Rosebud local fauna, South Dakota, and the Deep

River Formation, Montana). According to MacDonald (1963:149-150), the

Upper Rosebud is middle Miocene rather than early Miocene.

_Description._--Size small, about as in small kinds of _Thomomys_;

known only from fragmentary mandible, including molariform dentition

in place, and isolated cheek teeth, including M1 (see Wood, 1936:26-28

and fig. 32; Galbreath, 1948:316-317 and fig. 1; and Black, 1961:13-14

and fig. 58); upper incisors unknown; cheek teeth hyposodont,

persistently rooted, and having crowns of medium height compared with

Recent geomyids; enamel investment complete and uninterrupted in all

molariform teeth in all stages of wear; P4 unknown, but probably

formed like p4; p4 persistently biprismatic, two crowns joined at

mid-points by relatively narrow isthmus separating lateral re-entrant

folds; anterior lophid of p4 having distinct anteroexternal

inflection; molars also biprismatic throughout life; two lophids of

lower molars first uniting at mid-points as in p4, and, with

additional wear, m1 and m2 secondarily uniting at edge of protomeres

and forming isolated enamel fossette between point of connection

(detailed description of stages of wear discussed in account of

phylogeny of subfamily); m3 permanently joined at mid-point only,

without lateral union at edge of protomeres; upper molars, judging by

M1 (M2 and M3 unknown), having same pattern as lower molars, but first

union of lophs decidedly on lingual side of center, consequently,

lingual re-entrant fold small; M1 probably developing U-pattern in

advanced stages of wear by union of protomeres, with minute lingual

fossette developing in transition as lophs secondarily become united

at lingual edge of columns; mandible stout and geomyidlike; masseteric

ridge weakly developed; basitemporal fossa absent.

Evidently, _Dikkomys matthewi_ is more primitive than _Dikkomys

woodi_. The modified H-pattern in m1 and m2, with the metalophid and

hypolophid joined at both their mid-points and also at their

protomeres (by union of the protostylid and hypostylid in the lower

dentition), is persistent throughout life. Therefore, the enclosed

enamel fossette is not eradicated with wear. In m1 and m2 of _Dikkomys

woodi_, the fossette is shallower, and, at least in advanced stages of

wear, it would disappear, therefore, forming a U-pattern on the

occlusal surface, as in M1 and M2, but lateral inflection horizontally

shallow rather than deep as in entoptychines.

Specimen (No. P 26284 FMNH) reported as _Dikkomys matthewi_ by

Galbreath (1948:316) is referable to the recently described species

_Dikkomys woodi_ Black, 1961.

_Specimens examined._--One, no. P 26284, Field Mus. Nat. Hist., from

upper Rosebud, Shannon Co., South Dakota.

_Referred species._--two:

_Dikkomys matthewi_ Wood, 1936. Amer. Mus. Novit., 866:26, July.

Type from early Arikareean Lower Harrison deposits (early Miocene)

near Agate, Sioux County, Nebraska.

_Dikkomys woodi_ Black, 1961. Postilla, Yale Peabody Museum, 48:13,

January 16. Type from Deep River Formation, late Hemingfordian

(middle Miocene), Meagher County, Montana; also known from Upper

Rosebud deposits (middle Miocene) near Wounded Knee, Shannon

County, South Dakota.

Genus =Pliosaccomys= Wilson

1936. _Pliosaccomys_ Wilson, Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ.,

473:20, May 21.

_Type._--_Pliosaccomys dubius_ Wilson, 1936, from Smiths Valley local

fauna in Lyon County, Nevada.

_Chronologic range._--Early Pliocene, late Clarendonian (Wolf Creek

local fauna, South Dakota, and Nettle Springs local fauna, California)

to Middle Pliocene, middle part of Hemphillian (Smiths Valley local

fauna, Nevada, and McKay Reservoir and Otis Basin local faunas,

Oregon).

_Description._--Size small (alveolar length of mandibular tooth-row

measuring 6.0 in holotype), about as in _Thomomys monticola_; upper

incisor relatively broad and flat, having anterior face smooth,

without trace of grooving; crowns of cheek teeth of medium height and

rooted; enamel investment continuous and uninterrupted in all stages

of wear; premolars permanently, biprismatic; P4 having anterior prism

subtriangular and decidedly smaller that sub-crescentic posterior

prism, and joined near centers by narrow, obliquely oriented isthmus;

p4 having anterior prism subovate, posterior prism strongly compressed

anteroposteriorly, and joined at mid-points by relatively broad and

straight isthmus; first and second molars, both above and below,

monoprismatic in final (?adult) stage of wear, derived ontogenetically

from primitive bilophate pattern by coalescence of two columns into

one; M1 and M2 mirror images of m1 and m2 in pre-final stages of wear,

two columns first uniting at edge of protomeres forming U-pattern, and

primitive H-pattern never developing in either series (for detailed

description of stages of wear, see account of phylogeny, p. 546); m3

(M3 unknown, but probably with same form as in Geomyini, see p. 552)

persistently biprismatic, two columns joined by relatively broad

isthmus at centers, consequently, forming H-pattern of primitive

ancestors; rostrum heavy and broad as in modern geomyids; palate

narrow and strongly ribbed; mandible stout; masseteric ridge and fossa

well developed; basitemporal fossa absent.

_Specimens examined._--Six, nos. 1796 (holotype)--1799, 1804 and 1806

(CIT) now in the Los Angeles County Museum, all from Smiths Valley

local fauna, Middle Pliocene, Nevada.

_Referred species._--two:

*_Pliosaccomys dubius_ Wilson, 1936. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ.,

743:20, May 21. Known from early and middle Pliocene faunas

including Wolf Creek local fauna (late Clarendonian), Shannon

County, South Dakota; McKay Reservoir local fauna and Otis Basin

local fauna (Hemphillian), Oregon; type from Smiths Valley local

fauna (probably middle Hemphillian), Lyon County, Nevada.

*_Pliosaccomys wilsoni_ James, 1963. Univ. California Publ. Geol. Sci.,

45:101, June 26. Type from Nettle Springs local fauna of late

Clarendonian (early Pliocene), Ventura County, California.

Tribe THOMOMYINI, new tribe

_Type._--_Thomomys_ Wied-Neuwied, 1839.

_Chronologic and geographic range._--Known from late Pliocene (early

Blancan) to Recent. Known primarily from western North America from

southern Canada south to Central México in Pliocene, Pleistocene and

Recent and in middle and late Pleistocene of Maryland and Florida.

_Diagnosis._--Size small to medium (basilar length exclusive of _T.

bulbivorus_, measuring from approximately 24 to 45, including both

males and females); upper incisors without grooving, excepting fine,

indistinct sulcus rarely near inner margin (grooving more common in

_T. monticola_ than in other Recent species); crowns of cheek teeth

high, rooted and ever-growing; all molars, including M3, monoprismatic

and anteroposteriorly compressed, sometimes (especially in subadults)

having slight inflection on labial side in upper teeth and lingual

side in lower teeth; molars bicolumnar in pre-final stages of wear

(seen in juvenal teeth only), patterns of wear in both upper and lower

molars resembling those of _Pliosaccomys_, except that crowns of m3

and M3 unite into single column in final stages of wear; enamel

pattern interrupted in all cheek teeth, loss occurring only at sides

of each column; transverse enamel blade completely covering posterior

face of both P4 and p4; all upper and lower molars with two transverse

enamel blades, one on anterior surface and one on posterior surface,

of each tooth, including M3; small third plate sometimes persistent on

broad side of tooth, labial side in upper molars and lingual side in

lower molars (_T. bulbivorus_); skull generalized, neither unusually

narrow and deep or broad and flat; usually without marked cresting or

rugosity; masseteric ridge well developed and massive; basitemporal

fossa absent, sometimes shallow depression forming in _T. townsendii_;

pelage soft, never harsh or hispid, covering body with thick coat of

hair; forefoot exceptionally small for fossorial mammal, claws not

especially long; body form remarkably fossorial.

The tribe Thomomyini is monotypic, including only the genus

_Thomomys_.

Genus =Thomomys= Wied-Neuwied

1839. _Thomomys_ Wied-Neuwied, Nova Acta Phys. Med. Acad. Caesar.

Leop.-Carol., 19(1):377.

1836. _Oryctomys_ Eydoux and Gervais (in part), Mag. de Zool., 6:20,

pl. 21. Type: _Oryctomys_ (_Saccophorus_) _bottae_, from

coast of California, probably near Monterey.

1903. _Megascapheus_ Elliot, Field Columb. Mus., Publ. 76, Zool.

Ser., 3(11):190, July 25. Type: _Diplostoma bulbivorum_

Richardson, from Columbia River, probably near Portland, Ore.

1933. _Pleisothomomys_ Gidley and Gazin, Jour. Mamm. 14:354. Type:

_Pleisothomomys potomacensis_ Gidley and Gazin, from

Pleistocene, Cumberland Cave local fauna, Allegany County,

Maryland.

_Chronologic range._--Known from late Pliocene to Recent.

_Description._--Same as that given for the tribe Thomomyini above.

_Discussion._--Features characterizing _Thomomys_ and the tribe

Thomomyini are more advanced than those characterizing the tribe

Dikkomyini. Also, the Thomomyini retain more of the primitive

features of the Geomyinae than do the more specialized tribe Geomyini.

Specializations are few, but include the third molar being a single

column both above and below, enamel plates, and a masseteric ridge.

Key to the Subgenera of _Thomomys_

A Molars sub-crescent or ovate in cross-section, not

becoming abruptly narrower at one end of tooth.

Subgenus _Pleisothomomys_ p. 519

A´ Molars pear-shaped, not sub-crescent or ovate, in

cross-section, crown becoming abruptly narrow at one

end of tooth. Subgenus _Thomomys_ p. 520

Subgenus =Pleisothomomys= Gidley and Gazin

1933. _Pleisothomomys_ Gidley and Gazin, Jour. Mamm., 14:354,

November 13.

_Type._--_Pleisothomomys potomacensis_ Gidley and Gazin, 1933.

_Chronologic range._--Late Pliocene (Hagerman local fauna, Idaho) to

late Pleistocene. The latest records are from the fauna of Saber-tooth

Cave, Florida, a late Pleistocene assemblage that probably was

deposited in the Sangamon. The middle and late Pleistocene records are

from the eastern United States, suggesting that the subgenus

_Pleisothomomys_ was restricted to that region while the subgenus

_Thomomys_ occupied the western United States and parts of Canada and

México as it does today.

_Description and Comparison._--Separated from subgenus _Thomomys_ only

on basis of sub-crescentic shaped molars (only jaw fragments and

isolated teeth known), seemingly a primitive feature of the genus.

This dental structure continued into the late Pleistocene; none of the

Recent species expresses this feature of the molars, although the

molars of _Thomomys vetus_ of the late Pleistocene (Wisconsin

deposits), referred to the subgenus _Thomomys_ on the basis of

its alleged relationship to _Thomomys townsendii_ (see Davis,

1937:156-158), are less distinctly pear-shaped, and are more

sub-crescentic, than in any other known species of the subgenus

_Thomomys_. _Pleisothomomys_ Gidley and Gazin (_loc. cit._) was

proposed as a genus but is here considered as of no more than

subgeneric worth, and is recognized because of the apparent constancy

of the sub-crescentic molars in the earlier members of the genus and

in those populations of _Thomomys_ occurring in Pleistocene times in

the eastern United States.

_Referred species._--Three (all extinct):

*_Thomomys gidleyi_ Wilson, 1933. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ.

440:122, December. Type from Hagerman beds, late Pliocene,

Idaho.

*_Thomomys potomacensis_ Gidley and Gazin, 1933. Jour. Mamm.,

14:354, November 13. Type from Cumberland Cave, middle and late

Pleistocene, Maryland.

*_Thomomys orientalis_ Simpson, 1928. Amer. Mus. Novit., 328:6,

October 26. Type from Saber-tooth Cave, late Pleistocene,

Florida.

Subgenus =Thomomys= Wied-Neuwied

1839. _Thomomys_ Wied-Neuwied, Nova Acta Phys.-Med. Acad. Caesar.

Leop. Carol., 19(1):377.

1903. _Megascapheus_ Elliot, Field Columb. Mus., Publ. 76, Zool.

Ser., 3 (11):190, July 25. Type: _Diplostoma bulbivorum_

Richardson, from Columbia River, probably near Portland, Oregon.

_Type._--_Thomomys rufescens_ Wied-Neuwied, 1839.

Evolution and Classification of the Pocket Gophers of the Subfamily Geomyinae · 第 4 / 11 段