_Thomomys bottae_ has been identified from Wisconsin age deposits in

western North America, as follows: Burnet Cave, Gaudalupe Mt., New

Mexico (Schultz and Howard, 1935:280); Carpinteria Asphalt, California

(Wilson, 1933a:70); McKittrick Asphalt, Kern County, California (J. R.

Schultz, 1938:206); Rancho La Brea, Los Angeles County, California

(Dice, 1925:125--specimens described as a new subspecies, _T. b.

occipitalis_); Papago Springs Cave, Santa Cruz County, Arizona

(Skinner, 1942:150 and 158--probably _bottae_, but possibly _umbrinus_

on the assumption that the two are specifically instead of

subspecifically distinct); Isleta Cave, Bernalillo County, New Mexico

(Harris and Findley, 1964:115--some of these fossils may be

post-Wisconsin in age); Potter Creek Cave and Samwel Cave, Shasta

County, California (Sinclair, 1905:146--identified as _T. leucodon_,

now a subspecies of _T. bottae_; also see Hay, 1927:214-215).

_Thomomys umbrinus_ has been reported from San Josecito Cave, Nuevo

León, México (Russell, 1960:542); Upper Bercerra, México (Hibbard,

1955a:51--identified only as _Thomomys_ sp., but undoubtedly referable

to _T. umbrinus_). Post-Wisconsin remains of _Thomomys umbrinus_ are

reported by Alvarez (1964:6) from capa II and capa III of the Cueva La

Nopalera, southwestern Hidalgo. Hay (1927:222-223) reported specimens

of the genus _Thomomys_ from Wisconsin deposits in Hawver Cave,

Eldorado County, California, but did not assign them to species.

Gilmore (1947:158) found the remains of _Thomomys umbrinus_ in cave

deposits near Quatro Ciénegas in central Coahuila. These cave deposits

may have been laid down during the Wisconsin, but more likely

accumulated in the post-Wisconsin.

_Zygogeomys_

Remains found in the Curtis Ranch local fauna, Cochise County, in

southeastern Arizona are regarded as of middle Pleistocene age. See

Gazin (1942:481-484), Wilson (1937:39-40), Hibbard (1958:25), and

Hibbard _et al._ (1965:510-511). Although some question as to the

exact age of the Curtis Ranch local fauna still seems to exist, most

authorities on the Pleistocene agree that the age is not Pliocene and

that it is older than Rancholabrean. Gidley (1922:122) described the

pocket gopher found in the Curtis Ranch beds as _Geomys parvidens_,

which is preoccupied by _Geomys parvidens_ Brown (1908:194), a name

proposed for the pocket gopher from the Conard Fissure of Arkansas;

therefore, Hay (1927:136) proposed the name _Geomys persimilis_ for

the Curtis Ranch species to replace _Geomys parvidens_ Gidley.

_Geomys persimilis_ Hay became the type species of Gazin's genus

_Nerterogeomys_ (1942:507). In this paper, _Nerterogeomys_ is

considered to be a junior synonym of _Zygogeomys_.

_Zygogeomys persimilis_ is represented by a rostral fragment bearing

all the cheek teeth on the left side and the upper incisors. In

addition, two lower jaws, one with the first three cheek teeth,

are referred to the species (see Gazin, 1942:507). The fossils

identified as _Geomys_ from the Arroyo San Francisco, Cedazo fauna,

in Aguascalientes, México, by Mooser (1959:413) may be referable

instead to _Zygogeomys_. I have not seen the specimens and no figures

are available; Mooser states that a cranium was recovered. If either

the upper premolar or third molar is in place, generic identification

could be made with reasonable certainty. No other fossils of

_Zygogeomys_ have been uncovered in late Pleistocene deposits and the

significance of the absence of _Zygogeomys_ has been discussed in an

earlier paragraph of this section. _Geomys_ has not been found so far

south as Aguascalientes, but _Zygogeomys_ occurs farther south now and

presumably had a more extensive range on the plateau to the north in

the Pleistocene.

_Geomys_

_Geomys_ is common in Pleistocene deposits, especially on the Great

Plains. Certainly the center of differentiation for _Geomys_ was

in this region, although at times, probably when conditions were

favorable, _Geomys_ expanded its range into adjacent areas, reaching

the Pacific Coast in Irvingtonian times and the Atlantic Coast at the

time of the Illinoian glaciation. The earliest Pleistocene records

of the genus are from the Great Plains. McGrew (1944:49) described

_Geomys quinni_ from the Sand Draw local fauna, Brown County,

Nebraska, considered by Hibbard (1958:11) to be Nebraskan in age. As

mentioned in the account of Pliocene geomyids, _Geomys quinni_ occurs

also in the late Pliocene deposits of southwestern Kansas. Also,

_Geomys quinni_ occurs in the Broadwater-Lisco local fauna of Morrill

and Garden counties, western Nebraska (Barbour and Schultz, 1937:3;

Schultz and Stout, 1948:560-563; Schultz _et al._, 1951: table 1). The

Broadwater-Lisco is currently regarded as Aftonian deposits (Schultz

and Stout, _loc. cit._; Hibbard, 1958:11). Hibbard (1956:174)

identified _Geomys quinni_ from the Deer Park local fauna, probably

deposited during the early Aftonian interglacial, of Meade County,

Kansas. Strain (1966:36) described _Geomys paenebursarius_ on the

basis of fossils obtained from early Pleistocene deposits of the

Hudspeth local fauna from western Hudspeth County in the Trans-Pecos

of Texas. The Hudspeth fossils were probably deposited during the

Aftonian interglacial. From Kingman County, Kansas, Hibbard (_op.

cit._: 164) recovered isolated teeth of _Geomys_ from the Dixon local

fauna, regarded by him (_op. cit._:153-154) as deposited during the

latest Nebraskan glaciation, and correlated by him with the Sand Draw

local fauna of Nebraska. Hibbard (1958:11) later regarded the Dixon as

a transitional fauna between Nebraskan and Aftonian. The remains of

_Geomys_ from the Dixon are known only from isolated teeth. The teeth

are small, and suggest that a smaller species of _Geomys_ may have

occurred along with the more common and larger _G. quinni_ during the

early Pleistocene (see discussion beyond of the Saunders _Geomys_).

_Geomys quinni_ was widespread and common throughout the central Great

Plains from the late Pliocene (Rexroad fauna) through the early

Pleistocene (Nebraskan and Aftonian deposits).

Hibbard (1956:179) referred the pocket gopher remains taken from the

Saunders local fauna in Meade County, Kansas, to _Geomys tobinensis_,

a small species having continuous enamel bands around the lower

premolar in younger specimens. The Saunders local fauna was deposited

in the late Aftonian and is younger than the Deer Park local fauna

discussed above. Paulson (1961:138) later pointed out that the

Saunders _Geomys_ is distinct from _Geomys tobinensis_; hence, the

small pocket gopher from the Saunders local fauna is probably an

unnamed species, perhaps more closely allied to _paenebursarius_

than to _quinni_. The small _Geomys_ reported from the Aftonian

Broadwater-Lisco local fauna of Nebraska (Schultz and Stout, 1948:563)

may also be the same as the Saunders pocket gopher, but the smaller

adult specimens occurring in the same bed with larger specimens

probably are females and the larger specimens males. In all living

Geomyini females have smaller skulls than males.

The Irvingtonian provincial age is currently regarded as Middle

Pleistocene and includes the late Kansan glaciation (that part

occurring after the glacial maximum) and the Yarmouthian interglacial

(see Hibbard _et al._, 1965:512-514). The Irvingtonian provincial

age, therefore, follows the late Blancan provincial age of the early

Pleistocene and is succeeded by the Rancholabrean provincial age of

the late Pleistocene. No specimen of an Irvingtonian _Geomys_ is

referable to any living species. Two Irvingtonian species have been

described. Hibbard (1944:735) named _Parageomys tobinensis_ [= _Geomys

tobinensis_] from the Tobin local fauna of Russell County, Kansas.

This species since has been reported from the Cudahy local fauna of

Meade County, Kansas (Paulson, 1961:137). Hibbard (1956:183) also

identified as _Geomys tobinensis_ the pocket gopher recovered from the

Saunders local fauna, a late Aftonian deposit of Meade County, Kansas,

and reduced the technical name _Parageomys_ from generic to subgeneric

rank. Paulson (_op. cit._:138) pointed out that the Saunders specimens

differ from _G. tobinensis_, and he, therefore, restricted the name

to the small _Geomys_ of the Cudahy and Tobin local faunas of

Irvingtonian provincial age. _G. tobinensis_ is markedly smaller than

the Blancan _G. quinni_. The Cudahy and Tobin local faunas are of

approximately the same age, and presently both are included in one

unit, the Cudahy fauna. The Cudahy fauna is considered to have been

deposited in late Kansan as it occurs in strata immediately below the

Pearlette ash.

Recently, White and Downs (1961:8) described a new Irvingtonian

species, _Geomys garbanii_, from the middle Pleistocene Vallecito

Creek local fauna of San Diego County, California. Many well preserved

fossils of the new species were recovered. _Geomys garbanii_ is of

medium size (approximately the size of one of the larger subspecies of

_G. bursarius_), and significantly larger than the Irvingtonian

_Geomys tobinensis_ of the Great Plains. The Vallecito Creek

occurrence of _Geomys_ is the first authenticated record from the

Pacific Coast region. Matthew (1902:320) erroneously referred remains

of _Thomomys_ to the genus _Geomys_ in his revised list of Cope's

earlier report on the Fossil Lake (or Silver Lake) fauna (see

discussion of _Thomomys_ above).

A number of Irvingtonian fossil remains of _Geomys_ have not been

identified with particular species. Hibbard (1941a:206) found _Geomys_

in the Borchers local fauna (deposited in the time of the Yarmouthian

interglacial) of Meade County, Kansas. Also, _Geomys_ has been

reported from several sites in Nebraska. Schultz and Tanner (1957:67)

reported _Geomys_ from the Angus fossil quarry in Nuckolls County,

south-central Nebraska. The Angus fossils were found in sediments

of the Sappa Formation considered by Schultz and Tanner to be a

Yarmouthian deposit. Fossil quarries (Hay Springs, Rushville, and

Gordon) along the south side of the Niobrara River Valley in Sheridan

County, Nebraska, have also provided records of geomyids. Both a large

and small species of _Geomys_ have been reported from the more

recently excavated Rushville and Gordon sites (Schultz and Stout,

1948:562-567, and table 3). In view of the great disparity in size

owing to sex, these may actually be males and females of the same

species, as mentioned above. The name Hay Springs has been used in

reference to all three sites. The ages of the Hay Springs sites are

approximately the same, but their correlation is presently under

debate. Schultz and Tanner (1957:68-71) maintain that the fossils are

distinctly middle Pleistocene, and that they were deposited during

late Kansan glaciation, or perhaps from early Yarmouthian into early

Illinoian, with the largest concentration coming from the Sappa sands

of pre-Illinoian (Yarmouth) age. Hibbard (1958:25), basing his opinion

on the presence of _Microtus pennsylvanicus_, and the stage of

evolution of other species in the assemblage, regards the Hay Springs

sites as probably Illinoian deposits, but certainly no older than

that.

Mooser (1959:413) identified as _Geomys_ the pocket gopher from

Irvingtonian deposits in Arroyo San Francisco (loc. no. 5) near the

city of Aguascalientes, México. As suggested elsewhere in this

account, these fossils may be referable to _Zygogeomys_ rather

than _Geomys_. The Irvingtonian provincial age of this fauna was

established by Hibbard and Mooser (1963:245-250). Other alleged

occurrences have recently been compiled by Alvarez (1965:19-20).

Maldonado-Koerdell (1948:20) noted four fossil occurrences of the

genus _Geomys_ in México. Two of these from San Josecito Cave in

Nuevo León have since been identified with the genera _Orthogeomys_

and _Pappogeomys_ (Russell, 1960:543-548); the third listed by

Maldonado-Koerdell from "near Ameca, Jalisco," was based on Brown's

(1912:167) mention of some bones supposedly of the family "Geomyidae,"

and the fourth refers to pocket gopher remains from the "Hochtals von

Mexiko" listed as _Geomys_ by Freudenberg (1921:139). His generic

identification is doubtful and the specimens should be compared with

Mexican genera of the Geomyinae.

Upper Pleistocene records of _Geomys_ also are common. Upper

Pleistocene is here understood to include late Illinoian,

Sangamon and Wisconsin deposits; all are considered to be of

Rancholabrean provincial age (see Hibbard _et al._, 1965:512-515) and

post-Irvingtonian. The presence of remains of _Bison_ and/or _Microtus

pennsylvanicus_ are currently considered mammalian index fossils of

Rancholabrean faunas. In the Illinoian, _Geomys_ extended its range to

the Atlantic Coast in the southeastern United States. The eastern and

western species-groups evidently were isolated throughout much of the

late Pleistocene, and, therefore, evolved separately. Of the two, the

eastern, or _pinetis_, species-group seems to have remained somewhat

more generalized, and the western, or _bursarius_, species-group has

become more specialized. The Rancholabrean _Geomys_ from deposits in

the southeastern United States are referable (see Ray, 1963:325) to

_Geomys pinetis_.

Marsh (1871:121) described _Geomys bisulcatus_ from the North Prong of

the Loup River (near Camp Thomas), Nebraska. These beds are also

termed the Loup Fork or Loup River fossil beds (see discussion on p.

485), and they lie along the upper reaches of the Middle Loup River

in Thomas County (near Senea), Hooker County (near Mullen), and

southeastern Cherry County (probably the North Prong beds northwest

of Mullen). These beds were at first thought to be of Miocene age,

but later were regarded as early Pliocene (see Schultz and Stout,

1948:562-566 for a historical account of expeditions to these fossil

sites). Schultz and Tanner (1957:71-72) pointed out that the principal

fossiliferous beds in the Middle Loup region are of middle to late

Pleistocene age, with most of the fossils coming from the Crete sand

and silt beds which are probably early Illinoian deposits, and,

therefore, younger than the Hay Springs faunas. Some fossils may have

come from the Sappa deposits dated by Schultz and Tanner (_loc. cit._)

as mostly Yarmouthian deposits. _Geomys bisulcatus_, judging from

the original description and Hibbard's discussion of the cotypes

(1954:357), does not differ significantly from _Geomys bursarius_.

However, _Geomys bisulcatus_ is tentatively retained as a valid

species. Based on the evidence cited above it seems unlikely that

_Geomys bisulcatus_ occurred in pre-Irvingtonian times as often

suggested in the literature.

The genus _Geomys_ has been identified in several faunas of Illinoian

age, all from the Great Plains. Stephens (1960:1961) reported the

genus from the Doby Springs local fauna in Harper County, Oklahoma,

and Starrett (1956:1188) reported it from the Berends local fauna in

Beaver County, Oklahoma. Schultz (1965:249) assigned 21 isolated

teeth, including six incisors, from Butler Springs local fauna

(considered by him to be late Illinoian, following the glacial

maximum) to _Geomys_ cf. _bursarius_. Hibbard and Taylor (1960:167)

reported a baculum tentatively identified as that of _Geomys_ from the

early Illinoian Butler Springs local fauna (including the Adams fauna)

of Meade County, Kansas. Hibbard (1963:206) recorded the genus

_Geomys_ from the Mt. Scott local fauna (late Illinoian deposits) of

Meade County, Kansas; the specimens probably are referable to the

living species _bursarius_. From McPherson County, Kansas, Hibbard

(1952:7) reported the genus _Geomys_ from the Kentuck Assemblage,

which he (1958:25) regarded as a composite of Illinoian and Sangamon

species. Specific identification of the Illinoian pocket gophers is

uncertain, primarily due to the fragmentary nature of the material. On

the basis of dental characters alone most specimens could be referred

to _G. bursarius_; however the taxonomic status of _G. bisulcatus_

is in doubt, and more complete material may indicate that the

Illinoian gophers are specifically distinct from the living species.

Consequently, most authors, including myself, have made no attempt to

refer these specimens to species. Nevertheless, the Illinoian _Geomys_

from the Great Plains is more closely allied to the living species of

_Geomys_ than it is to the earlier Irvingtonian species.

_Geomys bursarius_ has been collected from a number of Sangamon fossil

sites on the Great Plains. Although specific identification of

specimens of _Geomys_ from Illinoian faunas is uncertain, the Great

Plains _Geomys_ from Sangamon and later deposits probably is referable

to the living species as Hibbard and Taylor (1960:165) pointed out.

They found no difference between _Geomys_ recovered from the Cragin

Quarry local fauna (early Sangamon) of Meade County, Kansas, and the

living species _Geomys bursarius_. Isolated teeth of the same species

were collected from the Jinglebob local fauna of Meade County, Kansas

(Hibbard, 1955b:206), a fauna of the late Sangamon. Hibbard (1943:240)

also recorded the genus _Geomys_ (referable to _G. bursarius_) from

the Rezabek local fauna of Lincoln County, Kansas. According to

Schultz _et al._ (1951:6 and table 1) the genus _Geomys_ occurs

in buried or "fossil" soils of Sangamon age, lying just above the

Loveland Loess, in Nebraska. No specific localities were given by

them, nor were any particular specimens mentioned. Dalquest reported

_Geomys bursarius_ from two Sangamon faunas in northern Texas. The

species is represented in the Ward Quarry local fauna of Cooke County,

Texas (1962a:42), and the Good Creek local fauna of Foard County,

Texas (1962b:575).

_Geomys bursarius_ has been reported from Wisconsin fossil deposits

of the Great Plains and adjacent areas as follows: Jones local fauna,

Meade County, Kansas (Hibbard and Taylor, 1960:64-66); Two Creeks

Forest beds of the third interstadial soils formed between Cary and

Mankato glaciations, late Wisconsin (Schultz _et al._, 1951:8 and

table 1); Cita Canyon local fauna in the northern part of the

Panhandle of Texas (Johnson and Savage, 1955:39); Howard Ranch local

fauna of Hardeman County in northwestern Texas (Dalquest, 1965:70);

Quitaque local fauna of Motley County, Texas (Dalquest, 1964:501);

Clear Creek local fauna of Denton County in north-central Texas

(Slaughter and Ritchie, 1963:120); Ben Franklin local fauna, of late

Wisconsin beds along the North Sulphur River in Delta County, NE Texas

(Slaughter and Hoover, 1963:137); Bulverde Cave (Hay, 1920:140;

1924:247) and Friesenhahn Cave (Tamsitt, 1957:321), both in Bexar

County, south-central Texas; Alton, Illinois (Hay, 1923:338-339);

Wisconsin drift of Illinois, without mention of specific locality

(Bader and Techter, 1959:172); Wisconsin drift of southwestern

Wisconsin and northeastern Iowa (Hay, _op. cit._:343); Wisconsin drift

near Galena, Illinois, and mouth of Platte River in eastern Nebraska

(Leidy, 1869:406).

Brown (1908:194) described _Geomys parvidens_ from the Conard Fissure,

in northern Arkansas. Hibbard (1958:25) concluded that the Conard

Fissure fauna represents a glacial stage, probably the Illinoian, and

Hibbard _et al._ (1965:510-511) regarded the fauna as a composite

including both Irvingtonian and Rancholabrean elements. White and

Downs (1961:21) considered _G. parvidens_ to be a subspecies of

_Geomys bursarius_.

The first Pleistocene occurrence of _Geomys_ in the southeastern

United States is from the Reddick I deposits reported by Gut and Ray

(1963:325), who found the remains of _Geomys pinetis_ among the

fossils comprising the "rodent beds" of Marion County, Florida. Gut

and Ray tentatively identified the beds as Illinoian, but Kurten

(1965:219) regarded the Reddick I fauna as early Sangamon. Simpson

(1928:2) reported _Geomys floridanus_ [= _pinetis_] from Saber-tooth

Cave deposits of Citrus County, Florida. The Saber-tooth Cave (or

Lecanto Cave) local fauna is considered by Kurten (_op. cit._:219)

also to be a Sangamon deposit. _Geomys floridanus_ [= _pinetis_] was

reported from the Seminole Field deposits by Simpson (1929:563); both

Simpson and Kurten (_op. cit._:221) agreed that the Seminole Field

fauna is mainly late Wisconsin, although sub-Recent fossils occur at

the tops of the beds. Ray (1958:430) collected remains of _Geomys

pinetis_ from the Melbourne Bone Bed of Brevard County, Florida. The

Melbourne local fauna is considered to be from Wisconsin deposits by

Kurten (_op. cit._:220). The eastern species of _Geomys_ were probably

derived from Great Plains stock that reached the southeastern Coastal

Plains in early Rancholabrean (Illinoian) time. Presently there is no

contact between the eastern and western populations of the genus, and

it is assumed that disjunction occurred as a result of Wisconsin

glaciation. It is interesting to note that the genus _Thomomys_

occurred in this region at approximately the same time; both genera

occur in Saber-tooth Cave deposits.

_Pappogeomys_

The genus _Pappogeomys_ is not known from Pleistocene deposits older

than the Wisconsin glaciation, but a pre-Pleistocene occurrence in the

Benson beds of Arizona (see discussion of the Pliocene above) shows

that _Pappogeomys_ had been differentiated by late Pliocene time.

The absence of _Pappogeomys_, beginning in the early Pleistocene and

continuing well into the late Pleistocene, is attributed to the

southern distribution of the genus, where its range probably was

centered on the Central Plateau of México. The paucity of early and

middle Pleistocene deposits from this critical region prevents any

definite statements about phyletic development within the genus. All

of the late Pleistocene records pertain to the subgenus _Cratogeomys_

(long in use as a generic name but in the present paper reduced to

subgeneric rank in the genus _Pappogeomys_). Schultz and Howard

(1935:280) found _Cratogeomys_ [= _Pappogeomys_] _castanops_ in

Burnett Cave in the Guadalupe Mountains of south-central New Mexico.

The Burnett deposits are probably late Wisconsin (see Schultz and

Tanner, 1957:75, for discussion of the age of these deposits based

on carbon-14 tests). These writers (_loc. cit._) also referred

the mandible of a small pocket gopher to the genus _Pappogeomys_

[= subgenus _Pappogeomys_]. However, neither genera nor subgenera of

the tribe Geomyini can be distinguished on the basis of their inferior

dentitions. Judging from the distribution of the modern geomyines, it

seems unlikely that the subgenus _Pappogeomys_ has occurred beyond its

present range in the late Pleistocene; therefore the small mandible is

most likely that of a young individual of _Pappogeomys castanops_.

Russell (1960:543) referred specimens collected at San Josecito Cave

in Nuevo León, México, to the group of small subspecies _Cratogeomys_

[= _Pappogeomys_] _castanops_. Also, Russell (_loc. cit._) identified

a rostral fragment as of the genus _Cratogeomys_ [= subgenus

_Cratogeomys_] although the fragment had a combination of features

different than in any named species of the genus; he did not name the

fragment as a new species, preferring to wait for additional material

that could clarify its taxonomic relationships.

Hibbard (1955a:52-53) identified _Cratogeomys_ [= _Pappogeomys_]

_tylorhinus_ from the Becerra Superior deposits in the valley of

Tequixquic in the northern part of the state of México. The Wisconsin

age of these beds suggests an earlier Pleistocene derivation of the

_gymnurus_-group of species.

Evolution and Classification of the Pocket Gophers of the Subfamily Geomyinae · 第 2 / 11 段