It is a little difficult to analyse the charm of Biskra. The charm is

great and the attraction strong. They do not lie altogether in the

brilliance of its sunshine, in the shade of its palms, in the richness

of its colouring, in the exuberance of its life. These things we may

meet elsewhere. Biskra has other qualities; it is barbaric, African to

the core, tropical in its intensity.

Biskra is barbaric. To one entering by rail or road its trim streets and

squares, and housing himself in a hostelry which might be anywhere

within the bounds of the civilized world, this is a hard saying. Yet he

may soon perceive that its veneer is very thin and understand that it is

very transitory. A hot wind from the desert in April, and it is gone,

and the real Biskra will reassert itself. But even during the months of

the incursion of the _hiverneurs_, the barbaric note is never absent; to

the ear that listens it is predominant; it rings more shrill by force of

contrast. The troops of snarling camels, with their loads from the Great

Beyond, the clash of African musicless music, the thronging crowds of

jostling races in its markets, the hooded figures crouched motionless

round its cafés, the bedizened native harlotry which stalks unashamed,—

nay, proudly as mistress of the town,—in its streets; all are there to

mark its essential savagery. A few hours ago in the upper lands behind

the desert gateway we breathed the chill atmosphere of Europe; at Biskra

we have passed the bounds; sun and sky and earth and man and outrageous

woman combine to tell us that at last we have entered Africa.

It may be that therein lies Biskra’s attraction to the jaded European.

It is all a little unnatural from the European point of view. There is a

sense of walking on the slopes of a volcano, or of playing with fire;

and if we may believe our novelists, European nature under its influence

tends to eccentric and eruptive manifestations. Yet its frequenters

exhibit little outward sign of disturbance. German tourists, arrayed

indeed as if about to combat a Touareg onslaught, yet read novels

peacefully in the pleasant seclusion of the hotel garden; the Kodak

fiend stalks his prey; the traffic in post cards goes merrily along; but

we cannot escape an uneasy feeling that this nonchalance is a cloak.

Perhaps the novelists have got on our nerves.

Biskra consists of a modern French town and garrison, and several more

or less distinct native villages grouped together on a large oasis, a

strip of cultivated ground between three or four miles in length, with

an average width of half a mile. It contains an immense number of palm

trees, the chief source of wealth in the great Sahara. There is abundant

water from springs, and during winter from the river, which conveys the

snows of Aurès to the desert, and is finally lost some miles further to

the south. It has a swarming native population, of every North African

race, and every hue. There is obviously a very great infusion of negro

blood; no doubt because Biskra is situate on a highway of the nations,

at a point where the caravan routes from the extreme south reach the

mountain lands of Barbary. These natives of various races are collected

in great numbers in the morning market, and throng the neighbouring

cafés throughout the day, where squatting figures play interminable

games of dominoes and backgammon. Conspicuous in the crowd are the

dancing girls of the Ouled Naïl tribe dressed in tawdry finery, hung

with barbaric jewellery and masses of gold and silver coins, their hair

mixed with wool and plastered with grease, their faces tattooed and

darkened with _khol_ and _henna_. These women delight their patrons with

their _danses à ventre_ in the Cafés Maures at night, and later sit—

waiting and watching—on little balconies in the street which is assigned

to them. Many attempts have been made by French and English writers to

shed a halo of romance over these unfortunate beings. The whitewashing

of the harlot is a common literary pose. The story that they come to the

desert towns to earn their dower and subsequently return to their own

tribe and marry may have some foundation; such a procedure is not

unknown in other parts of the world; but to judge from the appearance of

some of them they are a long time thinking about settling down.

It may, at any rate, be said of these girls that they are not a mere

“exploitation of local colour,” got up for the benefit of the tourist.

They are a genuine native product, flourishing no less in the oases of

the Sahara seldom visited by Europeans than under the shadow of the

hotels of Biskra. Their _danses_ excite their native admirers to great

enthusiasm, they often provoke furious jealousies, and are sometimes the

object of extraordinary prodigality. Some of them appear to affect an

air _très grande dame_. “Celles des Ouled-Naïl qui sont de grande tente

apportent dans leurs relations avec leurs visiteurs toute la générosité

et la délicatesse que comporte leur origine. Il suffit d’admirer une

seconde l’épais tapis qui sert de lit pour que le serviteur de la noble

prostituée apporte à son amant d’une minute, dès qu’il a regagné sa

demeure, l’objet qui l’avait frappé.”[8]

Footnote 8:

Guy de Maupassant, “Au Soleil.”

Biskra may be compared with a Nile town such as Luxor, if one can

imagine Luxor without the river, without the temples, and, it must be

added, without the flies. But it is a desert town, the town of an oasis,

born of springs of water rising in a dry place, and it revels in the

desert sun and sky. It is most pleasant when the sky is cloudless and

the air still. But its beauty is greater when a moderate wind is blowing

and light clouds are passing. Then are glorious deep blue shadows thrown

on scarred cliffs of the tawny Aurès range. The tower of the Royal Hotel

is a vantage point from which to view Biskra and its landscape. Thence

you may note the extent of the oasis, the belts of palm trees in the

distance which mark the existence of other oases, and miles to the south

the dunes of shifting sand which to the imagination of most of us

represent the real Sahara. Especially beautiful is the scene at sunset.

The changing lights on the mountains, the ruddy glow all around, the

peculiar quality of transparency in the sky when the sun has set, and

perhaps Venus appears and hangs like a lamp between earth and heaven,—

only in the desert may we behold these last glories of departing day.

The shady, bird-haunted garden of this hotel is a very haven of shelter

when the desert wind blows strong and raises the light dust of Biskra in

the street without. It is surrounded on all sides by the hotel buildings

built in the spacious Oriental manner with corridors opening to the

garden and pleasant balconies above.

Biskra of the tourists, _urbs circumcurrentium_, is in a fair way to

rechristen itself Hichenstown. The novelist and his not very edifying

story pervade the place; they are thrust at you everywhere with damnable

iteration. And the worst of it is that however mawkish the book it has

undeniable power, and if you are unfortunate enough to have read it you

will be unable to avoid recognizing at every turn the scenes in which

the much-longing-to-be-loved heroine and her uncouth lover played their

parts. You will probably not have been in the town many hours, perhaps

not many minutes, before a guide will accost you and produce with much

dignity a visiting-card of Mr. Hichens, on which something is written.

If you express neither interest nor emotion he will regard you with a

mixture of incredulity and pity. What are you here for but to worship at

the shrine of the marabout Hichens? Hichens has made—or marred—Biskra,

and Biskra is not unmindful. There is little or nothing to guide you to

in Biskra, wherefore is it full of guides. They are an ever-present

nuisance. The easier course is to engage one, he will at least keep off

the others; if you have more grit you may set out to prove yourself

unguidable; every guide’s hand will be against you at first, but you

will reap your reward. You will have no difficulty in hiring a guide

when you really want one, and he will respect you the more. The Arab is

no mean judge in such matters. The authorities have endeavoured to

mitigate the nuisance by licensing certain men to act as guides; but

they have not altogether suppressed the unauthorized, and the licensed

merely give themselves additional airs. Silly sentimental visitors have

aggravated matters, and have, moreover, turned many of the boys and

girls into impudent beggars. Books have actually been written embodying

the views on life and religion of these petted striplings; their

remarkable inaccuracies in serious matters suggest that the youth of

Biskra is not averse from “pulling the legs” of its amiable patrons. It

is all rather sad. But the debasing effect of the inconsiderate tourist

is not peculiar to Biskra.

The garden of Count Landon is botanically interesting, and a delightful

refuge from glare and dust and importunity. It is not in the ordinary

sense a garden; it is rather a great plantation or shrubbery divided by

winding paths. The excessive neatness of these paths, built of hard mud

and carefully sanded, rather spoils the effect of the wilderness to an

English eye. There is abundance of running water, and the palm, which

likes to have “its toes in the water and its head in the sun,”

flourishes exceedingly. With it are many bamboos, peppers, oranges, and

various species of _ficus_,—the usual subtropical assemblage. I observe

no tree-ferns; yet the conditions appear very suitable. It is one

continuous jumble; there is no attempt at grouping, which would perhaps

have produced a more noble and more natural effect. But as you come

suddenly here or there to the verge of this thicket, you are startled

and delighted by the contrast of mellow shade within, and the shimmering

glare without;—a contrast quite after the manner of Biskra, which revels

in the juxtaposition of the incongruous. Those who come to the desert in

search of peace and quiet may find themselves in the plight of the

guests of a Swiss innkeeper who advertised: “My hotel is recommended to

those in search of solitude; thousands come here in search of solitude

every summer.” But in the garden of M. Landon you may be at rest, and

dream dreams and see visions, as I did. I had been reading certain

modern French writers who are concerned to prove that the inhabitants of

this country, the _indigènes_, are not Arab at all. They don’t deny the

Arab conquest, but hold that the claim to have “come in with Okba” is as

empty a boast as among us is the assertion, “We came over with the

Conqueror.” They are arguing to a case. If the native is not of Semitic

origin there is hope for him. He has been more or less Christian before,

so he may be Christianized again, or anti-clerical radical socialized,

or whatever is necessary to make him an up-to-date Frenchman. But with

all their theorizing nothing is effected. The Arab,—or Berber,—goes on

in his Arabian,—or Berberic,—way, unmoved by any attraction of French

politics and irreligion. How is he to be broken in? A chance remark of

an American fellow-traveller opened to me the great discovery. History

supplies other instances of idle words changing its course. There is

to-day a great civilizing influence at work on cosmopolitan lines such

as the world has never seen before. It has already profoundly affected

some of the greatest of human interests,—religion, commerce, and

clothes. It will ultimately bring about the abolition of war, because no

one will have time to fight. It is permeating the most unlikely

quarters; if I mistake not my German neighbours this evening at dinner

were continually alluding to it; and what Germany thinks to-day, Europe

will think to-morrow. The Arab, or Berber, must be brought into the

movement. He must play golf. My American friend informed me that golf

has changed the habits of the American business man. It appears that

since Columbus arrived this individual has never taken any exercise; he

has sat in his office glued to his desk from dewy morn till long after

sunset. All that is over, and in a moment. At 3 p.m. he now furtively

affixes to his office door a notice, “Back in ten minutes,” and is off

to the American Sandwich. Saturday is a whole, not a half, holiday; and

Sunday has become a day of especial unrest. If in the twinkling of an

eye such a slave of ingrained habits may find salvation, need we despair

of the poor Arab, or worry ourselves about his pedigree? To all

appearance he is usually short of a job; his posture of seemingly

permanent repose is explained to me as one of waiting till his dates are

ripe. Golf will alter his whole attitude of mind as of body. Local

conditions are most favourable. The Sahara contains the finest

sand-bunkers in the world. The creation of greens is merely a matter of

sinking Artesian wells, a laudable process on which the French

Government is already embarked, but with no full appreciation of its

real significance. Temporary club-houses of galvanized iron would meet

all requirements for the present. At once the Arab’s (I must continue to

call him the Arab, in spite of my French authors) distinctive dress

would go. No one who has not put it on can realize in what a cuirass, in

what folds, he is involved. As he is he could never hope to drive a

decent ball. Array him in a Norfolk jacket and knickerbockers and

putties (I observe that his French conquerors are greatly affecting

putties) and his aloofness disappears. At a stroke he enters the

world-movement; Colonel Bogey will oust the Lord Okba; and when Hadji

ben Mohammed ben Yakoub comes over to represent the Biskra and North

Sahara Golf Club at St. Andrews may I be there to see him win.

[Illustration: OLD BISKRA]

A little way further south than the garden of Count Landon, on the

Touggourt road lie the scattered native hamlets known to the French as

_La Vieille Biskra_, the crumbling houses of a ragged population. Here

is the very _ne plus ultra_ of Arab untidiness. But the play of sunbeams

through the palm trees’ grateful shade turns squalor into beauty. Arab

villages are often half in ruins. Their irregular construction of blocks

of dried mud gives them the aspect of the homes of animals rather than

of men,—the creation perhaps of some gigantic ant. When it rains they

not infrequently fall down. And the labour of rebuilding is not lightly

undertaken.

Biskra is soon to lose its present distinction as the end of the railway

line. The rails are being rapidly laid towards Touggourt, 212 kilometres

to the south, a desert town where splendid gardens flourish beneath the

shade of 200,000 palm trees. The irrepressible motor-car has already

stirred its dust. The prudent Michelin guide describes the road thither

as _piste carrossable mais imprudente à suivre par mauvais temps_. You

are advised to take mats to lay down in the softer places for the car to

run over. But what happens in the event of a serious breakdown is not

explained. When the rail is finished the enterprising tourist may pass

by Biskra as a mere wayside station and continue to the end. But he may

be only going farther to fare worse. It does not appear that the distant

towns of the Sahara present any special points of interest beyond their

existence. Yet perhaps there are some to whom the desert calls as to

others the veldt. But they will stick to their camels and their mules,

and merely use the railway extension as a jumping-board for further

explorations.

[Illustration: BISKRA: STATUE OF CARDINAL LAVIGERIE]

To him who strives to peer beneath the obvious surface nothing in Biskra

is more significant than the statue of Cardinal Lavigerie. It stands in

the main street close to the luxurious Royal Hotel, hard by the quarter

of the Arab cafés and the street of the Ouled-Naïl dancing-girls, a

symbol of the eternal amidst the evanescent, a protest for God against

the Devil and the world. And it looks south. Thousands of miles away,

across the vast expanse of the continent, another statue looks north.

Rhodes and Lavigerie, two types of our civilization, further apart in

intention and in ideals of human conduct than are their statues, look

forth over Africa from their separate standpoints, the Africa for which

each spent his strength. Both worked to bring to the Dark Continent the

accumulated wealth of light to which Europe is heir; they drew perhaps

on different departments in the great storehouse; they directed the

illumination to different points; but to evolve order from chaos, to

substitute freedom for tyranny, to impose peace even, if need were, by

the sword,—these were the objects which both pursued.

The neighbourhood of Biskra is rich in memories of Sidi Okba, the barber

of the Prophet, and the first of the Arab conquerors. It was he who

pushed westward from Kairouan through Barbary to the Atlantic, having

defeated the Berbers under Koceïla and other chieftains. Arrived at the

shore of the ocean he raised the standard of the Prophet crowned with

the crescent, and indicating with it the course of the sun from its

rising to its setting, dashed forward and breasted the waves with his

horse, crying, “God of Mahomet, were I not stopped by the waves of this

sea, I would go to the ends of the earth to carry the glory of thy name,

to fight for thy religion and to destroy those who will not believe on

thee!” On his return journey he was attacked by a force of Berbers under

Koceïla near Biskra and killed with three hundred of his followers. He

was buried in the oasis which bears his name, and his tomb is an object

of pilgrimage and veneration.

But the Berbers, if they had killed one leader, did not succeed in

maintaining their independence. That they adopted the invaders’ religion

is not very surprising. Their previous religions seem to have sat

lightly on them: idolaters, pagans, converted in numbers to Judaism,

orthodox Christians, Donatists,—they had been all in turn. The dogmatic

simplicity of Islam is summed up in the words, “There is no God but God,

and Mohammed is the Prophet of God.” It only demands a belief in this

one God and the veneration of Mahomet, last of the prophets, invested by

God with the mission to bring back men to the religion of the ancient

patriarchs and to the acknowledgment of the Unity of the Godhead. It is

completed by belief in three revealed books, the Bible, the Gospel, and

the Koran. It denies the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus Christ, who

is regarded only as a prophet, but allowed to have possessed a special

nature.

The simple formula of Mohammedanism was not very difficult for a man

with no prejudices to accept. It meant, of course, more than appeared

from its positive assertion; it was directed alike against the

Trinitarianism of the Christians and the idolatry or image-worship of

pre-Mohammedan Arabians. In its rejection of anthropomorphism it stands

on a high intellectual plane; and it is one of the marvels of history

that such an abstraction as the God of Mahomet should have been

sufficient to rouse the Prophet’s followers to their pitch of conquering

enthusiasm. Races beaten in battle no doubt easily accepted its primary

proposition. “People follow the religion of their kings,” says an Arab

proverb. But there was more behind. The Prophet attached to his

religious doctrine a very precise ethical code, a moral system admirable

on the whole in its exposition of the duties of man to man; yet in its

permission of polygamy regarding women as inferior to men. And on the

political side he united the functions of the priest, the judge and the

king. It follows that however enlightened the main basis of

Mohammedanism it is fundamentally opposed alike to Christianity and to

modern theories of democratic government and the equality of the sexes.

“Men are superior to women on account of the qualities with which God

has gifted the one above the other,” says the Koran.

After the manner of organized religions all sorts of complicated

additions have been made to the originally simple rule of the Prophet,

which enjoined prayer, ablutions, fasting, abstinence from wine and the

flesh of the pig. These accretions are largely concerned with the

veneration of saints and the exorcising of spirits. Among the former not

the least is Sidi Okba, canonized rather, we may suppose, for his

prowess as a conqueror and his zeal as a propagandist than for any

peculiar sanctity of life.

The oasis of Sidi Okba lies about twenty-one kilometres south-east of

Biskra. The road crosses a level plain, and is at present in a rather

rough condition, but is being re-metalled. The drive is a pleasant one,

with the long line of mountains on the left fading away into a blue

distance; on the right the desert with an occasional oasis marked by its

group of palms. As we approach Sidi Okba the dark belt visible from

Biskra takes shape. The little town lies in the midst of an immense

group of date-palms, of all sizes, some of great age; one has the honour

of being described as the oldest palm in Africa. Sidi Okba has not been

in any way Europeanized, it is still the unadulterated East; its houses

built of mud, of one story; its streets narrow, winding and very

unclean. It appears to be greatly over-populated, and the mass of its

inhabitants to be very poor. The streets are thronged with men, but

scarcely a woman is to be seen. The stranger, who will do well on this

occasion to bring a guide, will be quite unmolested, and to all

appearance totally disregarded. A main street full of little shops,

curious and interesting, leads to the market-place, which is the very

climax of Arab untidiness. Sidi Okba is not a place for the squeamish.

The chief object of interest is the mosque, which is considered to be

the oldest Mohammedan building in Africa. It is a square building

surrounded by a portico, with a flat roof supported on twenty-six rudely

carved columns. The saint’s tomb is contained in a little chapel which

it is unlawful for the unbeliever to enter. The mosque and its porticoes

are greatly resorted to by students and pilgrims; it contains little

cells in which they are lodged, and endowments have been created by

pious benefactors for their support. There are many present to-day: here

a single student reading laboriously a passage of the Koran written on a

wooden slab; there a little group of doctors squatting in a circle

apparently discussing a knotty point, but in reality only capping each

other’s quotations from the sacred book. In an adjoining room is the

usual Arab school—a number of boys surrounding a seated master who is

armed with a long cane, and yelling their lesson (the Koran again) with

all their might. It is all very far apart from the workaday western

world. Yet even into this very shrine of esoteric Islam has the West

edged its way. On the walls of the mosque hang highly-coloured prints of

the holy cities of Arabia, Mecca and Medina. My guide pointed them out

to me as objects of interest. In the corner of the view of Medina I

noticed the words, “All rights reserved. The Cairo Punch.”

[Illustration: SIDI OKBA: A STREET]

On one of the pillars is engraved in early Cufic characters the grandly

simple inscription, “This is the tomb of Okba, son of Nafè. May God have

mercy on him.” The wooden door of the mosque is very finely carved in a

curious design. It is said to have been brought from Tobna, in the high

plateau of the Hodna, and to have been formerly covered with precious

metals and jewels, which were sold for the benefit of the mosque; but

this may be doubted.

About Algeria: Algiers, Tlemçen, Constantine, Biskra, Timgad · 第 9 / 13 段