J. H. M.

Bath.

_English Translation of the Canons._--In the 36th canon the record of

the subscriptions is, _Quod liber publicæ Liturgiæ ... nihil in se

contineat quod verbo Dei sit contrarium; quodque eodem_ taliter _uti

liceat_. This is copied from Bishop Sparrow's collection. The English

translation, to which subscription is now made, has the following

rendering of the second clause--_and that the same may be lawfully

used_. The word _taliter_ seems to be not rendered at all. Without

wishing to provoke theological controversy, I should ask, by what

authority, and at what date, was the English translation imposed upon

the clergy and graduates, all of whom understand Latin? Is it affirmed

that the English renders the Latin fully, or is the English translation

avowedly intended to fall short? I will not ask the meaning of the word

_taliter_ in the minds of those who imposed the Latin subscription,

because answers might provoke the inadmissible kind of controversy.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 124, March 13, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 41 / 146 题