CHAPTER IV.

COMMERCE.

95. As the currency conveys right of choice out of many things in

exchange for one, so Commerce is the agency by which the power of choice

is obtained; so that countries producing only timber can obtain for

their timber silk and gold; or, naturally producing only jewels and

frankincense, can obtain for them cattle and corn. In this function,

commerce is of more importance to a country in proportion to the

limitations of its products, and the restlessness of its

fancy;--generally of greater importance towards Northern latitudes.

96. Commerce is necessary, however, not only to exchange local products,

but local skill. Labour requiring the agency of fire can only be given

abundantly in cold countries; labour requiring suppleness of body and

sensitiveness of touch, only in warm ones; labour involving accurate

vivacity of thought only in temperate ones; while peculiar imaginative

actions are produced by extremes of heat and cold, and of light and

darkness. The production of great art is limited to climates warm enough

to admit of repose in the open air, and cool enough to render such

repose delightful. Minor variations in modes of skill distinguish every

locality. The labour which at any place is easiest, is in that place

cheapest; and it becomes often desirable that products raised in one

country should be wrought in another. Hence have arisen discussions on

"International values" which will be one day remembered as highly

curious exercises of the human mind. For it will be discovered, in due

course of tide and time, that international value is regulated just as

inter-provincial or inter-parishional value is. Coals and hops are

exchanged between Northumberland and Kent on absolutely the same

principles as iron and wine between Lancashire and Spain. The greater

breadth of an arm of the sea increases the cost, but does not modify the

principle of exchange; and a bargain written in two languages will have

no other economical results than a bargain written in one. The distances

of nations are measured, not by seas, but by ignorances; and their

divisions determined, not by dialects, but by enmities.[44]

97. Of course, a system of international values may always be

constructed if we assume a relation of moral law to physical geography;

as, for instance, that it is right to cheat or rob across a river,

though not across a road; or across a sea, though not across a river,

&c.;--again, a system of such values may be constructed by assuming

similar relations of taxation to physical geography; as, for instance,

that an article should be taxed in crossing a river, but not in crossing

a road; or in being carried fifty miles, but not in being carried five,

&c.; such positions are indeed not easily maintained when once put in

logical form; but _one_ law of international value is maintainable in

any form: namely, that the farther your neighbour lives from you, and

the less he understands you, _the more you are bound to be true in your

dealings with him_; because your power over him is greater in proportion

to his ignorance, and his remedy more difficult in proportion to his

distance.[45]

98. I have just said the breadth of sea increases the cost of exchange.

Now note that exchange, or commerce, _in itself_, is always costly; the

sum of the value of the goods being diminished by the cost of their

conveyance, and by the maintenance of the persons employed in it; so

that it is only when there is advantage to both producers (in getting

the one thing for the other) greater than the loss in conveyance, that

the exchange is expedient. And it can only be justly conducted when the

porters kept by the producers (commonly called merchants) expect _mere_

pay, and not profit.[46] For in just commerce there are but three

parties--the two persons or societies exchanging, and the agent or

agents of exchange; the value of the things to be exchanged is known by

both the exchangers, and each receives equal value, neither gaining nor

losing (for whatever one gains the other loses). The intermediate agent

is paid a known per-centage by both, partly for labour in conveyance,

partly for care, knowledge, and risk; every attempt at concealment of

the amount of the pay indicates either effort on the part of the agent

to obtain unjust profit, or effort on the part of the exchangers to

refuse him just pay. But for the most part it is the first, namely, the

effort on the part of the merchant to obtain larger profit (so-called)

by buying cheap and selling dear. Some part, indeed, of this larger gain

is deserved, and might be openly demanded, because it is the reward of

the merchant's knowledge, and foresight of probable necessity; but the

greater part of such gain is unjust; and unjust in this most fatal way,

that it depends, first, on keeping the exchangers ignorant of the

exchange value of the articles; and, secondly, on taking advantage of

the buyer's need and the seller's poverty. It is, therefore, one of the

essential, and quite the most fatal, forms of usury; for usury means

merely taking an exorbitant[47] sum for the use of anything; and it is

no matter whether the exorbitance is on loan or exchange, on rent or on

price--the essence of the usury being that it is obtained by advantage

of opportunity or necessity, and not as due reward for labour. All the

great thinkers, therefore, have held it to be unnatural and impious, in

so far as it feeds on the distress of others, or their folly.[48]

Nevertheless, attempts to repress it by law must for ever be

ineffective; though Plato, Bacon, and the First Napoleon--all three of

them men who knew somewhat more of humanity than the "British merchant"

usually does--tried their hands at it, and have left some (probably)

good moderative forms of law, which we will examine in their place. But

the only final check upon it must be radical purifying of the national

character, for being, as Bacon calls it, "concessum propter duritiem

cordis," it is to be done away with by touching the heart only; not,

however, without medicinal law--as in the case of the other permission,

"propter duritiem." But in this more than in anything (though much in

all, and though in this he would not himself allow of their application,

for his own laws against usury are sharp enough), Plato's words in the

fourth book of the Polity are true, that neither drugs, nor charms, nor

burnings, will touch a deep-lying political sore, any more than a deep

bodily one; but only right and utter change of constitution: and that

"they do but lose their labour who think that by any tricks of law they

can get the better of these mischiefs of commerce, and see not that they

hew at a Hydra."

99. And indeed this Hydra seems so unslayable, and sin sticks so fast

between the joinings of the stones of buying and selling, that "to

trade" in things, or literally "cross-give" them, has warped itself, by

the instinct of nations, into their worst word for fraud; for, because

in trade there cannot but be trust, and it seems also that there cannot

but also be injury in answer to it, what is merely fraud between enemies

becomes treachery among friends: and "trader," "traditor," and "traitor"

are but the same word. For which simplicity of language there is more

reason than at first appears: for as in true commerce there is no

"profit," so in true commerce there is no "sale." The idea of sale is

that of an interchange between enemies respectively endeavouring to get

the better one of another; but commerce is an exchange between friends;

and there is no desire but that it should be just, any more than there

would be between members of the same family.[49] The moment there is a

bargain over the pottage, the family relation is dissolved:--typically,

"the days of mourning for my father are at hand." Whereupon follows the

resolve, "then will I slay my brother."

100. This inhumanity of mercenary commerce is the more notable because

it is a fulfilment of the law that the corruption of the best is the

worst. For as, taking the body natural for symbol of the body politic,

the governing and forming powers may be likened to the brain, and the

labouring to the limbs, the mercantile, presiding over circulation and

communication of things in changed utilities, is symbolized by the

heart; and, if that hardens, all is lost. And this is the ultimate

lesson which the leader of English intellect meant for us, (a lesson,

indeed, not all his own, but part of the old wisdom of humanity), in the

tale of the _Merchant of Venice_; in which the true and incorrupt

merchant,--_kind and free beyond every other Shakspearian conception of

men_,--is opposed to the corrupted merchant, or usurer; the lesson being

deepened by the expression of the strange hatred which the corrupted

merchant bears to the pure one, mixed with intense scorn,--

"This is the fool that lent out money gratis; look to him, jailer," (as

to lunatic no less than criminal) the enmity, observe, having its

symbolism literally carried out by being aimed straight at the heart,

and finally foiled by a literal appeal to the great moral law that flesh

and blood cannot be weighed, enforced by "Portia"[50] ("Portion"), the

type of divine Fortune, found, not in gold, nor in silver, but in lead,

that is to say, in endurance and patience, not in splendour; and finally

taught by her lips also, declaring, instead of the law and quality of

"merces," the greater law and quality of mercy, which is not strained,

but drops as the rain, blessing him that gives and him that takes. And

observe that this "mercy" is not the mean "Misericordia," but the mighty

"Gratia," answered by Gratitude, (observe Shylock's leaning on the, to

him detestable, word, _gratis_, and compare the relations of Grace to

Equity given in the second chapter of the second book of the

_Memorabilia_;) that is to say, it is the gracious or loving, instead of

the strained, or competing manner, of doing things, answered, not only

with "merces" or pay, but with "merci" or thanks. And this is indeed the

meaning of the great benediction "Grace, mercy, and peace," for there

can be no peace without grace, (not even by help of rifled cannon), nor

even without triplicity of graciousness, for the Greeks, who began but

with one Grace, had to open their scheme into three before they had

done.

101. With the usual tendency of long repeated thought, to take the

surface for the deep, we have conceived these goddesses as if they only

gave loveliness to gesture; whereas their true function is to give

graciousness to deed, the other loveliness arising naturally out of

that. In which function Charis becomes Charitas;[51] and has a name and

praise even greater than that of Faith or Truth, for these may be

maintained sullenly and proudly; but Charis is in her countenance always

gladdening (Aglaia), and in her service instant and humble; and the true

wife of Vulcan, or Labour. And it is not until her sincerity of function

is lost, and her mere beauty contemplated instead of her patience, that

she is born again of the foam flake, and becomes Aphrodite; and it is

then only that she becomes capable of joining herself to war and to the

enmities of men, instead of to labour and their services. Therefore the

fable of Mars and Venus is chosen by Homer, picturing himself as

Demodocus, to sing at the games in the court of Alcinous. Phaeacia is the

Homeric island of Atlantis; an image of noble and wise government,

concealed, (how slightly!) merely by the change of a short vowel for a

long one in the name of its queen; yet misunderstood by all later

writers, (even by Horace, in his "pinguis, Phaeaxque"). That fable

expresses the perpetual error of men in thinking that grace and dignity

can only be reached by the soldier, and never by the artisan; so that

commerce and the useful arts have had the honour and beauty taken away,

and only the Fraud and Pain left to them, with the lucre. Which is,

indeed, one great reason of the continual blundering about the offices

of government with respect to commerce. The higher classes are ashamed

to employ themselves in it; and though ready enough to fight for (or

occasionally against) the people,--to preach to them,--or judge them,

will not break bread for them; the refined upper servant who has

willingly looked after the burnishing of the armoury and ordering of the

library, not liking to set foot in the larder.

102. Farther still. As Charis becomes Charitas on the one side, she

becomes--better still--Chara, Joy, on the other; or rather this is her

very mother's milk and the beauty of her childhood; for God brings no

enduring Love, nor any other good, out of pain; nor out of contention;

but out of joy and harmony. And in this sense, human and divine, music

and gladness, and the measures of both, come into her name; and Cher

becomes full-vowelled Cheer, and Cheerful; and Chara opens into Choir

and Choral.[52]

103. And lastly. As Grace passes into Freedom of action, Charis becomes

Eleutheria, or Liberality; a form of liberty quite curiously and

intensely different from the thing usually understood by "Liberty" in

modern language: indeed, much more like what some people would call

slavery: for a Greek always understood, primarily, by liberty,

deliverance from the law of his own passions (or from what the Christian

writers call bondage of corruption), and this a complete liberty: not

being merely safe from the Siren, but also unbound from the mast, and

not having to resist the passion, but making it fawn upon, and follow

him--(this may be again partly the meaning of the fawning beasts about

the Circean cave; so, again, George Herbert--

Correct thy passion's spite,

Then may the beasts draw thee to happy light)--

And it is only in such generosity that any man becomes capable of so

governing others as to take true part in any system of national economy.

Nor is there any other eternal distinction between the upper and lower

classes than this form of liberty, Eleutheria, or benignity, in the one,

and its opposite of slavery, Douleia, or malignity, in the other; the

separation of these two orders of men, and the firm government of the

lower by the higher, being the first conditions of possible wealth and

economy in any state,--the Gods giving it no greater gift than the power

to discern its true freemen, and "malignum spernere vulgus."

104. While I have traced the finer and higher laws of this matter for

those whom they concern, I have also to note the material law--vulgarly

expressed in the proverb, "Honesty is the best policy." That proverb is

indeed wholly inapplicable to matters of private interest. It is not

true that honesty, as far as material gain is concerned, profits

individuals. A clever and cruel knave will in a mixed society always be

richer than an honest person can be. But Honesty is the best "policy,"

if policy mean practice of State. For fraud gains nothing in a State. It

only enables the knaves in it to live at the expense of honest people;

while there is for every act of fraud, however small, a loss of wealth

to the community. Whatever the fraudulent person gains, some other

person loses, as fraud produces nothing; and there is, _besides_, the

loss of the time and thought spent in accomplishing the fraud, and of

the strength otherwise obtainable by mutual help (not to speak of the

fevers of anxiety and jealousy in the blood, which are a heavy physical

loss, as I will show in due time). Practically, when the nation is

deeply corrupt cheat answers to cheat; every one is in turn imposed

upon, and there is to the body politic the dead loss of the ingenuity,

together with the incalculable mischief of the injury to each defrauded

person, producing collateral effect unexpectedly. My neighbour sells me

bad meat: I sell him in return flawed iron. We neither of us get one

atom of pecuniary advantage on the whole transaction, but we both suffer

unexpected inconvenience; my men get scurvy, and his cattle-truck runs

off the rails.

105. The examination of this form of Charis must, therefore, lead us

into the discussion of the principles of government in general, and

especially of that of the poor by the rich, discovering how the

Graciousness joined with the Greatness, or Love with Majestas, is the

true Dei Gratia, or Divine Right, of every form and manner of King; _i.

e._, specifically, of the thrones, dominations, princedoms, virtues, and

powers of the earth:--of the thrones, stable, or "ruling," literally

right-doing powers ("rex eris, recte si facies"):--of the

dominations--lordly, edifying, dominant and harmonious powers; chiefly

domestic, over the "built thing," domus, or house; and inherently

twofold, Dominus and Domina; Lord and Lady:--of the Princedoms,

pre-eminent, incipient, creative, and demonstrative powers; thus poetic

and mercantile, in the "princeps carmen deduxisse" and the

merchant-prince:--of the Virtues or Courages; militant, guiding, or

Ducal powers:--and finally of the Strengths, or Forces pure; magistral

powers, of the More over the less, and the forceful and free over the

weak and servile elements of life.

Subject enough for the next paper, involving "economical" principles of

some importance, of which, for theme, here is a sentence, which I do not

care to translate, for it would sound harsh in English,[53] though,

truly, it is one of the tenderest ever uttered by man; which may be

meditated over, or rather _through_, in the meanwhile, by any one who

will take the pains:--

[Greek: Ar oun, hosper Hippos to anepistemoni men encheirounti de

chresthai zemia estin, houto kai adelphos, otan tis auto me epistamenos

encheir chresthai, zemia esti];

FOOTNOTES:

[44] I have repeated the substance of this and the next paragraph so

often since, that I am ashamed and weary. The thing is too true, and too

simple, it seems, for anybody ever to believe. Meantime, the theories of

"international values," as explained by Modern Political Economy, have

brought about last year's pillage of France by Germany, and the

affectionate relations now existing in consequence between the

inhabitants of the right and left banks of the Rhine.

[45] I wish some one would examine and publish accurately the late

dealings of the Governors of the Cape with the Caffirs.

[46] By "pay," I mean wages for labour or skill; by "profit," gain

dependent on the state of the market.

[47] Since I wrote this, I have worked out the question of interest of

money, which always, until lately, had embarrassed and defeated me; and

I find that the payment of interest of any amount whatever is real

"usury," and entirely unjustifiable. I was shown this chiefly by the

pamphlets issued by Mr. W. C. Sillar, though I greatly regret the

impatience which causes Mr. Sillar to regard usury as the radical crime

in political economy. There are others worse, that act with it.

[48] Hence Dante's companionship of Cahors, _Inf._, canto xi., supported

by the view taken of the matter throughout the middle ages, in common

with the Greeks.

[49] I do not wonder when I re-read this, that people talk about my

"sentiment." But there is no sentiment whatever in the matter. It is a

hard and bare commercial fact, that if two people deal together who

don't try to cheat each other, they will in a given time, make more

money out of each other than if they do. See Sec. 104.

[50] Shakspeare would certainly never have chosen this name had he been

forced to retain the Roman spelling. Like Perdita, "lost lady," or

Cordelia, "heart-lady," Portia is "fortune" lady. The two great relative

groups of words, Fortuna, fero, and fors--Portio, porto, and pars (with

the lateral branch, op-portune, im-portune, opportunity, &c.), are of

deep and intricate significance; their various senses of bringing,

abstracting, and sustaining being all centralized by the wheel (which

bears and moves at once), or still better, the ball (spera) of

Fortune,--"Volve sua spera, e beata si gode:" the motive power of this

wheel distinguishing its goddess from the fixed majesty of Necessitas

with her iron nails; or [Greek: ananke], with her pillar of fire and

iridescent orbits, _fixed_ at the centre. Portus and porta, and gate in

its connexion with gain, form another interesting branch group; and

Mors, the concentration of delaying, is always to be remembered with

Fors, the concentration of bringing and bearing, passing on into Fortis

and Fortitude.

[This note is literally a mere memorandum for the future work which I am

now completing in _Fors Clavigera_; it was printed partly in vanity, but

also with real desire to get people to share the interest I found in the

careful study of the leading words in noble languages. Compare the next

note.]

[51] As Charis becomes Charitas, the word "Cher," or "Dear," passes from

Shylock's sense of it (to buy cheap and sell dear) into Antonio's sense

of it: emphasized with the final _i_ in tender "Cheri," and hushed to

English calmness in our noble "Cherish." The reader must not think that

any care can be misspent in tracing the connexion and power of the words

which we have to use in the sequel. (See Appendix VI.) Much education

sums itself in making men economize their words, and understand them.

Nor is it possible to estimate the harm which has been done, in matters

of higher speculation and conduct, by loose verbiage, though we may

guess at it by observing the dislike which people show to having

anything about their religion said to them in simple words, because then

they understand it. Thus congregations meet weekly to invoke the

influence of a Spirit of Life and Truth; yet if any part of that

character were intelligibly expressed to them by the formulas of the

service, they would be offended. Suppose, for instance, in the closing

benediction, the clergyman were to give vital significance to the vague

word "Holy," and were to say, "the fellowship of the Helpful and Honest

Ghost be with you, and remain with you always," what would be the horror

of many, first at the irreverence of so intelligible an expression; and

secondly, at the discomfortable occurrence of the suspicion that while

throughout the commercial dealings of the week they had denied the

propriety of Help, and possibility of Honesty, the Person whose company

they had been now asking to be blessed with could have no fellowship

with cruel people or knaves.

[52] "[Greek: ta men oun alla zoa ouk echein aisthesin ton en tais

kinesesi taxeon oude ataxion ois de rythmos unoma kai haomonia emin de

ous eipomen tous Theous] (Apollo, the Muses, and Bacchus--the grave

Bacchus, that is--ruling the choir of age; or Bacchus restraining; 'saeva

_tene_, cum Berecyntio cornu tympana,' &c.) [Greek: synchoreutas

dedosthai, toutous einai kai tous dedokotas ten enrythmon te kai

enarmonion aisthesin meth' edones ... chorous te onomakenai para tes

charas emphyton onoma]." "Other animals have no perception of order nor

of disorder in motion; but for us, Apollo and Bacchus and the Muses are

appointed to mingle in our dances; and there are they who have given us

the sense of delight in rhythm and harmony. And the name of choir,

choral dance, (we may believe,) came from chara (delight)."--Laws, book

ii.

[53] [My way now, is to say things plainly, if I can, whether they sound

harsh or not;--this is the translation--"Is it possible, then, that as a

horse is only a mischief to any one who attempts to use him without

knowing how, so also our brother, if we attempt to use him without

knowing how, may be a mischief to us?"]

The Crown of Wild Olive also Munera Pulveris; Pre-Raphaelitism; Aratra Pentelici; The Ethics of the Dust; Fiction, Fair and Foul; The Elements of Drawing · 第 4 / 16 章