CHAPTER I.

LITTLE BLUE BOOK NO. 692

Edited by E. Haldeman-Julius

Homo-Sexual Life

William J. Fielding

Author of “The Caveman Within Us,” “Sanity In

Sex,” “Health and Self-Mastery Through Psychoanalysis

and Autosuggestion,” “The Puzzle of

Personality,” “Autosuggestion--How It

Works,” “Psychoanalysis--The Key to

Human Behavior,” “Rejuvenation--Science’s

New Fountain of

Youth,” “Rational Sex

Series,” etc.

HALDEMAN-JULIUS COMPANY

GIRARD, KANSAS

Vol. IX

Rational Sex Series

William J. Fielding

Copyright, 1925

Haldeman-Julius Company

PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

HOMO-SEXUAL LIFE

CHAPTER I.

COMPLEXITY OF SEX.

It has been stated that a person normally goes through three stages

in the course of his sexual development--which are represented

by the following dominant characteristics, in the order given:

_Autosexuality_, _Homosexuality_, and _Heterosexuality_.

Each is normal at a certain stage of life. Circumstances, hereditary

or environmental, or a combination of both (there is a vast amount of

controversy about this phase of the subject), may halt the course of

development at either the first or second stage, so that the final

evolution of sexual life may never be realized.

This refers to the psychological and emotional aspects of sexual

development, rather than the purely physical, as it is the former that

sustains the shocks in the difficult process of the individual’s social

adjustment.

While there is a great deal of theoretical abstraction in such a

broad survey of the sexual life, nevertheless, there are enough

concrete facts at hand to make the conclusions as accurate and

serviceable as any that are to be obtained within the realm of actual

clinical practice. The sexual urge is by no means a simple, direct

manifestation, but consists of many partial and often conflicting

impulses, with ramifications that extend into every channel and byway

of life.

AUTO-SEXUALITY, as the term implies, means that an individual’s sexual

interest is turned upon himself. This condition is normal to infants.

It also is more pronounced in primitive and savage tribes, and has its

analogy, in more practical form, in the lower order of the animal and

vegetable world in those species whose individuals are self-sufficient

sexually.

These types, which are capable of reproducing their kind without

depending for fertilization upon another individual of the same

species, are called _hermaphrodites_. This latter term, in its real

sense, means combining the sexual organs of the two sexes.

There are some human beings--_variants_--who possess hermaphrodite

characteristics, usually combining the more or less completely

developed organs of one sex with the rudimentary organs of the opposite

sex.

These hermaphrodite characters are not without their

significance--namely, the innate bisexuality of man. While in the

normal person, the attributes of one sex are dominant, there are always

present in latent form some evidences of the opposite sex. This is no

new discovery. In fact the concept of bisexuality is very ancient.

Traces of it are to be found in Chinese mythology. The classical Greek

mind seems to have had a particular interest in speculating about it.

The mythical personification of bisexuality in the Hermaphroditos, the

narrative of Aristophanes in the Platonic dialogue, and at a later

period the suggestion of a Gnostic sect (Theophites) that primitive

man was a “man-woman,” are all based on this presentiment. The first

divinities were always bisexual, being either women with a penis or men

with a female breast.

WHAT BIOLOGY TEACHES US.

Lower down in the biological scale--in fact, at the very bottom--we

find the _amoeba_, which represents an auto-sexual, or more accurately,

a mono-sexual, form. It has all the potentialities for reproduction

within itself. By the process of division, first of its nucleus, and

then its whole self, it becomes two new individuals.

A little further up the evolutionary path, we find the _paramoecium_.

At one stage of its career it will divide its nucleus first, and then

itself (an autosexual act) similar to the _amoeba_. At another stage it

will engage in an elementary sexual act by coming ventrally together

with another _paramoecium_, exchange one-half of its nucleus for

half the nucleus of the other _paramoecium_, through the mouth, and

this process is followed by other nuclear changes, and finally each

_paramoecium_ divides itself into two new entities.

There is no apparent difference between these primitive little

animals. They have no male and female organs, but it is a plausible

assumption that the nuclei of each one contains a “male” and “female”

portion--something unknown but necessary to procreation. In this

instance we have the beginning of bisexuality; but autosexuality is

still an essential factor in reproduction.

Somewhat higher up the scale we come across the _hydra_, a

multicellular animal. Here, also, autosexuality plays a prominent role.

The _hydra_ can, without the aid of another, “bud off” a new living

_hydra_. Bisexuality is evidenced, however, in the presence of male

and female cells which form in the single _hydra_. These unite with

one another to produce a new individual in true bisexual manner. In a

sense this creature is a combination of the autosexual, bisexual and

hermaphrodite.

Another step up the evolutionary ladder we find the earthworm. Each

worm has the organs of the two sexes--the equivalent of testes and

ovaries,--properly developed, but each worm needs another worm to

induce fertilization. In this instance, we have true hermaphroditism,

and bisexuality is definitely established. However, as the two worms

are of the same sex--each being male as well as female--they are in

that way homosexual, as well, being attracted by worms of similar

constitution.

As life grows more complex and we ascend the biological scale, the

sexual processes also become more ramified, until in the higher forms

of life we find the sexual nature of the individuals of the different

genera and species sharply differentiated.

But even in the highest form of life, there are the vestigial organs

and characters of the opposite sex, so that while the normal human

being has a definite sexual category, it is just as truly apparent that

no individual is wholly of one sexual character. The most masculine man

is not one hundred per cent masculine, nor is the most feminine woman

one hundred per cent feminine. The proof of this will be shown as we

proceed in our discussion.

The physical bisexual characters--those of the opposite sex being

present in rudimentary form--are readily observable. In the male, there

are the vestigial breasts and nipples, and other rudimentary features

less prominent; and sometimes a general feminine contour of body is

noticeable in the male.

The most feminine of women have a growth of colorless hair, called

the “lanugo,” corresponding to the male beard. If the woman has a

larger proportion of masculine chemistry in her make-up, this hirsute

growth may be quite prominent; and in some cases very pronounced, as

in the instance of the bearded ladies who exhibit themselves in shows

and circuses. Women with a more or less definite masculine cast of

figure, movement, manner and voice are commonplace;--as is the opposite

phenomenon--effeminate men.

The psychological phases of bisexualism parallel the physical. We might

even go farther and state they are more in evidence than the physical,

as they are subject to modification by environmental influences to a

degree far exceeding the physical.

As was observed in the opening paragraph of this chapter, the

individual may suffer a retardation or fixation at any stage of

the sexual development, which holds him back into another and more

primitive psychical and emotional level, which he has chronologically

outgrown.

All infants and small children are autosexual, and evidence a sexual

interest in their bodies. Sometimes this is true in only a slight,

almost casual, degree; other times it is pronounced, and becomes a

problem. There is often a tendency toward automatic masturbation,

or other forms of so-called sexual precocity, which may unduly

alarm parents. However, it is well for parents to know that these

manifestations are not abnormal--unless grossly over-emphasized--but

are merely indicative of the passing stage of autosexuality. They will

in due course be outgrown and replaced by other manifestations of

sexual interest, unless unwise methods of repression are used.

HOMOSEXUALITY means a state in which one is sexually attracted toward

members of the same sex. This is normally a primitive characteristic

of childhood, which prevails up to the time of adolescence, but which

may persist in adult life. Some degree of it does normally hold over in

every adult, but it remains in the background of the unconscious, and

is sublimated along social lines.

Young boys and young girls usually have little interest in the opposite

sex--in fact, are frequently quite scornful of them. On the other hand,

they form strong friendships with members of their own sex, and, as

is well known, when their sexual interests have not been successfully

sublimated, engage in mutual sexual practices and masturbation.

Before the full development of the genital organs, the sexual

tendencies are predominantly homosexual, although the influence of the

preceding stage (autosexuality) is still considerably in evidence,

and there is also present the germ of the succeeding stage of

heterosexuality (erotic desires toward members of the opposite sex).

If the youth has been reared in a healthy, constructive environment,

conducive to proper sublimation of his primitive sexual tendencies,

and particularly if his libido is not excessive, he may scarcely be

conscious of his homosexual impulses. On the other hand, if he is

endowed with an unusually strong hereditary sexual constitution, or if

the repression and sublimation have been faulty in his upbringing, the

homosexual tendencies may reflect themselves in various ways in his

conscious attitudes.

It should be borne in mind that there is no abrupt line of demarcation

between these stages of development. They overlap, and some of each of

them, even the most primitive and infantile, are carried over in the

unconscious mind throughout adult life. In the normal, well-adjusted

adult, there are still extant rudiments of the previous stages of the

emotional and affective life, just as the body contains vestiges of

the bisexual organism, from which it evolved in the early weeks of

intrauterine life.

The predominant homosexual element or primitive emotional character

asserts itself in various typical forms that are apparent to those

informed upon the subject. In this connection, Bousfield states:

“Cruelty on the part of boys at school (bullying) is nearly always

a sexual manifestation which, like homosexuality, should be only a

passing phase, which is later repressed into the unconscious. The

monks who denied themselves sexual intercourse, but found pleasure in

flogging themselves or others, form an example of the way that sexual

energy, when denied its normal course, finds a more primitive outlet.

A schoolmaster with repressed and unconscious homosexuality will often

be noted for his flogging proclivities, and so forth. Children, more

especially boys, are observed to have an instinct of cruelty; for

example, they pull the wings off flies. The sport of the chase or of

fishing serves to gratify the instinct in adults.”

Prominent in the classification of adolescent homosexual attraction

are the school-friendships of girls, which are known variously as

“crushes,” “flames,” and “raves.” Elaborate romances are sometimes

bound up in these attachments, with their love at first-sight,

courtship, love letters, jealousy, and other manifestations of erotic

affection. Havelock Ellis states that while these alliances are

sometimes sexual, they are often not so--but are full of “psychic

erethism.”

Homo-sexual life · 第 1 / 5 章