After the bishop of Chester had taken pleasure in punishing his

prisoner, and often reviling him, giving taunts and odious names of

heretic, &c., he caused him to be brought forth into a chapel in the

cathedral church, called Our Lady Chapel, before him the said bishop,

at two o’clock in the afternoon; when were also present the mayor of

the city, Dr. Wall and other priests assisting him, George Wensloe,

chancellor, and one John Chetham, registrar. Then they caused George

Marsh to take an oath to answer truly unto such articles as should be

objected against him. Upon which oath taken, the chancellor laid

unto his charge, that he had preached and openly published most

heretically and blasphemously, within the parishes of Dean, Eccles,

Bolton, Bury, and many other parishes within the bishop’s diocese, in

the months of January and February last preceding, directly against

the pope’s authority, and catholic church of Rome, the blessed mass,

the sacrament of the altar, and many other articles. Unto all which

in sum he answered, that he neither heretically nor blasphemously

preached or spake against any of the said articles; but simply and

truly, as occasion served, and as it were thereunto forced in

conscience, maintained the truth respecting the same articles, as he

said all now present did likewise acknowledge in the time of King

Edward VI.

Then they examined him severally of every article, and bade him

answer Yes, or No, without equivocation; for they were come to

examine, and not to dispute at that present. He accordingly answered

them every article very modestly, agreeably to the doctrine by public

authority received and taught in this realm at the death of King

Edward; which answers were every one written by the registrar, to the

uttermost that could make against him. This ended, he was returned

to his prison again.

Within three weeks after this, in the said chapel, and in like sort

as before, the bishop and others before named, there being assembled,

he was again brought before them. Then the chancellor, by way of an

oration, declared unto the people present, that the bishop had done

what he could in showing his charitable disposition towards Marsh,

but that all that he could do would not help; so that he was now

determined, if Marsh would not relent and abjure, to pronounce

sentence definitive against him. Wherefore he bade George Marsh to

be now well advised what he would do, for it stood upon his life; and

if he would not at that present forsake his heretical opinions, it

would, (after the sentence given) be too late, though he might never

so gladly desire it.

Then the chancellor read all his answers that he made at his former

examination; and at every one he asked, whether he would stick to the

same, or no? To which he answered again, “Yea, yea.” Here also

others took occasion to ask him (for that he denied the bishop of

Rome’s authority in England) whether Linus, Anacletus, and Clement,

that were bishops of Rome, were not good men, and he answered, “Yes,

and divers others. But,” said he, “they claimed no more authority in

England than the bishop of Canterbury doth at Rome; and I strive not

with the place, neither speak I against the person or the bishop, but

against his doctrine; which in most points is repugnant to the

doctrine of Christ.” “Thou art an arrogant fellow indeed, then,”

said the bishop. “In what article is the doctrine of the church of

Rome repugnant to the doctrine of Christ?”

To whom George Marsh said, “O my lord, I pray you judge not so of me;

I stand now upon the point of life and death: and a man in my case

hath no cause to be arrogant, neither am I, God is my record. And as

concerning the disagreement of the doctrine, among many other things,

the church of Rome erreth in the sacrament. For Christ, in the

institution thereof, did as well deliver the cup as the bread,

saying, ‘Drink ye all of this,’ and St. Mark reporteth that they

_did_ drink of it. In like manner St. Paul delivered it unto the

Corinthians. In the same sort also it was used in the primitive

church for the space of many hundred years. Now the church of Rome

doth take away one part of the sacrament from the laity. Wherefore

if I could be persuaded in my conscience by God’s word that it were

well done, I could gladly yield in this point.” “Then,” said the

bishop, “there is no disputing with a heretic.” Therefore, when all

his answers were ready, he asked him whether he would stand to the

same, or else forsake them, and come unto the catholic church? to

which Mr. Marsh answered, that “he held no heretical opinion, but

utterly abhorred all kinds of heresy, although they did so slander

him. And he desired all to bear him witness, that in all articles of

religion he held no other opinion than was by law established, and

publicly taught in England at the death of Edward VI.; and in the

same pure religion and doctrine he would, by God’s grace, stand,

live, and die.”

The bishop of Chester then took a writing out of his bosom, and began

to read the sentence of condemnation; but when he had proceeded half

through it, the chancellor called him, and said, “Good my lord, stay,

stay! for if you read any further, it will be too late to call it

again.” The bishop accordingly stopped, when several priests, and

many of the ignorant people, called upon Mr. Marsh, with many earnest

words, to recant. They bade him kneel down and pray, and they would

pray for him: so they kneeled down, and he desired them to pray for

him, and he would pray for them. When this was over, the bishop

again asked him, whether he would not have the queen’s mercy in time?

he answered, “he gladly desired the same, and loved her grace as

faithfully as any of them: but yet he durst not deny his Saviour

Christ, lest he lose his mercy everlasting, and so win everlasting

death.”

The bishop then proceeded with the sentence for about five or six

lines, when again the chancellor, with flattering words and smiling

countenance, stopped him, and said, “Yet good my lord, once again

stay, for if that word be spoken, all is past, no relenting will then

serve.” Then turning to Mr. Marsh, he asked, “How sayest thou? wilt

thou recant?” Many of the priests and people again exhorted him to

recant, and save his life. To whom he answered, “I would as fain

live as you, if in so doing I should not deny my master Christ; but

then he would deny me before his Father in heaven.”

The bishop then read his sentence unto the end, and afterwards said

unto him, “Now, I will no more pray for thee than I will for a dog.”

Mr. Marsh answered, that notwithstanding, he would pray for his

lordship. He was then delivered to the sheriffs of the city; when

his late keeper, finding he should lose him, said with tears,

“Farewell, good George;” which caused the officers to carry him to a

prison at the north gate, where he was very strictly kept until he

went to his death, during which time he had little comfort or relief

of any creature. For being in the dungeon, or dark prison, none that

would do him good could speak with him, or at least durst attempt it,

for fear of accusation; and some of the citizens who loved him for

the gospel’s sake, although they were never acquainted with him,

would sometimes in the evening call to him, and ask him how he did.

He would answer them most cheerfully, that he did well, and thanked

God highly that he would vouchsafe of his mercy to appoint him to be

a witness of his truth, and to suffer for the same, wherein he did

most rejoice; beseeching that he would give him grace not to faint

under the cross, but patiently bear the same to his glory, and to the

comfort of his church.

The day of his martyrdom being come, the sheriffs of the city, with

their officers, went to the Northgate, and thence brought him forth,

with a lock upon his feet. As he came on the way towards the place

of execution, some proffered him money, and looked that he should

have gone with a little purse in his hand, in order to gather money

to give unto a priest to say masses for him after his death; but Mr.

Marsh said, he would not be troubled to receive money, but desired

some good man to take it if the people were disposed to give any, and

give it to the prisoners or the poor. He went all the way reading

intently, and many said, “This man goeth not unto his death as a

thief, or as one that deserveth to die.” On coming to the place of

execution without the city, a deputy chamberlain of Chester showed

Mr. Marsh a writing under a great seal, saying, that it was a pardon

for him if he would recant. He answered, forasmuch as it tended to

pluck him from God, he would not receive it upon that condition.

He now began to address the people, showing the cause of his death,

and would have exhorted them to be faithful unto Christ, but one of

the sheriffs told him there must be no sermoning now. He then

kneeling down, prayed earnestly, and was then chained to the post,

having a number of fagots under him, and a barrel with pitch and tar

in it over his head. The fire being unskilfully made, and the wind

driving it to and fro, he suffered great extremity in his death,

which notwithstanding he bore very patiently. When the spectators

supposed he had been dead, suddenly he spread abroad his arms,

saying, “Father of heaven, have mercy upon me,” and so yielded his

spirit into the hands of the Lord. Upon this, many of the people

said he was a martyr, and died marvellously patient; which caused the

bishop shortly after to make a sermon in the cathedral church, and

therein to affirm, that the said Marsh was a heretic, burnt as such,

and was then a fire-brand in hell.

He was succeeded by Cuthbert Scott, S.T.P. He was educated at Christ’s

College, Cambridge, and was appointed Master of the College in 1553;

became Vice-Chancellor of the University in 1555, and had the

temporalities of the see of Chester delivered to him in 1556. He was an

active and zealous Romanist, and was implicated in the burning of Bucer’s

bones at Cambridge. He was concerned in most of the political movements

of his day, and being disaffected towards Queen Elizabeth, and opposed to

the reformed religion, was imprisoned in the Fleet in London, from which

he escaped, and died at Louvain about the year 1560.

William Downham, D.D., was born in Norfolk, elected Fellow of Magdalene

College, Oxford, in 1544, and appointed chaplain to the Lady Elizabeth,

who, when queen, nominated him to a Canonry in Westminster in 1560; and

on the 4th May, 1561, he was consecrated Bishop of Chester. He died in

November, 1577, aged 72, and was buried in the Cathedral of Chester, with

a monumental inscription, preserved by Webb, but the monument itself has

long since perished.

His sons were eminent theologians, and had the merit suitably rewarded.

George Downham became Bishop of Derry, and John Downham, B.D., a learned

writer, had various preferments.

William Chadderton, D.D., was born at Nuthurst, near Manchester. He was

educated at the Grammar School of Manchester, and afterwards became

Fellow of Christ’s College, Cambridge. In 1567 he was appointed Regius

and Lady Margaret’s Professor of Divinity, and the following year

President of Queen’s College. Shortly afterwards he became a Canon of

Westminster, and was fortunate in being appointed chaplain to the royal

favourite, Dudley, Earl of Leicester, to whom he was chiefly indebted for

his subsequent promotion. In 1568 he became Archdeacon of York, and held

the dignity for ten years. In 1579 he was nominated to the see of

Chester, which had been for some time vacant, and in the same year he

accepted the Wardenship of Manchester, where he chiefly resided. He was

a member of the Ecclesiastical Commission for the North; and it must be

admitted that he used considerable severity towards the Papists, fines

and imprisonments being amongst the strongest arguments he employed to

induce that body to acknowledge the queen’s supremacy. One of the

priests executed at Lancaster, in 1584, as a traitor and rebel,

complained of Chadderton as “a Calvinist, and a false and cruel Bishop,”

charges which lose much of their severity when proceeding from the friend

of Campian and Parsons. Antony á Wood says, that “the Bishop showed more

respect to a cloak than a cassock,” and there is no doubt that he was a

successful preacher, and a zealous puritan; although by a reference to

the Act Books of the Bishop of Chester it will be found that he was

strict in enforcing the use of clerical vestments, and both suspended and

deprived some of his clergy for their disregard of the Rubric. On the

5th April, 1595, he was translated to Lincoln, when he resigned the

Wardenship of Manchester. He died at Southoe, in Huntingdonshire, April

11th, 1608.

Hugh Bellot, D.D., second son of Thomas Bellot, Esq., of Moreton Hall, in

the county of Chester. Le Neve says he was brought up in Queen’s

College, Cambridge, though Leycester gives him to St. John’s. He was

Proctor in 1570, and afterwards Rector of Tydd, near Wisbeach, and Vicar

of Gresford, both in episcopal patronage. He was consecrated Bishop of

Bangor in the year 1585, and translated to Chester June 25th, 1595. He

was Bishop of Chester about seven months, and was buried at Wrexham, in

Denbighshire, in 1596, aged 54, where a monument was erected to his

memory by his brother, Cuthbert Bellot, Prebendary of Chester.

Richard Vaughan, D.D., a native of Caernarvonshire, educated at St.

John’s College, Cambridge, and one of the queen’s chaplains. He was B.D.

in Oct., 1588, when he was collated by Bishop Aylmer to the Archdeaconry

of Middlesex. He was also a Canon of Wells. He succeeded Bellot in the

see of Bangor, and was also his successor at Chester, being translated

thither, according to Lee, May 16th, 1596, which is probably the correct

date, although the generality of his biographers state that he did not

become Bishop of Chester until 1597, which might be the date of his

consecration. He was translated to London in 1604, and, dying of

apoplexy on the 30th March, 1607, was buried in St. Paul’s Cathedral.

Wood says he was accounted an excellent preacher and pious liver. It

appears from the Bishop’s registers that, like some of his predecessors,

he was much concerned to repress the spirit of insubordination and

impatience of episcopal restraint which he found existing among his

clergy. Failing in his attempts to act as the spiritual adviser and

comforter of his clerical brethren, and to uproot their antipathy to

certain ancient and decent ecclesiastical forms, he frequently cited them

to appear before him in the parish church of Aldford, in which village he

then resided, and publicly vindicated in their presence the polity of the

church. The bishop did not succeed, however, in removing the scruples of

these good men, who regarded their superior as one who sought to fetter

their independence and destroy their liberty. On the 3rd of Oct. 1604, a

large body of Lancashire dissentients appeared before the bishop at

Aldford. They appear to have been men of holy character, laborious in

the discharge of their ministerial functions in populous parishes, and

apparently received kind and impartial treatment. They were all publicly

admonished by the bishop, and required to conform to the liturgy and

ceremonies of the church, and also to subscribe, _ex animo_, to the three

articles in the 36th canon. They were cited to appear again at the same

place on the 28th of November following, but only one complied with the

order. In those days, when roads were proverbially bad, and public

conveyances unknown, a journey to Aldford must have been attended with

serious inconveniences, especially on a gloomy and boisterous November

day. Burnet says, in reference to these dissentients, that “they were

very factious and insolent.” During the Episcopate of Bishop Vaughan,

the cathedral was much repaired; he caused the bells to be re-cast and

hung in the great tower; the west roof he had new leaded, and the timber

work repaired. On his translation to London—

George Lloyd, D.D., rector of Halsall, near Ormskirk, and bishop of Sodor

and Man in 1509, was translated to Chester January 14th, 1604–5. He died

at Thornton-in-the-Moors, near Chester, of which parish he was Rector, on

the 1st of August, 1615, aged 55 years, and was privately buried in the

choir of the Cathedral of Chester.

Gerard Massie, B.D., was nominated to the bishopric on the death of

Lloyd; but died before consecration.

Thomas Moreton, S.T.P., son of Richard Moreton, of York, Mercer, born in

that city, March 20th, 1564, and educated there and at Halifax. He

distinguished himself by his extensive classical and theological

attainments at Cambridge, and was elected a Fellow of St. John’s College.

He became B.D. in 1598, and was presented to the rectory of Long Marston,

near Tadcaster. In 1602 he rendered himself conspicuous by his fearless

attendance on the sick during the prevalence of the plague in York; and

becoming chaplain to Lord Evers, accompanied that nobleman, in 1603, in

his embassy to the Emperor of Germany. On his return he was appointed

domestic chaplain to the Earl of Rutland, and wrote the first part of the

_Apologia Catholica_, in consequence of the merit of which Archbishop

Matthews collated him to a prependal stall at York. In 1608 he graduated

D.D., and was appointed chaplain to James I., from whom he received the

deanery of Gloucester; and in the following year succeeded to the deanery

of Winchester. He was a great benefactor to Winchester Cathedral. He

was elected Bishop of Chester May 22nd, 1616, and was consecrated at

Lambeth July 7th. With this see he held the rectory of Stockport, and

diligently applied himself to reconcile popish recusants and scrupulous

non-conformists to the church; and his success was noticed in the royal

declaration in 1618. He was translated to Lichfield and Coventry March

6th, 1618, and advanced to Durham June 29th, 1632. He died at the house

of Sir Henry Yelverton, Bart., at Easton Mauduit, Northamptonshire,

September 23rd, 1659, aged 95 years, unmarried, and was buried in the

parish church there, with a long epitaph recounting his preferments and

sufferings. He endured, with much resignation, hardships, confiscation,

and imprisonment. Clarendon mentions Bishop Moreton as being one of the

“less formal and more popular prelates.”

John Bridgeman, D.D., the successor of Moreton, was educated at

Cambridge, and elected Fellow of Magdalen College, of which he was

afterwards chosen master, and appointed chaplain to James I. He was also

prebendary of Lichfield and Peterborough. He was consecrated Bishop of

Chester 9th May, 1619, at Lambeth, the revenues of the sees amounting at

that time to £420 per annum. In 1621 he became rector of Bangor-Iscoed,

in Flintshire. He held his see until episcopacy was suspended under the

commonwealth; and on the 15th December, 1650, his palace, with all the

furniture, was sold by the republicans for £1059. He died at his son’s

house at Moreton, and was buried at Kinnersley church, in Shropshire,

about the year 1658. Bishop Bridgeman maintained annually at his own

expense, hopeful young men at the University, and preferred some to

ecclesiastical honours, who afterwards assisted to deprive him of his

mitre. He was father of Sir Orlando Bridgeman, created Baronet June 7th,

1660, who was successively Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer, Lord Chief

Justice of the Common Pleas, and Lord Keeper of the Great Seal. He was

also the direct ancestor of the present Earl of Bradford.

Brian Walton, D.D., a native of Cleveland, in the north riding of

Yorkshire, born in the year 1600, admitted of Magdalen College,

Cambridge, as a sizer, and removed thence to St. Peter’s College in 1616.

He graduated M.A. in 1623, and D.D. in 1639, being then a prebendary of

St. Paul’s, and chaplain to Charles I. His persecutions and losses

during the great rebellion having driven him into retirement, he

projected his great work, the Polyglot Bible, an imperishable monument of

his learning and industry, which was first printed at London in six folio

volumes in 1657. On presenting this work to Charles II. at the

restoration, he was made chaplain to the king, and consecrated Bishop of

Chester in Westminster Abbey, on the 2nd December, 1660. A. á Wood gives

a minute and graphic description of the enthusiastic reception which the

bishop met with when he went to take possession of this long desecrated

see. The joy of the people on the national resuscitation of episcopacy

was unbounded, and evinced itself by the most public and decided

manifestations.—_Wood’s Athenæ_, _Vol._ 2, _p._ 731. He enjoyed his

dignity for a short time only, and dying at his house in

Aldersgate-street, London, on the 29th November, 1661, aged 62, was

buried in St. Paul’s Cathedral.

Henry Ferne, D.D. was born at York, in 1642, he was chaplain to Charles

I.; he was one of the king’s commissioners, along with Sheldon, Hammond,

and others, to treat at Uxbridge, in matters relating to the Church. He

was a personal favourite of the king, and suffered much for the royal

cause; but at the Restoration, a succession of dignities and rewards were

conferred upon him. He was consecrated Bishop of Chester, February 9th,

1661–2, and died five weeks afterwards, on March 16th, and was buried

with great honour March 25th, 1662, aged 59 years, having never been at

Chester. In 1642, he published his “Case of Conscience touching

Rebellion,” being the first printed vindication of the royal cause.

George Hall, D.D. son of the pious and learned Joseph Hall, Bishop of

Norwich, was entered of Exeter College, Oxford, in 1628, being then aged

16 years, elected Fellow of his college in 1632, collated to a Prebend in

Exeter Cathedral, in 1639, and installed Archdeacon of Cornwall, October

8th, 1641. He was presented by his college to the vicarage of

Menherriot, near Liskeard, but was deprived of his benefice, and

prevented keeping a school for his subsistence, during the usurpation.

At the Restoration, he became chaplain to the king, was appointed Canon

of Windsor, and collated by Archbishop Juxon to the Archdeaconry of

Canterbury in 1660, which latter dignity he held _in commendam_ with the

see of Chester, of which he was consecrated bishop May 11th, 1662. About

the same time he was presented to the rectory of Wigan, by Sir Orlando

Bridgeman, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas. His death was occasioned

by a wound he received from a knife which happened to be in his pocket,

as he accidentally fell from a terrace in the rectory gardens at Wigan,

on the 23rd August, 1668, aged 55 years. He was buried in the rector’s

chancel, within Wigan church, where a marble monument was erected to his

memory, on which he is styled “Ecclesiæ Dei servus inutilis, sed

cordatus.” He published several sermons, and a treatise against popery,

with the singular title of “The Triumphs of Romans over Despised

Protestancy. London, 1655.”

A History of Chester Cathedral with biographical notices of the Bishops and Deans · 第 2 / 5 段