AN ESSAY IN REVIEWING.

We are obliged to "Beginner" for the proffered contribution to our

collection of Book Reviews. That is, however, a department of the

paper our noble friend the BARON DE BOOK-WORMS reserves for his own

pen. But as _Mr. Punch_ has never been known to discourage beginners,

he finds room here for the interesting contribution, which perhaps

should more appropriately have been addressed to his _confrère_ at the

office of the _Athenæum_:--

[Illustration]

_Don Quixote_. By MIGUEL CERVANTES. We have conscientiously plodded

through this voluminous work, which is certainly not entirely without

merit. It purports to recount the daily doings of a resident in a

village of La Mancha (Spain) who, accompanied by a clownish retainer,

went forth in search of adventures. He was not very happy, his day's

sport being invariably rounded oft by a sound drubbing, received

either by himself, his Squire, or both. We wish Lord MACAULAY had

lived to see the publication of this work, and had with fuller leisure

relieved us of the task of reviewing it. Remembering his method of

procedure as illustrated in his article on Dr. NARE's _Memoirs of Lord

Burleigh_, he would doubtless by careful enumeration have been able to

show that from first to last _Don Quixote_ had more ribs broken than

any man has actually possessed since ADAM was privy to a diminution of

their original number. He seems also to have had a perpetual renewal

of teeth, keeping pace with their frequent removal by brute force. As

for the number of legs and arms he had fractured, MACAULAY's Schoolboy

would have shrunk from the task of computing their aggregate.

These are blemishes upon a work that is, at least, well intentioned,

and which might have been more successful had our author been inclined

to give his hero credit for more acumen. When he represents _Don

Quixote_ as running tilt at windmills under the impression that they

are armed knights, and when he pictures him charging a flock of sheep

in the belief that it is an ordered army, we think he too grossly

trifles with the assumed credulity of his readers. Exaggeration

is, indeed, the bane of a work that, from first page to last, bears

evidence of the drawback of extreme youth on the part of the author.

We have been pleased to notice some indications of humour in the

conversation of _Sancho Panza_. But it is the pennyworth of sack to

an intolerably large quantity of bread. What we have written has been

without desire to discourage Mr. CERVANTES, whom we shall be glad to

meet with again, bringing with him the fruits of unremitted practice

and of maturer views of life.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 101, October 17, 1891 · 第 20 / 32 题