INTELLECTUAL GAG-LAW.

When the day comes when offences against the intellect are deemed as

great crimes as offences against the person, intellectual gag-law

will meet with no more respect than lynch-law does to-day, and will

be recognized as the expression of an undeveloped moral and social

condition. Choking an opinion into or out of a man's mind is no more

respectable than the same argument applied to his body.

Any form of faith, any religion, that has the vicarious element in it,

is an insult to the intellect. It is based upon the idea of a God of

revenge, a ruler infamously unjust. It is a system utterly ineffectual

without the wanton sacrifice of helpless innocence under fangs of

beastly cruelty--a revenge that has no thought of the redress of wrong

by its punishment--a revenge that simply requires a victim--and blood!

Even with those two elements of the plan it is still impotent until

it has appealed to the basest element in every human breast--the

willingness to accept happiness that is bought by the agony of another!

It is too abjectly selfish and groveling to command the least respect

from a noble character or a great, tender soul. It severs the ties of

affection without compunction. It destroys all loyalty. It says, "No

matter what becomes of my loved ones--those who would die to help me--I

must save my soul." Without the use of the microscope, however, such a

soul would never know whether it was saved or not.

What sort of a soul would it be that could have a heaven apart from

those it loved? It would not be big enough to save, and its heaven would

not be good enough to have.

I prefer the philosophy, the dignified loyalty and love for the dead of

the old Goth, the captive warrior whom the Christians persuaded to be

baptized. As he stood by the font he asked the bishop, "Where are

the souls of my heathen ancestors?" The bishop, with great alacrity,

replied, "In hell."

The brave old warrior, the loyal Goth, drew his skins about him and

said, "I would prefer, if you do not object, to go to my people;" and he

left unbaptized.

That was heathen philosophy; but I think I prefer it to the Christianity

of a devout man, a Sunday-school superintendent, whom I know. He is

a great light in a Christian church today. He worships the beautiful

provisions of vicarious atonement. He refused his mother her dying wish,

and on the following Sunday atoned for the inhuman act by singing with

unusual unction, "How gentle God's commands," and reading with devout

fervor, "The Lord is my shepherd, _I_ shall not want." His mother, who

had the same shepherd, had wanted for much. She even wanted for a stone

to mark her grave, because the money she had left for that purpose

her holy son thought best to use, vicariously, upon himself. That man

believes in the Bible absolutely. He is a good Christian, and he abhors

an infidel! He knows he is going to heaven because he has faith in

Christ, and Christ had an extra stab on his account. He is willing to

take his heavenly home through the blood of Christ, and his earthly one

out of the pockets of a dead mother. The blood of the murdered Nazarene

obliterates the infamy of his acts over her dishonored grave.

And this is perfectly consistent! A religion of faith, a religion that

gets its good vicariously and shifts its sins and responsibilities on

to the past, is a religion that can never elevate character; _it simply

makes a man more intensely what he was before_. It is all self,

self, self. Think of the infinitesimal smallness, the irredeemable

worthlessness, the unutterable meanness of a soul that could forsake

those it had loved, and be happy believing that they were suffering and

eternally lost!

Yet who does not know men who go tramping about the country, living

on the charity of their dupes, and declaring that "the Lord is their

Shepherd, _they_ shall not want," whose families want for almost every

comfort of life? And this is true orthodox doctrine. "Ye shall forsake

father, mother, wife, and children," for what?--to "follow me!" Think of

the infamy of it!

If that is the kind of souls that go to heaven, I shall do all I can to

keep mine amongst more respectable spirits. I will go with the Goth. I

could suffer in hell (if there were such a place) with those I love, and

keep my self-respect.

If I believed I could be happy in heaven with my loved ones in agony

below--if I believed it of myself--there is no vile, slime-covered

reptile on earth that I would so loathe! Forsake father, mother,

husband, children to save my soul! Never! I will go with my people!

Men, Women, and Gods; and Other Lectures · 第 49 / 79 题