THE LEGEND OF THE HORATII AND THE CURIATII.

[_No date assignable._]

It happened that, in each of the armies, there were three twin brothers,

between whom there was no disparity, in point of age, or of strength.

That their names were Horatius and Curiatius, we have sufficient

certainty, for no occurrence of antiquity has ever been more universally

noticed; yet, notwithstanding that the fact is so well ascertained, there

still remains a doubt respecting the names, to which nation the Horatii

belonged, and to which the Curiatii; authors are divided on the point;

finding, however, that the greater number concur in calling the Horatii

Romans, I am inclined to follow them. To these three brothers, on each

side, the kings proposed that they should support, by their arms, the

honor of their respective countries, informing them that the sovereignty

was to be enjoyed by that nation whose champions should prove victorious

in the combat. No reluctance was shown on their parts, and time and

place were appointed. Previous to the fight a league was made between

the Romans and Albans, on these conditions: That, whichever of the two

nations should, by its champions, obtain victory in the combat, that

nation should, without further dispute, possess sovereign dominion over

the other.

* * * * *

The league being concluded, the three brothers, on each side, pursuant

to the agreement, took arms, the friends of each putting them in mind

that “the gods of their country, the country itself, the whole of their

countrymen, whether at home or in the army, rested on their prowess

the decision of their fate.” Naturally bold and courageous, and highly

animated, beside, by such exhortations, they advanced into the midst,

between the two armies. The two armies sat down before their respective

camps, free from all apprehensions of immediate danger to themselves, but

not from deep anxiety, no less than sovereign power being at stake, and

depending on the bravery and success of so small a number. With all the

eagerness, therefore, of anxious suspense, they fixed their attention

on an exhibition which was far, indeed, from being a matter of mere

amusement. The signal being given, the three youths, who had been drawn

upon each side, as in battle array, their breasts animated with the

magnanimous spirits of whole armies, rushed forward to the fight, intent

on mutual slaughter, utterly thoughtless of their own personal peril,

and reflecting that, on the event of the contest, depended the future

fate and fortune of their respective countries. On the first onset, as

soon as the clash of their arms and the glittering of their swords were

perceived, the spectators shuddered with excess of horror, and their

hopes being, as yet, equally balanced, their voices were suppressed,

and even their breath was suspended. Afterward, in the progress of the

combat, during which not only the activity of the young men’s limbs, and

the rapid motions of their arms, offensive and defensive, but wounds

also, and blood, were exhibited to view, the three Albans were wounded,

and two of the Romans fell lifeless, one over the other. On their fall

the Alban army set up a shout of joy, while the Roman legions were in a

state of the most painful anxiety, almost bereft of hope, and reduced

to a state of despair by the situation of their champion, who was now

surrounded by the three Curiatii. It happened that he was unhurt, so

that, though singly he was by no means a match for them altogether,

yet was he confident of success against each of them, separately. In

order, therefore, to avoid their joint attack, he betook himself to

flight, judging that they would pursue with such different degrees of

speed as their wounds would allow. He had now fled to some distance

from the place where they had fought, when, looking back, he perceived

that there were large intervals between the pursuers, and that one was

at no great distance from him; against him he turned back, with great

fury, and while the Alban army called out to the Curiatii to succor

their brother, Horatius having in the meantime slain his antagonist,

proceeded, victorious, to attack the second. The Romans then cheered

their champion with shouts of applause, such as naturally burst forth

on occasions of unexpected joy; on his part, he delayed not to put an

end to the combat; for, before the third, who was at no great distance,

could come up to the relief of his brother, he dispatched the second

Curiatius. And now they were brought to an equality, in point of number,

only one on each side surviving, but were far from an equality either in

hopes or in strength; the one, unhurt, and flushed with two victories,

advanced with confidence to the third contest; the other, enfeebled by a

wound, fatigued with running, and dispirited, beside, by the fate of his

brethren already slain, met the victorious enemy. What followed could

not be called a fight; the Roman, exulting, cried out: “Two of you have

I offered to the shades of my brothers, the third I will offer to the

cause in which we are engaged, that the Roman may rule over the Alban;”

and, whilst the other could scarcely support the weight of his armor, he

plunged his sword downward into his throat; then as he lay prostrate, he

despoiled him of his arms. The Romans received Horatius with triumphant

congratulations, and a degree of joy proportioned to the greatness of

the danger that had threatened their cause. Both parties then applied

themselves to the burying of their dead, with very different dispositions

of mind; the one being elated with the acquisition of empire, the other

depressed under a foreign jurisdiction. The sepulchers still remain, in

the several spots where the combatants fell: those of the two Romans in

one place, nearer to Alba, those of the three Albans on the side next to

Rome; but in different places, as they fought.

* * * * *

Do our readers wonder that Byron speaks of Livy’s “pictured

page?” We advance immediately to the beginning of authentic

Roman history—the date of the war between Pyrrhus and Rome. Our

historian shall be the German, Wilhelm Ihne (pronounced Eé-nuh),

who, however, writes himself directly in English. He is still

later than Mommsen, and far more judicial than he.

The Chautauquan, Vol. 04, May 1884, No. 8 · 第 8 / 120 题