JANUARY 13, 1806.

The Message and documents therein referred to were read, and ordered to

lie for consideration,

And on motion, the House adjourned.

TUESDAY, January 14.

_Inhabitants of Galliopolis._

Mr. WORTHINGTON presented the petition of a number of French settlers

of Galliopolis, grantees, on the 3d of March, 1795, of 20,000 acres of

land, situated on the Ohio River, and nearly opposite the mouth of Little

Sandusky, on condition that they settle the same within five years from

the date of the letters patent, and stating that they, being ignorant

of this condition, are liable to lose their lands, although for the

space of four years they have paid the taxes thereon, and praying the

interposition of Congress in their behalf; and the petition was read

and referred to Messrs. WORTHINGTON, SMITH of Tennessee, and ADAIR, to

consider and report thereon.

FRIDAY, January 17.

_Aggressions on Commerce._

On motion, the galleries were cleared, and the doors of the Senate

Chamber were closed; and, after the considerations of the confidential

business,

The following Message was received from the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED

STATES:

_To the Senate and House of Representatives of the United

States_:

In my Message to both Houses of Congress at the opening of

their present session, I submitted to their attention, among

other subjects, the oppression of our commerce and navigation

by the irregular practices of armed vessels, public and

private; and by the introduction of new principles, derogatory

of the rights of neutrals, and unacknowledged by the usages of

nations.

The memorials of several bodies of merchants of the United

States are now communicated, and will develop these principles

and practices, which are producing the most ruinous effects on

our lawful commerce and navigation.

The right of a neutral to carry on commercial intercourse with

every part of the dominions of a belligerent, permitted by the

laws of the country, (with the exception of blockaded ports and

contraband of war,) was believed to have been decided between

Great Britain and the United States, by the sentence of their

commissioners mutually appointed to decide on that and other

questions of difference between the two nations, and by the

actual payment of the damages awarded by them against Great

Britain for the infractions of that right. When, therefore, it

was perceived that the same principle was revived, with others

more novel, and extending the injury, instructions were given

to the Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States at the

Court of London, and remonstrances duly made by him on the

subject, as will appear by documents transmitted herewith.

These were followed by a partial and temporary suspension only,

without any disavowal of the principle. He has, therefore,

been instructed to urge this subject anew, to bring it more

fully to the bar of reason, and to insist on rights too evident

and too important to be surrendered. In the mean time the evil

is proceeding, under adjudications founded on the principle

which is denied. Under these circumstances the subject presents

itself for the consideration of Congress.

On the impressment of our seamen, our remonstrances have

never been intermitted. A hope existed at one moment of an

arrangement which might have been submitted to, but it soon

passed away, and the practice, though relaxed at times in

the distant seas, had been constantly pursued in those in

our neighborhood. The grounds on which the reclamations on

this subject have been urged, will appear in an extract from

instructions to our minister at London now communicated.

Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16) · 第 91 / 232 题