CHAPTER X

INVASION OF ENGLAND AND IRELAND

The battle of Bannockburn might well have been the historical, as well

as the dramatic, close of the struggle. But Edward refused to be taught

by experience, and the desultory welter of war was miserably prolonged

for nearly half a generation to come. The disaster rankled in Edward's

mind, ever craving vengeance, impotently. With childish wilfulness,

he would not even concede to Bruce the formal title of King of Scots,

though the Lanercost chronicler admits that the victory at Bannockburn

extorted a general recognition of his right by conquest.

Edward retired from Berwick to York. It was plain that Bruce would

instantly follow up his victory, and already there was anxiety on

the Border. Berwick was not only vexed by the Scots, but still more

seriously menaced by the violence of the Northumbrians, who had been

exasperated by the hanging of a number of their countrymen for alleged

treachery; and the storm burst upon the north of England before Edward

could send up reinforcements. Before the middle of July, Sir Andrew

de Harcla, the constable of Carlisle, was in daily expectation of

an attack, and complained that he was hampered by lack of promised

support. Bishop Kellawe could not attend Parliament, so busy was he

in preparations for the defence of his episcopate; 'all the people

say that, if he now leave the district, they will not venture to stay

behind.'

Immediately after the battle, Sir Philip de Mowbray surrendered

Stirling Castle, and passed over to the side of the victor. Towards the

end of July, Sir Edward Bruce and Douglas, with other Scots nobles,

crossed the eastern Border and ravaged Northumberland, leaving the

castles unassailed. They spared the episcopate of Durham from fire

in consideration of a large sum of money. Crossing the Tees, they

penetrated beyond Richmond, the people fleeing before them to the

south, to the woods, to the castles. They turned up Swaledale, and

on Stainmoor severely handled Harcla, who had seized the opportunity

of quietness at Carlisle to make a luckless raid upon them. On their

northward march they burnt Brough, Appleby, Kirkoswald, and other

towns, and trampled down the crops remorselessly. Coupland bought off a

visitation. They re-entered Scotland with many prisoners of price, and

with great droves of cattle. They had met with no resistance, except

Harcla's futile effort. 'The English,' says Walsingham dolefully, 'had

lost so much of their accustomed boldness that a hundred of them fled

from the face of two or three Scots.'

On September 9, Edward held a parliament at York. He readily confirmed

the ordinances, changed ministers, even retired Despenser--anything

for the military help of his barons. But further operations against

Scotland were postponed till Hereford and the other prisoners of note

could be ransomed home. About a week later, Edward had a communication

from Bruce expressing a strong desire for accord and amity. Safe

conducts were issued, and truce commissioners were appointed.

Meantime, however, the negotiations were too slow for the Scots; for,

on the very day that Edward appointed his commissioners, the Prior

and Convent of Durham signed a bond for 800 marks to Randolph for a

quiet life till the middle of January. Randolph, in fact, penetrated

Yorkshire, committing the usual depredations. Still the negotiations,

which apparently had been entered into at the instance of Philip of

France, went forward. But in November the English envoys returned

from Dumfries with empty hands, and with the news of the likelihood

of another invasion of the Scots, 'owing to the lack of food in their

country.' Already, indeed, a body of Scots had occupied Tyndale,

and were pushing down towards Newcastle. About Christmas they again

ravaged Northumberland, and let off Cumberland till midsummer day next

year for the sum of 600 marks. The Archbishop of York, whose manor of

Hexham had suffered, vigorously denounced the invaders; and at York

Minster on January 17, barons and clergy resolved on making a stand

at Northallerton three days later. But the only serious effort of the

season was Harcla's valorous November raid on Dumfriesshire, where

he was well punished, despite the local knowledge of his recreant

lieutenant, Sir Thomas de Torthorwald. About the beginning of February,

indeed, John of Argyll overpowered the Scots in the Isle of Man, and

recovered it for Edward. But 'the terror that prevailed throughout the

north of England,' as Canon Raine says, 'was something unexampled';

'with the exception of a few fortresses, two or three of the northern

counties were almost permanently occupied by the Scots.'

On April 26, 1315, a Parliament was held in the Parish Church of Ayr,

to consider 'the condition, defence, and perpetual security of the

Kingdom of Scotland.' The business was to settle the succession to

the throne. It was enacted that, failing lawful male heirs of King

Robert, Sir Edward and his lawful male heirs should succeed; failing

these, Marjory; and failing Marjory, the nearest lineal heir of the

body of Robert. In case the heir were a minor, Randolph was to be

guardian of both heir and realm. Failing all these heirs, Randolph

was to be guardian until Parliament should determine the succession.

Presently Marjory married Sir Walter the Steward. She died in her first

confinement on March 2, 1315-16, leaving a son, who became Robert II.

of Scotland.

The settlement no doubt was influenced by the imminence of a large

expansion of policy--the ill-starred Irish expedition. On May 25,

1315, Sir Edward Bruce landed at Carrickfergus with 6000 men. On his

staff were some of the foremost Scots knights--Randolph, Sir Philip de

Mowbray, Sir John de Soulis, Sir John the Steward, and many others.

The true motives of the enterprise are by no means clear. There was no

immediate object in dividing the English forces, and in any case there

was involved a like division of the Scots forces. The suggestion of the

discontentment of the Scots with their territorial boundaries, growing

out of repeated successes in the field and a superfluity of money,

seems to be a mere speculation of the Lanercost chronicler. There is

more probability in Barbour's assertion that Sir Edward Bruce, 'who

stouter was than a leopard, thought Scotland too small for his brother

and himself.' It may be that this particular outlet for his restless

and ambitious spirit was opened up by an offer of the crown of Ireland

by independent Ulster kinglets either in the first place to King Robert

or directly to Sir Edward himself. It is not improbable, however, that

the movement may have been a serious attempt at a great flank attack

on England. Walsingham mentions 'a rumour that, if things went well in

Ireland, Sir Edward would at once pass over to Wales.' 'For these two

races,' he says, 'are easily stirred to rebellion, and, taking ill with

the yoke of servitude, they execrate the domination of the English.'

The Irish expedition despatched from Ayr, King Robert and his

lieutenants again turned to the Border. In the end of May, a meeting

of the clergy and magnates of the north had been convened at Doncaster

by the Archbishop of York, at the instance of the Earl of Lancaster

and other barons, who appear to have been in a conciliatory mood; and

on June 30, Edward issued his summons for the muster at Newcastle by

the middle of August. But already, on June 29, Douglas had entered

the episcopate of Durham. Pushing on to Hartlepool, he occupied, but

did not burn the town, the people taking refuge on the ships; and he

returned laden with plunder. Sir Ralph Fitz William had given Edward a

week's warning, but nothing had been done in consequence. It does seem

odd, therefore, to stumble on an account of payment to nineteen smiths

of Newcastle for 'pikois,' 'howes,' and other instruments sent to Perth

in August.

On July 22, Bruce himself invested Carlisle, which was held by the

redoubtable Harcla. His army was amply supplied by forays into

Allerdale, Coupland, and Westmorland. Every day an assault was

delivered upon one of the three gates of the city, and sometimes upon

all at once; but the besieged replied manfully with showers of stones

and arrows. On the fifth day of the siege, the Scots brought into

action a machine that hurled stones continuously at the Caldew gate and

the wall, but without effect; and the defenders answered with seven or

eight similar machines, as well as with springalds for hurling darts

and slings for hurling stones, 'which greatly frightened and harassed

the men without.' The Scots next erected a wooden tower overtopping

the wall; whereupon the besieged raised over the nearest tower on the

wall a similar wooden tower overtopping the Scots one. But the Scots

tower proved useless, for its wheels stuck in the mud of the moat, and

it could not be got up to the wall. Nor could the Scots use their long

scaling ladders, or a sow they had prepared to undermine the wall;

they could not fill up the moat with fascicles; and, when they tried

to run bridges of logs on wheels across the moat, the weight of the

mass, as in the case of the tower, sank the whole construction in the

mud. On the ninth day, Bruce abandoned his engines, and delivered a

general assault; but still the besieged made manful defence. Next day

the attack was renewed with special vigour on the eastern side, while

Douglas with a determined band attempted to scale the wall on the west,

at its highest and most difficult point, where an assault would not

be expected. His men mounted the wall under the protection of a body

of archers; but the English tumbled down ladders and men, killing and

wounding many, and baffling the attack. On the morrow (August 1), the

siege was raised. The Lanercost chronicler, who writes as if he had

been present, affirms that only two Englishmen were killed and a few

wounded during the eleven days' investment.

Whether Bruce was hopeless and disgusted, or had been informed of the

approach of a relieving force under Valence, or had heard the false

report of the defeat and death of Sir Edward in Ireland, at any rate he

hurried back to Scotland. Harcla promptly sallied in pursuit, harassing

flank and rear, and making two important captures--Sir John de Moray

and Sir Robert Baird. Moray had been conspicuous at Bannockburn, and

had been enriched by the ransom of twenty-three English knights,

besides squires and others, who had fallen to his share. Baird is

described as 'a man of the worst will towards Englishmen.' Harcla

delivered the prisoners to Edward, receiving (November 8) a guerdon

of 1000 marks; but the money was to be raised from wardships, and the

accrual of it was spread over eight years. The King's treasury was low.

There is very little news of the Scots navy in those days, but it seems

to have been reasonably active. On September 12, one bold mariner,

Thomas Dunn, 'with a great navy of Scots,' followed an English ship

into Holyhead harbour, and, in the absence of the master on shore,

carried it off to Scotland. About the same time John of Argyll was in

Dublin, impatiently expecting reinforcements from the Cinque Ports.

Edward retained part of the squadron to assist the French king against

the Flemings.

On January 15, 1315-16, Bruce and Douglas made a sudden attack on

Berwick, by land and sea simultaneously, during the night. They hoped

to effect an entrance from the sea, at a point between the Brighouse

and the castle, where there was no wall. The attempt failed. It was

bright moonlight, and the assailants were promptly observed and

repulsed. Sir John de Landells was slain, and Douglas himself escaped

with difficulty in a small boat.

The garrison of Berwick had only too much reason to complain. Writing

on October 3, Edward's Chamberlain of Scotland had informed him that

the provisions expected from Boston in the end of July had never

been sent, and 'the town is in great straits, and many are dying

from hunger.' Indeed, 'if the Mayor and himself had not promised the

garrison food and clothing for the winter, they would have gone.' Two

days later, Sir Maurice de Berkeley, the warden, wrote that the town

and the inhabitants never were in such distress, 'and will be this

winter, if God and the King don't think more of them,' and quickly.

Unless money and provisions arrive by the end of the month, they will

give up their posts and leave the town, to a man. On October 30,

indeed, a vessel had brought in malt, barley and beans, but the master

had had to throw overboard a great part of his cargo to escape the

enemy. On November 26, Edward sent £300 by way of pay to the garrison;

but he could not succour them effectually, and apparently Valence, who

was warden north of Trent, had fallen into a lethargy. The repulse of

Bruce was therefore signally creditable to the defence.

A series of four official despatches during the latter half of February

and the first week in March exhibit the deplorable state of the town

from famine. On February 14, part of the garrison, in the teeth of

the warden's orders, had gone out on a foray, declaring it was better

to die fighting than to starve. They had captured many prisoners and

cattle, but Douglas, on the information of Sir Adam de Gordon, who had

recently changed sides, caught them at Scaithmoor, slew their leader,

and furiously broke up their schiltron, killing or capturing twenty

men-at-arms and sixty foot. Considering that the men were struggling to

keep the means of rescuing them from starvation, Barbour may well be

right in declaring it to be the hardest fight that Douglas ever fought.

The foray brought no relief to the garrison, except by diminution of

mouths. The men were 'dying of hunger in rows on the walls.' 'Whenever

a horse dies,' wrote Sir Maurice de Berkeley, 'the men-at-arms carry

off the flesh and boil and eat it, not letting the foot soldiers touch

it till they have had what they will. Pity to see Christians leading

such a life.' He will remain warden no longer than his term, which

expires a month after Easter.

Meantime Sir Henry de Beaumont, warden of the March, had gone to

Lincoln to represent to the King and Council his conferences with some

of the Scots leaders for a truce. On February 22, Edward appointed

commissioners to treat with Bruce, Sir Maurice de Berkeley being one;

and on April 28, 1316, he authorised safe conducts for the Scots

envoys. But the business did not get forward, and the Mayor of Berwick,

on May 10, sent urgent news to the King. Berwick has provisions for a

month only; the enemy's cruisers have cut off supplies, and have just

captured two vessels with victuals; the warden will serve an extended

term till Whitsunday, but no longer; Bruce will be at Melrose in a

fortnight with all his force. And all the time Edward was hampered in

his measures against Scotland by the war in Ireland and by a rising in

Wales.

At midsummer 1316, the Scots again crossed the Border with fire and

sword, and penetrated to Richmond, where they were heavily paid to

abstain from further burning in the town and neighbourhood. Then they

headed west as far as Furness, burning and ravaging without opposition.

They carried home immense booty, as well as many prisoners, men and

women; and they were particularly delighted with the quantity of iron

they found at Furness, there being very little iron in Scotland. The

leader of this expedition is not named.

For many years there had been great scarcity in both countries, a

natural consequence of predatory warfare. 'This year,' says the

Lanercost chronicler, 'there was both in England and in Scotland a

mortality of men from famine and pestilence unheard of in our times;

and in the northern parts of England a quarter of corn sold at 40s.'

Walsingham says the distress was worst in the north, where, he heard,

'the people ate dogs and horses and other unclean animals.'

In Ireland it was still worse; in these wretched years of intestine

broils, it is said 'men were wont to devour one another.' Sir Edward

Bruce had now been fighting there for a full year. With his Irish

allies, he had raided the English adherents in Ulster; occupied

Carrickfergus after a great fight, but failed to take the castle;

captured and burnt Dundalk (June 29, 1315); defeated the joint forces

of the Earl of Ulster and the King of Connaught at Connor (September

10); besieged Carrickfergus in vain (till December 6); marched down

into Kildare, defeating first Sir Roger de Mortimer at Kenlis, and

afterwards (January 26) Sir Edmund le Butler, the justiciar, at

Arscott; and returned to the siege of Carrickfergus, which was starved

into surrender some time in summer. On May 2, 1316, Sir Edward was

crowned King of Ireland.

In autumn of 1315, and again in the following March, Randolph had

returned to Scotland for reinforcements. On the latter occasion he

brought Sir Edward's urgent request that King Robert would come in

person, for then the conquest would be assured. In autumn, 1316,

accordingly, Bruce appointed Douglas and the Steward Guardians in his

absence, and sailed from Loch Ryan to Carrickfergus. His operations

during the winter in Ulster do not appear to have advanced the cause

materially, and in spring he set out on an adventurous expedition

throughout Ireland.

Barbour's account, though considerably detailed, can be treated only

with the greatest reserve. King Edward led the van, King Robert brought

up the rear. The enemy lay in wait at Moyra Pass, 'the Gap of the

North,' the immemorial route of invaders north and south, some three

miles north of Dundalk. Edward, says Barbour, rode past the ambush.

When the rear came up, two archers appeared in view, immediately

suggesting the nearness of an enemy; and Bruce held back his men. Sir

Colin Campbell, son of Sir Nigel and nephew of Bruce, pressed forward

and killed one of them, but the other shot his horse; whereupon Bruce,

in great wrath, felled Sir Colin with his truncheon for disobedience,

which 'might be cause of discomfiting.' Emerging at length from the

gorge, they found Richard de Clare with 40,000 men drawn up on the

plain, whom they presently defeated: in all the Irish war 'so hard

a fighting was not seen.' When Edward heard of it, 'might no man

see a wrother man.' But only a cloistered ecclesiastic can be held

responsible for such military procedure.

Advancing on Dublin, the Scots took Castle Knock on February 23;

two days later they were at Leixlip; in four days more, they had

reached Naas; and on March 12, they were at Callan in Kilkenny. The

southernmost place they visited was Limerick, where they stayed two or

three days. As they were starting northwards again, King Robert heard a

woman's wail, and on inquiry learned that it was a poor laundress that

had been seized with the pains of labour and was lamenting to be left

behind; upon which he countermanded the march till she should be able

to accompany the army. Such is Barbour's story; let us call it, after

Scott, a 'beautiful incident.' The expedition then, somehow, passed

back to Dublin, and on to Carrickfergus. It is an amazing narrative.

Possibly the Bruces anticipated that they would gain over the tribes

of the south and west; possibly they expected to tap ampler and more

convenient sources of supplies; possibly they were trying the effect

of a grand demonstration. At any rate they did not win any permanent

support; 'in this march,' says Fordun, 'many died of hunger, and the

rest lived on horse-flesh'; and the demonstration was utterly futile.

Towards the end of the march, the English hung upon the Scots, but

'hovered still about them and did nothing.' Yet it seems unreasonable

to blame the English commanders, for it cannot be doubted that

they would have exterminated the Scots if they could. A change of

Lord-Lieutenant was impending; and Sir Roger de Mortimer of Wigmore,

who had been appointed to succeed Sir Edmund le Butler (November 23),

was delayed by want of outfit and did not arrive in Ireland till April

7, when the expedition was practically over.

King Robert returned to Scotland in May 1317, after an absence of

about half a year, bringing with him 'many wounded men.' Meantime his

lieutenants had kept Scotland with a strong hand. During 1316, Edward's

efforts to conduct an army against the Scots had been again and again

thwarted, and towards the end of November negotiations were in progress

for a truce. At the same time the redoubtable Harcla had been defeated

and captured by Sir John de Soulis (Barbour says) in Eskdale, and was

begging Edward for Sir John de Moray and Sir Robert Baird, his former

prisoners, 'in aid of his ransom, as he does not see how he can free

himself otherwise.' Truce or no truce, the Earl of Arundel, who was

in command on the March, conceived the notion of sending a force to

hew down Jedburgh Forest. Douglas, who was building himself a house

at Lintalee on the Jed, took 50 men-at-arms and a body of archers and

planted an ambush at a wooded pass. When the English--certainly nothing

like 10,000, as Barbour estimates them--had well entered, the archers

assailed them in flank, and Douglas struck upon the rear, killing

their leader, Sir Thomas de Richmond, and routing them disastrously. A

detachment that had taken possession of Douglas's quarters at Lintalee

he surprised at dinner and slew almost to a man. Jedburgh Forest was

left unfelled.

About the same time, it came to the ears of Douglas that Sir Robert de

Neville, 'the Peacock of the North,' irritated by the recurrent praise

of his deeds, had boasted at Berwick that he would fight him on the

first chance. Douglas instantly took the road to Berwick, marching in

the night, and in the early morning he displayed his broad banner, and

lit up the landscape by firing several villages. Neville issued at the

challenge and posted himself on a hill, expecting that the Scots would

scatter in search of plunder. Douglas, however, impatiently advanced,

and quickly met Neville, man to man. It was an unequal contest. Neville

fell under the sword of Douglas. His troops fled. His three brothers,

Alexander, John, and Ralph were among the prisoners captured, and were

held to ransom for 2000 marks each.

The English, beaten at all points on the Border, made an attempt by

sea, landing a force of 500 men near Inverkeithing to raid Fife. The

Earl and the Sheriff of Fife, though apprised of their coming, had not

the pluck or the numbers to prevent their landing, and retired. Bishop

Sinclair of Dunkeld, however, rode up at the head of 60 horsemen, his

episcopal cloak covering a suit of full armour. He scouted the Earl's

excuse of superior numbers, and told him to his face that he deserved

to have his gilt spurs hewn off his heels. 'Follow me,' he cried, 'and,

in the name of the Lord, and with the aid of St Columba, whose land

they are ravaging, we will take revenge.' Thereupon, casting off his

cloak and wielding a formidable spear, he spurred right on the enemy,

routed them, and drove them to their ships with great slaughter. So

precipitate was their flight that one barge was overladen and sank with

all on board. Ever after Sinclair was called by King Robert 'my own

Bishop,' and popularly he was 'the Fechtin' Bishop.'

Bruce had now complete control of every part of his kingdom, excepting

Berwick, and the northern counties of England lay open to him at his

will. It was more than time for a final peace.

King Robert the Bruce · 第 10 / 13 章